Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Prüfverfahren (9)
- Test method (9)
- Driver assistance system (8)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (8)
- Fußgänger (7)
- Pedestrian (7)
- Radfahrer (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Antikollisionssystem (5)
- Collision (5)
- Cyclist (5)
- Safety (5)
- Sicherheit (5)
- Active safety system (4)
- Automatic (4)
- Automatisch (4)
- Deutschland (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Germany (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Lkw (4)
- Versuch (4)
- Zusammenstoß (4)
- Accident (3)
- Analyse (math) (3)
- Analysis (math) (3)
- Automatische Notbremsung (3)
- Braking (3)
- Bremsung (3)
- Collision avoidance system (3)
- Fahrstabilität (3)
- Fahrzeug (3)
- Forschungsbericht (3)
- Lorry (3)
- Motorcycle (3)
- Motorrad (3)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (3)
- Test (3)
- Unfall (3)
- Vehicle (3)
- Vehicle handling (3)
- Vehicle regulations (3)
- Abbiegen (2)
- Accident prevention (2)
- Active safety (2)
- Aktive Sicherheit (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Autonomes Fahren (2)
- Autonomous driving (2)
- Blind spot (veh) (2)
- Conference (2)
- Detection (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Konferenz (2)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (2)
- Nacht (2)
- Night (2)
- Research report (2)
- Richtlinien (2)
- Simulation (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Speed (2)
- Steering (process) (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Toter Winkel (2)
- Turning (2)
- Unfallverhütung (2)
- Warning (2)
- Accuracy (1)
- Active Safety System (1)
- Anfahrversuch (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Ankündigung (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Autonomous Emergency Braking (1)
- Autonomous emergency braking (1)
- Autonomous emerhency braking (1)
- Bewertung (1)
- Bicycle (1)
- Bicycle brake (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Cause (1)
- Collision Avoidance System (1)
- Collisison avoidance system (1)
- Cost benefit analysis (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Deceleration (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Development (1)
- Driver (1)
- Driver Assistance System (1)
- Driver information (1)
- Driving (veh) (1)
- Dummy (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Entdeckung (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Error (1)
- Europa (1)
- Europe (1)
- Evaluation (assessment) (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrdynamik (1)
- Fahrer (1)
- Fahrerinformation (1)
- Fahrrad (1)
- Fahrradbremse (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrzeugabstand (1)
- Fahrzeugführung (1)
- Fahrzeugsicherheit (1)
- Fatality (1)
- Fehler (1)
- Genauigkeit (1)
- Gesetzgebung (1)
- Impact test (veh) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Messung (1)
- Modification (1)
- Moving (1)
- Official approval (1)
- On the right (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Radblockierung (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechts (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Research Report (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Rutschen (1)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Severity (accid (1)
- Severity (accid, injury) (1)
- Skidding (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Technische Vorschriften [Kraftfahrzeug] (1)
- Traffic safety (1)
- Truck (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vehicle Regulations (1)
- Vehicle Spacing (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verkehrssicherheit (1)
- Verletzung) (1)
- Verzögerung (1)
- Veränderung (1)
- Vorschrift (1)
- Warnung (1)
- Wheel locking (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- driving dynamics (1)
- injury) (1)
- trailer (1)
- vehicle safety (1)
Institut
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.
