Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (39)
- Konferenz (39)
- Accident (30)
- Unfall (30)
- Germany (25)
- Deutschland (24)
- Injury (23)
- Verletzung (22)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (18)
- Severity (accid, injury) (16)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (15)
- Statistics (12)
- Statistik (12)
- Analysis (math) (11)
- Cyclist (10)
- Data acquisition (10)
- Datenerfassung (10)
- Radfahrer (10)
- Accident reconstruction (9)
- Datenbank (9)
- Fußgänger (9)
- Pedestrian (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Car (8)
- Cause (8)
- Ursache (8)
- Data bank (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- On the spot accident investigation (7)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (7)
- injury) (7)
- Motorcyclist (6)
- Motorradfahrer (6)
- Reconstruction (accid) (6)
- Severity (accid (6)
- Europa (5)
- Europe (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Interview (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- Zusammenstoß (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Collision (4)
- Geschwindigkeit (4)
- Head (4)
- Human factor (4)
- Menschlicher Faktor (4)
- PKW (4)
- Pkw (4)
- Safety belt (4)
- Schutzhelm (4)
- Sicherheitsgurt (4)
- Simulation (4)
- Speed (4)
- Wirbelsäule (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Anfahrversuch (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Biomechanics (3)
- Biomechanik (3)
- Brustkorb (3)
- China (3)
- Crash helmet (3)
- Fracture (bone) (3)
- Impact test (veh) (3)
- Knochenbruch (3)
- Kopf (3)
- Spinal column (3)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Age (2)
- Alte Leute (2)
- Alter (2)
- Analyse (Math) (2)
- Angle (2)
- Bewertung (2)
- Bicycle (2)
- Blickfeld (2)
- Child (2)
- Digital model (2)
- Error (2)
- Evaluation (assessment) (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fahrrad (2)
- Fahrzeug (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Field of vision (2)
- Finite element method (2)
- Front (2)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (2)
- Head on collision (2)
- Kind (2)
- Leg (human) (2)
- Numerisches Modell (2)
- Old people (2)
- Overturning (veh) (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Risiko (2)
- Risk (2)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (2)
- Side impact (2)
- Vehicle (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Winkel (2)
- Überschlagen (2)
- Acceptability (1)
- Aggression (psycho) (1)
- Aggression (psychol) (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Alkohol (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Australia (1)
- Australien (1)
- Back (human) (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bein (menschl) (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Blutkreislauf (1)
- Breaking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chest (1)
- Circulation (blood) (1)
- Compression (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Cost (1)
- Crash victim (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Cycling (1)
- Data base (1)
- Database (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Design (overall design) (1)
- Deutschalnd (1)
- Development (1)
- Digital image processing (1)
- Digitale Bildverarbeitung (1)
- Disablement (1)
- Drei (1)
- Droge (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamics (1)
- Dynamik (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency medical aid (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (1)
- Fahrzeugsitz (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Health (1)
- Hospitsl (1)
- Human body (1)
- Illness (1)
- Impact (collision) (1)
- Insasse (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Interior (veh) (1)
- International (1)
- Japan (1)
- Junction (1)
- Knee (human) (1)
- Knie (menschl) (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Krankenhaus (1)
- Krankheit (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Langfristig (1)
- Length (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Location (1)
- Long term (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Länge (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Methode der finite Elemente (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Movement (1)
- Noise (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pfosten (1)
- Pole (1)
- Post crash (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Protective helmet (1)
- Psychological aspects (1)
- Psychologische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Radfahren (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Reversing (veh) (1)
- Rib (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Road user (1)
- Rupture (1)
- Rücken (1)
- Rücksichtslosigkeit (1)
- Rückwärtsfahren (1)
- Safety (1)
- Seat (veh) (1)
- Severity (accid, injuy) (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spinal calum (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Thorax (1)
- Three (1)
- Transparent (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallfolgemaßnahme (1)
- Unfallopfer (1)
- Unfallrate (1)
- Ungeschützter Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Vehicle occupant (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Verschiebung (1)
- Versuchspuppe (1)
- Vulnerable road user (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- accident (1)
- Überlappung (1)
Institut
This study aimed at comparing head Wrap Around Distance (WAD) of Vulnerable Road User (VRU) obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS), the China in-depth Accident Database (CIDAS) and the Japanese in-depth Accident Database (ITARDA micro). Cumulative distribution of WAD of pedestrian and cyclist were obtained for each database (AIS2+) showing that WAD of cyclists were larger than the ones of pedestrians. Comparing three regions, the 50%tile WAD of GIDAS was larger than that of both Asian accident databases. Using linear regression that might predict WAD of pedestrians and cyclists from Impact speed and VRU height, WADs were calculated to be 206cm/219cm (Pedestrian/Cyclist) for GIDAS, 170cm/192cm for CIDAS and 211cm/235cm for ITARDA. In addition, this study may be helpful for reconsideration of WAD measurement alignment between accident reconstruction and test procedures.
