Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2015 (16) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Safety (16) (entfernen)
Institut
In 2014 the sixth ESAR conference (Expert Symposium on Accident Research) was held in Hannover. ESAR is an international convention of experts, who analyze traffic accidents all over the world and discuss their results in this context, conducted at the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover every 2 years. It connected representatives of public authorities, engineers in automotive development and scientists and offers a forum with particular emphasis on In-Depth-Analyses of accident statistics and accident analyses. Special focus is placed on research on the basis of so-called "In-Depth-Accident-Investigations" [data collections at the sites of the accidents], which are characterized by extensive documentations of the sites of the accidents, of the vehicles as well as of the injuries, encompassing several scientific fields. ESAR aims at a multi-disciplinary compilation of scientific results and at discussing them on an international, scientific level. It is thus a scientific colloquium and a platform for exchanging information for all accident researchers. Experiences in accident prevention as well as in the complex field of accident reconstruction are stated and new research fields are added. Existing results of long-term research work in Europe, the US, Australia and Japan include different infrastructural correlations and give findings on population, vehicle population and driver characteristics, which offer a basis for recommendations to be derived and measures for increasing road safety.
A methodology to derive precision requirements for automatic emergency braking (AEB) test procedures
(2015)
AEB Systems are becoming important to increase traffic safety. Test procedures in testing for consumer information, manufacturer self-certification and technical regulations are used to ensure a certain minimum performance of these systems. Consequently, test robustness, test efficiency and finally test cost become increasingly important. The key driver for testing effort and test costs is the required repeatable accuracy in a test design - the higher the accuracy, the higher effort and test costs. On the other hand, the performance of active safety systems depends on time discretization in the environment perception and other sub-systems: for instance, typical sensors supply information with a cycle time of 50 - 150 ms. Time discretization results in an inherent spread of system performance, even if the test conditions are perfectly equal. The proposed paper shows a methodology to derive requirements for a test setup (e.g. test repeats, use of driving robots, ...) as function of AEB system generation and rating method (e.g. Euro NCAP points awarded, pass/fail, ...). While the methodology itself is applicable to AEB pedestrian and AEB Car-Car scenarios, due to the lack of sufficient test data for AEB Car-Car, the focus of this paper is on AEB pedestrian scenarios. A simulation model for the performance of AEB Pedestrian systems allows for the systematic variation of the discretization time as well as test condition accuracy. This model is calibrated with test results of 4 production vehicles for AEB Pedestrian, all fully tested by BASt according to current Euro NCAP test protocols. Selected parameters to observe the accuracy of the test setup in case of pedestrian AEB is the calculated impact position of pedestrian on the vehicle front (as if no braking would have occurred), and the test vehicle speed accuracy. These variable was shown in real tests to be repeatable in the range of ± 5 cm and ± 0,25 km/h, respectively, with a fully robotized state of the art test setup. The sensitivity of AEB performance (measured in achieved speed reduction as well as overall rating result according to current Euro NCAP rating methods) towards discretization and the sensitivity of performance towards test accuracy then is compared to identify economic yet robust test concepts. These comparisons show that the available repeatability accuracy of current test setups is more than sufficient for today's AEB system capabilities. Time discretization problems dominate the performance spread especially in test scenarios with a limited pedestrian dummy reveal time (e.g. child behind obstruction, running adult scenarios with low car speeds). This would allow to increase test tolerances to decrease test cost. A methodology which allows to derive the required tolerances in active safety tests might be valuable especially for NCAPs of emerging countries that do not have the necessary equipment (e.g. driving robots, positioning units) available for the full-scale and high tolerance EuroNCAP active safety procedures yet still want to rate active safety systems, thus improving the global safety.
