Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (6) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Europe (6) (entfernen)
Institut
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (6) (entfernen)
The presence and performance of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) has increased over last years. Systems available on the market address also conflicts with vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Within the European project PROSPECT (Horizon2020, funded by the EC) improved VRU ADAS systems are developed and tested. However, before determining systems" properties and starting testing, an up-to-date analysis of VRU crashes was needed in order to derive the most important Use Cases (detailed crash descriptions) the systems should address. Besides the identified Accident Scenarios (basic crash descriptions), this paper describes in short the method of deriving the Use Cases for car-to-cyclist crashes. Method Crashes involving one passenger car and one cyclist were investigated in several European crash databases looking for all injury severity levels (slight, severe and fatal). These data sources included European statistics from CARE, data on national level from Germany, Sweden and Hungary as well as detailed accident information from these three countries using GIDAS, the Volvo Cars Cyclist Accident database and Hungarian in-depth accident data, respectively. The most frequent accident scenarios were studied and Use Cases were derived considering the key aspects of these crash situations (e.g., view orientation of the cyclist and the car driver- manoeuvre intention) and thus, form an appropriate basis for the development of Test Scenarios. Results Latest information on car-to-cyclist crashes in Europe was compiled including details on the related crash configurations, driving directions, outcome in terms of injury severity, accident location, other environmental aspects and driver responsibilities. The majority of car-to-cyclist crashes occurred during daylight and in clear weather conditions. Car-to-cyclist crashes in which the vehicle was traveling straight and the cyclist is moving in line with the traffic were found to result in the greatest number of fatalities. Considering also slightly and seriously injured cyclists led to a different order of crash patterns according to the three considered European countries. Finally the paper introduced the Use Cases derived from the crash data analysis. A total of 29 Use Cases were derived considering the group of seriously or fatally injured cyclists and 35 Use Cases were derived considering the group of slightly, seriously or fatally injured cyclists. The highest ranked Use Case describes the collision between a car turning to the nearside and a cyclist riding on a bicycle lane against the usual driving direction. A unified European dataset on car-to-cyclist crash scenarios is not available as the data available in CARE is limited, hence national datasets had to be used for the study and further work will be required to extrapolate the results to a European level. Due to the large number of Use Cases, the paper shows only highest ranked ones.
Im Zeitraum 1991/92 wurde in 15 europäischen Ländern eine Vergleichsstudie zu den Einstellungen und Meinungen von Autofahrern durchgeführt (das sogenannte SARTRE-Projekt). Anhand der dabei erhobenen Daten wurden Sekundäranalysen zur Altersgruppe der 18- bis 24-jährigen Autofahrer vorgenommen. Die Sekundäranalysen beruhen auf deskriptiven Vergleichen der Altersgruppen in den verschiedenen europäischen Ländern und varianzanalytischen Berechnungen. Wenn diese Berechnungen zu eher geringen Varianzaufklärungen geführt haben, ist dies auch in der schlechten Anpassung der abhängigen Variablen an der Normalverteilung begründet. Kleinere Effekte, vor allem die berichteten Interaktionseffekte, sind daher auch bei Vorliegen signifikanter Werte nur mit Vorbehalt zu interpretieren. Insgesamt lassen die Ergebnisse der Sekundäranalysen folgende Aussagen zum jungen Fahrer zu: 1. Junge Fahrer machen in den einzelnen europäischen Ländern unterschiedliche Anteile an den jeweiligen Fahrerpopulationen aus. Auch der Anteil der Frauen unter den jungen Fahrern schwankt beträchtlich. Bereits unter Berücksichtigung dieser beiden soziodemografischen Basismerkmale ergeben sich für die Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit in Europa unterschiedliche Gewichtungen. Der Anteil junger männlicher Fahrer ist besonders groß in den südeuropäischen Ländern. 2. Bei den meisten Meinungs- und Einstellungsfragen ist die Variabilität im Antwortverhalten zwischen den Fahrerpopulationen der Länder größer als die Variabilität der Altersgruppen innerhalb der Länder. Dies gilt insbesondere für den Themenkomplex "Sicherheitsgurt", mit Abstrichen auch für das Problemfeld "Alkohol und Fahren". Das Antwortverhalten der jungen Fahrer liegt hier in aller Regel im Trend nationaler Gewohnheiten und weicht nicht auffällig von den Meinungen und Einstellungen der übrigen Fahrer im eigenen Land ab. 3. Bei denjenigen Fragen, die die Einstellung zu geschwindigkeitsorientiertem und regelabweichendem Fahrverhalten und das damit verbundene Risiko betreffen, ist die Variabilität der Altersgruppen meist größer als die der Länderstichproben insgesamt. Die Bereitschaft, das - meist unterschätzte - Risiko hoher und regelabweichender Fahrgeschwindigkeiten einzugehen, scheint junge Fahrer - insbesondere junge männliche Fahrer - in Europa zu verbinden. Dieses Ergebnis der Sekundäranalyse ist sicher nicht überraschend, könnte aber eine inhaltliche Ausrichtung liefern, wenn es darum geht, europaweite Aufklärungsmaßnahmen für junge Fahrer in die Wege zu leiten.
