Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (701)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (209)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (110)
- Bericht (26)
- Arbeitspapier (25)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (12)
Sprache
- Deutsch (907)
- Englisch (174)
- Mehrsprachig (2)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (1083) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (634)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (157)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (133)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (75)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (64)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (50)
- Präsident (10)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (4)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (1)
- Zentralabteilung (1)
The paper aims to study the injury risk and kinematics of pedestrians involved in different passenger vehicle collisions. Furthermore, the difference of pedestrian kinematics in the accidents involved minivan and sedan was analyzed. The 18 sample cases of passenger car to pedestrian collisions were selected from the database of In-depth Investigation of Vehicle Accident in Changsha of China (IVAC),of which the 12 pedestrian accidents involved in a minivan impact for each case, and the 6 accidents in a sedan impact for each. The selected cases were reconstructed by using mathematical models of pedestrians and accident vehicles in a multi-body dynamic code MADYMO environment. The logistic regression models of the risks for pedestrian AIS 3+ injuries and fatalities were developed in terms of vehicle impact speed by analyzing the minivan-pedestrian and sedan-pedestrian accidents. The difference of pedestrian kinematics was identified by comparing the results from reconstructed pedestrian accidents between the minivans and sedans collisions. The result shows that there is a significant correlation among the impact speed and the severity of pedestrian injuries. The minivan poses greater risk to pedestrian than sedan at the same impact speed. The kinematics of pedestrian was greatly influenced by vehicle front shape.
The practicability and feasibility of using alcohol ignition interlock devices has been discussed for more than 15 years in Germany. Thereby, judicial issues have been treated conversely. Consensus exists about the fact that the voluntary use of alcohol ignition interlocks is in all areas of possible use recommendable. Great reservation is shown concerning the operation of the devices for DUI (Driving Under Influence) offenders. Main doubts regard the missing legal base for application in such cases and potential circumvention attempts while the need of supportive psychological measures is unquestioned. In 2011, the Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs entered this topic in its newly released traffic safety programme as a matter of future research. Almost in parallel, the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) launched an alcohol ignition interlock project for DUI offenders. The study at hand aimed at developing a comprehensive programme concept for the use of alcohol ignition interlocks as additional measure to psychological rehabilitation for DUI offenders. Expert surveys serve as input for the establishment of a widely accepted innovative concept for nationwide implementation. By means of a pilot trial, the added value of using a combination of structural (alcohol interlock) and individual (psychological measure) intervention for DUI offenders to the existing countermeasure system should be studied. In addition, selection criteria for DUI offenders eligible for future programme participation should be defined. The majority of the experts evaluate the introduction of alcohol ignition interlocks as a good option to enhance traffic safety. The possibility of early psychological rehabilitation is emphasized in the process. Those who do not approve alcohol ignition interlock usage estimate the amount of offenders eligible for such programmes too small. The survey also revealed that legal regulations for issuing an alcohol interlock restricted licence to DUI offenders is missing. Hence, a possible amendment to the German Driving Licencing Regulation was developed within the project. Consultations with the Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs and the Ministry of Justice disclosed the need for a change of the road traffic law before an amendment to the existing regulations may be put into force. At least, the person responsible in the Ministry of Justice developed a proposal for the law section that needs revision. All in all, it became clear within the process of the project that a field trial in Germany is still a distant vision. Nevertheless, all institutions involved are motivated to deal with the matter further on in order to pave the way for a soon start of the pilot trial.