Within the COST Action TU1101 the working group WG 1 is dealing with acceptance criteria and problems in helmet use while bicycling concerning conspicuity, thermal stress, ventilation deficits and other potential confounding. To analyze the helmet usage practice of bicyclists in Europe a questionnaire was developed in the scope of working group 1 to collect relevant information by means of a field study. The questionnaire consists of some 66 questions covering the fields of personal data of the cyclist, riding und helmet usage habits, information concerning the helmet model and the sensation of the helmet, as well as information on previous bicycle accidents. A second complementary study is conducted to analyze if the use of a bicycle helmet influences the seating geometry and the posture of cyclists when riding a bicycle and if the if the helmet vertically limits the vision. For this purpose cyclists with and without helmets were photographed in real world situations and relevant geometrical values such as the decline of the torso, the head posture of the upper vertical vision limit due to the helmet were established from the photos. The interim results of the field studies which were conducted in Germany by the Hannover Medical School are presented in this study. Some 227 questionnaires were filled out, of which 67 participants had used a helmet and 42 of the 227 participants have had a bicycle accident before. For the analysis of the riding position and posture of the cyclist over 40 pictures of riders with a helmet and over 240 pictures of riders without a helmet were measured concerning the seating geometry to describe the influence of using a bicycle helmet. Some results in summary: From the riders interviewed with the questionnaire only 11% of the city bike riders and 12% of the mountain bike riders always used the helmet, while 38% of the racing bike riders and 88% of the e-bike-riders always used the helmet. The helmet use seems not to change the sensation of safety of cycling compared to the use of a car. The arguments for not wearing a helmet are mostly stated to be the short distance of a trip, high temperatures or carelessness and waste of time. The reasons for using a helmet are stated to be the feeling of safety and being used to using a helmet. Being a role model for others was also stated to be a reason for helmet use. Concerning the sensation of the helmet 9% of the riders reported problems with the field of vision when using a helmet, 57% saw the problem of sweating too much, and 10% reported headaches or other unpleasant symptoms like pressure on the forehead when using the helmet. The analysis of the seating posture from the pictures taken of cyclists revealed that older cyclists generally have a riding position where the handle bar is higher than the seat (0-° to 10-° incline from seat to handlebar), while younger riders had a higher variance (between -10-° decline and 20-° incline). Further, elderly riders and riders with helmets seem to have a more upright position of the upper body when cycling. The vertical vision limit due to the helmet is determined by the front rim of the helmet (mostly the sun shade). Typical values here range from 0-° (horizontal line from the eye to the sun shade) to 75-° upwards, in which elderly riders tend to have a slightly higher vertical vision limit possibly due to the helmet being worn more towards the face.
Introduction: The method of causation analysis applied under the German accident survey GIDAS, which is based on Accident Causation Analysis System (ACAS) focuses on an on-scene data collection of predominantly directly event-related causation factors which were crucial in the accident emergence as situational resulting events and influences. The paradigm underlying this method refers to the findings of the psychological traffic accident research that most causally relevant features of the system components human, infrastructure and vehicle technology are found directly in the situation shortly before the accident. This justifies the survey method which is conducted directly at the accident (on-scene), shortly after the accident occurrence (in-time) with the detection of human-related causes (in-depth). Human aspects of the situation analysis that interact and influence the risk situations shortly before the collision are reported as errors, lapses, mistakes and failures in ACAS in specific categories and subcategories. Thus methodically ACAS is designed primarily for the collection of accident features on the level of operational action, which certainly leads to valid findings and behavioral causes of accidents. The enhancement by means of Moderating Conditions concerns the pre-crash phase in different levels: strategical, tactical and operational.
An approach to the standardization of accident and injury registration systems (STAIRS) in Europe
(1998)
STAIRS is a European Commission funded study whose aim is to produce a set of guidelines for a harmonised, crash injury database. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of the forthcoming European Union front and side impact directives has emphasised the need for real world crash injury data-sets that can be representative of the crash population throughout Europe. STAIRS will provide a methodology to achieve this. The ultimate aim of STAIRS is to produce a set of data collection tools which will aid decision making on vehicle crashworthiness as well as providing a means to evaluate the effectiveness of safety regulations. This paper will disseminate the up-to-date findings of the group as they try to harmonise their methods. The stage has been reached where studies into the diverse methods of the UK, French and German systems of crash injury investigation have been undertaken. An assessment has already been made of the relationships between the three current systems in order to define the areas of agreement and divergence. The conclusions reached stated that there were many areas that are already closely related and that the differences were only at the detailed level. With the emphasis on secondary safety and injury causation, core data sets were decided upon, taking into account: vehicle description, collision configuration, structural response of vehicles, restraint and airbag performance, child restraint performance, Euro NCAP, pedestrian and vehicle occupant kinematics, injury description and causation. Each variable was studied objectively, the important elements isolated and developed into a form that all partners were agreeable on. A glossary of terms is being developed as the project progresses which includes ISO standards and other definitions from the associated CAREPLUS project, which addresses the comparability of national data sets. A major consideration of the group was the data collection method to be employed. The strengths and weaknesses of each study were investigated to obtain a clear idea of which aspects offered the best way forward. The quality of this information and transference into a common format, as well as the necessary error checking systems to be employed have just been completed and are described. In tandem with this area of study the problem of the statistical relationship of each sample to the national population is also being investigated. The study proposes a mechanism to use a sample of crash injury data to represent the national and international crash injury problem
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.
