84 Personenschäden
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2007 (9) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (7)
- Injury (7)
- Konferenz (7)
- Statistics (7)
- Statistik (6)
- Verletzung (6)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (5)
- Severity (accid, injury) (5)
- Accident prevention (4)
- Analyse (math) (4)
Bicyclists are minimally or unprotected road users. Their vulnerability results in a high injury risk despite their relatively low own speed. However, the actual injury situation of bicyclists has not been investigated very well so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual injury situation of bicyclists in Germany to create a basis for effective preventive measures. Technical and medical data were prospectively collected shortly after the accident at the accident scenes and medical institutions providing care for the injured. Data of injured bicyclists from 1985 to 2003 were analyzed for the following parameters: collision opponent, collision type, collision speed (km/h), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Maximum AIS (MAIS), incidence of polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >16), incidence of death (death before end of first hospital stay). 4,264 injured bicyclists were included. 55% were male and 45% female. The age was grouped to preschool age in 0.9%, 6 to 12 years in 10.8%, 13 to 17 years in 10.4%, 18 to 64 years in 64.7%, and over 64 years in 13.2%. The MAIS was 1 in 78.8%, 2 in 17.0%, 3 in 3.0%, 4 in 0.6%, 5 in 0.4%, and 6 in 0.2%. The incidence of polytrauma was 0.9%, and the incidence of death was 0.5%. The incidence of injuries to different body regions was as follows: head, 47.8%; neck, 5.2%, thorax, 21%; upper extremities, 46.3%; abdomen, 5.8%; pelvis, 11.5%, lower extremities, 62.1%. The accident location was urban in 95.2%, and rural in 4.8%. The accidents happened during daylight in 82.4%, during night in 12.2%, and during dawn/dusk in 5.3%. The road situation was as follows: straight, 27.3%; bend, 3.0%; junction, 32.0%; crossing, 26.4%; gate, 5.9%; others, 5.4%. The collision opponents were cars in 65.8%, trucks in 7.2%, bicycles in 7.4%, standing objects in 8.8%, multiple objects in 4.3%, and others in 6.5%. The collision speed was grouped <31 in 77.9%, 31-50 in 4.9%, 51-70 in 3.7%, and >70 in 1.5%. The helmet use rate was 1.5%. 68% of the registered head injuries were located in the effective helmet protection area. In bicyclists, head and extremities are at high risk for injuries. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. Remarkably, two thirds of the head injuries could have been prevented by helmets. Accidents are concentrated to crossings, junctions and gates. A significant lower mean injury severity was observed in victims using separate bicycle lanes. These results do strongly support the extension or addition of bicycle lanes and their consequent use. However, the lanes are frequently interrupted at crossings and junctions. This emphasizes also the important endangering of bicyclists coming from crossings, junctions and gates, i.e. all situations in which contact of bicyclists to motorized vehicles is possible. Redesigning junctions and bicycle traffic lanes to minimize the possibility of this dangerous contact would be preventive measures. A more consequent helmet use and use and an extension of bicycle paths for a better separation of bicyclists and motorized vehicle would be simple but very effective preventive measures.
The incidence and treatment of sternal fractures among traffic accidents are of increasing importance to ensure best possible outcomes. Analysis of technical indicators of the collision, preclinical and clinical data of patients with sterna fractures from 1985-2004 among 42,055 injured patients were assessed by an Accident Research Unit. Two time groups were categorized: 1985-1994 (A) vs. 1995-2004 (B). 267/42,055 patients (0.64%) suffered a sterna fracture. Regarding the vehicle type, the majority occurred after car accidents in 0.81% (251/31,183 pts), followed by 0.19% (5/2,633pts) driving motorbike, and 0.11% (4/3,258pts) driving a truck. 91% wore a safety belt. Only 13% of all passengers suffering a sternal fracture had an airbag on board (33/255 car/trucks), with an airbag malfunction in 18%. The steering column was deformed in 39%, the steering wheel in 36%. Cars in the recent years were significantly older (7.67-±5 years (B) vs. 5.88-±5 years (A), p=0.003). Cervical spine injuries are frequent (23% vs. 22%), followed by multiple rib fractures (14% vs. 12%) and lung injuries (12% vs. 11%). We found 9/146 (6%) and 3/121 patients (3%) with heart contusion among the 267 sternal fractures. MAIS was 2.56-±1.3 vs. 2.62-±1.3 (A vs. B, p=0.349). 18% of patients were polytraumatized, with 11.2% dying at the scene, 2.3% in the hospital. Sternal fractures occur most often in old cars to seat-belted drivers often without any airbag. Severe multiple rib fractures and lung contusion are concomitant injuries in more than 10% each indicating the severity of the crash. Over a twentyyear period, the injury severity encountered was not different with 18% polytrauma patients suffering sternal fractures.