Abbiegeunfälle mit Kollisionen zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Güterkraftfahrzeugen und Fahrrädern haben in der Regel schwerwiegende Folgen für den ungeschützten Verkehrsteilnehmer. In der Vergangenheit wurde durch eine steigende Anzahl von Spiegeln das individuelle Sichtfeld des Lkw-Fahrers vergrößert und die Sicherheit für ungeschützte Verkehrsteilnehmer durch den Seitenunterfahrschutz verbessert. Da Abbiegeunfälle trotz der Vielzahl an Spiegeln auch heute noch geschehen, gleichzeitig aber Fahrerassistenzsysteme Einzug in viele Fahrzeugklassen gehalten haben, liegt es nahe, derartige Systeme für die Verhinderung von Abbiegeunfällen zu nutzen. Um entsprechende Systementwicklungen fördern zu können oder aber auch Systeme vorschreiben zu können, sind Anforderungen und passende Testmethoden für Abbiegeassistenzsysteme erforderlich. Ziel der BASt war es, solche Anforderungen und ein mögliches Testverfahren hierfür zu entwickeln. Ausgehend von Analysen des Unfallgeschehens wurden charakteristische Parameter und Begleitumstände von Unfällen zwischen Fahrrädern und rechtsabbiegenden Lkw identifiziert. Aus fahrdynamischen Überlegungen folgt bei den gegebenen Parametern, dass nur eine frühe, aber niederschwellige Fahrerinformation eine wirkungsvolle Assistenzfunktion zur Verhinderung der Unfälle sein kann. Für automatische Bremsungen gibt es bisher noch zu wenig Erfahrungen im Feld, und klassische, hochschwellige, aber sehr spät erfolgende Warnsignale würden durch die dann noch verstreichende Reaktionszeit keine rechtzeitige Bremsung des Lkw-Fahrers mehr hervorrufen. Basierend auf dem identifizierten Parameterraum, der zum komfortablen Anhalten erforderlichen Zeit und einem geeigneten Kinematikmodell lassen sich die räumlichen Bereiche um den Lkw definieren, in dem eine Umfelderkennung den Fahrradfahrer detektieren können muss, damit das Informationssignal durch das Assistenzsystem an den Lkw-Fahrer rechtzeitig ausgegeben wird. Aktuell wird davon ausgegangen, dass ein Abbiegeassistenzsystem, das die hier beschriebenen Prüfungen besteht, einen sehr positiven Einfluss auf das Unfallgeschehen zwischen rechtsabbiegenden Lkw und Fahrrädern haben wird.
Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.
A methodology to derive precision requirements for automatic emergency braking (AEB) test procedures
(2015)
AEB Systems are becoming important to increase traffic safety. Test procedures in testing for consumer information, manufacturer self-certification and technical regulations are used to ensure a certain minimum performance of these systems. Consequently, test robustness, test efficiency and finally test cost become increasingly important. The key driver for testing effort and test costs is the required repeatable accuracy in a test design - the higher the accuracy, the higher effort and test costs. On the other hand, the performance of active safety systems depends on time discretization in the environment perception and other sub-systems: for instance, typical sensors supply information with a cycle time of 50 - 150 ms. Time discretization results in an inherent spread of system performance, even if the test conditions are perfectly equal. The proposed paper shows a methodology to derive requirements for a test setup (e.g. test repeats, use of driving robots, ...) as function of AEB system generation and rating method (e.g. Euro NCAP points awarded, pass/fail, ...). While the methodology itself is applicable to AEB pedestrian and AEB Car-Car scenarios, due to the lack of sufficient test data for AEB Car-Car, the focus of this paper is on AEB pedestrian scenarios. A simulation model for the performance of AEB Pedestrian systems allows for the systematic variation of the discretization time as well as test condition accuracy. This model is calibrated with test results of 4 production vehicles for AEB Pedestrian, all fully tested by BASt according to current Euro NCAP test protocols. Selected parameters to observe the accuracy of the test setup in case of pedestrian AEB is the calculated impact position of pedestrian on the vehicle front (as if no braking would have occurred), and the test vehicle speed accuracy. These variable was shown in real tests to be repeatable in the range of ± 5 cm and ± 0,25 km/h, respectively, with a fully robotized state of the art test setup. The sensitivity of AEB performance (measured in achieved speed reduction as well as overall rating result according to current Euro NCAP rating methods) towards discretization and the sensitivity of performance towards test accuracy then is compared to identify economic yet robust test concepts. These comparisons show that the available repeatability accuracy of current test setups is more than sufficient for today's AEB system capabilities. Time discretization problems dominate the performance spread especially in test scenarios with a limited pedestrian dummy reveal time (e.g. child behind obstruction, running adult scenarios with low car speeds). This would allow to increase test tolerances to decrease test cost. A methodology which allows to derive the required tolerances in active safety tests might be valuable especially for NCAPs of emerging countries that do not have the necessary equipment (e.g. driving robots, positioning units) available for the full-scale and high tolerance EuroNCAP active safety procedures yet still want to rate active safety systems, thus improving the global safety.
