Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (28) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Test method (28) (entfernen)
Institut
Side-impact safety of passenger cars is assessed in Europe in a full-scale test using a moving barrier. The front of this barrier is deformable and represents the stiffness of an 'average' car. The EU Directive 96/27/EC on side impact protection has adopted the EEVC Side Impact Test Procedure, including the original performance specification for the barrier face when impacting a flat dynamometric rigid wall. The requirements of the deformable barrier face, as laid down in the Directive, are related to geometrical characteristics, deformation characteristics and energy dissipation figures. Due to these limited requirements, many variations are possible in designing a deformable barrier face. As a result, several barrier face designs are in the market. However, research institutes and car manufacturers report significant difference in test results when using these different devices. It appears that the present approval test is not able to distinguish between the different designs that may perform differently when they impact real vehicles. Therefore, EEVC Working Group 13 has developed a number of tests to evaluate the different designs. In these tests the barrier faces are loaded and deformed in a specific and/or more representative way. Barrier faces of different design have been evaluated. In the paper the set-up and the reasoning behind the tests is presented. Results showing specific differences in performance are demonstrated.
Despite the steadily declining number of pedestrian fatalities and injuries in most European countries during recent decades, pedestrian protection is still of great importance in the European Union as well as in Germany. This is because they still constitute a large proportion of road user casualties and are more likely to suffer serious and fatal injuries than most other road users. In 1999 only car occupants suffered more fatal injuries than pedestrians in Germany. In December 1998, EEVC WG 17 completed their review and updating of the EEVC WG 10 pedestrian test procedure that made it possible to evaluate the protection afforded to pedestrians by the front of passenger cars in an accident. Within the scope of this procedure, four different impactors are used representing those parts of the body which are injured very often and/or very seriously in vehicle-pedestrian-collisions. In a project executed by IKA and BASt, a small family car was tested according to the EEVC WG 17 test procedure. Afterwards modifications to the car were carried out in order to improve the pedestrian protection provided by the vehicle design. There were certain restrictions placed on the level of modifications undertaken, e.g. only minor modifications to vehicle styling and to the vehicle structures, which provide passenger protection. The redesigned vehicle was tested again using the WG 17 test procedure. The test results of the modified vehicle were compared with those of the standard vehicle and evaluated. The results show that considered measures for pedestrian protection in many areas of the vehicle front structure and the use of innovative techniques can lead to a significant reduction of the loads of pedestrians at an acceptable expense.
The Swedish National Road Administration (SNRA), the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) and the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) are co-operating in the International Harmonized Research Activities on Intelligent Transportation Systems (IHRA-ITS). Under this umbrella a joint study was conducted. The overall objective of this study was to contribute to the definition and validation of a "battery of tools" which enables a prediction and an assessment of changes in driver workload due to the use of in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) while driving. In this sense \"validation\" means to produce empirical evidence from which it can be concluded that these methods reliably discriminate between IVIS which differ in terms of relevant features of the HMI-design. Additionally these methods should also be sensitive to the task demands imposed on the driver by the traffic situation and their interactions with HMI-design. To achieve these goals experimental validation studies (on-road and in the simulator) were performed in Sweden, Germany and Japan. As a common element these studies focused on the secondary task methodology as an approach to the study of driver workload. In a joint German-Swedish on-road study the Peripheral Detection Task (PDT) was assessed with respect to its sensitivity to the complexity of traffic situations and effects of different types of navigation systems. Results show that the PDT performance of both the German and the Swedish subjects reflects the task demands of the traffic situations better than those of the IVIS. However, alternative explanations are possible which will be examined by further analyses. Results of this study are supplemented by the Japanese study where informational demands induced by various traffic situations were analysed by using a simple arithmetic task as a secondary task. Results of this study show that relatively large task demands can be expected even from simple traffic situations.
