Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Sprache
- Englisch (16) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Prüfverfahren (7)
- Test method (7)
- Driver assistance system (6)
- Fußgänger (6)
- Pedestrian (6)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (5)
- Radfahrer (5)
- Active safety system (4)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (4)
- Automatic (4)
- Automatisch (4)
- Collision (4)
- Cyclist (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (4)
- Safety (4)
- Sicherheit (4)
- Antikollisionssystem (3)
- Braking (3)
- Bremsung (3)
- Zusammenstoß (3)
- Accident (2)
- Analyse (math) (2)
- Analysis (math) (2)
- Anti locking device (2)
- Automatische Notbremsung (2)
- Autonomes Fahren (2)
- Autonomous driving (2)
- Collision avoidance system (2)
- Conference (2)
- Fahrstabilität (2)
- Fahrzeug (2)
- Geschwindigkeit (2)
- Konferenz (2)
- Lenken (Fahrzeug) (2)
- Lkw (2)
- Lorry (2)
- Motorcycle (2)
- Motorrad (2)
- Richtlinien (2)
- Simulation (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Speed (2)
- Steering (process) (2)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Technology (2)
- Unfall (2)
- Vehicle (2)
- Vehicle handling (2)
- Vehicle regulations (2)
- Abbiegen (1)
- Accident prevention (1)
- Accuracy (1)
- Active safety (1)
- Aktive Sicherheit (1)
- Anfahrversuch (1)
- Anhänger (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Antiblockiereinrichtung (1)
- Antiblockiersystem (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Autonomous emergency braking (1)
- Autonomous emerhency braking (1)
- Bewertung (1)
- Bicyclist (1)
- Blind spot (veh) (1)
- Cause (1)
- Collisison avoidance system (1)
- Cost benefit analysis (1)
- Crossing the road (pedestrian) (1)
- Daylight (1)
- Detection (1)
- Detektion (1)
- Deutschland (1)
- Development (1)
- Driver (1)
- Driving (veh) (1)
- Dummy (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Europa (1)
- Europe (1)
- Evaluation (assessment) (1)
- Fahrassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrbahnüberquerung (1)
- Fahrdynamik (1)
- Fahrer (1)
- Fahrstreifenwechsel (1)
- Fahrzeugführung (1)
- Fahrzeugsicherheit (1)
- Fatality (1)
- Genauigkeit (1)
- Germany (1)
- Gesetzgebung (1)
- Impact test (veh) (1)
- In Bewegung (1)
- Intersection (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Lane changing (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Moving (1)
- Nacht (1)
- Night (1)
- Official approval (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Robot (1)
- Roboter (1)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung (1)
- Schweregrad /Unfall (1)
- Sensor (1)
- Severity (accid (1)
- Severity (accid, injury) (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Tageslicht (1)
- Test (1)
- Toter Winkel (1)
- Turning (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Unfallverhütung (1)
- United Kingdom (1)
- Ursache (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verhütung (1)
- Verletzung) (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (1)
- Zulassung (tech) (1)
- Zusammenstoss (1)
- driving dynamics (1)
- injury) (1)
- trailer (1)
- vehicle safety (1)
Institut
Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.
It is well known that most accidents with pedestrians are caused by the driver not being alert or misinterpreting the situation. For that reason advanced forward looking safety systems have a high potential to improve safety for this group of vulnerable road users. Active pedestrian protection systems combine reduction of impact speed by driver warning and/or autonomous braking with deployment of protective devices shortly before the imminent impact. According to the Euro NCAP roadmap the Autonomous Emergency Braking system tests for Pedestrians Protection will be set in force from 2016 onwards. Various projects and organisations in Europe are developing performance tests and assessment procedures as accompanying measures to the Euro NCAP initiative. To provide synthesised input to Euro NCAP so-called Harmonisation Platforms (HP-) have been established. Their main goal is to foster exchange of information on key subjects, thereby generating a clear overview of similarities and differences on the approaches chosen and, on that basis, recommend on future test procedures. In this paper activities of the Harmonisation Platform 2 on the development of Test Equipment are presented. For the testing targets that mimic humans different sensing technologies are required. A first set of specifications for pedestrian targets and the propulsion systems as collected by Harmonisation Platform 2 are presented together with a first evaluation for a number of available tools.
