Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (1354)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (637)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (542)
- Bericht (83)
- Arbeitspapier (53)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (40)
- Sonstiges (25)
Sprache
- Deutsch (2249)
- Englisch (482)
- Mehrsprachig (3)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (1083)
- Germany (1079)
- Forschungsbericht (724)
- Research report (704)
- Safety (514)
- Sicherheit (514)
- Unfall (444)
- Accident (434)
- Bewertung (423)
- Conference (413)
Institut
- Sonstige (1197)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (425)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (395)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (268)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (267)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (230)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (24)
- Präsident (11)
- Zentralabteilung (8)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (2)
Verkehrserziehung an weiterführenden und beruflichen Schulen findet bislang nicht in dem Maße statt, wie es in den Empfehlungen der Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK) für Verkehrserziehung von 1994 beschrieben ist. Gründe für die eher schleppende Umsetzung sind unter anderem das Fehlen eines "Basiswissens" verkehrserzieherischer Inhalte sowie mangelhafte Kenntnisse hinsichtlich methodischer Möglichkeiten. Mit den Projekten "EVA" (Bayern), "XpertTalks" (NRW), "sicherfahren" (Sachsen) und "RiSk" (Hessen) besteht für Lehrer erstmals die Möglichkeit, sich in der Ausbildung, im Referendariat und in der Fortbildung systematisch mit dem Thema der besonderen Verkehrsunfallgefährdung junger Fahrer zu befassen. Neben theoretischem Hintergrundwissen werden in diesen Lehrgängen verschiedene Moderationstechniken und Möglichkeiten der Zusammenarbeit mit Dritten erarbeitet. In diesem Zusammenhang wurde untersucht, wie Lehrer und andere mit der Thematik befasste Personen, die auf die oben beschriebene Weise Kontakt mit Fragen der Verkehrserziehung hatten, diese Programme grundsätzlich einschätzen und ob sie langfristig bereit sind, das Thema im Unterricht der weiterführenden Schulen zu bearbeiten, oder ob nach Einkehr des Unterrichtsalltages Fragen der Verkehrserziehung kaum noch berücksichtigt werden. Im Rahmen einer Langzeitstudie wurden Lehrer sowohl unmittelbar nach der Ausbildung als auch einige Jahre später befragt. Die Befragung der Moderatoren unmittelbar nach der Ausbildung belegt, dass alle vier Programmvarianten insgesamt sehr positiv gesehen werden. Dabei werden insbesondere die neu erlernten methodischen Ansaetze (Dilemmaspiel, Reden über Dritte) befürwortet, die auch den Kern des Ansatzes der personalen Kommunikation darstellen. Diese Methoden überzeugten, weil die Jugendlichen selbst die gewünschten Ergebnisse erarbeiten und der Moderator nicht moralisieren muss. Eine zweite Befragung der Moderatoren, die einige Jahre nach der Ausbildung durchgeführt wurde, zeigt, dass die Programme "EVA", "sicherfahren" und "XpertTalks" in einem ganz beachtlichen Umfang im beruflichen Alltag umgesetzt werden. Die Gründe derjenigen, die selten oder nicht als Moderatoren aktiv wurden, sind eher organisatorischer als inhaltlicher Art. Anhand der Befragungen konnte zudem nachgewiesen werden, dass unabhängig von den Programmen der fächerübergreifenden Fragestellung der Verkehrserziehung von den Moderatoren eine deutlich höhere Bedeutung beigemessen wird, als bei Lehrern sonst üblich. Die Bedeutung der Programme "EVA", "sicherfahren", "RiSk" und "XpertTalks" geht zudem über das Thema der Verkehrssicherheit hinaus, da die Programme eine allgemeine Methodenkompetenz vermitteln. Die ausgebildeten Moderatoren übertrugen die Methoden sehr häufig auch auf Themenfelder wie Gewalt, Alkohol und Drogen, Sozialverhalten, Kriminalität etc. Insofern tragen die Veranstaltungen zur Verbesserung der Methodenkompetenz von Lehrern und Polizeibeamten sowie zur grundlegenden Handlungs- und Risikokompetenzförderung Jugendlicher und Heranwachsender bei. Das kommt nicht nur der Verkehrssicherheit zugute.