While the number of fatal accidents is diminishing every year, there is still a need of improvement and action to prevent these deaths. Basis for this purpose has to be an analysis about the factors influencing the car crash mortality. There are various studies describing the univariate influence of several factors, but crash scenarios are too complex to be described by a single variable. The multivariate analysis respects the interference of the variables and gets so to more detailed and representative results. This multivariate analysis is based on about 2,600 cases (the data have been collected by the accident research units Hannover and Dresden (during the years 1999-2003). This paper presents a multivariate model (containing ten different variables) which detects 93% of these cases properly. This means it detects the cases as truly survived and truly death.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung gibt einen zusammenfassenden Überblick über die Leistungen des öffentlichen Rettungsdienstes in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Zeitraum 2004/05. Die wesentlichsten Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: Bundesweit werden im öffentlichen Rettungsdienst im Zeitraum 2004/05 jährlich rund 10,2 Mio. Einsätze mit insgesamt 12,1 Mio. Einsatzfahrten durchgeführt. Die Einsatzrate beträgt rund 123 Einsätze pro 1.000 Einwohner und Jahr. An einem mittleren Werktag gehen bundesweit rund 30.900 Hilfeersuchen in den Rettungsleitstellen ein. Am Wochenende sinkt die Zahl der eingehenden Hilfeersuchen auf rund 21.600 an einem mittleren Samstag und auf rund 18.900 an einem mittleren Sonntag. 46 % des Einsatzaufkommens werden vom Leitstellenpersonal als Notfall eingestuft, 56 % entfallen auf die Kategorie Krankentransport. Praktisch die Hälfte aller Notfalleinsätze werden unter Hinzunahme eines Notarztes durchgeführt (Notarzteinsatz). Zwei Drittel der Notfälle zu Verkehrsunfällen (41 %) werden von einem Notarzt bedient. Rund 85 % des Notarzteinsatzaufkommens werden im Rendezvous-System und 15 % im Stationssystem bedient. Damit besteht auch im Zeitraum 2004/05 eine deutliche Dominanz des Rendezvous-Systems gegenüber dem Stationssystem. Rund jeder 19. Notfalleinsatz gilt einem Verkehrsunfall, was bundesweit rund 250.000 Einsätzen entspricht. Die Verteilung der übrigen Einsatzanlässe bei Notfällen mit und ohne Notarztbeteiligung beträgt: Internistischer Notfall 44 %, Sonstiger Notfall (z. B. Verbrechen, Suizid, dringende Blut- und Organtransporte) 37 %, Sonstiger Unfall (z.B. Haus-, Schul- und Sportunfall) 12 % und Arbeitsunfall 1 %. Die Verteilung der Rettungsmitteltypen am bundesweiten Einsatzfahrtaufkommen im Zeitraum 2004/05 beträgt: RTW 51 %, KTW 30 %, NEF 7 %, NAW 1 % und RTH/ITH unter 1 %. Beim Einsatzfahrtaufkommen werden rund die Hälfte der Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt durchgeführt. Dies entspricht bundesweit jährlich 5,7 Mio. Einsatzfahrten unter Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt. Das Einsatzfahrtaufkommen weist im Bundesgebiet 2004/05 einen Fehlfahrtanteil von 8 % auf. Bundesweit sind dies jährlich über 996.000 Fehlfahrten. Mit zunehmender Einsatzdringlichkeit steigt der Fehlfahrtanteil. Für das Notfallaufkommen sind bundesweit rund 723.000 Fehlfahrten zu erwarten, für das KTP-Aufkommen rund 278.000. Die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 1,5 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt beträgt die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit im Mittel 12,4 Minuten. Bei Einsätzen mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt errechnet sich nach dem zuerst eingetroffenen Rettungsmittel am Einsatzort eine mittlere Hilfsfrist von 8,1 Minuten, wobei 95 % der Notfälle innerhalb von 16,4 Minuten mit einem Rettungsmittel bedient werden. Die mittlere Hilfsfrist zu Verkehrsunfällen beträgt an Straßen innerorts am Tag 7,4 Minuten und in der Nacht 8,5 Minuten, an Straßen außerorts am Tag 8,6 Minuten und in der Nacht 10,9 Minuten. Die Unterscheidung der Einsatzzeit nach Notfällen und Krankentransporten unter zwei Stunden ergibt eine mittlere Einsatzzeit von 49 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt und 52 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt. Die Transportzeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 12,3 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt liegt die Transportzeit im Mittel bei 15,9 Minuten. Die Verweilzeit am Transportziel/Wiederherstellungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 18,3 Minuten, während bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt der Vergleichswert im Mittel bei 15,0 Minuten liegt.
