Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (100)
- Buch (Monographie) (18)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (4)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Verletzung (123) (entfernen)
Institut
The head impact of pedestrians in the windscreen area shows a high relevance in real-world accidents. Nevertheless, there are neither biomechanical limits nor elaborated testing procedures available. Furthermore, the development of deployable protection systems like pop-up bonnets or external airbags has made faster progress than the corresponding testing methods. New requirements which are currently not considered are taken into account within a research project of BASt and the EC funded APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) integrated project relating to passive pedestrian protection. Testing procedures for head impact in the windscreen area should address these new boundary conditions. The presented modular procedure combines the advantages of virtual testing, including full-scale multi-body and finite element simulations, as well as hardware testing containing impactor tests based on the existing procedures of EEVC WG 17. To meet the efforts of harmonization in legislation, it refers to the Global Technical Regulation of UNECE (GTR No. 9). The basis for this combined hardware and virtual testing procedure is a robust categorization covering all passenger cars and light commercial vehicles and defining the testing zone including the related kinematics. The virtual testing part supports also the choice of the impact points for the hardware test and determines head impact timing for testing deployable systems. The assessment of the neck rotation angle and sharp edge contact in the rear gap of pop-up bonnets is included. For the demonstration of this procedure, a hardware sedan shaped vehicle was modified by integrating an airbag system. In addition, tests with the Honda Polar-II Dummy were performed for an evaluation of the new testing procedure. Comparing these results, it was concluded that a combination of simulation and updated subsystem tests forms an important step towards enhanced future pedestrian safety systems considering the windscreen area and the deployable systems.
Ruptures and dissections of the thoracic and abdominal aortic vessel caused by traffic accidents are rare but potentially life-threatening injuries. They can occur by blunt trauma via seat belt or dashboard injury. The study aimed at evaluating the overall mortality, morbidity, neurological disorders, and differences in operative procedures of open repair and stenting. It shows that, with a change and improvement in diagnostic tools and surgical approach, mortality and morbidity of blunt aortic injuries were significantly reduced. Still an immediate life-threatening injury early diagnosis via multiple-slice and scans and surgical repair with minimally invasive stents showed excellent short-time results for selected patients.
Still correlated with high mortality rates in traffic accidents traumatic aortic ruptures were frequently detected in unprotected car occupants in the early years. This biomechanical analysis investigates the different kinds of injury mechanisms leading to traumatic aortic injuries in todays traffic accidents and how the way of traffic participation affects the frequency of those injuries over the years. Based on GIDAS reported traffic accidents from 1973 to 2014 are analyzed. Results show that traumatic aortic injuries are mainly observed in high-speed accidents with high body deceleration and direct load force to the chest. Mostly chest compression is responsible for the load direction to the cardiac vessels. The main observed load vector is from caudal-ventral and from ventral solely, but also force impact from left and right side and in roll-over events with chest compression lead to traumatic aortic injuries. Classically, the injury appeares at the junction between the well-fixed aortic arch and the pars decendens following a kind of a scoop mechanism, a few cases with a hyperflexion mechanism are also described. In our analysis the deceleration effect alone never led to an aortic rupture. Comparing the past 40 years aortic injuries shift from unprotected car occupants to today's unprotected vulnerable road users like pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. Still the accident characteristics are linked with chest compression force under high speed impact, no seatbelt and direct body impact.
Each year the traffic accident research teams in Dresden and Hanover provide an in-depth investigation of approximately two thousand accidents, aggregated in the GIDAS database. To accomplish a comprehensive review of each traffic accident recorded, a sensible and thorough encoding of suffered injuries is indispensable. The Abbreviated Injury Scale by AAAM offers a valuable and handy solution to achieve this goal. However, there were a few difficulties in the use of the AIS that came up in the past, which let to necessary improvements for the utilization of the AIS 2005 for GIDAS.
