Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (59)
- Buch (Monographie) (24)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (84) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Statistics (84) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (84)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (1)
In order to enable foreseeing or comparing the benefit of safety systems or driver assistance systems in Germany, in the United States and in Japan, the traffic accident databases in those three countries are examined. The variables used are culpable party, collision partner, accident type, and injury level and the method to re-classify the databases for comparison are proposed. The result indicates that single passenger car fatality is the most frequent in Germany and in the United States, while passenger car vs. pedestrian is the most frequent fatality scenario in Japan. When the casualty by fatality ratio is focused, the greatest difference is observed in rear-end collisions. The ratio of slight injuries in Japan yields about eighteen times as many as those in Germany, and about eight times as many as those in the United States.
Auf Straßen mit - benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen, - nicht benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen, - Radfahrstreifen sowie - Schutzstreifen wurde das Unfallgeschehen sowie die Flächennutzung von fast 39.000 Radfahrern untersucht. Für jeden Anlagentyp wurde der Verkehrsablauf erfasst und Radfahrer befragt. Etwa 90 % der rechts fahrenden Radfahrer nutzen unabhängig von der Benutzungspflicht die Radwege beziehungsweise die Radfahrstreifen beziehungsweise Schutzstreifen selber. Der Anteil regelwidrig Linksfahrender liegt bei 20 % bei Radwegen und bei 10 % bei markierten Führungen. Auf Radwegen begegnen Radfahrer seltener Behinderungen durch andere Verkehrsteilnehmer als auf den Straßen mit Radfahrstreifen oder Schutzstreifen. Bei markierten Führungen gehen die meisten Behinderungen auf regelwidrig haltende Kfz zurück. Auf mehreren untersuchten Radfahrstreifen beziehungsweise Schutzstreifen kommen Radfahrer häufiger in kritische Situationen als auf Radwegen. Bei jedem Anlagentyp streuen die Unfalldichten und die Unfallraten in einem weiten Bereich. Die mittleren Unfallraten (Radfahrerunfälle bezogen auf die Radverkehrsstärke) der Straßen mit Radwegen liegen etwas höher als die der Straßen mit Radfahrstreifen und Schutzstreifen. Jeder Anlagentyp weist jedoch auch hoch unfallbelastete Abschnitte auf. Die hier untersuchten Straßen mit nicht benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen weisen nach Aufhebung der Benutzungspflicht " ebenso wie auch Straßen mit weiterhin benutzungspflichtigen Radwegen - eine niedrigere Unfalldichte als in den "Vorher"-Vergleichsjahren auf. Unabhängig von der Benutzungspflicht von Radwegen ereignen sich über 90 % der Unfälle in den Seitenbereichen. Die mittlere Unfallrate Rechtsfahrender ist bei anforderungsgerechten Radwegen niedriger als bei nicht anforderungsgerechten Radwegen und annähernd mit der Unfallrate anforderungsgerechter Radfahrstreifen vergleichbar. Ausreichenden Sichtbeziehungen zwischen der Radverkehrsanlage und Kraftfahrzeugen-Fahrstreifen sowie ausreichenden Sicherheitsräumen zu Kraftfahrzeugen-Parkständen kommt hohe Bedeutung für die Sicherheit zu. Nicht benutzungspflichtige Radwege werden vor allem wegen eines höheren subjektiven Sicherheitsempfindens oder aus Gewohnheit, aber auch aus Unkenntnis über die aufgehobene Benutzungspflicht genutzt. Typische Regelverstöße von Radfahrern sind nicht durch mangelndes Regelwissen bedingt. Stattdessen besteht sogar ein ausgeprägt deutliches Bewusstsein für Regelübertritte. Eine generelle Präferenz für einen Anlagentyp kann aufgrund der Untersuchungsergebnisse nicht getroffen werden. Ob bauliche Radwege als benutzungspflichtig ausgewiesen sind oder nicht, ist für die Unfallbelastung des Radverkehrs und für die Flächennutzung fast aller Radfahrer nicht ausschlaggebend. Die Beachtung der technischen Entwurfsempfehlungen hat maßgeblichen Einfluss auf eine niedrige Unfallbelastung. Jugendliche und erwachsene Radfahrer sollten breiter über typische Gefahrenstellen bei Unfällen mit Kraftfahrzeugen informiert werden.
