The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
The EVERSAFE project addressed many safety issues for electric vehicles including the crash and post-crash safety. The project reviewed the market shares of full electric and hybrid vehicles, latest road traffic accident data involving severely damaged electric vehicles in Europe, and identified critical scenarios that may be particular for electric vehicles. Also, recent results from international research on the safety of electric vehicles were included in this paper such as results from performed experimental abuse cell and vehicle crash tests (incl. non-standardized tests with the Mitsubishi i-MiEV and the BMW i3), from discussions in the UN IG REESS and the GTR EVS as well as guidelines (handling procedures) for fire brigades from Germany, Sweden and the United States of America. Potential hazards that might arise from damaged electric vehicles after severe traffic accidents are an emerging issue for modern vehicles and were summarized from the perspective of different national approaches and discussed from the practical view of fire fighters. Recent rescue guidelines were reviewed and used as the basis for a newly developed rescue procedure. The paper gives recommendations in particular towards fire fighters, but also to vehicle manufacturers and first-aiders.
Automotive interiors have long been a potentially injurious impact area to occupants during accidents, especially in the absence of adequate padding. The U.S. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 201, Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, outlines test procedures and performance criteria in order to mitigate potentially injurious head impacts to interior surfaces. FMVSS 201 specifies a finite set of impact locations and applies to passenger vehicles of a specified year range and with a gross vehicle weight rating less than 10,000 lb. In this paper, two head impact test methodologies are presented, a pendulum-test device and a Free Motion Headform (FMH) launching device, which allows for dynamic, repeatable impact evaluation of various vehicle interior surfaces and their impact attenuation abilities. The presented testing includes multiple series that evaluate the effect of differing vehicle upper interior padding on occupant head injury. One study in particular, analyzes a head impact to the side header of a heavy truck (not included in FMVSS 201) during a 90 degree rollover. Additionally, two other series of tests are presented which assess the injury reduction effect of side airbags to near side as well as far side occupants in a side impact scenario. Lastly, a forensic analysis is presented which evaluates two possible head impact locations experienced in a real world accident by analysis of the resulting interior compartment damage utilizing the FMH launching device test method. The data collected and presented includes accelerometer instrumentation and high speed video analysis. These studies demonstrate that adequate padding and airbags are very effective at mitigating head injury potential at impact speeds of 12-25 mph (19-40 kph).
Im Jahr 1981 wurde die erste Versuchsstrecke mit einer Betondecke auf einer Tragschicht mit hydraulischem Bindemittel und einer Vliesstoffzwischenschicht hergestellt. Es zeigte sich, dass bei dieser Bauweise Probleme in Form von Plattenpumpen und Erosionen nicht auftreten. Im Rahmen von mehreren Erprobungsstrecken wurde das positive Verhalten bestätigt. Im Jahr 2001 wurden die Bauweise mit Vliesstoffzwischenschicht als eine neue Standardbauweise eingeführt und Anforderungen an die Verlegung der Vliesstoffe und die zu verwendenden Produkte festgeschrieben. Im Weiteren erkannte man, dass neben der Anwendung bei Neubaumaßnahmen der Vliesstoff auch bei der Überbauung von schadhaften Betondecken sinnvoll eingesetzt werden kann. Trotz der guten Erfahrungen blieb die Bauweise aber über Jahre eine deutsche Besonderheit, bis im Jahr 2006 eine amerikanische Delegation die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen besuchte und sich über Innovationen im Straßenbau informierte. Dabei wurde auch die Bauweise mit Vliesstoff vorgestellt. Man erkannte das Potenzial dieser Bauweise und im Jahr 2008 wurden zwei Versuchsstrecken mit Betondecken auf Vliesstoff in den amerikanischen Bundesstaaten Missouri und Oklahoma eingerichtet.
Im aktuellen Kontext der Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit besteht in Deutschland insbesondere auf Landstraßen der Bedarf an sicherheitsfördernden Konzepten. Als mögliche Maßnahme werden im Ausland bereits vielfach Rüttelstreifen verwendet um die Geschwindigkeit im Annäherungsbereich von Gefahrenstellen zu reduzieren beziehungsweise die Verkehrsteilnehmer zu warnen und somit die Verkehrssicherheit zu erhöhen. Im Rahmen einer Literaturstudie und Befragung von Straßenbauverwaltungen wurde der nationale und internationale Status Quo zum Einsatz von Rüttelstreifen erhoben. Auf Basis dieser Erkenntnisse und theoretischer Grundlagen aus dem Bereich der Akustik, Haptik und Psychologie wurden mögliche Ausführungsvarianten entworfen. Neben psychologischen, physikalischen und verkehrlichen Grundlagen wurden dabei ebenso betriebliche, straßenbautechnische und finanzielle Aspekte berücksichtigt. Die unterschiedlichen Konzepte wurden auf Versuchsfeldern baulich umgesetzt und mit unterschiedlichen messtechnisch ausgerüsteten Fahrzeugen in allen relevanten Geschwindigkeitsbereichen überfahren. Die Messdaten zur Fahrzeuginnenraumakustik und -schwingung wurden im Hinblick auf ihre psychologische Wirkung auf den Fahrer analysiert und so eine optimierte Bauform und ein optimaler Abstand für Rüttelstreifen ermittelt. Zur Untersuchung der verkehrlichen Wirkung wurden vier unfallträchtige Landstraßenabschnitte ausgewählt. Auf diesen wurden die zuvor erarbeiteten Varianten umgesetzt und sowohl Geschwindigkeitsmessungen, als auch Beobachtungen des allgemeinen Fahrerverhaltens durchgeführt. Im Rahmen dieser Untersuchungen konnten keine sicherheitskritischen Fahrmanöver beobachtet werden. Im Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich sank die Geschwindigkeit durch den Einsatz von Rüttelstreifen signifikant um mehrere km/h. Im Rahmen von Befragungen der Fahrer und Anwohner ergab sich eine hohe Akzeptanz hinsichtlich der Maßnahme durch die " meist ortskundigen " Fahrer. Bei den Anwohnern fiel die Akzeptanz insbesondere auf Grund der " teilweise messtechnisch nachweisbaren " erhöhten Lärmemission niedriger aus. Durch die Geschwindigkeitsdämpfung und eine einhergehende Erhöhung der Aufmerksamkeit wird eine Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf den untersuchten Landstraßen erwartet.