In Germany, courses for the restoration of the fitness to drive after licence revocation are provided for different offender groups (alcohol, drug and demerit point offenders). Providers of these courses are by law required to prove the effectiveness of the applied course programs. For the evaluation of effectiveness, the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) established specific "Reference Values" in 2002. The objective of the study at hand was to collect valid data in order to renew the old-established Reference Values from 2002. Additionally, data collection aimed at initializing Reference Values for drug offender programs. Over 66,000 drivers were analysed regarding their traffic probation in the three years after licence reinstatement. Offenders were assigned to an offender group (alcohol, drugs and demerit point offenders) based on the reason for prior licence revocation. Different indicators were used as criteria for re-offending: new alcohol or drug records, culpable accident involvement and repeated licence revocation. For each of the offender groups, frequency distributions regarding these indicators were calculated. Frequencies of recidivism are highest for the group of demerit point offenders. Compared to the Reference Values of this group from 2002, frequencies of re-offending increased. Conversely, re-offence frequencies of alcohol offenders are halved compared to the data from 2001. The analysis of the re-offence frequencies of drug offenders reveals an equal amount of re-offenders as in the alcohol offender group. The collected data serve as a good base for renewal of the old-established Reference Values and may be applicable as comparative data for future evaluations The results reveal significant differences between recent data and earlier studies. These may occur due to improvements of the applied programmes, but also due to situational changes, e.g. increased enforcement levels and expansion of the catalogue of offenses which lead to demerit points.
The misuse of CRS (child restraint system) is one of the most urgent problems in connection of child safety in cars. Numerous field studies show that more than two thirds of all CRS are used in a wrong way. This misuse could lead to serious injuries for the children. Surprisingly the quality of CRS use is coded much better in accident data (e.g. GIDAS) than the results of observatory field studies show. It is expected that misuse of CRS was not detected by the accident teams in a large number of the cases. An essential part in improving child seats and their usability is the knowledge of the relation between misuse and resulting injuries. For that the analysis and experimental reconstruction of accidents is an important part. For allowing an exact experimental accident reconstruction, it is necessary to have detailed information about the securing situation of the child and about the installation of the CRS in the car.
This paper will outline ETSC's contribution to the European Union's road safety policy 2011-2020. It will present some of the main recommendations from ETSC's Blueprint for the 4th Road Safety Action Programme and will introduce the response to the European Commission's Road Safety Policy Orientations 2011-2020 (published July 2010). The second framework document presented is the Transport White Paper (published March 2011). The paper will focus on new targets and the new vision set for Europe's Road Safety policy picking out some issues in particular such as traffic law enforcement and the protection of vulnerable road users. It will argue that by reinforcing the current Road Safety Policy Orientations, the EU will be better placed to reach its new ambitious goal of halving road deaths by 2020 and the longer term zero casualty vision.
A series of drop tests and vehicle tests with the adult head impactor according to Regulation (EC) 631/2009 and drop tests with the phantom head impactor according to UN Regulation No. 43 have been carried out by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development (BMVBS). Aim of the test series was to study the injury risk for vulnerable road users, especially pedestrians, in case of being impacted by a motor vehicle in a way described within the European Regulations (EC) 78/2009 and (EC) 631/2009. Furthermore, the applicability of the phantom head drop test described in UN Regulation No. 43 for plastic glazing should be investigated. In total, 30 drop tests, thereof 18 with the adult head impactor and 12 with the phantom head impactor, and 49 vehicle tests with the adult head impactor were carried out on panes of laminated safety glass (VSG), polycarbonate (PC) and laminated polycarbonate (L-PC). The influence of parameters such as the particular material properties, test point locations, fixations, ambient conditions (temperature and impact angle) was investigated in detail. In general, higher values of the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) were observed in tests on polycarbonate glazing. As the HIC is the current criterion for the assessment of head injury risk, polycarbonate glazing has to be seen as more injurious in terms of vulnerable road user protection. In addition, the significantly higher rebound of the head observed in tests with polycarbonate glazing is suspected to lead to higher neck loads and may also cause higher injury risks in secondary impacts of vulnerable road users. However, as in all tests with PC glazing no damage of the panes was observed, the risk of skin cut injuries may be expected to be reduced significantly. The performed test series give no indication for the test procedure prescribed in UN Regulation No. 43 as a methodology to approve glass windscreen not being feasible for polycarbonate glazing, as all PC panes tested fulfilled the UN R 43 requirements. The performance of the windscreen area will not be relevant for vehicle type approval according to the upcoming UN Regulation for pedestrian protection. However, it is recommended that pedestrian protection being considered for plastic windscreens to ensure at least the same level of protection as glass windscreens.