When the EEVC proposed the full-scale side impact test procedure, it recommended that consideration should be given to an interior headform test in addition. This was to evaluate areas of contact not assessed by the dummy. EEVC Working Group 13 has been researching the parameters of a possible European headform test procedure in four phases. Earlier stages of the research have been presented at previous ESV conferences. The conclusions from these have suggested that the US free motion headform should be used in any European test procedure and that it should be a free flight test, not guided. This research has now culminated in proposals for a European test procedure. This paper presents the proposed EEVC side impact interior headform test procedure, giving the rationale for the test and the first results from the validation phase of the test protocol.
At the 2005 ESV conference, the International Harmonisation of Research Activities (IHRA) side impact working group proposed a 4 part draft test procedure, to form the basis of harmonisation of regulation world-wide and to help advances in car occupant protection. This paper presents the work performed by a European Commission 6th framework project, called APROSYS, an further development and evaluation of the proposed procedure from a European perspective. The 4 parts of the proposed procedure are: - A Mobile Deformable Barrier test; - An oblique Pole side impact test; - Interior headform tests; - Side Out of Position (OOP) tests. Full scale test and modelling work to develop the Advanced European Mobile Deformable Barrier (AE-MDB) further is described, resulting in a recommendation to revise the barrier face to include a bumper beam element. An evaluation of oblique and perpendicular pole tests was made from tests and numerical simulations using ES-2 and WorldSID 50th percentile dummies. It was concluded that an oblique pole test is feasible but that a perpendicular test would be preferable for Europe. The interior headform test protocol was evaluated to assess its repeatability and reproducibility and to solve issues such as the head impact angle and limitation zones. Recommendations for updates to the test protocol are made. Out-of-position (OOP) tests applicable for the European situation were performed, which included additional tests with Child Restraint Systems (CRS) which use is mandatory in Europe. It was concluded that the proposed IHRA OOP tests do cover the worst case situations, but the current test protocol is not ready for regulatory use.
A legform impactor with biofidelic characteristics (FlexPLI) which is being developed by the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (JARI) is being considered as a test tool for legislation within a proposed Global Technical Regulation on pedestrian protection (UNECE, 2006) and therefore being evaluated by the Technical Evaluation Group (TEG) of GRSP. In previous built levels it already showed good test results on real cars as well as under idealised test conditions but also revealed further need for improvement. A research study at the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) deals with the question on how leg injury risks of modern car fronts can be revealed, reflected and assessed by the FlexPLI and how the impactor can be used and implemented as a legislative instrument for the type approval of cars according to current and future legislations on pedestrian protection. The latest impactor built level (GTα ) is being evaluated by a general review and assessment of the certification procedure, the knee joint biofidelity and the currently proposed injury criteria. Furthermore, the usability, robustness and durability as a test tool for legislation is examined and an assessment of leg injuries is made by a series of tests with the FlexPLI on real cars with modern car front shapes as well as under idealised test conditions. Finally, a comparison is made between the FlexPLI and the current european legislation tool, the legform impactor according to EEVC WG 17.
The PDB, BASt and Opel conducted two test series to evaluate possible effects on the results obtained using the EEVC WG17 Lower Legform Impactor as a test tool for the assessment of pedestrian safety. The reproducibility and repeatability of the test results were assessed using six legform impactors while keeping the test parameters constant. In the second series one impactor was used and the test parameters were varied to assess the effects on the readings of the legform. The test parameters were velocity, temperature, relative humidity, the point of first contact regarding the deviation in z-direction and the deviations of the pitch, roll and yaw angle. The tests were performed using an inverse setup, i.e. the legform was hit by a guided linear impactor equipped with a honeycomb deformation element. This setup was chosen to be able to vary each single parameter while avoiding variations of the other test parameters at the same time. The test parameters were varied stronger than allowed in regulatory use in order to determine possible dependencies between the parameters and the readings which were acceleration, bending angle and shear displacement.
