84 Personenschäden
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2015 (9) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (9) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (9)
- Germany (9)
- Conference (8)
- Konferenz (8)
- Injury (7)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (7)
- Verletzung (7)
- Accident reconstruction (6)
- injury) (6)
- Accident (5)
Die wesentlichsten Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: - Bundesweit werden im öffentlichen Rettungsdienst im Zeitraum 2012/13 jährlich rund 12,0 Mio. Einsätze mit insgesamt 14,3 Mio. Einsatzfahrten durchgeführt. Die Einsatzrate beträgt rund 147 Einsätze pro 1.000 Einwohner und Jahr. - 52 % des Einsatzaufkommens werden vom Leitstellenpersonal als Notfall eingestuft, 48 % entfallen auf die Kategorie Krankentransport. - Über zwei Fünftel aller Notfalleinsätze werden unter Hinzunahme eines Notarztes durchgeführt (Notarzteinsatz). Fast ein Drittel der Notfälle zu Verkehrsunfällen (29 %) wird von einem Notarzt bedient. - Rund 3,5 % der Notfalleinsätze gelten einem Verkehrsunfall, was bundesweit rund 208.000 Einsätzen entspricht. Die Verteilung der übrigen Einsatzanlässe bei Notfällen mit und ohne Notarztbeteiligung beträgt: Sonstiger Notfall 51 %, Internistischer Notfall 34 %, Sonstiger Unfall (z.B. Haus-, Schul- und Sportunfall) 11 % und Arbeitsunfall unter 1 %. - Die Verteilung der Rettungsmitteltypen am bundesweiten Einsatzfahrtaufkommen im Zeitraum 2012/13 beträgt: RTW 57 %, KTW 24 %, NEF 18 %, NAW und RTH/ITH unter 1 %. - Beim Einsatzfahrtaufkommen werden rund die Hälfte der Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt durchgeführt. Dies entspricht bundesweit jährlich 8,4 Mio. Einsatzfahrten unter Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt. - Die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 2,5 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte bei der Anfahrt liegt die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit im Mittel bei 14,5 Minuten. - Bei Einsätzen mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt errechnet sich nach dem zuerst eingetroffenen Rettungsmittel am Einsatzort eine mittlere Hilfsfrist von 8,4 Minuten, wobei 95 % der Notfälle innerhalb von 16,9 Minuten mit einem Rettungsmittel bedient werden. - Die Unterscheidung der Einsatzzeit nach Notfällen und Krankentransporten unter zwei Stunden ergibt eine mittlere Einsatzzeit von 52 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt und 56 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt.
Injury severity of e.g. pedestrians or bikers after crashes with cars that are reversing is almost unknown. However, crash victims of these injuries can frequently be seen in emergency departments and account for a large amount of patients every year. The objective of this study is to analyze injury severity of patients that were crashed into by reversing cars. The Hannover Medical School local accident research unit prospectively documented 43,000 road traffic accidents including 234 crashes involving reversing cars. Injury severity including the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) was analyzed as well as the location of the accident. As a result 234 accidents were included into this study. Pedestrians were injured in 141 crashes followed by 70 accidents involving bikers. The mean age of all crash victims was 57 -± 23 years. Most injuries took place on straight stretches (n = 81) as well as parking areas (n = 59), entries (n = 36) or crossroads (n = 24). The AIS of the lower extremities was highest followed by the upper extremities. The AIS of the neck was lowest. The mean MAIS was 1.3 -± 0.6. The paper concludes that the lower extremities show the highest risk to become injured during accidents with reversing cars. However, the risk of severe injuries is likely low.
Ruptures and dissections of the thoracic and abdominal aortic vessel caused by traffic accidents are rare but potentially life-threatening injuries. They can occur by blunt trauma via seat belt or dashboard injury. The study aimed at evaluating the overall mortality, morbidity, neurological disorders, and differences in operative procedures of open repair and stenting. It shows that, with a change and improvement in diagnostic tools and surgical approach, mortality and morbidity of blunt aortic injuries were significantly reduced. Still an immediate life-threatening injury early diagnosis via multiple-slice and scans and surgical repair with minimally invasive stents showed excellent short-time results for selected patients.
In North America, frontal crash tests in both the regulatory environment and consumer-based safety rating schemes have historically been based on full-width and moderate-overlap (40%) vehicle to barrier impacts. The combination of improved seat-belt technologies, notably belt tensioning and load limiting systems, together with advanced airbags, has proven very effective in providing occupant protection in these crash modes. Recently, however, concern has been raised over the contribution of narrower frontal impacts, involving primarily the vehicle corners, to the incidence of fatality and serious injury as a result of the potential for increased occupant compartment intrusion and performance limitations of current restraint systems. Drawing on data documented in the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS)/ Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) for calendar years 1999 to 2012, the present study examines the characteristics of existing and proposed corner crash test configurations, and the nature of real-world collisions that approximate the test environments. In this analysis, particular emphasis is placed on crash pulse information extracted from vehicle-based event data recorders (EDR's).