The German highway network hast o face new challenges in the near future, e.g. increasing traffic density and loads, climate change effects and new quality requirements regarding sustainability. It is necessary to come up with foresighted concepts in the present to be prepared for these challenges. Therefore it is important to adapt and enhance innovative attempts, which take changing impacts into account. One goal of these efforts is the development of adaptive systems for the provision of information and a holistic evaluation in real time. The paper describes the recent research and developments on a system for information and holistic evaluation in real time, taking into account sensor networks, evaluation procedures and their implementation in existing maintenance and inspection strategies.
The BASt-project group "Legal consequences of an increase in vehicle automation" has identified, defined and consequently compiled different automation degrees beyond Driver Assistance Systems. These are partial-, high- and full automation. According to German regulatory law, i.e. the German Road Traffic Code, it has been identified that the distinctive feature of different degrees of automation is the permanent attention of the driver to the task of driving as well as the constant availability of control over the vehicle. Partial automation meets these requirements. The absence of the driver- concentration to the traffic situation and to execute control is in conflict with the use of higher degrees of vehicle automation (i.e. high and full automation). Their use is therefore presently not compatible with German law, as the human driver would violate his obligations stipulated in the Road Traffic Code when fully relying on the degree of automation these systems would offer. As far as higher degrees of automation imply free-hand driving, further research in terms of behavioural psychology is required to determine whether this hinders the driver in the execution of permanent caution as required by sec. 1 para. 1 StVO (German Road Traffic Code). As far as liabilities according to the StVG (German Road Traffic Act) are concerned, the presently reversed burden of proof on the driver within sec. 18 para. 1 S. 2 StVG might no longer be considered adequate in case of higher degrees of automation that allow the driver to draw attention from the task of driving (in case making such use of a system would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code). The liability of the vehicle "keeper", according to the German Road Traffic Act, would remain applicable to all defined degrees of automation. In case of partial automation, the use of systems according to their limits is accentuated. The range of use that remains within the intended must be defined closely and unmistakeably. Affecting user expectations properly can immensely help to maintain safe use, in case design-measures that exclude overreliance are not available according to the current state of the art (otherwise such measures would have to be applied primarily). In case of the higher degrees of automation that no longer require the driver- permanent attention (under the presupposition their use would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code), every accident potentially bears the risk to cause product liability on the side of the manufacturer. Liability of the manufacturer might only be excluded in case of a breach of traffic rules by a third party or in case of overriding/ oversteering by the driver. In so far aspects of German procedural law and the burden of proof are of great importance. The project group has identified the need for further continuative research not only to advance legal assessment but also to improve basic technical conditions for vehicle automation as well as product reliability.