In Germany averagely two million traffic accidents happen each year and emergency medical services are called to more than 400 000 patients. Even though this number is decreasing continuously (due to improvements in the fields of vehicle safety, road construction, and accident prevention) every case is yet a challenge for the rescuers and requires improvements in emergency medicine as well. Especially during diagnostics right at the accident scene, there are only limited instruments available to gain the necessary knowledge of the injuries suffered, to come to essential decisions about treatment or transport. To provide an additional diagnostic aid by scouting and estimating the situation, a software-tool calculating the likeliness of the most frequent severe injuries (AIS 3-6) of front occupants in passenger cars has been developed to deliver this necessary information about particular accident scenarios. To achieve this, logistic likelihood functions have been calculated in a multivariate regression analysis analysing all AIS 3+ injuries in the GIDAS database of the years 1999-2006 that happened more than four times
Die flächendeckende Einrichtung von Notarztsystemen ist eine zentrale Aufgabe der jüngsten Ausbaustufe des Rettungswesens. Es ist das Ziel des Forschungsprojekts, die möglichen Organisationsformen von Notarztsystemen aufzuzeigen und die für die Auswahl einer Variante bedeutsamen Planungs- und Entscheidungsfaktoren zu ermitteln und zu systematisieren. Der Gang der Untersuchung gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Aufgabe des ersten Arbeitsschrittes ist es, eine wissenschaftlich abgesicherte Basis zum Planungsproblem der Organisation von Notarztsystemen zu entwickeln. Im Mittelpunkt dieses Untersuchungsabschnitts steht eine sowohl rettungstaktische als auch Kostengesichtspunkte beachtende Analyse der strategischen Organisationsmöglichkeiten von Notarztsystemen. Der zweite Untersuchungsteil ist empirisch ausgelegt. Er hat zur Aufgabe, einen Überblick über die bereits bestehenden Notarztsysteme zu vermitteln und die mit den verschiedenen Ausgestaltungsformen in der Praxis gemachten Erfahrungen aufzuzeigen. Zu diesem Zweck wurden verschiedene Informationsquellen herangezogen. Einerseits wurden die in der Literatur relativ zahlreich vorzufindenden Beschreibungen bereits eingerichteter Notarztsysteme systematisch ausgewertet. Darüber hinaus wurden durch eine Umfrage die in den Bundesländern Saarland und Niedersachsen bestehenden Notarztsysteme flächendeckend erfasst. Die Forschungsergebnisse zeigen, dass die Eignung einer Organisationsform zur Versorgung eines bestimmten Gebietes von einer Vielzahl ortsspezifischer Rahmenbedingungen abhängt und daher keine allgemeingültigen Empfehlungen zur Ausgestaltung von Notarztsystemen ausgesprochen werden können. Allerdings gibt die Untersuchung zu erkennen, dass bei vielen typischen Ausgangslagern ein an ein Krankenhaus angegliedertes, im Rendezvous-Verfahren betriebenes Notarztsystem die günstigste Organisationsvariante darstellt. Zum Abschluss der Untersuchung sind die wichtigsten Planungsempfehlungen zusammengefasst dargelegt. Als gundlegender Punkt wird auf die Notwendigkeit hingewiesen, Notarztsystemen als Teilbereichen des Rettungsdienstes einen rechtlichen und organisatorischen Rahmen zu geben. Wichtig ist dabei zum Beispiel, dass eindeutige Regelungen für die Zuständigkeiten bei der Planung und Durchführung der Dienste getroffen werden.