With an ever rising human life expectancy the share of elderly people in society is constantly rising. This leads to the fact that at the same rate the share of people with age related diseases such as dementia and poor eyesight taking part in traffic will rise and therefore traffic accidents caused by this group of people due to the disease will play an ever greater role. This Situation will be among the future challenges of road safety work. At present this study displays specific characteristics of accidents caused by elderly car drivers (aged 65 or higher) based on the analysis of the German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Herein almost 1000 elderly car drivers were identified as accident participants in the years 2008 to 2011. The focus of this study lies on identifying special types of accidents which are caused by elderly drivers and on characterizing these types with the information gathered on scene and by interviewing the participants. The main evidence analyzed is the knowledge about the accident locality, the trajectories of the participants as well as the reasons for the occurrence of the accidents. Furthermore personal information such as the personal condition before the accident and driving purposes is used to identify patterns of contributing circumstances for accidents caused by elderly traffic participants.
Introduction: Spine injuries pose a considerable risk to life and quality of life. The total number of road deaths in developed countries has markedly decreased, e.g. in Germany from over 20000 in 1970 to less than 4000 in 2010, but little is known how this is reflected in the burden of spine fractures of motor vehicle users. In this study, we aimed to show the actual incidence of spine injuries among drivers and front passengers and elucidate possible dependencies between crash mechanisms and types of injuries.
From literature well-known analyzes on risks, hazards and causes of accidents of older drivers are amended by the present study in which a comparison of the specific features of accident causes of older car drivers (older than 60 years) and of younger car drivers (under 25 years) is conducted. Mainly the question is pursued if specific errors, mistakes and lapses are predominant in the two different age groups. The analysis system ACAS (Accident Causation Analysis System) used hereby consists of a sequential system of accident causation factors from the human, the technical and the infrastructural field, whereupon for this study the influence of the human features on the accident development in two different age groups is of interest. ACAS is both an accident model and an analysis and classification system, which describes the human participation factors of an accident and their causes in the temporal sequence (from the perceptibility to concrete action errors) taking into consideration the logical sequence of individual basic functions. In five steps (categories) of a logical and temporal sequence the hierarchical system makes human functions and processes as determinants of accident causes identifiable. The methodology specifically focuses on the use in so-called "In-Depth" and "On-Scene" investigation studies. With the help of the system for each accident participant one or more of five hypotheses of human cause factors are formed and then specified by appropriate verification criteria. These hypotheses in turn are further specified by indicators in such manner that the coding of the causation factors by a code system meets the needs of database processing and are accessible to a quantitative data analysis. The first results of the descriptive comparison of the two age groups concern mainly differences in the functional levels "information admission/perception" (where the elderly drivers have more difficulties than the young ones) and "information processing/evaluation" (where the younger drivers show more problems). Concerning the cognitive function of "planning" the group of younger drivers seems to be more often involved in an accident because of excessive speed.
Pedestrian and cyclist are the most vulnerable road users in traffic crashes. One important aspect of this study was the comparable analysis of the exact impact configuration and the resulting injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists in view of epidemiology. The secondary aim was assessment of head injury risks and kinematics of adult pedestrian and cyclists in primary and secondary impacts and to correlate the injuries related to physical parameters like HIC value, 3ms linear acceleration, and discuss the technical parameter with injuries observed in real-world accidents based documented real accidents of GIDAS and explains the head injuries by simulated load and impact conditions based on PC-Crash and MADYMO. A subsample of n=402 pedestrians and n=940 bicyclists from GIDAS database, Germany was used for preselection, from which 22 pedestrian and 18 cyclist accidents were selected for reconstruction by initially using PC-Crash to calculate impact conditions, such as vehicle impact velocity, vehicle kinematic sequence and throw out distance. The impact conditions then were employed to identify the initial conditions in simulation of MADYMO reconstruction. The results show that cyclists always suffer lower injury outcomes for the same accident severity. Differences in HIC, head relative impact velocity, 3ms linear contiguous acceleration, maximum angular velocity and acceleration, contact force, throwing distance and head contact timing are shown. The differences of landing conditions in secondary impacts of pedestrians and cyclists are also identified. Injury risk curves were generated by logistic regression model for each predicting physical parameters.