Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (6) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Wahrnehmung (6) (entfernen)
There is considerable evidence for the negative effects of driver distraction on road safety. In many experimental studies, drivers have been primarily viewed as passive receivers of distraction. Thus, there is a lack of research on the mediating role of their self-regulatory behavior. The aim of the current study was to compare drivers' performance when engaged in a system-paced secondary task with a self-paced version of this task and how both differed from baseline driving performance without distraction. Thirty-nine participants drove in a simulator while performing a secondary visual"manual task. One group of drivers had to work on this task in predefined situations under time pressure, whereas the other group was free to decide when to work on the secondary task (self-regulation group). Drivers' performance (e.g., lateral and longitudinal control, brake reaction times) was also compared with a baseline condition without any secondary task. For the system-paced secondary task, distraction was associated with high decrements in driving performance (especially in keeping the lateral position). No effects were found for the number of collisions, probably because of the lower driving speeds while distracted (compensatory behavior). For the self-regulation group, only small impairments in driving performance were found. Drivers engaged less in the secondary task during foreseeable demanding or critical driving situations. Overall, drivers in the self-regulation group were able to anticipate the demands of different traffic situations and to adapt their engagement in the secondary task, so that only small impairments in driving performance occurred. Because in real traffic drivers are mostly free to decide when to engage in secondary tasks, it can be concluded that self-regulation should be considered in driver distraction research to ensure ecological validity.
This study was one part of the research activities of work package 5 "Rehabilitation" of the integrated EU DRUID project (6th Framework Programme). It aimed at gathering information about the cognitive"affective and behavioral processes that participants undergo while attending driver rehabilitation (DR) programs. The primary objective was to analyze the outcomes of group interventions for alcohol offenders in order to assess any cognitive, motivational and behavioral modifications within individual participants and to identify the relevant variables which initiate and support this change process. The general methodological concept of the study was a prospective cohort design of participants of group-based European driver rehabilitation programs, carried out via a participant feedback questionnaire survey. In total N=7.339 DUI offenders in 9 European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands and Poland) participated in the survey. The results indicate that DR participants feel such programs provide strong support for their cognitive and behavioral change processes. The findings suggest that participants feel encouraged to establish new behavioral goals and the commitment to stick to them. At the same time, the participants' ratings emphasize the important role of the course leader in encouraging such changes. The findings of this explorative questionnaire survey are promising. Although it is impossible to draw any conclusions regarding long-term behavioral changes or effects on recidivism rates, participants of DR courses express positive feedback on completion of the program. The positive outcomes of the study can motivate decisionmakers to launch DR measures and to regard them as an essential part of a comprehensive countermeasure system against DUI.
This paper presents findings of a laboratory experiment which aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and intrusiveness of Tactile Detection Response Task (TDRT) methodology. Various single-task, dual-task and triple-task scenarios were compared. The task scenarios included a surrogate of driving (tracking task) and different secondary tasks (N-back, surrogate reference task (SuRT)). The results suggest that the TDRT is sensitive to load levels of secondary tasks which primarily demand for cognitive resources (N-back). Sensitivity to variations of visual"manual load could not be shown (SuRT). TDRT seems also to be able to differentiate between modes of primary task which varies in terms of cognitive load (visual against auditory tracking task). Results indicated intrusiveness of TDRT on primary task performance and secondary task performance depending on the type of underlying task scenario. As a conclusion, TDRT can be recommended as a method to assess attentional effects of cognitive load of a secondary task, but should be used with caution for secondary tasks with strong motor demands.