An analysis of NASS and FARS was conducted to determine crash conditions that involved injuries that are not currently being directly addressed by vehicle safety standards or by consumer information test protocols. Analysis of both field data and US NCAP tests were conducted to determine the relative safety provided by seating position and by vehicle model year. Opportunities for improvements were determined by crash categories with large populations of injuries that were not addressed by safety tests or smaller numbers that were increasing in frequency. Areas of opportunities include improved occupant restrain in rollovers, improved frontal protection for rear seat occupants and improved fire prevention in frontal and rollover crashes.
Since 2005, the motorcycle crash fatalities in the US exceeded 10% of the overall annual traffic fatalities. Consequently, it has become critical to gain in-depth understanding of the factors and characteristics contributing to motorcycle crashes. Unfortunately, there currently exists no database gathering the necessary information for an in-depth analysis of the US motorcycle crashes. So this study utilizes the NASS/CDS database (National Automotive Sampling System, Crashworthiness Data System) in order to gain insights into the patterns and factors leading to a NASS/CDS motorcycle crash, from 1997 to 2007. NASS/CDS samples about 5,000 passenger car tow-away crashes per year. Each case includes photographs and detailed data on crash and pre-crash characteristics, vehicle types, trajectories, types of impact, and other pertinent roadway and crash scene information, allowing an in-depth investigation of the crash mechanisms. However, the NASS/CDS sampling process specifically focuses on passenger car crashes, so the cases extracted only correspond to crashes in which a passenger vehicle was towed, and a motorcycle was somehow involved. Thus, a by-hand in-depth review of about 200 cases allowed retrieving 106 relevant crashes for this study, tending to represent the severe passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes on US roads. The findings lead to the conclusion that these crashes mostly result from the low conspicuity of the motorcycle, and from the inability of the car drivers to fully appreciate and anticipate the behavior of a motorcycle. Indeed, it has been shown that, first, the car drivers involved in these cases did not attempt any avoidance maneuver, second, they were largely of ages under 25, and finally, the majority of the crashes were in an intersection scenario. In addition, the two major scenarios unveiled were the car attempting a left turn from the opposite direction and the car attempting a left turn from the right. The paper mentions several solutions to enhance the motorcycle- conspicuity and to allow the car drivers to better anticipate its behavior, which seem to be key factors in the intersection-related crashes (and more generally in the passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes).
In order to enable foreseeing or comparing the benefit of safety systems or driver assistance systems in Germany, in the United States and in Japan, the traffic accident databases in those three countries are examined. The variables used are culpable party, collision partner, accident type, and injury level and the method to re-classify the databases for comparison are proposed. The result indicates that single passenger car fatality is the most frequent in Germany and in the United States, while passenger car vs. pedestrian is the most frequent fatality scenario in Japan. When the casualty by fatality ratio is focused, the greatest difference is observed in rear-end collisions. The ratio of slight injuries in Japan yields about eighteen times as many as those in Germany, and about eight times as many as those in the United States.
Side impacts, both nearside and farside, have been indicated by research to be responsible for a large proportion of serious injuries from road crashes. This study aimed to compare and contrast the characteristics of nearside and farside crashes in Australia, Germany and the U.S., using the ANCIS, GIDAS and NASS/CDS in-depth-databases, in order to establish the impact and injury severity associated with these crashes, and the types of injuries sustained. The analyses revealed some interesting similarities, as well as differences, between both nearside and farside crashes, and the emergent trends between the three investigated countries. More specifically, it was indicated that whilst the severity of injury sustained in nearside crashes was slightly greater overall than that found for farside crashes, careful consideration of struck and nonstruck side occupants must be made when considering aspects such as vehicle design and occupant protection.
NASS: the glass is half full
(2007)
The National Accident Sampling System (NASS) was born in the late 1970s. It was based on a substantial amount of experience and analysis of what was needed in the United States to understand the safety challenges of our highways. This work also showed how to collect high quality and useful crash data efficiently. Unfortunately, when Ronald Reagan - a President who believed in limited government - was elected, any hope of full funding for NASS was lost. The concept of 75 teams investigating about 18,000 serious crashes in detail annually was never realized. The system got up to 50 teams, then was cut to 36, and finally to 24 teams investigating fewer than a quarter of the originally anticipated number of crashes per year. Despite this, the NASS investigations provide a rich source of data, collected according to a sophisticated statistical sampling system to facilitate detailed national estimates of road casualties on our nation- highways and their causes. In addition, changes have been made in recent years to increase the number of more serious crashes of recent model vehicles to make the results more relevant to improving vehicle safety. A recent, detailed examination of hundreds of rollovers has provided considerable insight into rollover casualties and into what can be done to reduce them. Some of these results will be presented that show the value of the NASS system. Our experience with NASS and the Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) suggests a number of improvements that could be made in the United States" crash data systems. It also provides justification for a doubling or tripling of our national expenditures on crash data collection.