Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (252)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (123)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (111)
- Arbeitspapier (13)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (9)
- Bericht (5)
- Sonstiges (1)
Schlagworte
- Safety (514) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (243)
- Abteilung Verhalten und Sicherheit im Verkehr (115)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (89)
- Abteilung Straßenverkehrstechnik (79)
- Abteilung Brücken- und Ingenieurbau (22)
- Stabstelle Presse und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (12)
- Präsident (6)
- Abteilung Straßenbautechnik (5)
- Stabstelle Forschungscontrolling, Qualitätsmanagement (2)
Ziel der Gesamtstudie ist die Zusammenstellung pharmakologisch geeigneter, praktikabler Versuchsplanungen sowie Untersuchungs- und Auswerteverfahren, die zur Feststellung der Wirkung von Medikamenten auf die Fahrtüchtigkeit empfohlen werden können. Im ersten Projektabschnitt der Studie erfolgt eine Literatursichtung, die sich auf deutsch- und englischsprachige Arbeiten stützt. Es werden alle unmittelbar verfügbaren Arbeiten ab dem Veröffentlichungsjahr 1970 berücksichtigt, wobei in diesen Arbeiten der Einfluss von Medikamenten auf verkehrsrelevante Leistungs- und Persönlichkeitsbereiche mit vorwiegend psychologischen Testverfahren überprüft wird. Ein Teil der Untersuchungen weist gravierende methodische Mängel auf, die sich auf Stichprobengröße, Stichprobenauswahl, Kontrollgruppendesign, fehlende Aussagen über den Versuchsablauf sowie auf Mängel in der statistischen Auswertung beziehen. Solche methodischen Mängel machen die Entwicklung eines Untersuchungsdesigns notwendig, in das verwertbare Ergebnisse der Literaturrecherche eingehen können und mit dessen Hilfe in einem zweiten Projektabschnitt eine endgültige standardisierte Testbatterie ermittelt werden kann. Wegen der methodischen Einschränkungen wird nur eine vorläufige Testauswahl vorgeschlagen.
Aufgabe des Projektes war eine auf deutsch- und englischsprachige Autoren beschränkte Literaturrecherche mit dem Ziel, ein geeignetes Prüfverfahren aufzuzeigen, dass im Rahmen gesetzlicher Maßnahmen zum Nachweis der Fahrtüchtigkeit nach Medikamentenwirkungen als verbindlich vorgeschrieben werden kann. Der Bearbeitung lag ein theoretisches Modell zugrunde, bei dem die Fahrtüchtigkeit als ein Konstrukt aufgefasst wird, das keiner unmittelbaren Messung zugänglich ist. Es wurden deshalb in einem ersten Operationalisierungsschritt Funktionsbereiche (Prädikatoren) etabliert, die die Fahrtüchtigkeit optimal definieren. In einem zweiten Operationalisierungschritt wurden solche Prädikatoren auf Tests zurückgeführt. Es wird eine Auswahl von Tests zusammengestellt, die aufgrund bestimmter Gütekriterien für den Nachweis der Fahrtüchtigkeit nach Arzneimitteleinnahme als valide anzusehen sind. Die Tests werden nur als ein Element des gesamten Prüfverfahrens angesehen, zu dem u.a. auch der Testverlauf, die Auswahl der Stichproben sowie die Registrierung pharmakogenetischer Kenngrößen gehören. Die erste Bearbeitungsphase des Projektes führte zu dem Vorschlag eines vorläufigen Testpolls und zu Vorschlägen über die Ausgestaltung des gesamten Testverlaufs einschließlich der zu erhebenden physiologischen Parameter und pharmakologischen Kenngrößen.
