Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Ablenkung (psychol) (3) (entfernen)
Institut
Im Rahmen eines Pilotversuches wurden auf der A 24 auf einem 35,9 km langen Streckenabschnitt Rüttelstreifen in den Seitenstreifen eingefräst. Hintergrund der Maßnahme war die Erprobung von längs zur Fahrbahn eingefrästen Rüttelstreifen zur Senkung der Unfallzahlen, insbesondere der ermüdungsbedingten Unfälle mit Abkommen von der Fahrbahn. Um die Wirksamkeit der Rüttelstreifen zu beurteilen, wurde ein Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich mit Kontrollstrecke durchgeführt. Im Ergebnis konnte gezeigt werden, dass sich der Einfluss der Maßnahme auf spezielle Unfallkollektive beschränkt. Das größte Potenzial von Rüttelstreifen liegt in der Reduktion der Unfälle mit Abkommen von der Fahrbahn nach rechts. Für Unfälle dieser Art konnte ein maßnahmebedingter Rückgang um 43 Prozent festgestellt werden. Der Einsatz von eingefrästen Rüttelstreifen entlang des Seitenstreifens von Autobahnen wird deshalb empfohlen, insbesondere auf Streckenabschnitten mit einer hohen Anzahl von Unfällen mit Abkommen von der Fahrbahn nach rechts.
This paper presents findings of a laboratory experiment which aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and intrusiveness of Tactile Detection Response Task (TDRT) methodology. Various single-task, dual-task and triple-task scenarios were compared. The task scenarios included a surrogate of driving (tracking task) and different secondary tasks (N-back, surrogate reference task (SuRT)). The results suggest that the TDRT is sensitive to load levels of secondary tasks which primarily demand for cognitive resources (N-back). Sensitivity to variations of visual"manual load could not be shown (SuRT). TDRT seems also to be able to differentiate between modes of primary task which varies in terms of cognitive load (visual against auditory tracking task). Results indicated intrusiveness of TDRT on primary task performance and secondary task performance depending on the type of underlying task scenario. As a conclusion, TDRT can be recommended as a method to assess attentional effects of cognitive load of a secondary task, but should be used with caution for secondary tasks with strong motor demands.
This article describes the development of techniques to minimize automobile driver distraction when an in-vehicle information systems (IVIS) that requires visual attention is in use. The authors explain the visual occlusion technique that has been developed as a tool for the assessment of the in-vehicle human-machine interface (HMI) of IVIS in terms of visual demands. The authors addressed an unresolved issue in previous standardized experimental protocols - how subjects make use of the occluded intervals and how this might affect the assessments of visual demands. This study protocol assumed that subjects would continue task performance during occluded periods, leading to an underestimation of visual demands by the occlusion parameters "total shutter open time" (TSOT) and the "occlusion index". The authors predicted that a simple additional loading task to be performed in parallel could disrupt IVIS task performance during the occluded period leading to higher estimations of visual demands by TSOT and R. Their prediction was confirmed by the study findings. The results also showed that under the condition of additional auditory tracking, TSOT and R discriminated more clearly between an "easy" and a "difficult" IVIS task than under the standard condition. They conclude with a discussion of the implications of this research for designers of assessment tools for driver visual distractions.