PROSPECT (Proactive Safety for Pedestrians and Cyclists) is a collaborative research project involving most of the relevant partners from the automotive industry (including important active safety vehicle manufacturers and tier-1 suppliers) as well as academia and independent test labs, funded by the European Commission in the Horizon 2020 research program. PROSPECT's primary goal is the development of novel active safety functions, to be finally demonstrated to the public in three prototype vehicles. A sound benefit assessment of the prototype vehicle's functionality requires a broad testing methodology which goes beyond what has currently been used. Since PROSPECT functions are developed to prevent accidents in intersections, a key aspect of the test methodology is the reproduction of natural driving styles on the test track with driving robots. For this task, data from a real driving study with subjects in a suburb of Munich, Germany was used. Further data from Barcelona will be available soon. The data suggests that intersection crossing can be broken down into five phases, two phases with straight deceleration / acceleration, one phase with constant radius and speed turning, and two phases where the bend is imitated or ended. In these latter phases, drivers mostly combine lateral and longitudinal accelerations and drive what is called a clothoid, a curve with curvature proportional to distance travelled, in order to change lateral acceleration smoothly rather than abrupt. The data suggests that the main parameter of the clothoid, the ratio distance travelled to curvature, is mostly constant during the intersections. This parameter together with decelerations and speeds allows the generation of synthetic robot program files for a reproduction of natural driving styles using robots, allowing a much greater reproducibility than what is possible with human test drivers. First tests show that in principle it is possible to use the driving robots for vehicle control in that manner; a challenge currently is the control performance of the robot system in terms of speed control, but it is anticipated that this problem will be solved soon. Further elements of the PROSPECT test methodology are a standard intersection marking to be implemented on the test track which allows the efficient testing of all PROSPECT test cases, standard mobile and light obstruction elements for quick reproduction of obstructions of view, and a concept for tests in realistic surroundings. First tests using the PROSPECT test methodology will be conducted over the summer 2017, and final tests of the prototype vehicles developed within PROSPECT will be conducted in early 2018
The term test procedure refers to a method that describes how a system has to be tested to identify and assess specific behavior or properties by experiments. This also includes the specification of required tools, equipment, boundary conditions, and evaluation methods. Test procedures are an essential tool to check whether desired product properties are present, which of course also applies to the development of driver assistance systems. In addition to development and release testing that mainly is performed by the vehicle or system manufacturer, there are tests with the purpose of an independent product testing that are conducted by external test organizations. These tests are needed for vehicle type approval (for admission to a specific market), in the context of applying the standard for functional safety (in both cases mainly executed by technical services (being accredited as certification laboratory)) or for customer information purposes (by a test institute for consumer protection). The focus of this chapter is these "external" test methods. After a taxonomy of test procedures, the differences between legislation (type approval) and consumer testing are highlighted. Typical tests and the associated test setup, tools, and assessment criteria are discussed, and an outlook toward testing in the near and mid-future is given.
Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.
Motorcycling is a fascinating kind of transportation. While the riders' direct exposure to the environment and the unique driving dynamics are essential to this fascination, they both cause a risk potential which is several times higher than when driving a car. This chapter gives a detailed introduction to the fundamentals of motorcycle dynamics and shows how its peculiarities and limitations place high demands on the layout of dynamics control systems, especially when cornering. The basic principles of dynamic stabilization and directional control are addressed along with four characteristic modes of instability (capsize, wobble, weave, and kickback). Special attention is given to the challenges of braking (brake force distribution, dynamic over-braking, kinematic instability, and brake steer torque induced righting behavior). It is explained how these challenges are addressed by state-of-the-art brake, traction, and suspension control systems in terms of system layout and principles of function. It is illustrated how the integration of additional sensors " essentially roll angle assessment " enhances the cornering performance in all three categories, fostering a trend to higher system integration levels. An outlook on potential future control systems shows exemplarily how the undesired righting behavior when braking in curves can be controlled, e.g., by means of a so-called brake steer torque avoidance mechanism (BSTAM), forming the basis for predictive brake assist (PBA) or even autonomous emergency braking (AEB). Finally, the very limited potential of brake and chassis control to stabilize yaw and roll motion during unbraked cornering accidents is regarded, closing with a promising glance at roll stabilization through a pair of gimbaled gyroscopes.