Various kinds of demerit point systems have been developed and implemented in European countries, aimed at tackling repeat offences in road transport by acting as a deterrent and providing sanctioning. The impact of a demerit point system on the number of crashes is often reported to be significant, but temporary. The objective of the EU BestPoint project was to establish a set of recommended practices that would result in a more effective and sustainable contribution of demerit point systems to road safety. A high actual chance of losing the licence and a high perceived chance of losing the licence are basic prerequisites for the effective operation of demerit point systems. For measures applied within the context of a demerit point system, a four-step-approach is recommended: warning letter, driver improvement course, licence withdrawal, rehabilitation course. Further recommendations concern issues like points and offences, e.g. which offences should lead to points, target groups, and the administration of demerit point systems. The final result of the EU BestPoint project is a handbook (van Schagen & Machata, 2012) which provides a concise overview of all recommended practices. The presentation/paper outlines how sustainable safety improvements can be achieved if national demerit point systems are implemented and maintained according to the recommended practices. In addition, potential further steps towards an EU-wide demerit point system (cross-border exchange on points and/or offences) are presented.
Established in 1997, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) provides consumers with a safety performance assessment for the majority of the most popular cars in Europe. Thanks to its rigorous crash tests, Euro NCAP has rapidly become an important driver safety improvement to new cars. After ten years of rating vehicles, Euro NCAP felt that a change was necessary to stay in tune with rapidly emerging driver assistance and crash avoidance systems and to respond to shifting priorities in road safety. A new overall rating system was introduced that combines the most important aspects of vehicle safety under a single star rating. The overall rating system has allowed Euro NCAP to continue to push for better fitment and higher performance for vehicles sold on the European market. In the coming years, the safety rating is expected to play an important role in the support of the roll-out of highly automated vehicles.
The paper describes the development of transitions between different safety barriers in Germany but also in the context of the European standardization. In the paper practical and impact test expriences with transitions are shown. In view of the sheer number of theoretically possible combinations of safety barriers, the demand for testing every transition, even if the connecting safety barriers differ only slightly, appears to be economically unacceptable. On the other hand the experience from accidents and also from failed impact tests shows that transitions can be a risk to traffic safety. Therefore criteria for the distinction between transitions (impact test required/impact test unnecessary) are explained. In order to distinguish transitions which do not have to be impact-tested from those that require impact tests, criteria were developed and formulated.
Although cruise control (CC) is available for most cars, no studies have been found which examine how this automation system influences driving behaviour. However, a relatively large number of studies have examined adaptive cruise control (ACC) which compared to CC includes also a distance control. Besides positive effects with regard to a better compliance to speed limits, there are also indications of smaller distances to lead vehicles and slower responses in situations that require immediate braking. Similar effects can be expected for CC as this system takes over longitudinal control as well. To test this hypothesis, a simulator study was conducted at the German Aerospace Center. Twenty-two participants drove different routes (highway and motorway) under three different conditions (assisted by ACC, CC and manual driving without any system). Different driving scenarios were examined including a secondary task condition. On the one hand, both systems lead to lower maximum velocities and less speed limit violations. There was no indication that drivers shift more of their attention towards secondary tasks when driving with CC or ACC. However, there were delayed driver reactions in critical situations, e.g., in a narrow curve or a fog bank. These results give rise to some caution regarding the safety effects of these systems, especially if in the future their range of functionality (e.g., ACC Stop-and-Go) is further increased.
Before 2002, France was in the queue of Europeans countries in terms of road safety results because of the low density of population and the faulty behaviour of French due itself to a very low level of traffic law enforcement Even if there were signs of the change of mind in France towards road safety before, the turning point was in summer 2002, when the President declared road safety as a priority work during his mandate. The more symbolic measure was the decision to settle an automatic speed control system (700 fixed and 300 mobile). Over three years, the average speed on French roads decreased by 5 km/h and the number of fatalities on road turned down from an average of 8000 deaths per year to 5 300, which represents a decrease of more than 34 %. For the next months, we anticipate that, as many drivers have kept loosing points on their driving licence through light speed violations, this will lead drivers to check their speed and the speed limits more systematically as loosing points on one's driving license has longer time effects than paying a fine. Consequently, we expect a decrease of 10 % to 15% of fatalities in 2006, which is a very good result if we compare with the trend of the last twenty five years (about 2,3 %). The reverse effect of this system that lies on the changes of behaviour of the majority is that, there is more and more discontent against the system taking into account that automatic speed control system allows only a minor tolerance above limits and that local speed limits are not always adapted to local infrastructure and traffic conditions. Another weakness of the system is that motorcyclists are too rarely caught by the system; the system is being gradually improved by placing the new speed cameras in position of taking photographs of the back of the vehicle. But this would not be sufficient to reduce the speed of motorcyclists that are a very high risk group (16% of fatalities for 0,8 % of traffic) For alcohol, there is no easy route for progress: all what is done nowadays is toward festive impaired driving (through designating sober drivers or mass alcohol preventive screenings) although there is not enough done towards chronic alcoholic driving.