Every second counts when human lives are at stake. The increasingly safe design of vehicles presents rescuers with a serious challenge. Faced with high-strength steels and body reinforcements, even the most powerful cutters reach their limits. Therefore, incident commanders require information on the technical features and components installed, directly in the vehicle. Several tests have shown that such information helps to save valuable minutes. Therefore, a standardised A4 "rescue sheet" containing information on the location of cabin reinforcements, the tank, the battery, airbags, gas generators, control units etc. " and indicating adequate cutting points must be used throughout Europe. Hopefully, in a few years, the new eCall emergency call system will be in place everywhere in Europe. The system will transmit the relevant vehicle-specific data directly to the rescuers on-site. Until then, we need a simple and effective solution that saves lives.
W.-D. FRIEDRICH schildert in seinem Einführungsvortrag die praktischen Erfahrungen und Probleme der DEGES Deutsche Einheit, Fernstraßenplanungs- und -bau GmbH beim straßenrechtlichen Grunderwerb. Die DEGES ist dazu übergegangen, den Grunderwerb unter Einbeziehung von Dienstleistungsfirmen zu realisieren, was sich als effizient, kostengünstig und flexibel erwiesen hat. Im Zuge der Vorbereitung und Durchführung von Besitzeinweisungsverfahren bilden namentlich der Nachweis der Dringlichkeit und die Besitzeinweisung für Ausgleichs- und Ersatzmaßnahmen Problemschwerpunkte. Im Zentrum der Rechtsstreitigkeiten der eigentlichen Enteignungsverfahren steht die Verkehrswertermittlung, wobei FRIEDRICH beispielhaft die Bewertung von Grundstücken, in denen bergfreie Bodenschätze lagern, und die kontrovers umstrittene Frage der Berücksichtigung von Betriebsprämien als gesicherte Rechtsposition diskutiert. E. ALLESCH berichtet über aktuelle Rechtsfragen der straßenrechtlichen Enteignung, die sich aus Sicht der Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit stellen. Er verdeutlicht das Zusammenspiel der Vorschriften des Bundesfernstraßengesetzes (-§ 18f, -§ 19 FStrG) mit dem Enteignungsrecht der Länder und behandelt als Einzelprobleme unter anderem die Probleme der Enteignung und Besitzeinweisung auf Grundlage eines isolierten Straßenbebauungsplans, die Fragen der Wirksamkeit und Durchsetzbarkeit einer Einigung in und ausserhalb des Enteignungsverfahrens, das Erfordernis des sofortigen Baubeginns im Sinne des -§ 18f Abs. 1 Satz 1 FStrG und die Frage nach dem Ausschluss "weiterer Voraussetzungen" nach -§ 18f Abs. 1 Satz 3 FStrG. H. SCHMITZ liefert einen Bericht zum Stand der geplanten Vereinheitlichung der Fachplanungsgesetze im Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz, die insbesondere auf eine Verallgemeinerung der Regelungen des Infrastrukturplanungsbeschleunigungsgesetzes abzielt. Er stellt dabei namentlich den Inhalt des Musterentwurfs der Verwaltungsverfahrensrechtsreferenten von Bund und Ländern mit den letzten Fortschreibungen vor. T. TEGTBAUER beschreibt in ihrem Beitrag zur "Privatisierung im Straßenbau" die aktuellen Erfahrungen des Bundes mit dem sog. A-Modell. Einer Darstellung des Konzepts selbst folgen eine Chronologie der Entwicklung der A-Modelle, eine Vorstellung der vier A-Modell-Pilotprojekte sowie des strukturierten Verhandlungsverfahrens und insbesondere der Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung i. S. v. -§ 7 BHO. Die Auswertung der vier Pilotprojekte ergab, dass die selbst gesteckten Ziele mit den Pilotprojekten teilweise erreicht wurden, weshalb der Bund mit den Ländern bereits acht weitere Projekte abstimmen konnte. G. RECKER vervollständigt dieses Bild aus Sicht eines Landes und berichtet über die Grundsanierung und den erforderlichen Ausbau auf sechs Streifen eines Streckenabschnitts der BAB 1, die die stark befahrenen Strecken von Schleswig-Holstein bis Saarbrücken und die Seehäfen Norddeutschlands mit dem Westen Deutschlands verbindet und Teil der transeuropäischen Netze ist. Im Ergebnis ist der Aufwand für das gebündelte Vergabeverfahren im Vergleich zur Durchführung von sieben Einzelverfahren geringer ausgefallen, wobei weitere Synergieeffekte als möglich angesehen werden. Allerdings ist gerade in der Umsetzungsphase auch auf Seiten des Konzessionsnehmers noch die erforderliche Routine auszubauen.
