360 Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste; Verbände
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2009 (30) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (26)
- Konferenz (26)
- Unfall (17)
- Accident (15)
- Statistics (12)
- Statistik (12)
- Analyse (math) (9)
- Germany (9)
- Injury (9)
- Verletzung (9)
Institut
Um die Position der Verkehrs- und Mobilitätserziehung in den Schulen und vor allem in der Sekundarstufe zu stärken und den zuständigen Ministerien, Lehrerinnen und Lehrern und anderen Verantwortlichen vor Ort Einblick in die Fähigkeiten der Schüler zu geben, wurde von der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) das Forschungsprojekt "Entwicklung von Evaluationsinstrumenten zur Erreichung von Standards in der Verkehrs- /Mobilitätserziehung der Sekundarstufe" an das Zentrum für Evaluation und Methoden (ZEM), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vergeben. Vorbereitet und begleitet wurde das Projekt von der Arbeitsgruppe BASt/ Kultusbehörden der Länder, die mit den Leistungsstandards und den inhaltlichen Schwerpunkten (Jahrgangsstufe 6: Fahrradfahren, Jahrgangsstufe 9/10: Vorbereitung auf die Teilnahme am motorisierten Straßenverkehr) wichtige Rahmenbedingungen vorgegeben hat. Im Rahmen des Projektes wurden zunächst auf umfassender empirischer Grundlage die Leistungsstandards als Kompetenzen und Items beschrieben. In einem weiteren Schritt wurde auf der Basis der Ergebnisse einer Machbarkeitsstudie ein computerbasiertes Evaluationsinstrument entwickelt, das Lehrern im Sinne eines Monitoringsystems Anhaltspunkte zur Ausprägung der Kompetenzen ihrer Schüler gibt. Ergebnisse werden Lehrern, aber auch Schülern unmittelbar nach der Durchführung des Verfahrens auf verschiedenen Ebenen zurückgemeldet. Das Instrument ist inhaltsvalide und weist zudem günstige Werte in konvergenter und diskriminanter Validität auf. Auch die Ergebnisse zur internen Konsistenz sind zufriedenstellend. Die Retest-Reliabilität des Instruments konnte allerdings nicht nachgewiesen werden. Das Instrument ermöglicht Lehrern, ihren Unterricht im Folgenden gezielt auf die Kompetenzen ihrer Schüler auszurichten und ihnen genau die Inhalte zu vermitteln, die sie noch nicht beherrschen. Dies gibt der schulischen Verkehrs- und Mobilitätserziehung eine neue, individuell auszurichtende Struktur und bietet Anreize, entsprechende Themen verstärkt in den Schulen zu verankern. Der Computertest dauert ca. eine Schulstunde und setzt durch seinen abwechslungsreichen Charakter neue Impulse in der Verkehrs- und Mobilitätserziehung. Das Evaluationsinstrument wurde so konzipiert, dass es an Schulen mit und ohne Computernetzwerk eingesetzt werden kann und in Bezug auf Grafik und Kapazitäten nur geringe Anforderungen an die Qualität der vorhandenen Rechner stellt. Eine Installation des Instrumentes ist nicht erforderlich. Fakultativ wurde darüber hinaus für die Schüler der Jahrgangsstufe 6 ein Fahrradparcours entwickelt, der den Lehrern einen Einblick dazu vermittelt, wie gut ihre Schüler verschiedene Situationen, die für den Straßenverkehr relevant sind, beherrschen. So können gezielt Hinweise dafür gesammelt werden, welche Themen im Unterricht aufgegriffen werden müssen, vor allem bevor, z.B. im Rahmen einer Klassenfahrt, die Schüler aktiv am realen Verkehr teilnehmen. Der Fahrradparcours ist innerhalb von zwei Schulstunden durchzuführen, zudem erfordert der Aufbau nur wenige Materialien. Insgesamt stehen mit Computertest und Fahrradparcours für Schüler sowie Lehrer ansprechende Instrumente zur Verfügung, die Einblicke in die Ausprägung der für eine sichere Teilnahme am Straßenverkehr erforderlichen Kompetenzen geben und Anhaltspunkte für die inhaltliche Ausrichtung der schulischen Verkehrs- und Mobilitätserziehung geben. Das Instrument kann dementsprechend im Sinne einer lokalen Lernstanderhebung zur Identifikation von Wissenslücken bei einzelnen Schülern, Klassen oder Schulen eingesetzt werden. Darüber hinaus besteht auch die Möglichkeit, im Sinne einer zentralen Lernstandserhebung die Daten der verschiedenen Klassen, Schulen und Länder für länder- und bundesweite Vergleiche zu sammeln, Stärken und Schwächen auf einem höheren Aggregationsniveau zu identifizieren und möglicherweise in einem weiteren Schritt im Sinne eines Input-Output-Vergleichs besonders effektive Maßnahmen der Verkehrserziehung und weitere relevante Rahmenbedingungen zu identifizieren. Welche Verwendung des Programms sich schließlich durchsetzen wird, liegt in der Hand der Länder.
