Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2013 (8) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (8) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Europa (8) (entfernen)
Im September 2013 wurde der 2. CEDR Call (Conference of European Directors of Roads, Call 2013), der eine Summe von ca. 5,3 Mio Euro umfasst, veröffentlicht. Im Rahmen der länderübergreifen europäischen Forschung waren fünf Themen der künftigen strategischen Forschungsplanung und dem anstehenden Forschungsbedarf durch Befragung der europäischen nationalen Straßenbauverwaltungen identifiziert worden: Energieeffizienz, Verkehrssicherheit, Alternde Infrastruktur, Straßen und Umwelt, Verkehrsmanagement. Im Rahmen von Workshops waren zuvor zu diesen fünf Themen "Descriptions of Research Needs" (DoRNs) erarbeitet worden, welche zusammen mit dem Call veröffentlicht wurden. Die wesentlichen Inhalte der DoRNS werden im Beitrag kurz beschrieben.
Für den Verkehr auf Straße und Schiene sowie für den Luft- und Seeverkehr sind kritische Infrastrukturen oft die zentralen Knotenpunkte, ohne deren Funktionieren der Güter- und Personenverkehr erheblich beeinträchtigt werden kann. Die Wichtigkeit funktionierender und robuster Verkehrsnetze und eben dieser Knotenpunkte wird bei Betrachtung der steigenden Gütertransportmengen von intra-europäischen Transportaktivitäten deutlich: So soll sich der Verkehr zwischen den Europäischen Mitgliedsstaaten bis 2020 verdoppeln. Eine umsichtige Infrastrukturentwicklung spielt daher eine besondere Rolle in Europa. So nehmen Planung und Ausbau des TEN-T-Netzes (Trans-European Networks of Transport) zwischen 2010 und 2030 550 Milliarden Euro in Anspruch. Gerade im Hinblick auf terroristische oder kriminelle Bedrohungen, Großunfälle oder immer intensiver werdende Extremwetterereignisse und andere Naturgefahren spielt die Sicherheit dieser Infrastrukturen eine wichtige Rolle in der Planung neuer sowie beim Betrieb bestehender Bauwerke.
Europa bedeutet nicht nur eine gemeinsame Währung, sondern auch die Schaffung eines gemeinsamen Marktes verbunden mit dem Abbau von Handelshemmnissen. Dies bedeutet für Produkte aus dem Bereich Straßenausstattung, dass die unterschiedlichen nationalen Anforderungen durch einheitliche europäische Anforderungen ersetzt werden. Nationale Freigaben scheinen daher nicht im Sinne Europas zu sein, da durch zusätzliche nationale Anforderungen Handelshemmnisse eher aufgebaut als abgebaut werden. Die nationalen Freigaben im Bereich Straßenausstattung dienen jedoch nicht dem Aufbau neuer Handelshemmnisse, sondern der Umsetzung europäischer Vorgaben auf nationaler Ebene. Durch die mithilfe der nationalen Freigaben getroffene Vorauswahl können bereits während der Ausschreibungsphase Produkte erkannt werden, die die nationalen Randbedingungen nicht erfüllen beziehungsweise beim Einsatz zu Kompatibilitätsproblemen führen. Um dies zu verdeutlichen, werden exemplarisch für den Bereich Straßenausstattung die europäischen Anforderungen sowie die zusätzlichen Anforderungen aus den nationalen Freigaben für Fahrzeug-Rückhaltesysteme, Verkehrszeichenfolien und Fahrbahnmarkierungen betrachtet.