The role of a national motor vehicle crash causation study-style data set in rollover data analysis
(2010)
On 1 January 2005, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, an agency of the United States Department of Transportation, implemented a new data collection strategy designed to assess crash avoidance technologies and report associated behavioral inputs and outcomes. The original goal was a six-year program, however, during the shortened data collection period; it proved a valuable resource for understanding a precrash environment previously obscured by forensic case investigation. Another unintended consequence was an overlap with infrastructure, roadway geometry, and design with the occupant and vehicle outcomes, by virtue of well-defined attributes. External to the collected data, supplementary information was extrapolated, by using manuals published in the United States, by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials and selected State Departments of Transportation, in conjunction with the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Study (NMVCCS). This provided a backdrop to the infrastructure framework of the rollover problem within which the occupant and vehicle outcomes were studied. If a NMVCCS-style data collection were to be implemented elsewhere, then complementary manuals produced by federal transportation officials might be consulted producing similar relationships. The current study uses NMVCCS data to describe vehicles travelling through diverse design geometries and the outcome for occupants involved in crashes within that system. Codified and extrapolated data form the basis for assessing NMVCCS and its value to the transportation safety community, as the protocols are applicable universally. The benefit in continuing a NMVCCS-style study is noted, as the interaction of roadway infrastructure and occupant protection agencies might find paths to better work together in solving the complex rollover problem using a common data-driven approach.
The overall purpose of the ASSESS project is to develop a relevant and standardised set of test and assessment methods and associated tools for integrated vehicle safety systems, primarily focussing on currently available pre-crash sensing systems. The first stage of the project was to define casualty relevant accident scenarios so that the test scenarios will be developed based on accident scenarios which currently result in the greatest injury outcome, measured by a combination of casualty severity and casualty frequency. The first analysis stage was completed using data from a range of accident databases, including those which were nationally representative (STATS19, UK and STRADA, SE) and in-depth sources which provided more detailed parameters to characterise the accident scenarios (GIDAS, DE and OTS, UK). A common analysis method was developed in order to compare the data from these different sources, and while the data sets were not completely compatible, the majority of the data was aligned in such a way that allowed a useful comparison to be made. As the ASSESS project focuses on pre-crash sensing systems fitted to passenger cars, the data selected for the analysis was "injury accidents which involved at least one passenger car". The accident data analysis yielded the following ranked list of most relevant accident scenarios: Rank Accident scenario 1 Driving accident - single vehicle loss of control 2 Accidents in longitudinal traffic (same and opposite directions) 3 Accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions 4 Accidents involving pedestrians The ranked list highlights the relatively large role played by "accidents in longitudinal traffic", and "accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions" (the second and third most prevalent accident scenarios, respectively). The pre-crash systems addressed in ASSESS propose to yield beneficial safety outcomes with specific regard to these accident scenarios. This indicates that the ASSESS project is highly relevant to the current casualty crash problem. In the second stage of the analysis a selection of these accident scenarios were analysed further to define the accident parameters at a more detailed level .This paper describes the analysis approach and results from the first analysis stage.
This work aims at bringing evidence for mass incompatibility in frontal impact for cars built according to the UNECE R94 regulation. French national injury accidents database census for years 2005 to 2008 were used for the analysis. The heterogeneity of frontal self-protection among cars of different masses is investigated, as well as the partner protection parameter offered by these cars. The last part of the analysis deals with the estimation of the benefit, in terms of fatal and severe injuries avoided, if crashworthiness was harmonized for the whole fleet of vehicle. This calculation is done for France and is extended to all Europe.
Over the past two decades the popularity of consumer crash test programs, commonly referred to as New Car Assessment Programs (NCAP), has grown across the world. They are popular among government regulators as they afford a means of promoting safety innovations and levels of vehicle performance beyond those dictated by national standards. They also fulfill the demand for information regarding the safety ranking of vehicles among consumers contemplating the purchase of a new vehicle. There is no question that consumer crash test programs greatly influence vehicle design changes as well as accelerate the fitment of new safety features. The extent to which these changes can be expected to reduce serious and potentially fatal injuries will be influenced by how well the testing protocols and associated rating schemes correctly reflect the nature of the residual safety problem they seek to address. Drawing on data contained primarily in the US National Automotive Sampling System (NASS), the field relevance of current and proposed testing and rating protocols addressing frontal crash test protection is examined. Emphasis is placed on examining how accurately injury rates computed from the dummy responses measured in consumer crash tests correspond to actual injury rates observed in the field. Additional data from Canadian field investigations and US databases such as the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS) are examined to see how well frontal airbag firing times, crush pulse durations and other determinants of injury are replicated in consumer testing protocols. This portion of the analysis draws on data obtained from Event Data Recorders (EDR) in both field collisions and staged tests of the same vehicle model. Vehicle rankings and overall frontal crash test ratings were found to be particularly sensitive to the choice of injury risk functions employed in the test. This was particularly true in the case of injury risk functions used to assess neck injury potential. Neck injury risk derived from Nij was found to show the least agreement with the field. Agreement between field chest injury rates and those derived from crash tests was improved considerably when chest injury risk functions for "older" occupants were employed. The paper concludes with a discussion of how different current testing protocols could be improved to enhance their field relevance.