In September 2004 the first international symposium called ESAR (Expert Symposium on Accident Research) was carried out at the University of Hannover (Germany). The idea for such international conference was to bring together experts from the fields of accident investigation teams worldwide to present their results for a common audience of people from government, industry and other universities. The first conference was a really sufficient one and followed by the second symposium also at the Hannover Medical School two years later in 2006. This two year rhythm was now continued with the third conference in Hannover again in 2008. It is planned to carry out ESAR every two years also in the future. ESAR is a scientific colloquium and can be seen as a platform for exchange of information on accident research issues based on methodologies of investigation, injury mechanisms and injury assessment, accident causation and other issues of statistical accident data analysis. Representatives from authorities as well as from medical and technical institutions come together to discuss new research issues and exchange experiences on accident prevention and the complex field of accident reconstruction. Special focus was given to the target the European Union set for itself in 2000 which stipulates that within 10 years the number of person killed in road traffic accidents must be cut in half. To reach this goal, optimized measures, comprehensive research and analysis are necessary. A key hurdle comes from the European Union extension to 27 member states, each featuring different levels of traffic safety standards and different accident scenarios. Existing results from long term research projects in Europe, the USA, Australia and Japan including analyses of infrastructure, population, vehicle fleet and driver behaviour offer an excellent basis for understanding and improving countermeasures and research support needs in underdeveloped countries. ESAR's goal is to bring together researchers from all parts of the world, who will report on their methods and recommendations to improve traffic safety based on "In-Depth-Investigations" of real world accidents. These In-depth-investigations of accidents require thorough documentation and an accident data analysis on multidisciplinary levels which must be carried out immediately after it occurs. ESAR presents scientists the opportunity to present their studies on a common basis of research level.
The bicyclist accidents were analyzed to get better understanding of the occurrences and frequency of the accidents, injury distributions, as well as correlation of injury severity/outcomes with engineering and human factors in two different countries of China and Germany. The accident cases that occurred from 2001 to 2006 were collected from IVAC database in Changsha and GIDAS database in Hannover. Based on specified sampling criteria, 1,570 bicyclist cases were selected from IVAC database in Changsha, and 1806 cases were collected from Hannover, documented in GIDAS database. Statistical analyses were carried out by using these selected data. The results from the statistical analysis are presented and discussed in this study.
Who doesn't wear seat belts?
(2009)
Using real world accident data, seat belts were estimated to be 61% effective at preventing fatalities, and 32% effective at preventing serious injuries. They were most effective for drivers with an airbag. Seat belts were estimated as having prevented 57,000 fatalities and 213,000 seriously injured casualties in the UK since 1983. Seat belt legislation was estimated to have prevented 31,000 fatalities and 118,000 seriously injured casualties. A future increase in effective seat belt wearing rate (which takes into account seating position) in the UK from 92.5% to 93% may prevent casualties valued at a societal cost of over -£18 million per year. To target a seat belt campaign, the question "who doesn"t wear seat belts?" must be answered. Seat belt wearing rates and the number of unbelted casualties were analysed. It was primarily young adult males who didn"t wear seat belts, and they made up the majority of unbelted fatalities and seriously injured casualties.