Haftung bei kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen : Forschungsprojekt FE 89.0251/2010
(2012)
Die Untersuchung zum Forschungsprojekt FE 89.0251/2010 "Haftung bei kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen" beschäftigt sich mit der rechtlichen Analyse verschiedener haftungsrechtlich relevanter Szenarien im Straßenverkehr, bei denen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme bereits eingebunden sind, oder aber eine Einbindung in naher Zukunft zu erwarten ist. Berücksichtigt sind nur Informations- und Warnsysteme. Als relevante Szenarien werden die lokale Gefahrenwarnung und die optimale Verkehrsflusssteuerung für Lichtsignalanlagen identifiziert. Bei der lokalen Gefahrenwarnung ist zu unterschieden, ob sicherheitsrelevante Informationen von den beteiligten Verkehrs- bzw. Fahrerassistenzsystemen nur weitergeleitet oder auch bearbeitet und ausgewertet werden. Die untersuchten Fälle berücksichtigen verschiedene Fehlerquellen und unterscheiden danach, ob die involvierte Infrastruktur von öffentlicher Hand oder von einem privaten Unternehmen betrieben wird. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: a) Haftungsrechtliche Anspruchsgrundlagen ergeben sich aus dem allgemeinen Deliktsrecht (-§ 823 BGB), der Produkt- und Produzentenhaftung (ProdHaftG bzw. -§ 823 BGB), dem Straßenverkehrsrecht (-§-§ 7, 18 StVG), sowie der Amtshaftung (-§ 839 BGB i.V.m. Art. 34 GG). b) Informatorische oder warnende kooperative Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme dienen alleine einer zusätzlichen Unterstützung des Fahrers und können diesen nicht von der Pflicht befreien, die im Verkehr gebotene Sorgfalt zu beachten. c) Die Hersteller von kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen müssen wie bei jedem anderen Produkt auch die berechtigten Sicherheitserwartungen der Käufer erfüllen. d) Die öffentliche Hand kommt durch das Betreiben der genannten Systeme ihrer Straßenverkehrssicherungspflicht nach. Nur wenn sie diese nicht mit der nötigen Sorgfalt erfüllt, kommt eine Haftung in Betracht. e) Durch die Verwendung von informatorischen oder warnenden kooperativen Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsystemen ist keine grundsätzliche Haftungsverschiebung festzustellen. Weitere Empfehlungen: Informatorische oder warnende kooperative Verkehrs- und Fahrerassistenzsysteme können ohne zusätzliches systemspezifisches Haftungsrisiko in den Straßenverkehr eingeführt werden.
Die steigende Lebenserwartung sowie die geringe Geburtenrate führen zu einer Alterung der Gesellschaft, die sich schon heute bemerkbar macht und sich in den nächsten Jahrzehnten noch verstärkt auswirken wird. Damit verbunden ist eine relative Zunahme von Auto fahrenden Senioren. Immer mehr ältere Menschen orientieren sich an einem aktiven Lebens- und Freizeitstil. Dabei spielt der Pkw eine herausragende Rolle - ermöglicht er doch oft erst die Aufrechterhaltung von Mobilität und Unabhängigkeit. Gleichzeitig kann es jedoch mit fortschreitendem Alter zu verschiedenen körperlichen oder geistigen Leistungseinbußen kommen, die möglicherweise die Fahrleistung beeinflussen. Vor diesem Hintergrund rückt die Frage nach den Unfallrisiken älterer Kraftfahrer weiter in den Mittelpunkt des Interesses. Das von der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen geförderte Projekt PROSA (Profile von Senioren mit Autounfällen) setzte sich zum Ziel, den Einfluss altersbedingter Leistungseinbußen auf das Unfallrisiko differenzierter zu betrachten. Am Zentrum für Alternskulturen der Universität Bonn wurden Profile von Senioren untersucht, die in einen Autounfall verwickelt waren, und es wurde der Frage nachgegangen, welche Bedeutung diese für die Ableitung von Interventionsmaßnahmen haben. Im Großraum Bonn wurden dazu 180 Senioren mit einem Mindestalter von 65 Jahren interviewt, die in den letzten fünf Jahren als Fahrer eines Pkws in einen Unfall verwickelt waren. Die Teilnehmer wurden zu individuellen Leistungsbeeinträchtigungen und Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen sowie zu ihrer Fahrbiographie und Unfallgeschichte befragt. Darüber hinaus wurde eine Teilstichprobe von 50 Teilnehmern einer internistisch-verkehrspsychologischen Untersuchung sowie einer Fahrverhaltensprobe unterzogen. Die Ergebnisse verdeutlichen, dass das Alter allein kein Prädiktor für individuelle Leistungsfähigkeit und Unfallrisiko darstellt. Vielmehr scheinen spezifische Kombinationen aus alterskorrelierten Einbußen und Krankheit zu einem erhöhten Risiko zu führen. Diese Heterogenität sollte vor allem bei interventiven Maßnahmen und bei künftigen Forschungen berücksichtigt werden.