Analysis of pedestrian leg contacts and distribution of contact points across the vehicle front
(2015)
Determining the risk to pedestrians that are impacted by areas of the front bumper not currently regulated in type-approval testing requires an understanding of the target population and the injury risk posed by the edges of the bumper. National statistics show that approximately 10% of all accident casualties are pedestrians, with 20% to 30% of these pedestrian casualties being killed or seriously injured. However, the contact position across the front of the bumper is not recorded in national statistics and so in-depth accident databases (OTS, UK and GIDAS, Germany) were used to examine injury risk in greater detail. The results showed that some injury types and severities of injuries appear to peak around the bumper edges. Although there are sometimes inconsistencies in the data, generally there is no evidence to suggest that the edges of the bumper are less likely to be contacted or cause injury.
This study aimed at prediction of long bone fractures and assessment of lower extremity injury mechanisms in real world passenger car to pedestrian collision. For this purpose, two pedestrian accident cases with detail recorded lower limb injuries were reconstructed via combining MBS (Multi-body system) and FE (Finite element) methods. The code of PC Crash was used to determine the boundary conditions before collision, and then MBS models were used to reproduce the pedestrian kinematics and injuries during crash. Furthermore, a validated lower limb FE model was chosen to conduct reconstruction of injuries and prediction of long bone fracture via physical parameters of von Mises stress and bending moment. The injury outcomes from simulations were compared with hospital recorded injury data and the same long bone fracture patterns and positions can be observed. Moreover, the calculated long bone fracture tolerance corresponded to the outcome from cadaver tests. The result shows that FE model is capable to reproduce the dynamic injury process and is an effective tool to predict the risk of long bone fractures.
This study aimed at developing an injury estimation algorithm for AACN technologies for Germany and compared them to findings based on Japanese data. The data to build and to verify the algorithm was obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS) and split into a training and a validation dataset. Significant input variables and the generalized linear regression model to predict severe injuries (ISS>15) were selected to maximize area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Probit regression with the input parameter multiple impact, delta v, seatbelt use and impact direction gave the largest AUC of 0.91. Sensitivity of the algorithm was validated at 90% and specificity at 76% for an injury risk threshold of 2%. It appears that no major differences between Japan and Germany exist for injury estimation based on delta v and impact direction. However, far side impact and multiple crash events appear to be associated with a larger risk increase in the German data.
This study aimed at comparing head Wrap Around Distance (WAD) of Vulnerable Road User (VRU) obtained from the German in-depth Accident Database (GIDAS), the China in-depth Accident Database (CIDAS) and the Japanese in-depth Accident Database (ITARDA micro). Cumulative distribution of WAD of pedestrian and cyclist were obtained for each database (AIS2+) showing that WAD of cyclists were larger than the ones of pedestrians. Comparing three regions, the 50%tile WAD of GIDAS was larger than that of both Asian accident databases. Using linear regression that might predict WAD of pedestrians and cyclists from Impact speed and VRU height, WADs were calculated to be 206cm/219cm (Pedestrian/Cyclist) for GIDAS, 170cm/192cm for CIDAS and 211cm/235cm for ITARDA. In addition, this study may be helpful for reconsideration of WAD measurement alignment between accident reconstruction and test procedures.
Pedestrians represent about 20% of the overall fatalities in Europe- road traffic accidents. In this paper a methodology is proposed to understand why the numbers are so high, especially in the south of Europe and particularly in Portugal, . First a detailed statistical analysis using Ordinal Logistic Regression model (OLR) was applied to the gathered data from all Portuguese accidents with victims in the period 2010-2012. In a second stage accident reconstruction computational techniques using pedestrian biomechanical models are used to evaluate the accident conditions that lead to the injuries, such as the speed and the impact location. For biomechanical injury criterions, the AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale), the HIC (Head Injury Criterion) and other injury criterions based on the resulting accelerations in the pedestrian's body are used. The statistical model reported that there were several predictors that significantly influenced the pedestrian injury severity in the event of a road accident, such as Pedestrian's age, Pedestrian's gender, Vehicle Design/Category or Driver's gender. The use of injury scales and biomechanical criterions in in-depth investigation of road accidents, such as AIS, can significantly improve the quality of the reconstruction process.