Accidents between right turning trucks and straight riding cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity is much higher than in other accidents. The situation is critical especially due to the fact that, in spite of the six mirrors that are mandatory for ensuring a minimum field of sight for the truck drivers, cyclists in some situations cannot be seen or are not seen by the driver. Either the cyclist is overlooked or is in a blind spot area that results from the turning manoeuvre of the truck and its articulation if it is a truck trailer or truck semitrailer combination. At present driver assistance systems are discussed that can support the driver in the turning situation by giving a warning when cyclists are riding parallel to the truck just before or in the turning manoeuvre. Such systems would generally bear a high potential to avoid accidents of right turning trucks and cyclists no matter if they ride on the road or on a parallel bicycle path. However, performance requirements for such turning assist systems or even test procedures do not exist yet. This paper describes the development of a testing method and requirements for turning assist systems for trucks. The starting point of each development of test procedures is an analysis of accident data. A general study of accident figures determines the size of the problem. In-depth accident data is evaluated case by case in order to find out which are representative critical situations. These findings serve to determine characteristic parameters (e.g. boundary conditions, trajectories of truck and cyclist, speeds during the critical situation, impact points). Based on these parameters and technical feasibility by current sensor and actuator technology, representative test scenarios and pass/fail-criteria are defined. The outcome of the study is an overview of the accident situation between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists in Germany as well as a corresponding test procedure for driver assistance systems that at this first stage will be informing or warning the driver. This test procedure is meant to be the basis for an international discussion on introducing turning assist systems in vehicle regulations.
Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.
It is commonly agreed that active safety will have a significant impact on reducing accident figures for pedestrians and probably also bicyclists. However, chances and limitations for active safety systems have only been derived based on accident data and the current state of the art, based on proprietary simulation models. The objective of this article is to investigate these chances and limitations by developing an open simulation model. This article introduces a simulation model, incorporating accident kinematics, driving dynamics, driver reaction times, pedestrian dynamics, performance parameters of different autonomous emergency braking (AEB) generations, as well as legal and logical limitations. The level of detail for available pedestrian accident data is limited. Relevant variables, especially timing of the pedestrian appearance and the pedestrian's moving speed, are estimated using assumptions. The model in this article uses the fact that a pedestrian and a vehicle in an accident must have been in the same spot at the same time and defines the impact position as a relevant accident parameter, which is usually available from accident data. The calculations done within the model identify the possible timing available for braking by an AEB system as well as the possible speed reduction for different accident scenarios as well as for different system configurations. The simulation model identifies the lateral impact position of the pedestrian as a significant parameter for system performance, and the system layout is designed to brake when the accident becomes unavoidable by the vehicle driver. Scenarios with a pedestrian running from behind an obstruction are the most demanding scenarios and will very likely never be avoidable for all vehicle speeds due to physical limits. Scenarios with an unobstructed person walking will very likely be treatable for a wide speed range for next generation AEB systems.