Fahrbahnmarkierungen werden vor allem zur Orientierung und zur visuellen Führung im Nahbereich (10 m bis 70 m vor dem Fahrzeug) benötigt, während die visuelle Führung im Fernbereich überwiegend von Leitpfostenrückstrahlern gewährleistet wird. Es ist in der Fachwelt strittig, wie die Sichtweite von Fahrbahnmarkierungen zu definieren ist und welche Sichtweiten notwendig sind, um ein sicheres Fahren vor allem bei Nacht zu gewährleisten. Die tatsächlichen Sichtweiten von Markierungen hängen logarithmisch von der Retroreflexion und der Breite der Markierung ab. Zur Bestimmung der notwendigen Sichtweite ist die Kenntnis der "Vorhersehzeit" - der Zeit von der Wahrnehmung einer Markierung bis zum Ende des davon ausgelösten Manövers (im allgemeinen eines Brems- oder Lenkmanövers) - notwendig. Problematisch ist bei allen Überlegungen, ob den Berechnungen die Entwurfsgeschwindigkeit, die zulässige oder die tatsächlich gefahrene Geschwindigkeit - repräsentiert durch die mittlere oder die v85-Geschwindigkeit - zugrunde gelegt werden soll. Da Längsmarkierungen kein Anhaltegebot, sondern in der Regel Bremsmanöver auslösen, bei denen die Geschwindigkeit nur verringert wird, liegen bei einer angenommenen Reaktionszeit von 1,3 Sekunden die notwendigen Vorhersehzeiten mit 2 bis 5 Sekunden deutlich unter denen, die zum Abbremsen bis zum völligen Stillstand (Anhalteweg) benötigt werden (bis zu 11 Sekunden). Daraus ergeben sich je nach Geschwindigkeit, Geschwindigkeitsdifferenz und Bremsverzögerung notwendige Sichtweiten von 27 m bis 148 m. Aus diesen Sichtweiten wird gefolgert, dass der Mindestwert der Nachtsichtbarkeit (Retroreflexion) von Fahrbahnmarkierungen auf Außerortsstraßen und Autobahnen den Wert von 200 mcd/m2 mal Ix nicht unterschreiten sollte.
Das Fahrverhalten, das einen großen Einfluss auf die Verkehrssicherheit hat, wird auch durch die Straßenraumgestaltung beeinflusst. In Ergänzung zu den bislang weitgehend fahrdynamisch geprägten Entwurfsgrundsätzen werden Konzepte, die auf die gezielte Beeinflussung des Fahrverhaltens durch die Straßenraumgestaltung ausgerichtet sind, im steigenden Maße im Straßenentwurf berücksichtigt und als geeignet angesehen, die Anzahl der Unfälle zu reduzieren. Durch eine weitgehende Standardisierung der Straßenraumgestaltung sollen unerwartete Situationen so weit wie möglich vermieden und somit die Fahrer bei ihrer Fahraufgabe entlastet werden. Dieses Konzept standardisierter und selbsterklärender Straßen, das in ähnlicher Form auch in den Niederlanden und in Dänemark verfolgt wird, liegt auch dem Entwurf der neuen Richtlinien für die Anlage von Landstraßen (RAL) zugrunde. In diesem Beitrag werden die Grundlagen der standardisierten Außerortsstraße erläutert und die Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede der Ansätze der genannten Länder verglichen.
This article describes the development of techniques to minimize automobile driver distraction when an in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) that requires visual attention is in use. The authors explain the visual occlusion technique that has been developed as a tool for the assessment of the in-vehicle human-machine interface (HMI) of IVIS in terms of visual demands. The authors addressed an unresolved issue in previous standardized experimental protocols - how subjects make use of the occluded intervals and how this might affect the assessments of visual demands. This study protocol assumed that subjects would continue task performance during occluded periods, leading to an underestimation of visual demands by the occlusion parameters "total shutter open time" (TSOT) and the "occlusion index". The authors predicted that a simple additional loading task to be performed in parallel could disrupt IVIS task performance during the occluded period leading to higher estimations of visual demands by TSOT and R. Their prediction was confirmed by the study findings. The results also showed that under the condition of additional auditory tracking, TSOT and R discriminated more clearly between an "easy" and a "difficult" IVIS task than under the standard condition. They conclude with a discussion of the implications of this research for designers of assessment tools for driver visual distractions.