Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2016 (4) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (4) (entfernen)
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (4) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Bewertung (2)
- Evaluation (assessment) (2)
- Safety (2)
- Sicherheit (2)
- Accident prevention (1)
- Anti locking device (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Autonomes Fahren (1)
- Autonomes Fahrzeug (1)
- Autonomous driving (1)
- Autonomous vehicle (1)
- Braking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Classification (1)
- Crash Test (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Development (1)
- Driver assistance system (1)
- Driving (veh) (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrzeug (1)
- Fahrzeugführung (1)
- Fatality (1)
- Forschungsarbeit (1)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (1)
- Head on collision (1)
- Hospital (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Impact test (1)
- Improvement (1)
- Injury (1)
- Intelligent transport system (1)
- Intelligentes Verkehrssystem (1)
- Klassifizierung (1)
- Krankenhaus (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Motorcycle (1)
- Motorcyclist (1)
- Motorrad (1)
- Motorradfahrer (1)
- Prüfverfahren (1)
- Public transport (1)
- Research project (1)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (1)
- Severity (accid (1)
- Social factors (1)
- Soziale Faktoren (1)
- Technologie (1)
- Technology (1)
- Test (1)
- Test method (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Unfallverhütung (1)
- Vehicle (1)
- Verbesserung (1)
- Verletzung (1)
- Verletzung) (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Wirkungsanalyse (1)
- injury) (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
Institut
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (4) (entfernen)
In line with the new definition introduced by the European Commission (EC), the number of seriously injured road casualties in Germany for 2014 is assessed in this study. The number of MAIS3+ casualties is estimated by two different methodological approaches. The first approach is based on data from the German Inâ€Depth Accident Study (GIDAS), which is closely related to the German Road Traffic Accident Statistics. The second approach is based on data from the German TraumaRegister DGU-® (TRâ€DGU), which includes many more hospitals but not all MAIS3+ injuries.
Established in 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) provides consumers with a safety performance assessment for the majority of the most popular cars in Europe. Thanks to its rigorous crash tests, Euro NCAP has rapidly become an important driver safety improvement to new cars. After ten years of rating vehicles, Euro NCAP felt that a change was necessary to stay in tune with rapidly emerging driver assistance and crash avoidance systems and to respond to shifting priorities in road safety. A new overall rating system was introduced that combines the most important aspects of vehicle safety under a single star rating. The overall rating system has allowed Euro NCAP to continue to push for better fitment and higher performance for vehicles sold on the European market. In the coming years, the safety rating is expected to play an important role in the support of the roll-out of highly automated vehicles.
Automated driving will provide many kinds of benefits - some direct and some indirect. The benefits originate at the individual level, from changes in the behaviour of drivers and travellers with regard to driving and mobility, ending up with benefits at the social level via changes in the whole transport system and society, where many of the current planning and operations paradigms are likely to be transformed by automated driving. There may also be disbenefits, particularly at a social level, for example in intensity of travel which could result in additional congestion and increased use of natural resources. There may also be unintended consequences. For example, we do not know the impacts on public transport: driverless vehicles could provide a means to a lower cost service provision, but the availability of automated cars could lead to more car travel at the expense of collective transport.
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.