Arbeitsstellen stellen auf Autobahnen neuralgische Bereiche dar. Der erforderliche Ausbau (Anbau von Fahrstreifen) und die Erhaltung (Instandsetzung bzw. grundhafte Erneuerung) der Autobahnen führen zwangsläufig zu einer vermehrten Einrichtung von Arbeitsstellen längerer und kürzerer Dauer. Bisherige Untersuchungen zum Einsatz von Lang-Lkw gehen davon aus, dass sich durch die Erhöhung der zulässigen Länge von Fahrzeugen bzw. Fahrzeugkombinationen keine grundlegenden Risiken neuer Art ergeben. Es wird aber nicht ausgeschlossen, dass durch die Fahrzeuglängen eine Zunahme der Anzahl kritischer Situationen, z. B. in Überleitungsbereichen von Arbeitsstellen, möglich ist. Erkenntnisse hierzu liegen bislang jedoch nicht vor. Deshalb sollte der Einsatz von Lang-Lkw in Arbeitsstellen längerer wie kürzerer Dauer analysiert werden, mit dem Ziel, fundierte Erkenntnisse zu den Auswirkungen von Lang-Lkw auf Verkehrsablauf und -sicherheit in Arbeitsstellen auf Autobahnen zu gewinnen. Insbesondere sollte bewertet werden, ob diesbezüglich Unterschiede zwischen Lang-Lkw und herkömmlichen Lkw zu erwarten sind. Dazu wurden " aufbauend auf einer Recherche und Auswertung internationaler Literatur zu bisherigen Erkenntnissen hinsichtlich der Auswirkungen von Lang-Lkw, aber auch des Schwerverkehrs allgemein, auf Verkehrsablauf und Verkehrssicherheit in Arbeitsstellen auf Autobahnen " im Rahmen des Feldversuchs mit Fahrzeugen und Fahrzeugkombinationen mit Überlänge gezielt empirische Untersuchungen mit Lang-Lkw in Arbeitsstellen durchgeführt. Hierbei wurden bei 16 Begleitfahrten von Lang-Lkw acht verschiedener Speditionen insgesamt 34 Arbeitsstellen längerer Dauer " mit 40 unterschiedlichen Verkehrsführungen " sowie 18 Arbeitsstellen kürzerer Dauer, mit Sperrung mindestens eines Fahrstreifens, durchfahren. Alle Fahrten wurden anschließend im Hinblick auf die zu klärenden Fragestellungen bezüglich möglicher verkehrlicher Auswirkungen von Lang-Lkw in Arbeitsstellen analysiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass durch Lang-Lkw keine Auswirkungen auf die Sicherheit und den Ablauf des Verkehrs in Arbeitsstellen auf Autobahnen zu erwarten sind. Sowohl in Arbeitsstellen längerer Dauer als auch in Arbeitsstellen kürzerer Dauer konnten alle Verkehrsführungen durch Lang-Lkw problemlos befahren werden. Weder der Verkehrsablauf noch die Verkehrssicherheit wurden negativ beeinflusst. Seitens der anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer war in keiner Situation ein auf die Lang-Lkw angepasstes Verhalten erkennbar. Somit sind auf Grund des Einsatzes von Lang-Lkw keine erhöhten Anforderungen an die Sicherung von Arbeitsstellen längerer und kürzerer Dauer zu stellen. Für Lang-Lkw gelten diesbezüglich dieselben generellen Anforderungen, die sich aus dem Schwerverkehr allgemein ergeben, wie z. B. die Markierung einer Trennlinse in Überleitungen.
During the past five years, a Euro NCAP technical working group on pedestrian safety has been working on improving test and assessment procedures for enhanced passive pedestrian safety. After harmonizing the tools and procedures as much as possible with legislation, the work was mainly focused on the development of grid procedures for the pedestrian body regions head, upper leg with pelvis and lower leg with knee. Furthermore, the test parameters for the head and the upper leg were revised, a new lower legform impactor was introduced and the injury thresholds were adjusted or, where necessary, the injury criteria were changed. Finally, the assessment limits and colour scheme were refined, widening the range and adding two more colours in order to provide a more detailed description of the pedestrian safety performance. By abstaining from an assessment based on a worst point selection philosophy, the improved test point determination procedures that were introduced during the years 2013 and 2014 give a more homogeneous, high resolution picture of the pedestrian safety performance of the vehicle frontends. By using a uniform grid for each test zone approximately 200 test points, evenly distributed within each area, can now be assessed per vehicle. The introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor in 2014 enables a more realistic injury prediction of the knee and the tibia using a biofidelic test tool. With the new upper legform test that has been launched in 2015 the assessment in that area is now focusing on the injured body region instead of the injury causing vehicle part and thus is aligned with the approach in the remaining body regions head and lower leg. At the same time, a monitoring test with the headform impactor against the bonnet leading edge is closing the possible gap between the test areas to identify injury causing vehicle parts that moved out of focus due to the introduction of the new upper legform test. The paper describes the new test and assessment procedures with their underlying philosophy and gives an outlook in terms of open issues, specifying the needs for further improvement in the future. In parallel to the work of the pedestrian subgroup, a Euro NCAP working group on heavy vehicles introduced a set of protocol changes in 2011 that were related to the assessment of M1 vehicles derived from commercial vehicles, with a gross vehicle weight between 2.5 and 3.5 tons and 8 or 9 seats. The paper also investigates the applicability of the new pedestrian test and assessment procedures to heavy vehicles.
