Filtern
Schlagworte
- Conference (3)
- Konferenz (3)
- Safety belt (2)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (2)
- Severity (accid, injury) (2)
- Sicherheitsgurt (2)
- Accident (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Anfahrversuch (1)
- Benutzung (1)
- Brustkorb (1)
- Car (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Damage (1)
- Data acquisition (1)
- Data bank (1)
- Datenbank (1)
- Datenerfassung (1)
- Fahranfänger (1)
- Fatality (1)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (1)
- Head on collision (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Impact test (1)
- Injury (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Man (1)
- Mann (1)
- PKW (1)
- Passive safety system (1)
- Pssives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Recently qualified driver (1)
- Reconstruction (accid) (1)
- Sachschaden (1)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (1)
- Severity (accid (1)
- Simulation (1)
- Statistics (1)
- Statistik (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Thorax (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Unfall (1)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Use (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verletzung (1)
- Verletzung) (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- injury) (1)
Who doesn't wear seat belts?
(2009)
Using real world accident data, seat belts were estimated to be 61% effective at preventing fatalities, and 32% effective at preventing serious injuries. They were most effective for drivers with an airbag. Seat belts were estimated as having prevented 57,000 fatalities and 213,000 seriously injured casualties in the UK since 1983. Seat belt legislation was estimated to have prevented 31,000 fatalities and 118,000 seriously injured casualties. A future increase in effective seat belt wearing rate (which takes into account seating position) in the UK from 92.5% to 93% may prevent casualties valued at a societal cost of over -£18 million per year. To target a seat belt campaign, the question "who doesn"t wear seat belts?" must be answered. Seat belt wearing rates and the number of unbelted casualties were analysed. It was primarily young adult males who didn"t wear seat belts, and they made up the majority of unbelted fatalities and seriously injured casualties.
Impact severity is a fundamental measure for all in-depth crash investigation projects. One methodology used in the UK is based on the US Calspan software package CRASH3. The UK- in-depth crash investigation studies routinely use AiDamage3 a software package which is based on an updated version of the original CRASH3 algorithm, including enhancements to the vehicle stiffness coefficients. Real world accident-damaged vehicles are measured and their crush is correlated with a library of stiffness coefficients. These measurements are then used, along with other parameters, to calculate the crash energy and equivalent changes of velocity of the vehicles (delta-v), which is a measure of the impact severity. UK in-depth accident studies routinely validate the crash severity methodologies applied as the vehicle fleet changes. This is achieved by analysing crash test data and using the appropriate residual crush damage and other inputs to AiDamage3 and checking the program- outputs with the known crash severity parameters. This procedure checks, at least in part, the default stiffness values in the data libraries and the reconstruction methods used.
The following paper presents the nature and mechanism of injuries sustained in frontal impacts, focusing on car to car impacts. It was found that the body regions most frequently sustaining severe to fatal injuries were the legs and the thorax. The nature and mechanism of the injury sustained was investigated only for the thorax injuries, due to their potentially life threatening nature. The analysis revealed that the most frequent cause of the injury recorded was the seatbelt for low severity injuries and the front structure of the vehicle for higher severity injuries. An analysis of the effect of load limiter technology in the restraint system showed that the proportion of occupants who sustained "no thorax injury" did not increase when a load limiter was fitted to the restraint system. However, a decrease in the "organ" and "organ and skeletal" injuries was observed in the load limiter sample. Sample size and variation mean that these findings are not conclusive.