The significant demographic changes are predicted for the European future. The age group over 65 years is permanently increasing and over next 30 years every fourth person will belong to this group. This development will continue so far that by 2050 in many countries will double the percentage of the population aged 65 and more. Many studies analyze the new phenomena of the ageing (graying) society during the last decade. Mobility is integrated part of the life of every citizen, even more it means for the elderly people. The adequate mobility is the precondition for their active life and for their social communication that contribute to their health and functional capacity and their autonomy and independency. The active seniors demand less public support. The mobility of the older citizens is closely linked with health and societal problems and creates an important public challenge. On the other side the participation of seniors in transport due to their limited physical and mental possibilities means for them an increased risk to be injured or killed. The main mobility spaces are roads that can be used not only as a traveler in a vehicle (driver or passenger) but also as a pedestrian or cyclist or even as a motorcyclist. The road traffic is then an opportunity and danger in the same time. The accident analyzes show specific risk features of seniors that are different compared with other age groups. First of all the older road users (65 and more) are facing to the higher risk (number of killed divided by the population size) to be killed in a road accident compared with the group of younger road users (0 - 64). More significant difference can be observed when comparing the road user groups. The fatality percentage of the older pedestrians is 2,5 times higher compared with the group 25 " 64. Similar frequency show the cyclist fatalities. On the other side the vehicle passengers in the younger group have more or less two time higher percentage compared to seniors and in the group of motorcyclists even achieved in 2008 almost five times higher compared with the older group. The share of the old road users fatalities (around 19%) didn"t practically change during the last 10 years in the European average. But comparing the gender involvement (2006) there is an interesting difference " female fatalities make 30, 2%, male fatalities 15, 3% of all fatalities in their groups. The risk of the senior users is more connected with their physical and mental limits than with their risk behavior. According to the Czech statistics (2007) the vehicle drivers over 65 years cause only 3, 6% of all accidents. The solution of the problem is to minimize the risk and to create a safe environment for the elderly people using the roads. In order to achieve this goal a deep knowledge of risk and of accident circumstances, full understanding of the behavior of the seniors and their limitations and accommodating approach of the whole society is necessary. Road risk of the ageing society has to be considered as a part of the health and social policy. These can build a creditable basis for the implementation of the measures that secure safe moving of seniors on the roads.
There is considerable evidence for the negative effects of driver distraction on road safety. In many experimental studies, drivers have been primarily viewed as passive receivers of distraction. Thus, there is a lack of research on the mediating role of their self-regulatory behavior. The aim of the current study was to compare drivers' performance when engaged in a system-paced secondary task with a self-paced version of this task and how both differed from baseline driving performance without distraction. Thirty-nine participants drove in a simulator while performing a secondary visual"manual task. One group of drivers had to work on this task in predefined situations under time pressure, whereas the other group was free to decide when to work on the secondary task (self-regulation group). Drivers' performance (e.g., lateral and longitudinal control, brake reaction times) was also compared with a baseline condition without any secondary task. For the system-paced secondary task, distraction was associated with high decrements in driving performance (especially in keeping the lateral position). No effects were found for the number of collisions, probably because of the lower driving speeds while distracted (compensatory behavior). For the self-regulation group, only small impairments in driving performance were found. Drivers engaged less in the secondary task during foreseeable demanding or critical driving situations. Overall, drivers in the self-regulation group were able to anticipate the demands of different traffic situations and to adapt their engagement in the secondary task, so that only small impairments in driving performance occurred. Because in real traffic drivers are mostly free to decide when to engage in secondary tasks, it can be concluded that self-regulation should be considered in driver distraction research to ensure ecological validity.