Die Bewertung von Projekten im Rahmen von Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen erfordert quantitative Input-Informationen zu den Kosten von Verkehrsunfällen. In der deutschen Bewertungspraxis werden bislang ausschließlich die mittel- und unmittelbar anfallenden monetären Folgen von Verkehrsunfällen quantitativ berücksichtigt, während die immateriellen Folgen wie Schmerz, Leid, Verlust an Lebensqualität bzw. die Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung zur Verringerung/Vermeidung dieser Folgen unberücksichtigt bleiben. Die hier vorgelegte Vorstudie fasst den heutigen Stand der Forschung zur Quantifizierung von Zahlungsbereitschaften für die Verkehrssicherheit durch eine umfassende und systematische Übersicht der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zusammen. Die fünf Verfahren hedonische Preisbildung, kontingente Bewertungsmethode, Risiko-Risiko-Analyse, Standardlotteriemethode und Stated-Choice (SC) werden hinsichtlich ihrer theoretischen Fundierung, der verwendeten methodischen Ansätze (Art der Befragung, Modellierung etc.) und den Anwendungserfahrungen untersucht. Unter den verfügbaren Verfahren stellen die SC-Methoden den heutigen State-of-the-Art in der Forschung zur Ermittlung der Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung für nicht marktfähige Güter dar. Allerdings liegen die meisten Anwendungserfahrungen mit SC-Ansätzen bislang für die Bewertung der Reisezeit und der Zuverlässigkeit vor. Zusammenfassend ist festzustellen, dass im Laufe der letzten Jahre eine Lücke zwischen dem Stand der Forschung (SC-Methoden) und dem Stand der Praxis (andere Methoden) entstanden ist, die mit Anwendungserfahrungen gefüllt werden sollte. Insbesondere für Deutschland liegt ein wesentlicher Forschungsbedarf vor. Basierend auf diesem Überblick werden daher Vorschläge für die weitere Forschung entwickelt.
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in car occupant injury severity recorded in AIS 2005 compared to AIS 1990 and to outline the likely effects on future data analysis findings. Occupant injury data in the UK Cooperative Crash Injury Study Database (CCIS) were coded for the period February 2006 to November 2007 using both AIS 1990 and AIS 2005. Data for 1,994 occupants with over 6000 coded injuries were reviewed at the AIS and MAIS level of severities and body regions to determine changes between the two coding methodologies. Overall there was an apparent general trend for fewer injuries to be coded at the AIS 4+ severity and more injuries to be coded at the AIS 2 severity. When these injury trends were reviewed in more detail it was found that the body regions which contributed the most to these changes in severity were the head, thorax and extremities. This is one of the first studies to examine the implications for large databases when changing to an updated method for coding injuries.
Police records about traffic accidents like used by IRTAD (International Road Traffic and Accident Database) and CARE (Community Road Accident Database) do not represent all road injuries. For instance, road accidents of bicyclists without a counterpart are usually not reported. Furthermore, IRTAD-like data contains hardly any information on injury outcome and accident circumstances. This information gap leads to an under-representation of the safety concerns of the most vulnerable road users like children and the elderly both in accident research and safety promotion. Injury registration for the European Injury Database (IDB), in turn, combines details of accident causation with diagnostic information that can be used to assess injury severity and long term consequences. The IDB is collecting data from hospital emergency department patients and is being implemented in a growing number of countries. In this article IDB results on mode of transport and injury outcome are presented from a sample of nine EU member states.
