Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (409)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (37)
- Buch (Monographie) (18)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (9)
- Arbeitspapier (8)
- Bericht (1)
Sprache
- Englisch (482) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (279)
- Konferenz (277)
- Germany (178)
- Deutschland (174)
- Unfall (163)
- Accident (162)
- Injury (116)
- Verletzung (116)
- Safety (102)
- Sicherheit (97)
Institut
- Sonstige (337)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (126)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (23)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (22)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (22)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (17)
- Präsident (9)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (6)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (1)
With the aim of identifying suitable indicators and criteria for evaluating the safe human-machine interaction for SAE level 3 systems up to 60 km/h in the context of automated driving, this research project has started with a focus group interview to identify relevant publication channels and list of keywords regarding indicators for the evaluation of human-machine interaction at SAE Level 3. Based on the identified list of keywords, literature reviews have been conducted to extract relevant publications from the identified publication channels. According to the defined inclusion and exclusion criterion, 38 papers have then been selected and used for meta-analysis to study the influence of different takeover situations on takeover performances. The results of meta-analysis have indicated that drivers’ takeover performances measured by the categories of takeover time, takeover quality and subjective workload are different in static and dynamic situations. After that, expert interviews have been conducted with six international experts to help interpret the results of meta-analysis and develop checklist items. In the end, 16 checklist items assigned in six categories of system requirements have been developed and can be used by international experts to evaluate the safety of the human-machine interaction of SAE Level 3 systems up to 60 km/h in production vehicles. This checklist has been further developed to an online application, which can be used as an easy-to-implement and efficient evaluation procedure in relation to the traffic safety relevant interaction quality of the system.
Annual Report 2021
(2022)
In the Annual Report 2021, the BASt presents a selection of research activities of the year 2021.
In almost 40 contributions, projects from 5 specialist areas are presented. The spectrum of topics ranges from digital transformations in bridges and structural technology to sustainable, climate-resistant highway construction, efficient, ecological and digital traffic engineering, automated, environmentally conscious automotive engineering and the safety of all who participate in traffic.
Highlights as well as facts and figures in short and concise form complete the report.
Annual Report 2020
(2021)
The focus of the Annual Report 2020 is on selected research results from all fields of activity of the BASt.
Among the topics are for example the re-evaluation of the alcohol ban for novice drivers, the effectiveness of emergency braking systems for trucks or risk factors in motorbike traffic. ‘Talking’ workplaces will be discussed as well as the communication of automated vehicles with non-automated road users and airbag safety systems for cyclists.
The traffic barometer shows how traffic developed during the Corona pandemic. Also presented are technical developments to avoid road closures, the RITUN guide for resilient road tunnels, concrete roadway 4.0, how occupational safety demands and promotes innovation, and cross-national research cooperation in road construction.
Results on safe rural roads through suitable protective devices, on the use of digital technologies in engineering structures, on sustainable innovative replacement of concrete bridges as well as BASt activities in the BMVI Network of Experts are also presented.
Highlights as well as facts and figures complete the report.
Annual Report 2019
(2020)
In its Annual Report 2019, the BASt has compiled a selection of its research. For example, the climate impact analysis, among other things, describes an essential research focus for the federal main road network. The new information and evaluation platform "BaustellenCheck" is presented, and reports on digitization in road equipment and maintenance as well as on various activities on the innovative test site duraBASt.
The results of current simulator and test track studies are also part of the annual report, as are the results of level 3 automation studies in real road traffic with an appropriately equipped test vehicle. Approaches to solutions for the infrastructure requirements of automated driving on motorways and federal trunk roads are presented, as well as the current status of the development of regulations in the field of vehicle technology.
The BASt scientists investigated the significance of virtual reality in road safety work. Whether influencers can be used effectively in road safety communication was also considered, as well as other proposed measures to reduce the risk of accidents, especially among young novice drivers.
Highlights as well as facts and figures in short and concise form complete the report.
The Netherlands is on the way to change its existing skid resistance measuring method for its highway network from the Dutch RAW 72, a longitudinal force method, to the Sideway Force method. This method is described in the Technical Specification 15901-8 (SKM device) as well as 15901-6 (SCRIM device) and is in use in 9 European countries. The CEN TC 227 WG5 on Surface Characteristics is currently working on combining of these two technical Specifications into a European standard for Sideway-Force (SWF) measurement devices. The idea of this change in the Netherlands was perceived in 2013 and since then a lot of meetings have been held with the different Dutch decision makers as well as with countries which currently operate SWF devices. There was an intensive exchange of knowledge about these devices and their corresponding quality assurance systems, because the Netherlands wanted to incorporate and rely on an existing system of a neighbor country without losing their present level of quality. The Netherlands has therefore decided to incorporate the German SKM approach. The network monitoring with the new system will start in 2017. To ensure the quality of skid resistance measurements and further cooperation in this field, it has been decided to initiate an alliance between BASt and the Dutch road owner Rijkswaterstaat (RWS). This alliance will facilitate an exchange of research activities, calibration of the Dutch systems according to the existing German Standard as well as control measurements with a BASt-device on the Dutch network during the network monitoring. During 2016 also comparative measurements will be performed on a network level with the current Dutch device and with an SKM device to determine a conversion between the two and to be able to define new threshold values.
