Erhebungen am Unfallort
(1983)
Der Bericht einer Projektgruppe bei der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen beschreibt einleitend das Projekt "Unfallerhebung Hannover (uh)". Weitere Spezialerhebungen aus dem Bereich der empirischen Unfallforschung werden beispielhaft dargestellt und mit der Unfallerhebung Hannover verglichen. Der Vergleich dient der Herausarbeitung spezieller Eigenschaften und Möglichkeiten dieses Projektes und der Beurteilung der Aussagefähigkeit des gewonnenen Datenmaterials. Unter Berücksichtigung bereits vorhandener Daten aus anderen Erhebungen und des Datenbedarfs der Unfallforschung wird die Notwendigkeit von Erhebungen am Unfallort erörtert und alternative Konzepte hierfür entwickelt. Abschließend wird eine neue nutzungsorientierte Konzeption für ein zukünftiges Projekt zur Datengewinnung durch Erhebung am Unfallort vorgeschlagen.
Der Vergleich der Ergebnisse aus drei von der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) durchgeführten Studien ergab, dass keiner der bisher gewählten Ansätze optimal erscheint, um als Grundlage für eine langfristige Untersuchungsreihe zu schwerstverletzten Unfallopfern zu dienen. Dagegen verspricht die Verknüpfung der Daten des Traumaregisters der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie mit polizeilichen Unfalldaten einen Fortschritt. Somit könnten die Primärdaten zweier bereits etablierter Dokumentationssysteme für die künftige Untersuchung der Schwer(st)verletztenproblematik effizient genutzt werden. Zu einem ähnlichen Ergebnis kommt eine aktuelle Studie der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Hochschule Aachen und der Universitätsklinik Aachen aus dem Jahr 2009. Hierdurch wurde der viel versprechende Erkenntnisgewinn zur Verletzungsschwere und Verletzungsmustern belegt, der durch eine Zusammenführung der Daten der laut amtlicher Unfallstatistik Schwerstverletzten mit denjenigen der nach medizinischen Krankenakten ermittelten schweren Unfälle bestätigt.
Die amtliche Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik kann nur in begrenztem Umfang Informationen zu Unfallentstehung, Unfallablauf sowie zu den zugrunde liegenden Verletzungsmechanismen bereitstellen. Verbleibende Informationslücken lassen sich durch spezielle Erhebungsteams schließen, die Verkehrsunfälle nach wissenschaftlichen Aspekten dokumentieren. Hierzu unterhalten das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen seit 30 Jahren ein Forschungsprojekt zur Unfalldatenerhebung an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover. Seit 1999 erfolgt eine Kooperation mit der Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik (FAT), die ein weiteres Erhebungsteam an der Technischen Universität Dresden unterhält. Die Unfalldaten gehen in die gemeinsame GIDAS-Datenbank ein, aus der sich umfassende Informationen zu den breit gefächerten Forschungsfeldern "Passive und aktive Fahrzeugsicherheit", "Verkehrs- und Rettungsmedizin" und "Straßenbezogene Sicherheitsfragen" gewinnen lassen. In der Zukunft werden Unfallvermeidungsstrategien und Unfallursachenprophylaxe im Vordergrund einer prospektiven Unfallforschung stehen. Die Daten werden auch in Zukunft für die weitere Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit einen bedeutenden Beitrag leisten.
Durch chemisch-toxikologische Analysen von Blut- und Urinproben unfallverletzter Fahrer sowie eine detaillierte Unfallanalyse werden Daten über die Häufigkeit von Medikamenten, Drogen und Alkohol bei Verkehrsunfällen gewonnen und die Relevanz von Befunden hinsichtlich einer Unfallkausalität geprüft. Das Untersuchungskollektiv umfasst 500 unfallverletzte Fahrer in den Erhebungsgebieten Hannover und Saarland. In über einem Drittel der verunfallten Fahrer wurden verkehrsmedizinisch relevante Wirkstoffe nachgewiesen. Alkohol spielt hierbei eine dominante Rolle, zum Teil in Verbindung mit Medikamenten. In über drei Viertel der alkoholpositiven Proben wurden Blutalkoholkonzentrationen über 0,8 Promille gemessen. Ein Viertel aller Befunde lag über 1,7 Promille. Aus den Ergebnissen der Untersuchung wurde deutlich, dass aus dem Nachweis verkehrsmedizinisch relevanter Substanzen nicht zwingend ein Kausalzusammenhang zur Unfallverursachung abzuleiten ist. Bei 19 % der alkoholisierten Fahrer war der Unfall nicht auf das Fehlverhalten der Fahrer zurückzuführen.