The use of alcohol interlocks for DUI offenders is widespread around the world. in North America and Australia alcohol interlocks are core elements in the countermeasure system against DUI recidivism. Based on a European experience exchange hosted by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) in October 2013, key features of European alcohol interlock programmes are illustrated. In addition, key findings from international alcohol interlock research are presented. They point towards a need for an accompanying rehabilitative measure in order to achieve long-lasting behavioural changes in the offender. Data from the interlock recorder can be used as predictor for recidivism risk, but also as objective data to aid counselling. Finally, an example of an accompanying rehabilitative measure, which was specifically developed for interlock programmes within a BASt project, is given.
Various kinds of demerit point systems have been developed and implemented in European countries, aimed at tackling repeat offences in road transport by acting as a deterrent and providing sanctioning. The impact of a demerit point system on the number of crashes is often reported to be significant, but temporary. The objective of the EU BestPoint project was to establish a set of recommended practices that would result in a more effective and sustainable contribution of demerit point systems to road safety. A high actual chance of losing the licence and a high perceived chance of losing the licence are basic prerequisites for the effective operation of demerit point systems. For measures applied within the context of a demerit point system, a four-step-approach is recommended: warning letter, driver improvement course, licence withdrawal, rehabilitation course. Further recommendations concern issues like points and offences, e.g. which offences should lead to points, target groups, and the administration of demerit point systems. The final result of the EU BestPoint project is a handbook (van Schagen & Machata, 2012) which provides a concise overview of all recommended practices. The presentation/paper outlines how sustainable safety improvements can be achieved if national demerit point systems are implemented and maintained according to the recommended practices. In addition, potential further steps towards an EU-wide demerit point system (cross-border exchange on points and/or offences) are presented.
The 6th RFP project DRUID aimed at supporting European transport policy makers by suggesting scientifically based recommendations to combat impaired driving. The main DRUID objectives were: 1. In-depth analysis of the problem situation with regard to DUI/DUID in Europe; 2. Assessment of prevalence and accident risks of DUI/DUID on the basis of epidemiological and experimental studies; 3. Evaluation of oral fluid screening devices and cost-benefit analysis of a strengthened drug driving enforcement; 4. Development of a classification system for medicines; 5. Evaluation of driver rehabilitation schemes and strategies of licence revocation; 6. Assessment of the effectiveness of new prescribing and dispensing guidelines for medicines; 7. Ddevelopment of policy recommendations on the basis of DRUID results. All in all, the DRUID results revealed that prevalence of psychoactive substance consumption, DUI/DUID, enforcement levels and legal strategies are very heterogeneous in European countries. Nonetheless, DRUID derives general recommendations as base for national solutions.
The DRUID expert consensus established recommendations on how to define limits for psychoactive substance use in traffic. The European DRUID project established a group of experts who are members of national working groups for defining analytical and/or risk thresholds. This group evaluated the results of DRUID, scientific literature and the experience of representatives of several EU Member States and Norway in determining cut-off levels. 1. Cut-offs should be defined for the most frequently used psychoactive substances; 2. In order to achieve compliance of the population towards cut-off regulations, they should be clear and comprehensible, pointing out the risks when used in traffic; 3. Thus, the definition of cut-offs should be based on current scientific knowledge; 4. The lowest substance concentration exerting an effect on driving should be preferred instead of the lowest limit of quantification/ detection; 5. For all psychoactive substances including alcohol, the same risk should be accepted. When a country intends to determine per se cut-off levels, several considerations have to be taken into account. From a scientific point of view, the same risk should be anticipated for all psychoactive substances including alcohol. Nevertheless, every cut-off discussion should address the question if the DRUID approach, to determine risk thresholds equivalent to alcohol limits, is feasible for the respective case.