Enhanced protection of pedestrians and cyclists remains on the focus. Besides infrastructural and behavioral aspects it is necessary to exploit technical solutions placed on motorized vehicles. Accident research needs reliable data as well as national road accident statistics. Changing the view on seriously injured road users is one of the challenges which will substantially contribute to the optimization on future traffic safety. The missing accuracy in the definition of personal injury has a detrimental effect on making cost efficient road safety policy which is not only focused on fatal accidents. The European commission requested that, starting in 2015, all EU member states provide more detailed data on the injury status of road casualties, with special regard to the group of seriously injured. Conventional accident data will always be essential. But to obtain detailed data about driver behavior in real traffic situations further data sources are required. These could be EDR data, data from electronic control units, data from traffic surveys and traffic counting, naturalistic diving studies and field operational tests. Gaining insight into normal as well as critical driver behavior will enable accident researchers to deduct functions estimating the increase or decrease of accident risk associated with certain behaviors or vehicle functions. Also with view to the introduction of highly automated driving functions in the future such data is urgently needed. Computer simulation based tools to estimate the benefits of active safety systems are another step on the way towards the safety assessment of automated driving. It is now the duty of the scientific community to ask the right questions, to develop a methodology and to merge all these data sources into a common framework for the assessment of future traffic safety innovations.
SEEKING is looking for answers regarding electric powered bicycles and their relation to traffic safety issues. Does a cyclist need "E"? Is it as risky as riding a moped or are E-bikes creating conflicts with other cyclists? The project described herein, funded by the Austrian Ministry of Transport, has the aim of seeking answers to these hot topics. The SEEKING-team shows an in-depth investigation of vehicle dynamic sensing, together with subjective feedback of test riders to detect similarities and differences between conventional cycling and E-biking. Following an overview on the international status quo, measurement runs and their analyses are performed to find a set of preventative measures to make (E-)biking safer. A specific focus is the detection of curve handling, stopping and acceleration phases as well as conflict studies on course-based test rides and "real world" tests on cycling paths (naturalistic riding).
Der Entwurf und der Betrieb von Tunneln im Zuge von Bundesautobahnen sind in den Richtlinien für die Anlage von Autobahnen (RAA 2008) und in den Richtlinien für die Ausstattung und den Betrieb von Straßentunneln (RABT 2006) geregelt. Hier sind die Hinweise zu der Wahl des Tunnelquerschnittes und zu den anzusetzenden Trassierungsgrenzwerten sowie die Anforderungen hinsichtlich Sicherheit und Betriebsabläufen enthalten. Zielsetzung des Forschungsvorhabens war es daher, die Tunnelbauwerke bezüglich ihrer Verkehrssicherheit zu untersuchen. Auf Grundlage der vorhandenen Informationen zur Trassierung wurden die Tunnelbauwerke gemäß ihrer Besonderheiten typisiert. Die Typisierung der 41 untersuchten Tunnel wurde anhand der Merkmale Fahrstreifenanzahl, dem Vorhandensein von Seitenstreifen und Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln sowie der Höhe der zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit vorgenommen. Im nächsten Arbeitsschritt wurde eine makroskopische Unfallanalyse durchgeführt. Für die Analyse wurden die Verkehrsunfallanzeigen bzw. vergleichbare Unfalldaten aus Lieferungen der Polizeidienststellen herangezogen. Darauf aufbauend wurden Unfallkenngrößen der einzelnen Tunnelröhren ermittelt. Das Tunnelkollektiv umfasste Tunnelstrecken sowohl mit als auch ohne Anschlussstellen. In der makroskopischen Unfallanalyse wurden die ermittelten Unfallkenngrößen der Tunnelteilkollektive gegenübergestellt sowie mit denen der Aussenstrecken verglichen. Die Bewertung des Unfallgeschehens in Tunneln führte zu der Erkenntnis, dass eine Anordnung von Seitenstreifen zur Senkung der Unfallrate und der mittleren Unfallkostenrate bei 2-streifigen Tunnelquerschnitten beitragen kann. In der anschließenden mikroskopischen Unfallanalyse wurden die Anschlussstellen innerhalb der Tunnelbauwerke untersucht. Hierbei wurden vor allem die Unfallmerkmale wie Unfallursachen und Unfallumstände näher betrachtet. Die Betrachtung der Lage von Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln hat ergeben, dass diese keine eindeutige Auswirkung auf das Unfallgeschehen hat. Infolge der Ein und Ausfahrvorgänge treten jedoch vermehrt Unfälle in diesen Bereichen auf. Somit sind die Ein- und Ausfahrten in Tunneln nach Möglichkeit zu vermeiden. Darüber hinaus wurde eine Analyse zum Verkehrsablauf in Tunneln durchgeführt. Im Rahmen dieser Analyse erfolgten für ausgewählte Tunnel die Modellierung von q-V-Beziehungen und die Ermittlung von Kapazitätswerten.
