Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (5)
- Fahrzeug (5)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (5)
- Head on collision (5)
- Konferenz (5)
- Accident (4)
- Bewertung (4)
- Car (4)
- Deutschland (4)
- Evaluation (assessment) (4)
- Germany (4)
- Injury (4)
- Unfall (4)
- Vehicle (4)
- Verletzung (4)
- Analyse (math) (3)
- Analysis (math) (3)
- Anfahrversuch (3)
- Compatibility (3)
- Cost benefit analysis (3)
- Fußgänger (3)
- Impact test (veh) (3)
- Kompatibilität (3)
- Pedestrian (3)
- Pkw (3)
- Safety (3)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (3)
- Severity (accid, injury) (3)
- Sicherheit (3)
- Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung (3)
- Anthropometric dummy (2)
- Body (car) (2)
- Collision (2)
- Driver (2)
- Dummy (2)
- Europa (2)
- Europe (2)
- Fahrer (2)
- Forecast (2)
- Karosserie (2)
- Passive safety system (2)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (2)
- Prognose (2)
- Prüfverfahren (2)
- Simulation (2)
- Statistics (2)
- Statistik (2)
- Test method (2)
- Zusammenstoß (2)
- Active safety system (1)
- Age (1)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- Alter (1)
- Antikollisionssystem (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Automatic (1)
- Automatisch (1)
- Bau (1)
- Befreiung (Bergung) (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Biomechanics (1)
- Biomechanik (1)
- Braking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Child (1)
- Classification (1)
- Collision avoidance system (1)
- Construction (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Cyclist (1)
- Dauer (1)
- Demografie (1)
- Demography (1)
- Diesel engine (1)
- Dieselmotor (1)
- Driver assistance system (1)
- Engine capacity (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- European New Car Assessment Programme (1)
- Extrication (1)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (1)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (1)
- Fahrzeugsitz (1)
- Failure (1)
- Fatality (1)
- First aid (1)
- Geschwindigkeit (1)
- Gesetzgebung (1)
- Great Britain (1)
- Großbritannien (1)
- Harmonization (1)
- Hinten (1)
- Hospital (1)
- Hubraum (1)
- Human body (1)
- Improvement (1)
- Interior (veh) (1)
- Kind (1)
- Klassifizierung (1)
- Knee (human) (1)
- Knie (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Krankenhaus (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Medical examination (1)
- Medizinische Untersuchung (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Method (1)
- Modification (1)
- Motorcyclist (1)
- Motorradfahrer (1)
- Radfahrer (1)
- Reaction (human) (1)
- Reaktionsverhalten (1)
- Rear (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Reproducibility (1)
- Reproduzierbarkeit (1)
- Schlag (1)
- Schweden (1)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (1)
- Seat (veh) (1)
- Severity (accid (1)
- Shock (1)
- Speed (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Statistical analysis (1)
- Statistische Analyse (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Stochastic process (1)
- Stochastischer Prozess (1)
- Sweden (1)
- Technische Vorschriften (Kraftfahrzeug) (1)
- Test (1)
- Time (1)
- Tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterfahrschutz (1)
- Vehicle regulations (1)
- Verbesserung (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (1)
- Verfahren (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verletzung) (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Veränderung (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Zeit (1)
- injury) (1)
Institut
It is commonly agreed that active safety will have a significant impact on reducing accident figures for pedestrians and probably also bicyclists. However, chances and limitations for active safety systems have only been derived based on accident data and the current state of the art, based on proprietary simulation models. The objective of this article is to investigate these chances and limitations by developing an open simulation model. This article introduces a simulation model, incorporating accident kinematics, driving dynamics, driver reaction times, pedestrian dynamics, performance parameters of different autonomous emergency braking (AEB) generations, as well as legal and logical limitations. The level of detail for available pedestrian accident data is limited. Relevant variables, especially timing of the pedestrian appearance and the pedestrian's moving speed, are estimated using assumptions. The model in this article uses the fact that a pedestrian and a vehicle in an accident must have been in the same spot at the same time and defines the impact position as a relevant accident parameter, which is usually available from accident data. The calculations done within the model identify the possible timing available for braking by an AEB system as well as the possible speed reduction for different accident scenarios as well as for different system configurations. The simulation model identifies the lateral impact position of the pedestrian as a significant parameter for system performance, and the system layout is designed to brake when the accident becomes unavoidable by the vehicle driver. Scenarios with a pedestrian running from behind an obstruction are the most demanding scenarios and will very likely never be avoidable for all vehicle speeds due to physical limits. Scenarios with an unobstructed person walking will very likely be treatable for a wide speed range for next generation AEB systems.
A biofidelic flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) has been developed from the year 2000 onwards and evaluated by a technical evaluation group (Flex-TEG) of UN-ECE GRSP. A recently established UN-ECE GRSP Informal Group on GTR9 Phase 2 is aiming at introducing the FlexPLI within world-wide regulations on pedestrian safety (Phase 2 of GTR No. 9 as well as the new UN regulation 127 on pedestrian safety) as a test tool for the assessment of lower extremity injuries in lateral vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents. Besides, the FlexPLI has already been introduced within JNCAP and is on the Euro NCAP roadmap for 2014. Despite of the biofidelic properties in the knee and tibia sections, several open issues related to the FlexPLI, like the estimation of the cost benefit, the feasibility of vehicle compliance with the threshold values, the robustness of the impactor and of the test results, the comparability between prototype and production level and the finalization of certification corridors still needed to be solved. Furthermore, discussions with stakeholders about a harmonized lower legform to bumper test area are still going on. This paper describes several studies carried out by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) regarding the benefit due to the introduction of the FlexPLI within legislation for type approval, the robustness of test results, the establishment of new assembly certification corridors and a proposal for a harmonized legform to bumper test area. Furthermore, a report on vehicle tests that previously had been carried out with three prototype legforms and were now being repeated using legforms with serial production status, is given. Finally, the paper gives a status report on the ongoing simulation and testing activities with respect to the development and evaluation of an improved test procedure with upper body mass for assessing pedestrian femur injuries.