This study examines the severity and types of injuries sustained by child pedestrians aged 18 years and below in order to identify the body regions at greatest risk for injury in a pedestrian accident. Detailed medical diagnoses were reviewed retrospectively for 572 child pedestrians admitted to an urban pediatric trauma center with injuries during the time period from January 2001 to December 2005. Eighty percent of these children sustained AIS 2 or greater injuries, most commonly to the lower extremity (41%) and head (34%). Fortyfour percent of admitted children had more significant AIS 3 or greater injuries primarily to the head (58%), thorax (17%) and lower extremities (14%). Testing procedures to assess the child- interaction with the motor vehicle should include injury assessment for the pediatric head, thorax and lower extremities. This understanding of how child pedestrians interact with motor vehicles may provide insight into effective countermeasures with potential for implementation in vehicle designs world-wide.
The number of injuries sustained by car occupants involving the head, thorax, spine, pelvis and the upper limbs have been reduced significantly during recent years. This is probably due to better safety features in the cars, especially the availability and usage of safety belts, airbags etc. Therefore one can notice clinically a relative increase in survivors of severe frontal crashes, but many of them have injuries to the lower extremities. To verify this, we analyzed the foot and ankle injuries of front seat passengers.
The primary goal of this investigation was to determine the relative risk of traffic accidents in students. In a two year period, a survey amongst 2,325 students was carried out, and 3,645 injuries sustained by students treated at our hospital were analyzed. Moped-riding in adolescents were associated with a 23.75-fold increased risk for injury as compared to biking. Children who ride bicycles have a 2.2-fold increased risk for an injury sustained by traffic accidents compared to pedestrians. None of 50 injured bicycle riders with helmet had an AIS for head injuries of more than 2. 24 of 233 injured bicycle drivers without helmet had an AIS for head injuries of more than 2. The use of a protective helmet significantly reduced the severity of head injuries. The level of awareness towards danger and a history of previous accidents correlate with the likelihood of future accidents. Due to the severity of traffic accidents, more adequate prevention measures (wearing of bicycle helmets and better education for moped riders) are urgently needed.
The fact that ADAC Air Rescue handles approximately 4,000 road accident missions every year gave rise to set up an accident research programme for which ADAC Air Rescue provides its data. This data is of initial informational quality and will be supplemented by data from the police, experts, fire brigades as well as hospitals and forensic institutes. Although the number of cases is still rather low, certain tendencies can be identified. The causes for most accidents occur when joining or intersecting traffic, followed by speeding in road bends and tailgating. Many accidents involve HGV rear end collisions, often causing serious injuries, considerable damage and technical problems for the rescue operations. With regard to the various impact types, it has become obvious that most of the extremely serious injuries are inflicted during a passenger car side impact. In addition, access to and removal of trapped passengers is becoming more and more complicated, partly due to the increasing use of high-strength materials, and rescue operations tend to be more time consuming.
Description of road traffic related knee injuries in published investigations is very heterogeneous. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of knee injuries in real world car impacts in Germany focusing vulnerable road users (pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists) and restrained car drivers. The accident research unit analyses technical and medical data collected shortly after the accident at scene. Two different periods (years 1985-1993 and 1995-2003) were compared focusing on knee injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AISKnee) 2/3). In order to determine the influences type of collision, direction and speed as well as the injury pattern and different injury scores (AIS, MAIS, ISS) were examined. 1.794 pedestrians, 742 motorcyclists, 2.728 bicyclists and 1.116 car drivers were extracted. 2% had serious ligamentous or bony injuries in relation to all injured. The risk of injury is higher for twowheelers than for pedestrians, but knee injury severity is higher for the latter group. Overall the current knee injury risk is low and significant reduced comparing both time periods (27%, p<0,0001). Severe injuries (AISKnee 2/3) were below 1%). Improved aerodynamic design of car fronts reduced the risk for severe knee injuries significantly (p=0,0015). Highest risk of injury is for motorcycle followed by pedestrians, respectively. Knee protectors could prevent injuries by reducing local forces. The classically described dashboard injury was rarely identified. The overall injury risk for knee injuries in road traffic is lower than estimated and reduced comparing both periods. The aerodynamic shape of current cars compared to older types reduced the incidence and severity of knee injuries. Further modification and optimization of the interior and exterior design could be a proper measurement. Classic described injury mechanisms were rarely identified. It seems that the AIS is still underestimating extremity injuries and their long term results.