An approach to the standardization of accident and injury registration systems (STAIRS) in Europe
(1998)
STAIRS is a European Commission funded study whose aim is to produce a set of guidelines for a harmonised, crash injury database. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of the forthcoming European Union front and side impact directives has emphasised the need for real world crash injury data-sets that can be representative of the crash population throughout Europe. STAIRS will provide a methodology to achieve this. The ultimate aim of STAIRS is to produce a set of data collection tools which will aid decision making on vehicle crashworthiness as well as providing a means to evaluate the effectiveness of safety regulations. This paper will disseminate the up-to-date findings of the group as they try to harmonise their methods. The stage has been reached where studies into the diverse methods of the UK, French and German systems of crash injury investigation have been undertaken. An assessment has already been made of the relationships between the three current systems in order to define the areas of agreement and divergence. The conclusions reached stated that there were many areas that are already closely related and that the differences were only at the detailed level. With the emphasis on secondary safety and injury causation, core data sets were decided upon, taking into account: vehicle description, collision configuration, structural response of vehicles, restraint and airbag performance, child restraint performance, Euro NCAP, pedestrian and vehicle occupant kinematics, injury description and causation. Each variable was studied objectively, the important elements isolated and developed into a form that all partners were agreeable on. A glossary of terms is being developed as the project progresses which includes ISO standards and other definitions from the associated CAREPLUS project, which addresses the comparability of national data sets. A major consideration of the group was the data collection method to be employed. The strengths and weaknesses of each study were investigated to obtain a clear idea of which aspects offered the best way forward. The quality of this information and transference into a common format, as well as the necessary error checking systems to be employed have just been completed and are described. In tandem with this area of study the problem of the statistical relationship of each sample to the national population is also being investigated. The study proposes a mechanism to use a sample of crash injury data to represent the national and international crash injury problem
The incidence and treatment of sternal fractures among traffic accidents are of increasing importance to ensure best possible outcomes. Analysis of technical indicators of the collision, preclinical and clinical data of patients with sterna fractures from 1985-2004 among 42,055 injured patients were assessed by an Accident Research Unit. Two time groups were categorized: 1985-1994 (A) vs. 1995-2004 (B). 267/42,055 patients (0.64%) suffered a sterna fracture. Regarding the vehicle type, the majority occurred after car accidents in 0.81% (251/31,183 pts), followed by 0.19% (5/2,633pts) driving motorbike, and 0.11% (4/3,258pts) driving a truck. 91% wore a safety belt. Only 13% of all passengers suffering a sternal fracture had an airbag on board (33/255 car/trucks), with an airbag malfunction in 18%. The steering column was deformed in 39%, the steering wheel in 36%. Cars in the recent years were significantly older (7.67-±5 years (B) vs. 5.88-±5 years (A), p=0.003). Cervical spine injuries are frequent (23% vs. 22%), followed by multiple rib fractures (14% vs. 12%) and lung injuries (12% vs. 11%). We found 9/146 (6%) and 3/121 patients (3%) with heart contusion among the 267 sternal fractures. MAIS was 2.56-±1.3 vs. 2.62-±1.3 (A vs. B, p=0.349). 18% of patients were polytraumatized, with 11.2% dying at the scene, 2.3% in the hospital. Sternal fractures occur most often in old cars to seat-belted drivers often without any airbag. Severe multiple rib fractures and lung contusion are concomitant injuries in more than 10% each indicating the severity of the crash. Over a twentyyear period, the injury severity encountered was not different with 18% polytrauma patients suffering sternal fractures.
[Introduction:] A large number of road users involved in road traffic crashes recover from their injuries, but some of them never recover fully and suffer from some kind of permanent disability. In addition to loss of life or reduced quality of life, road accidents carry many and diverse consequences to the survivors such as legal implications, economic burden, job absences, need of care from a third person, home and vehicle adaptations as well as psychological consequences. Within an EU funded project MOVE/C4/SUB/2011-294/SI2.628846 (REHABIL AID) these consequences were analyzed more detailed.
Injury severity of e.g. pedestrians or bikers after crashes with cars that are reversing is almost unknown. However, crash victims of these injuries can frequently be seen in emergency departments and account for a large amount of patients every year. The objective of this study is to analyze injury severity of patients that were crashed into by reversing cars. The Hannover Medical School local accident research unit prospectively documented 43,000 road traffic accidents including 234 crashes involving reversing cars. Injury severity including the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) was analyzed as well as the location of the accident. As a result 234 accidents were included into this study. Pedestrians were injured in 141 crashes followed by 70 accidents involving bikers. The mean age of all crash victims was 57 -± 23 years. Most injuries took place on straight stretches (n = 81) as well as parking areas (n = 59), entries (n = 36) or crossroads (n = 24). The AIS of the lower extremities was highest followed by the upper extremities. The AIS of the neck was lowest. The mean MAIS was 1.3 -± 0.6. The paper concludes that the lower extremities show the highest risk to become injured during accidents with reversing cars. However, the risk of severe injuries is likely low.
The bicyclist accidents were analyzed to get better understanding of the occurrences and frequency of the accidents, injury distributions, as well as correlation of injury severity/outcomes with engineering and human factors in two different countries of China and Germany. The accident cases that occurred from 2001 to 2006 were collected from IVAC database in Changsha and GIDAS database in Hannover. Based on specified sampling criteria, 1,570 bicyclist cases were selected from IVAC database in Changsha, and 1806 cases were collected from Hannover, documented in GIDAS database. Statistical analyses were carried out by using these selected data. The results from the statistical analysis are presented and discussed in this study.
While cyclists and pedestrians are known to be at significant risk for severe injuries when exposed to road traffic accidents (RTAs) involving trucks, little is known about RTA injury risk for truck drivers. The objective of this study is to analyze the injury severity in truck drivers following RTAs. Between 1999 and 2008 the Hannover Medical School Accident Research Unit prospectively documented 43,000 RTAs involving 582 trucks. Injury severity including the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) were analyzed. Technical parameters (e.g. delta-v, direction of impact), the location of accident, and its dependency on the road type were also taken into consideration. The results show that the safety of truck drivers is assured by their vehicles, the consequence being that the risk of becoming injured is likely to be low. However, the legs especially are at high risk for severe injuries during RTAs. This probability increases in the instance of a collision with another truck. Nevertheless, in RTAs involving trucks and regular passenger vehicles, the other party is in higher risk of injury.