In the course of the EUROPEAN PROJECT TRACE all fatally injured pedestrians autopsied at the Institute for Legal Medicine in Munich in 2004 had been analysed by using the "Human Functional Failure (HFF) analysis" method. It was possible to apply this method although some restrictions have to be taken into account. The results derived from this analysis comprise first the failures the pedestrians (most often "impairment of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities") and the opponents (most often " Non-detection in visibility constraints conditions") faced in the accident, second the conflicts and tasks (pedestrian crossing the street conflicting with a vehicle from the side (which was going ahead on a straight road), the degree of accident involvement (pedestrians often the primary active part), and further the contributing factors to the accident (pedestrians most often "alcohol (> 0.05% BAC)", opponents most often "visibility constraints").
In a first step, we have examined approximately 23 000 single vehicle accidents within the Austrian National Statistics database. In a second step, we considered 15% of all fatal "running off the road" accidents that occurred in Austria in 2003. As a result, two accident categories were specified; "leaving the road without preceding manoeuvre" and "leaving the road with preceding manoeuvre". These two categories can be basically characterised by the vehicle- heading angle and its velocity angle. In this report, we further suggest theoretical approaches for the dimensioning of a safety zone, an area adjacent to the road free of fixed objects or dangerous slopes. We also show the link between the two accident categories mentioned above and the real world accidents analysed in detail. These observations also form the basis for the required length for safety devices. Finally, we summarise accident avoidance strategies.
The national accident statistics demonstrate that the situation of passenger car side impacts is dominated by car to car accidents. Car side to pole impacts are relatively infrequent events. However the importance of car side to pole impacts is significantly increasing with fatal and seriously injured occupants. For the present study the German in-depth database GIDAS (German In-Depth-Accident Study) and the UK based database CCIS (Co-operative Crash Injury Study) were used. Two approaches were undertaken to better understand the scenario of car to pole impacts. The first part is a statistical analysis of passenger car side to pole impacts to describe the characteristics and their importance relevant to other types of impact and to get further knowledge about the main factors influencing the accident outcome. The second part contains a case by case review on passenger cars first registered 1998 onwards to further investigate this type of impact including regression analysis to assess the relationship between injury severity and pole impact relevant factors.
The following paper presents the nature and mechanism of injuries sustained in frontal impacts, focusing on car to car impacts. It was found that the body regions most frequently sustaining severe to fatal injuries were the legs and the thorax. The nature and mechanism of the injury sustained was investigated only for the thorax injuries, due to their potentially life threatening nature. The analysis revealed that the most frequent cause of the injury recorded was the seatbelt for low severity injuries and the front structure of the vehicle for higher severity injuries. An analysis of the effect of load limiter technology in the restraint system showed that the proportion of occupants who sustained "no thorax injury" did not increase when a load limiter was fitted to the restraint system. However, a decrease in the "organ" and "organ and skeletal" injuries was observed in the load limiter sample. Sample size and variation mean that these findings are not conclusive.
In the context of the COST357 research project, the climatic conditions and requirements for protective helmets for motorcyclists have been examined. The extent to which these factors would influence motorbike handling and accidents in which motorcyclists are involved have also been examined. This project addresses how cognitive abilities of motorcyclists relate to helmet construction factors. In particular, the aspects of motorcycle driver helmets are to be parameterized in order that they may be used subsequently as a basis for future requirement profiles. The task of one working group of the COST357 project has been to analyse accident events and to identify helmet design issues which affect motorcycle drivers while wearing a helmet. This has been achieved by collating accident data across different countries recorded in the course of in-depth investigations at the site of accidents and by combining this with field studies of motorcyclists participating in traffic, but not involved in accidents. This paper presents the study methodology, database and first results of this international survey. The basis of the study has been a total of 424 interviews of motorcyclists and 134 motorcycle accidents, which were collected across Germany, Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Turkey and combined in a single database.
Relevant accident related factors : risk and frequencies of contributing to road traffic accidents
(2009)
In the course of the European Project TRACE (Traffic Accident Causation in Europe) an attempt was made to analyse the cause of road traffic accidents from a factors' point of view. By literature review the most important independent risk factors for traffic accidents were identified to be speed, alcohol intake, male gender, young age, cell phone use, and fatigue. However, the impact of an accident related factor also depends on its prevalence in traffic and accidents, respectively. Available to the Partners in the TRACE Project were different accident databases. Causally contributing factors found by accident investigations that are most often coded in accident databases are connected to unadapted speed and inattention. Taking into account the risk increase and the frequency of contribution to accidents the conclusion can be drawn that the most relevant factors for accident causation are: "alcohol", "speed", and "inattention and distraction".