The ASSESS project is a collaborative project that develops test procedures for pre-crash safety systems like Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). One key criterion for the effectiveness of e.g. AEB is reduction in collision speed compared to baseline scenarios without AEB. The speed reduction for a given system can only be determined in real world tests that will end with a collision. Soft targets that are crashable up to velocities of 80 km/h are state of the art for these assessments, but ordinary balloon cars are usually stationary targets. The ASSESS project goes one step further and defines scenarios with moving targets. These scenarios define vehicle speeds of up to 100 km/h, different collision scenarios and relative collision speeds of up to 80km/h. This paper describes the development of a propulsion system for a soft target that aims to be used with these demanding scenario specifications. The Federal Highway Research Institute- (BASt-) approach to move the target is a self-driving small cart. The cart is controlled either by a driver (open-loop control via remote-control) or by a computer (closed-loop control). Its weight is limited to achieve a good crashability without damages to the test vehicle. To the extent of our knowledge BASt- approach is unique in this field (other carts cannot move at such high velocities or are not crashable). This paper describes in detail the challenges and solutions that were found both for the mechanical construction and the implementation of the control and safety system. One example for the mechanical challenges is e.g. the position of the vehicle- center of gravity (CG). An optimum compromise had to be found between a low CG oriented to the front of the vehicle (good for driveability) and a high CG oriented to the rear of the vehicle (good for crashability). The soft target itself which is also developed within the ASSESS project will not be covered in detail as this is work of a project partner. Publications on this will follow. The paper also shows first test results, describes current limitations and gives an outlook. It is expected that the presented test tools for AEB and other pre-crash safety systems is introduced in the future into consumer testing (NCAP) as well as regulatory testing.
Fahrdynamikregelungen für Zweispurfahrzeuge haben in der letzten Dekade stark dazu beigetragen, die Getötetenzahlen im Straßenverkehr auf einen seit dem zweiten Weltkrieg nicht gekannten Tiefststand zu senken. Die Getötetenzahlen bei Einspurfahrzeugen, speziell Motorrädern, sind im selben Zeitraum bei weitem nicht im selben Maße gesunken. Zwar existieren für Motorräder ABS-Bremssysteme und Antriebsschlupfregelungen, aber darüber hinaus gehende technische Lösungen zur Stabilisierung des Motorrads sind nicht bekannt. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, abzuschätzen, ob Fahrdynamikregelungen für Motorräder einerseits technisch möglich sind und andererseits zur deutlichen Senkung der Unfallzahlen von Motorrädern beitragen können. Aus einer Analyse des Unfallgeschehens wurden für zukünftige Fahrdynamikregelungen ungebremste Kurvenunfälle durch ßberschreiten der maximalen Querbeschleunigung und durch Reibwertsprünge (wie beispielsweise glatte Fahrbahnabschnitte, Sand, ßl, Bitumen und dergleichen) als relevante Unfalltypen identifiziert und als Hauptszenarien für potenzielle Fahrdynamikregelsysteme herangezogen. Ihr Anteil am Unfallgeschehen von Motorrädern wurde mit etwa 4 bis 8 % abgeschätzt. Dazu wurden Motorradexperten nach ihren bisher erlebten Unfällen befragt und die Unfälle einer großen Unfalldatenbank im Detail untersucht. Die beiden Grundszenarien wurden mittels Simulationen und Fahrversuchen hinsichtlich besonderer Erkennungsmerkmale untersucht. Dabei erwies sich die Schwimmwinkelgeschwindigkeit des Fahrzeugs als robustes Kriterium zur Erkennung beginnender ungebremster Kurvenunfälle. ßhnlich große Schwimmwinkelgeschwindigkeiten wurden bei einer Vielzahl von unkritischen Fahrten nicht gefunden. Die Beeinflussbarkeit der untersuchten kritischen Fahrsituationen wurde mit Hilfe eines Modells für die Fahrzeugbewegung während der kritischen Fahrsituationen abgeschätzt. Eine Beeinflussung des Rollmoments zum Aufrichten des Fahrzeugs ist nicht möglich, da weder die Seitenkraft am Reifen in diesen Szenarien, wie es erforderlich wäre, erhöht werden kann, noch realistisch dimensionierte Kreisel diese Stabilisierung erbringen können. Eine Beeinflussung der Schwimmbewegung ist hingegen technisch sinnvoll durch Veränderung der Seitenkräfte über Bremsschlupf an den Rädern darstellbar. Auf diese Weise kann eine Destabilisierung des gleitenden Fahrzeugs beim ßbergang von Niedrig zurück auf Hochreibwert vermieden werden. Damit lässt sich jedoch nur eine kleine Untermenge der genannten Unfallszenarien günstig beeinflussen, sodass als Ergebnis dieser Untersuchung das Potenzial von Fahrdynamikregelungen als recht gering einzuschätzen ist.