Zur Ergänzung der bestehenden Routineverfahren in der forensischen Blutalkoholanalytik wurde ein massenspektrometrisches Verfahren mit d6-Ethanol als internem Standard entwickelt. Ziel war die Anwendung eines beweissicheren Bestimmungsverfahrens, bei dem Ethanol über die Retentionszeit und Substanzeigenschaften identifiziert wird. Die Pilotstudie belegt, dass die forensische Blutalkoholbestimmung durch Anwendung eines gaschromatographischen und massenspektrometrischen Verfahrens mit Dampfraumanalyse routinemäßig möglich ist. Im Gegensatz zum GC- und ADH-Verfahren ist die massenspektrometrische Blutalkoholbestimmung beweissicher. Die Autoren empfehlen die Aufnahme in die Richtlinien zur Bestimmung der Blutalkoholkonzentration für forensische Zwecke. Die Arbeit wurde vom Bund gegen Alkohol und Drogen im Straßenverkehr e.V. (B.A.D.S.) unterstützt.
Diese Studie erfolgte als eine erste Prüfung der Frage, ob 0,1 Promille als Sicherheitszuschlag für eine Bestimmung eines Blutalkoholwertes von 0,1 Promille aus Gründen der Messunsicherheit angebracht und ausreichend ist. Beides trifft zu. Obwohl zur Zeit der Studie noch nicht bei oder unter 0,2 Promille kalibriert wurde, bestimmten alle Labors eine Blutalkoholkonzentration von 0,08 Promille mit einem Wert unter 0,18 g/L (Cmax ADH: 0,15 g/L = CmaxGC: 0,15 g/L = Blutalkoholkonzentration (BAK) von 0,12 Promille). Es bestand kein Bias zwischen beiden Verfahren. Festgestellte Standabweichungen: ADH: 0,021 g/L, GC: 0,025 g/L. Ein Sicherheitszuschlag von 0,1 Promille auf 0,1 Promille umfasst demnach vier Standardabweichungen und bietet für die neue Regelung im Paragrafen 24 Straßenverkehrsgesetz (StVG) bei der richtliniengemäß ausgeführten forensischen Blutalkoholbestimmung genügend Analysensicherheit.
Die Begutachtung der Fahreignung beinhaltet in Deutschland neben einer medizinischen Untersuchung und einer psychologischen Exploration gegebenenfalls auch die Anwendung anlassbezogener verhaltenswissenschaftlicher/psychologischer Testverfahren. Diese stellen keine isolierte Maßnahme dar, sondern sind Bestandteil eines Begutachtungsprozesses. Dabei stellt der sachgerechte Gebrauch von so genannten Grenzwerten unter Berücksichtigung der Einzelfallgerechtigkeit und der Einhaltung des Grundsatzes der Verhältnismäßigkeit eine unabdingbare Voraussetzung dar. Testwerte sind nicht absolut, sondern relativ und üben von daher einen eher geringen Einfluss auf das Gutachtenergebnis in Bezug auf eine Prognose des Verkehrsverhaltens aus. Im Bereich des Verkehrsverhaltens kommt es nicht entscheidend darauf an, ob eine im Milli- oder Nanobereich exakte Messgenauigkeit erreicht wird, sondern wie die verkehrsmedizinischen, verkehrspsychologischen, technischen und anderen Sachverständigen mit dem Messwert fachlich umgehen. So müssen im Bereich der Begutachtung der Fahreignung tätige psychologische und medizinische Sachverständige in der Lage sein, Befunde im Einzelfall fehler-, mangel- sowie widerspruchsfrei zu interpretieren. Dies beinhaltet auch, sich mit den Ergebnissen eines psychologischen Testverfahrens fach- und sachgerecht auseinanderzusetzen, nach Kompensationsmöglichkeiten zu suchen und gegebenenfalls eine psychologische Fahrverhaltensbeobachtung durchzuführen. Bei grenzwertigen Vorgaben handelt es sich nicht um "Cut-Offs", sondern um "kritische Grenzwerte", die im Zusammenhang mit mehreren anderen Faktoren zu werten sind.