In road traffic accidents, a car-seat and its occupant can be subjected to various crash pulses in the case of a rear impact. This study investigates the influence of crash pulse shape on seat-occupant response and evaluates the corresponding risk of whiplash injury. For this purpose, a rigorously validated seat-occupant system model is used to study different carseat designs and crash pulses. Two different car-seat concepts are also presented which can effectively mitigate whiplash injury for a wide range of crash severity. It is shown that for crash pulses of similar severity, the level of whiplash-risk depends strongly on the combined effects of seat design and crash pulse shape.
Event Data Recorder (EDR) is an additional function installed in airbag control module (ACM) to record vehicle and occupant information for a brief period of time before, during, and after a crash event. EDRs are now being installed in ACMs by several automakers in the USA and in Japan. The aim of this study is to understand the performance of EDRs for the improvement of accident reconstruction with more reliable information. In the first report of the study, data obtained from EDRs of seven vehicle types were evaluated using 2006-2007 J-NCAP (Japanese new car assessment program) full-lap frontal barrier crash tests and offset frontal deformable barrier crash tests data. For more practical standpoint, we conducted thirteen crash tests reconstructing typical real-world accidents such as single vehicle accidents with barriers or poles, car to car accidents and multi rear-end collisions focusing on Japanese typical accident types. Data obtained from EDRs are compared with data obtained from optical speed sensor, instrumented accelerometers and high speed video cameras. The velocities determined from pre-crash data of EDRs and the maximum change in velocity, delta-V, and delta-V time history data obtained from post-crash data of EDRs are analyzed. The results are as follows: - Pre-crash velocities of EDRs were very accurate and reliable. An average difference between the EDR recording values and reference speeds was 4.2% and a root mean square of the differences was 9.2%. Only two cases resulted large differences for the pre-crash velocity. Both of them were cases with braking prior to the collision. However, another test with braking resulted less difference. The braking condition may influence accuracy of pre-crash velocities. - Maximum delta-Vs obtained from the EDRs showed uncertainty of measurement in several cases in comparisons with the reliable delta-V data. The differences in maximum delta-V were more than 10% in five of twenty-five events data and more than 20% in two of twenty-five events data. An average of the all differences was about 4% and root mean square of the differences was about 11%. Especially large deformation at narrow area may influence accuracy of post-crash delta-V. - Multiple rear-end crash tests were reconstructed using EDRs data as case studies. Some EDRs recorded two events and a time gap between two events, so that these reconstruction case studies were very accurate and reliable. - If though only one of three vehicles in multiple rear end crash was equipped EDR, overview and velocities of all cars may be reconstructed using these limited EDR data. In this case study, leading car- EDR data and middle car- EDR data were valuable. However if only following car was equipped EDR, the reconstruction was not accurate
A total survey of road traffic accidents involving most severely injured, defined as sustaining a polytrauma or severe monotrauma (ISS > 15) or being killed, was conducted over 14 months in a large study region in Germany. Data on injuries, pre-clinical and clinical care, crash circumstances and vehicle damage were obtained both prospectively and retrospectively from trauma centers, dispatch centers, police and fire departments. 149 patients with a polytrauma and eight with a severe monotrauma were recorded altogether. 22 patients died in hospital. Another 76 victims had deceased at the accident scene. In 2008, 49 % of patients treated with life-threatening injuries were car or van occupants, 21 % motorcyclists, 18 % cyclists and 10 % pedestrians. Among fatalities at the scene, vehicle occupants constituted an even larger portion. The number of road users with life-threatening trauma in the region was extrapolated to the German situation. It suggests that 10 % among the "seriously injured" as defined in national accident statistics are surviving accident victims with a polytrauma or severe monotrauma.