Although the annual traffic accident statistics published by the national police is available in public, the detailed traffic accident data has not been released in Korea. Recently the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport recognized the importance of in-depth accident data to enhance road traffic safety and initiated a research project to establish a collection of the detailed accident data. The main objective of the project is a feasibility study to establish KIDAS (Korea In-Depth Accident Study). Within this project, three university hospitals which are located in mid-size cities have been selected to collect accident data. Annually, more than 500 cases of accidents have been collected from the in-patient's interviews and diagnosis. Unlike GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study), currently on-site investigation can"t be performed by the Korean police. The only available data is patient medical records, patient's description of accident circumstances and the damaged vehicle. Occasionally the police provide the accident investigation reports containing very brief information on accident causation and vehicle safety. In a first step, the concept of KIDAS is to adopt the format of iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) for harmonization. Since the currently collected accident information is extremely limited compared with GIDAS, the other sources of data and calculations such as KNCAP vehicle data, pc-crash simulations, vehicle registration information, insurance company data are utilized to complete the iGLAD template. Results from KIDAS_iGLAD and the cases of assessment of active safety devices such as AEBS, ESC, and LDWS will be evaluated.
Many safety-relevant tasks in control or diagnostics require binary choices such as "conflict versus separation" in air traffic control, "normal versus pathological" when interpreting x-ray pictures, or "permitted versus forbidden" when inspecting airport security scans. Deciders often are uncertain, but nevertheless required to decide between two alternatives, that is, they have not only to decide upon an action, but also about the admissible level of uncertainty. If the accepted level of judgment certainty is not taken into account, the sequence of decisions does not capture the full picture of the underlying decision process. Differences in judgment certainty are relevant, because they reflect not only the adequacy of the human-machine interface that is evaluated, but also the differences in expertise of the decider and the requirements of the actual situation or task. Therefore, capturing both judgment certainty and discrimination performance is essential. A comparison of different human-machine-interfaces (for air traffic control) is used to illustrate a methodological approach, which allows for integrated analyses of decision processes based on receiver-operator-characteristics and practical guidelines for the evaluation of human-machine-interfaces for safety-relevant operation procedures are provided.
Since the beginning of the testing activities related to passive pedestrian safety, the width of the test area being assessed regarding its protection level for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users has been determined by geometrical measurements at the outer contour of the vehicle. During the past years, the trend of a decreased width of the lower extremity test and assessment area realized by special features of the outer vehicle frontend design could be observed. This study discusses different possibilities for counteracting this development and thus finding a robust definition for this area including all structures with high injury risk for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle. While Euro NCAP is addressing the described problem by defining a test area under consideration of the stiff structures underneath the bumper fascia, a detailed study was carried out on behalf of the European Commission, aiming at a robust, worldwide harmonized definition of the bumper test area for legislation, taking into account the specific requirements of different certification procedures of the contracting parties of the UN/ECE agreements from 1958 and 1998. This paper details the work undertaken by BASt, also serving as a contribution to the TF-BTA of the UN/ECE GRSP, towards a harmonized test area in order to better protect the lower extremities of vulnerable road users. The German In-Depth Accident Database GIDAS is studied with respect to the potential benefit of a revised test area. Several practical options are discussed and applied to actual vehicles, investigating the differences and possible effects. Tests are carried out and the results studied in detail. Finally, a proposal for a feasible definition is given and a suggestion is made for solving possible open issues at angled surfaces due to rotation of the impactor. The study shows that, in principle, there is a need for the entire vehicle width being assessed with regard to the protection potential for lower extremities of vulnerable road users. It gives evidence on the necessity for a robust definition of the lower extremity test area including stiff and thus injurious structures at the vehicle frontend, especially underneath the bumper fascia. The legal definition of the lower extremity test area will shortly be almost harmonized with the robust Euro NCAP requirements, as already endorsed by GRSP, taking into account injurious structures and thus contributing to the enhanced protection of vulnerable road users. After finalization of the development of a torso mass for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) it is recommended to consider again the additional benefit of assessing the entire vehicle width.