Tree impacts are still one of the most important focal points of road deaths in Germany. For the year 2008, the latest figures in the national statistics show a share of 28% of road users killed in crashes with trees alongside a road amongst all crashes on rural roads (except the Autobahn). The official German statistics show the attribute "impact on a tree" since 1995. For this first reported year, the share of road users killed in such crashes was 30%. During the last 14 years, fatal accidents with road users killed on rural roads (except the Autobahn) after impacts on a tree declined by 60% from 1,737 (year 1995) to 696 (year 2008). But this is more or less in line with the general evolution of vehicle and traffic safety in Germany. For Germany as a whole the accident statistics do not show a reduction for "treer crashes" which is clearly more than the average for all accidents. But, as shown with the paper, there are different evolutions in the several German States. In public awareness the topic "tree impacts" is mostly associated with the situation in Germany after the reunification. At that time a lot of road users were killed on the avenues in the so called "new countries". The fact that "tree impacts" are still a big share within the figure of killed road users seems to be little-known. Using updated information coming from the official statistics and in-depth-studies, accident researchers can identify a big potential for further improvements of traffic safety on the associated district roads, state roads and federal highways. There is still a need to analyse more details of the accident occurrence with impacts on trees to generate new and updated findings on the current limits and potentials of measures to improve vehicle and traffic safety. To make further efforts in reducing the figures of victims of "tree impacts" the intensification of well-known conventional solutions " for example implementation of guard rails and reduction of speed - is an option. Measures related to vehicle safety technology especially in the field of primary (active) safety will have additional benefit within the physically imposed limits. With this background it can be seen that the subject "tree impacts" should be analysed with a holistic approach taking into account the entire system of driver, vehicle, road, the environment and a social consensus as well.
It is well known that motorcycle riding is fascinating but quite more dangerous than for example car driving. In 2006, 5,091 persons were killed as victims of crashes occurring on public roads in Germany. 52% (2,683) were car occupants, 16% (793) motorcycle riders, 14% (711) pedestrians, 10% (486) bicycle riders, 5% (235) commercial vehicle occupants, 2% (107) riders of smaller powered two-wheelers, called "Mofa, Moped and Mokick". This shows that motorcycle riders recently are the second largest group of killed traffic participants in Germany. Latest information coming from the Federal Statistics predict for the year 2007 the figure of 4,958 killed road victims in total. This would be again a successful reduction (-133 killed persons or "2.6% compared to the year 2006). But the news coming from the Federal Statistics during the year 2007 and at the begin of 2008 did not always tell the same positive story. It is questioned whether the positive trend of substantially reduced figures of killed road user year by year will longer continue for Germany. That means it could be impossible to reach the ambitious target, set by the European Commission, to cut in half the figure of killed road users until the year 2010 " compared to the figure for the year 2001. It was reported that the group of 45 to 49 years old traffic participants (all traffic modes) is conspicuous with an increase of 30% up to 297 killed road users in total from January to August 2007. This increase can be ascribed in particular by an increase of killed motorcycle riders within this age group. Due to mild weather conditions in Germany in 2007 the season for motorcycle riding began relatively early and this may be a main reason for the increase of the figure of killed motorcycle riders by 16% from January to August 2007. With this background the accident occurrence of motorcycles became more and more essential. As part of the actual discussion about historical trends, recent emphases, causes and relevant structures of the events of motorcycle crashes it is evident, to have latest and carefully updated figures coming from both the Federal Statistics and In-depth studies. The paper will give a contribution to this using the German Federal Statistics and in-depth studies, for example GIDAS. Additional data coming from the DEKRA Motorcycle Accident Database as well as from literature are considered, too. The paper will help to describe the current situation of the accident involvement of motorcycles in Germany.
The paper gives an overview of the recent (mostly 2012) figures of killed bus/coach occupants (drivers and passengers) in 27 Member States of the European Union as reported by CARE. The Evolution of the figures of bus/coach occupants killed in road accidents urban, rural without motorway and on motorways from 1991 to 2010 in 15 Member States of the EU supplements this information. More detailed are the figures reported for Germany by the Federal Statistics. The paper displays long-term evaluations (1957 to 2012) for killed, seriously and slightly injured occupants in all kinds of buses/coaches. Midterm evaluations (1995 to 2012) of the figures of fatalities and casualties are displayed for different busses according to their identification of road using as coaches, urban buses, school buses, trolley buses and "other buses". To be able to compare the evolutions of the safety of vehicle occupants it is customary to use different risk indicators. Calculations and illustrations for three often used indicators with their development over time are given: fatalities, seriously injured and slightly injured per 100,000 vehicles registered, per 1 billion (109) vehicle-kilometres travelled and per 1 billion (109) person-kilometres. These indicators are shown for occupants of cars, goods vehicles and buses/coaches. For the period from 1957 until 2012 it is obvious, that for all three vehicle categories analysed there was a clear long-term trend towards more occupant safety in terms of casualties per vehicles registered and per vehicle mileage. This was most significant for car occupants but it can be seen for bus/coach occupants and goodsvehicle occupants as well. Figures of killed occupants and of casualties related to person-kilometres are calculated and displayed for the shorter period 1995 to 2012. Here it becomes obvious that the bus/coach is still the safest mode of transport for the occupants of road vehicles. Graphs for the casualty risk indices still show significantly higher risks for car occupants despite the corresponding curve moved sustainable downwards. It is remarkable, that the risks of being killed or injured for the occupants of urban buses is growing whereas the corresponding risk for the occupants of coaches in line traffic tends downwards. The article ends with a short comparison and discussion of the risk indicators which are actually published for the occupants (driver and passengers) of cars and the passengers of buses/coaches, railroads, trams and airplanes. The interpretation of such information depends on the perception and it seems that for a complete view not only one indicator should be used and the evolutions of the indicator values during longer periods (as displayed with examples in the paper) should also be taken into account.