Trauma management (TM) covers two types of medical treatment: the initial one provided by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and a further one provided by permanent medical facilities. There is a consensus in the professional literature that to reduce the severity and the number of road crash victims, the TM system should provide rapid and adequate initial care of injury, combined with sufficient further treatment at a hospital or trauma centre. Recognizing the important role of TM for reducing road crash injury outcome, it was decided, within the EU funded SafetyNet project, to develop road safety performance indicators (SPIs) which would characterize the level of TM systems" performance in European countries and enable country comparisons. The concept of TM SPIs was developed based on a literature study of performance indicators in TM, a survey of available practices in Europe and data availability examinations. A set of TM SPIs was introduced including 14 indicators which characterize five issues such as: availability of EMS stations; availability and composition of EMS medical staff; availability and composition of EMS transportation units; characteristics of the EMS response time, and availability of trauma beds in permanent medical facilities. Basic information on the TM systems was collected in close cooperation with the national expert group. A dataset with TM SPIs for 21 countries was created. It was demonstrated that the countries can be compared using selected TM SPIs. Moreover, a more general comparison of the TM systems' performance in the countries is possible, using multiple ranking and statistical weighting techniques. By both methods, final estimates were received enabling the recognition of groups of countries with similar levels of the TM system's performance. The results of various trials were consistent as to the recognition of countries with high or low level of the TM systems" performance, where in grouping countries with intermediate levels of the TM system's performance some differences were observed. The SafetyNet project's practice demonstrated that data collection for estimating TM SPIs is not an easy task but is realizable for the majority of countries. The TM SPIs" message is currently limited to the availability of trauma care services. Further development of the TM SPIs should focus on characteristics of actual treatment supplied, based on combined police and medical road crash related databases.
The 6th RFP project DRUID aimed at supporting European transport policy makers by suggesting scientifically based recommendations to combat impaired driving. The main DRUID objectives were: 1. In-depth analysis of the problem situation with regard to DUI/DUID in Europe; 2. Assessment of prevalence and accident risks of DUI/DUID on the basis of epidemiological and experimental studies; 3. Evaluation of oral fluid screening devices and cost-benefit analysis of a strengthened drug driving enforcement; 4. Development of a classification system for medicines; 5. Evaluation of driver rehabilitation schemes and strategies of licence revocation; 6. Assessment of the effectiveness of new prescribing and dispensing guidelines for medicines; 7. Ddevelopment of policy recommendations on the basis of DRUID results. All in all, the DRUID results revealed that prevalence of psychoactive substance consumption, DUI/DUID, enforcement levels and legal strategies are very heterogeneous in European countries. Nonetheless, DRUID derives general recommendations as base for national solutions.
The DRUID expert consensus established recommendations on how to define limits for psychoactive substance use in traffic. The European DRUID project established a group of experts who are members of national working groups for defining analytical and/or risk thresholds. This group evaluated the results of DRUID, scientific literature and the experience of representatives of several EU Member States and Norway in determining cut-off levels. 1. Cut-offs should be defined for the most frequently used psychoactive substances; 2. In order to achieve compliance of the population towards cut-off regulations, they should be clear and comprehensible, pointing out the risks when used in traffic; 3. Thus, the definition of cut-offs should be based on current scientific knowledge; 4. The lowest substance concentration exerting an effect on driving should be preferred instead of the lowest limit of quantification/ detection; 5. For all psychoactive substances including alcohol, the same risk should be accepted. When a country intends to determine per se cut-off levels, several considerations have to be taken into account. From a scientific point of view, the same risk should be anticipated for all psychoactive substances including alcohol. Nevertheless, every cut-off discussion should address the question if the DRUID approach, to determine risk thresholds equivalent to alcohol limits, is feasible for the respective case.
Although the EU has implemented some legislation on the security of transport infrastructure in Europe (i.e. EPCIP Directive 2008/114/), the security of transport networks up to date remains a national prerogative. While research has been conducted on a European scale, operative measures are implemented only on the national level. This paper argues for an Europeanisation of transport security, focussing on practicable recommendations for achieving this goal. Additionally, the divergence between a nationally shaped risk perception and the cross-boundary nature of security threats is discussed and possible strategies to overcome this problem are outlined. Furthermore, the paper aims at fostering the debate between (transport) security stakeholders in the EU Member States and presenting incentives and arguments for a shift from a national to a European security rationale.
Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.