Traditionally, traffic count statistics in Germany contain the so-called relevant hourly volume, which is defined as the 30th-highest hour of the year when listing the hourly volumes in descending order. When the first edition of the German Highway Capacity Manual (HBS) was prepared in 2001, the Federal Government decided that this 30th hour should be used as the basis for the level of service determination for all Federal freeways and trunk roads. While German freeways are quite well equipped with inductive loop detectors, there are much fewer counts on rural roads and almost no long-term data on urban roads. With the current redraft of the German HBS detailed advice will be given on how to estimate peak-hour demand (all vehicles and heavy vehicle portion), based on the n-th highest hour concept depending on the available traffic counts. As the HBS will be divided into three major parts: freeways, rural roads, and urban roads, three separate chapters for the peak-hour demand estimation will be provided. Whereas for freeways the task consists in finding the comparable site equipped with inductive loop detectors, for urban roads it is a matter of establishing which time periods of the year and weekdays are appropriate for manual short-term counts as estimation of the 30th hour of the year. For all kind of traffic devices the requirements on traffic demand models for level of service calculations are described.
The term test procedure refers to a method that describes how a system has to be tested to identify and assess specific behavior or properties by experiments. This also includes the specification of required tools, equipment, boundary conditions, and evaluation methods. Test procedures are an essential tool to check whether desired product properties are present, which of course also applies to the development of driver assistance systems. In addition to development and release testing that mainly is performed by the vehicle or system manufacturer, there are tests with the purpose of an independent product testing that are conducted by external test organizations. These tests are needed for vehicle type approval (for admission to a specific market), in the context of applying the standard for functional safety (in both cases mainly executed by technical services (being accredited as certification laboratory)) or for customer information purposes (by a test institute for consumer protection). The focus of this chapter is these "external" test methods. After a taxonomy of test procedures, the differences between legislation (type approval) and consumer testing are highlighted. Typical tests and the associated test setup, tools, and assessment criteria are discussed, and an outlook toward testing in the near and mid-future is given.
The term driver assistance systems in the chapter title shall be understood to include vehicle automation. This chapter starts with a homogeneous and consistent classification and nomenclature of all kinds of driver assistance systems known and under discussion today (including vehicle automation). It thereby builds upon familiar classification schemes by the German Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) and the standardization body SAE international. Detailed evaluation of the German legal situation for driver assistance systems and vehicle automation is provided in the following Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, an overview is given on the legal system in the US to reveal aspects relevant for vehicle automation. This is intended as initial information for those not acquainted to the US legal system which has been the first to regulate automation in several federal states. Finally, in Sect. 4, the current rating scheme of the European New Car Assessment Programme (EuroNCAP) is presented in comparison to legal instruments. The model of a consumer protection based approach proves to be a flexible instrument with great advantages in promoting new technologies. Technical vehicle regulations on the other hand rule minimum requirements. Both approaches are needed to achieve maximum vehicle safety.
The "Autonomous driving on the roads of the future: Villa Ladenburg Project" by the Daimler und Benz-Stiftung looks at degrees of automation that will only become technically feasible in the distant future. The treatment of the legal questions in the present chapter therefore draws heavily on the description of the use cases, which begin to provide a concrete basis for evaluating individual issues. Uncertainties in predicting future technical developments can be expected and will have a commensurate impact on the assumptions and conclusions of this chapter. The resulting uncertainty is nevertheless unavoidable if one wants to press ahead with important interrelated issues. This chapter is therefore intended as a contribution to the debate on societal aspects of automated driving from a legal perspective and not as a legalistic evaluation of the subject. The consideration will largely focus on the situation within the context of current German law. The legal views expressed are those of the author and are based on nine years of experience in the field of driver assistance system research. In terms of the underlying conception presented here, the societal dimension of autonomous vehicles addressed in the present project goes well beyond the adjustments to the legal framework currently being called for in Germany. The following will examine the question of "societal acceptance" in the context of the legal questions raised by autonomous vehicles. This line of investigation is not immediately obvious and covers only a segment of the more thoroughgoing focus of the project.