Since 2005, the motorcycle crash fatalities in the US exceeded 10% of the overall annual traffic fatalities. Consequently, it has become critical to gain in-depth understanding of the factors and characteristics contributing to motorcycle crashes. Unfortunately, there currently exists no database gathering the necessary information for an in-depth analysis of the US motorcycle crashes. So this study utilizes the NASS/CDS database (National Automotive Sampling System, Crashworthiness Data System) in order to gain insights into the patterns and factors leading to a NASS/CDS motorcycle crash, from 1997 to 2007. NASS/CDS samples about 5,000 passenger car tow-away crashes per year. Each case includes photographs and detailed data on crash and pre-crash characteristics, vehicle types, trajectories, types of impact, and other pertinent roadway and crash scene information, allowing an in-depth investigation of the crash mechanisms. However, the NASS/CDS sampling process specifically focuses on passenger car crashes, so the cases extracted only correspond to crashes in which a passenger vehicle was towed, and a motorcycle was somehow involved. Thus, a by-hand in-depth review of about 200 cases allowed retrieving 106 relevant crashes for this study, tending to represent the severe passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes on US roads. The findings lead to the conclusion that these crashes mostly result from the low conspicuity of the motorcycle, and from the inability of the car drivers to fully appreciate and anticipate the behavior of a motorcycle. Indeed, it has been shown that, first, the car drivers involved in these cases did not attempt any avoidance maneuver, second, they were largely of ages under 25, and finally, the majority of the crashes were in an intersection scenario. In addition, the two major scenarios unveiled were the car attempting a left turn from the opposite direction and the car attempting a left turn from the right. The paper mentions several solutions to enhance the motorcycle- conspicuity and to allow the car drivers to better anticipate its behavior, which seem to be key factors in the intersection-related crashes (and more generally in the passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes).
The purpose of this study was to analyse the actual injury situation of bicyclists regarding accidents involving more than one bicyclist. Bicyclists were included in a medical and technical analysis to create a basis for preventive measures and discovered repeating accident patterns and circumstances such as daytime, environment, helmet use rate. Technical and medical data were collected at the scene, shortly after accident. The population was compared focusing on bicycle versus bicycle accidents. Technical analysis included speed at crash, type of collision, impact angle, environment, used lane and relative velocity. Medical analysis included injury pattern and severity (AIS, ISS). Included were 578 injured bicyclists in 289 accidents from years 1999 to 2008, 61 percent were male (n=350) and 39 percent female (n=228). Sixty-seven percent ranged between 18 to 64 years of age, twelve percent each between 13 to 17 years of age and older than 65 years, eight percent between 6 to 12 years and one percent between 2 to 5 years.. Crashes took place in urban areas in 92 percent, in rural areas in 8 percent. Weather conditions were dry lanes in 97 percent and wet conditions in 3 percent. Eighty-three percent of all accidents happened during daytime, ten percent during night, and seven percent during dawn. The helmet use rate was only 7,5 percent in all involved bicyclists. The mean Maximum Abbreviated injury scale, Injury severity score was 1,31. Bicyclists are still minimally- or unprotected road users. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. The incidence of bicycle to bicycle crashes is high. Most of these accidents take place in urban areas. The level and pattern of injuries is moderate. Most of the more severe injuries occur to the head and could have been avoided by frequent helmet use.