Zielsetzung des Projektes war die Weiterentwicklung der Unfallfolgenbewertung entsprechend neuerer Ergebnisse vor allem aus der Umwelt- und Gesundheitsökonomie, unter Beachtung objektiver wie subjektiver Bewertungsansätze und mit Schwerpunktsetzung auf Personenschäden. Vorgehensweise: Auswertung der vorliegenden Arbeiten unter inhaltlichen und methodischen Gesichtspunkten. Erarbeitung von Verbesserungsvorschlägen unter theoretischen Aspekten sowie unter Beachtung von Möglichkeiten und Problemen der Datenverfügbarkeit. Zentrale Ergebnisse: Ansatzpunkte, die gängige Unfallfolgenbewertung sowohl in theoretischer als auch in methodischer Hinsicht neu zu überdenken, wurden vor allem in folgenden Bereichen identifiziert: 1. Kosten der medizinischen Behandlung: Bei der Erfassung der Behandlungskosten von Unfallopfern wäre ein Verfahren wünschenswert, das auf vorhandenem Datenmaterial aufbaut und die angefallenen Behandlungskosten differenzierter als die Zweiteilung in Schwer- und Leichtverletzte vornimmt. Hier würden sich zunächst vor allem ICD-basierte Fallpauschalen anbieten. 2. Kosten der Invalidität: Zur Ermittlung der langfristigen Kosten von unfallbedingten Invaliditätsfällen bietet sich die Ermittlung und die Bewertung solcher dauerhafter Unfallfolgen auf der Basis von Funktionsniveaueinschränkungen an. Im Vergleich zum Grad der Minderung der Erwerbsfähigkeit ermöglicht diese Vorgehensweise eine realistische Einteilung der unterschiedlichen Grade langfristiger Beeinträchtigungen. 3. Kosten unfallinduzierter Todesfälle: Als Alternative zur Berechnung der Kosten unfallbedingter Todesfälle mit Hilfe des Ertragswert- beziehungsweise Kostenwertansatzes besteht die Möglichkeit zur Ermittlung eines subjektiven Wertansatzes. Diese, zumindest im deutschsprachigen Raum noch wenig berücksichtigten Verfahren, versuchen auf der Basis von Marktbeobachtungen beziehungsweise Befragungen den Wert eines Menschenlebens zu ermitteln. Verfahren aus der Umweltökonomie haben gezeigt, dass inzwischen verfeinerte Instrumentarien entwickelt wurden, dass auch empirische Untersuchungen im Bereich der Verkehrsunfälle durchgeführt werden sollten.
This work aims at bringing evidence for mass incompatibility in frontal impact for cars built according to the UNECE R94 regulation. French national injury accidents database census for years 2005 to 2008 were used for the analysis. The heterogeneity of frontal self-protection among cars of different masses is investigated, as well as the partner protection parameter offered by these cars. The last part of the analysis deals with the estimation of the benefit, in terms of fatal and severe injuries avoided, if crashworthiness was harmonized for the whole fleet of vehicle. This calculation is done for France and is extended to all Europe.
Pedestrian and cyclist are the most vulnerable road users in traffic crashes. One important aspect of this study was the comparable analysis of the exact impact configuration and the resulting injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists in view of epidemiology. The secondary aim was assessment of head injury risks and kinematics of adult pedestrian and cyclists in primary and secondary impacts and to correlate the injuries related to physical parameters like HIC value, 3ms linear acceleration, and discuss the technical parameter with injuries observed in real-world accidents based documented real accidents of GIDAS and explains the head injuries by simulated load and impact conditions based on PC-Crash and MADYMO. A subsample of n=402 pedestrians and n=940 bicyclists from GIDAS database, Germany was used for preselection, from which 22 pedestrian and 18 cyclist accidents were selected for reconstruction by initially using PC-Crash to calculate impact conditions, such as vehicle impact velocity, vehicle kinematic sequence and throw out distance. The impact conditions then were employed to identify the initial conditions in simulation of MADYMO reconstruction. The results show that cyclists always suffer lower injury outcomes for the same accident severity. Differences in HIC, head relative impact velocity, 3ms linear contiguous acceleration, maximum angular velocity and acceleration, contact force, throwing distance and head contact timing are shown. The differences of landing conditions in secondary impacts of pedestrians and cyclists are also identified. Injury risk curves were generated by logistic regression model for each predicting physical parameters.
Estimation of the benefits for the UK for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation No. 95
(2010)
The side impact problem in Europe remains substantial. UK data shows that between 22% and 26% of car occupant casualties are involved in a side impact, but this rises to between 29% and 38% for those who are fatally injured. This indicates the more injurious nature of side impacts compared with frontal impacts. The European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) has performed work to address the side impact issue since 1979. As part of its continuing work, it has recently investigated potential options for regulatory changes to improve side impact protection in cars further. To support this work the UK undertook an analysis to estimate the benefit for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation 95. The analysis used the UK national STATS19 and detailed Co-operative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) accident databases. Of the potential options reviewed, it was found that the addition of a pole test offered the greatest benefit.