Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (6) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Abbiegen (6) (entfernen)
Institut
Accidents between right turning trucks and straight riding cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity is much higher than in other accidents. The situation is critical especially due to the fact that, in spite of the six mirrors that are mandatory for ensuring a minimum field of sight for the truck drivers, cyclists in some situations cannot be seen or are not seen by the driver. Either the cyclist is overlooked or is in a blind spot area that results from the turning manoeuvre of the truck and its articulation if it is a truck trailer or truck semitrailer combination. At present driver assistance systems are discussed that can support the driver in the turning situation by giving a warning when cyclists are riding parallel to the truck just before or in the turning manoeuvre. Such systems would generally bear a high potential to avoid accidents of right turning trucks and cyclists no matter if they ride on the road or on a parallel bicycle path. However, performance requirements for such turning assist systems or even test procedures do not exist yet. This paper describes the development of a testing method and requirements for turning assist systems for trucks. The starting point of each development of test procedures is an analysis of accident data. A general study of accident figures determines the size of the problem. In-depth accident data is evaluated case by case in order to find out which are representative critical situations. These findings serve to determine characteristic parameters (e.g. boundary conditions, trajectories of truck and cyclist, speeds during the critical situation, impact points). Based on these parameters and technical feasibility by current sensor and actuator technology, representative test scenarios and pass/fail-criteria are defined. The outcome of the study is an overview of the accident situation between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists in Germany as well as a corresponding test procedure for driver assistance systems that at this first stage will be informing or warning the driver. This test procedure is meant to be the basis for an international discussion on introducing turning assist systems in vehicle regulations.
The Intersection 2020 project was initiated to develop a test procedure for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in intersection car-to-car scenarios to be transferred to Euro NCAP. The project aims to address current road traffic accidents on European roads and therefore sets a priority of the identification of the most important car-to-car accidents and Use Cases. Taking into account technological and practical limitations, Test Scenarios are derived from the Use Cases in a later stage of the project. This paper presents parts of a larger study and provides an overview of common car-to-vehicle(at least four wheels) collision types at junctions in Europe and specifies seven Accident Scenarios from which the three scenarios “Straight Crossing Paths (SCP)”, “Left Turn Across Path – Opposite Direction Conflict (LTAP/OD)” and “Left Turn Across Path – Lateral Direction (LTAP/LD)” are most important due to their high relevance regarding severe car-to-car accidents. Technical details about crash parameters such as collision and initial speeds are delivered. The analysis work performed is input for the definition and selection of the Use Cases as well as for the project’s benefit estimation. The numbers of accidents and fatalities in accidents at intersections involving a passenger car were shown per intersection type. In both statistics, it was found that accidents at crossroads and T- or staggered junctions are of highest relevance, followed by roundabouts. Focusing on accidents at intersections between one passenger car and another road user shows that around one-third of all accidents and related fatalities could have been assigned to car-to-PTW accidents and one-fifth of all accidents and fatalities to car-to-car accidents. Regarding car-to-car accidents with at least serious injury outcome 38% out of 34,489 car-to-car accidents happened at intersections. These figures correspond to 18% of the fatalities (4,236 fatalities in total). Considering all intersection types, around half of all related accidents happened in urban environments whereas this number decreased to one-third of all fatalities. Further, the proportion of road fatalities per country occurring at intersections varies widely across the EU. Also, there are proportionately more fatalities in daylight or twilight conditions at junctions. Use Cases are supposed to be derived from Accident Scenarios and by adding detailed information for example about the road layout, right-of-way and the vehicle trajectories prior to the collision. Instead of applying cluster algorithms to the accident data, a pragmatic approach was finally preferred to create them. Note: Use Cases serve as an intermediate step between the Accident Scenarios and the Test Scenarios which describe the actual testing conditions. Finally, 74 Use Cases were identified. This large number indicates the complexity of intersection crashes due to the combination of several parameters.
Das Unfallgeschehen der Radfahrer wird analysiert. Ein erheblicher Anteil der Unfälle ereignet sich ohne Beteiligung motorisierter Fahrzeuge als Alleinunfall, bei Kollisionen mit Fußgängern oder Radfahrern. Viele Alleinunfälle werden nicht angezeigt, daher gibt es eine große Dunkelziffer. Das Schwergewicht der unfallbeteiligten Radfahrer liegt bei Kindern/Jugendlichen und bei Senioren. Der Anteil der Radfahrer als Hauptverursacher liegt bei ca. 47%. Hauptunfallstellen sind Kreuzungen und Einmündungen mit je über 28 %. Auf gesonderten Radwegen ist das Radfahren nur wenig sicherer als auf Straßen ohne Radwege; hinsichtlich der Unfallschwere ist das Bild uneinheitlich. Das Unfallgeschehen an Knotenpunkten wird genauer beschrieben.
Since 2005, the motorcycle crash fatalities in the US exceeded 10% of the overall annual traffic fatalities. Consequently, it has become critical to gain in-depth understanding of the factors and characteristics contributing to motorcycle crashes. Unfortunately, there currently exists no database gathering the necessary information for an in-depth analysis of the US motorcycle crashes. So this study utilizes the NASS/CDS database (National Automotive Sampling System, Crashworthiness Data System) in order to gain insights into the patterns and factors leading to a NASS/CDS motorcycle crash, from 1997 to 2007. NASS/CDS samples about 5,000 passenger car tow-away crashes per year. Each case includes photographs and detailed data on crash and pre-crash characteristics, vehicle types, trajectories, types of impact, and other pertinent roadway and crash scene information, allowing an in-depth investigation of the crash mechanisms. However, the NASS/CDS sampling process specifically focuses on passenger car crashes, so the cases extracted only correspond to crashes in which a passenger vehicle was towed, and a motorcycle was somehow involved. Thus, a by-hand in-depth review of about 200 cases allowed retrieving 106 relevant crashes for this study, tending to represent the severe passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes on US roads. The findings lead to the conclusion that these crashes mostly result from the low conspicuity of the motorcycle, and from the inability of the car drivers to fully appreciate and anticipate the behavior of a motorcycle. Indeed, it has been shown that, first, the car drivers involved in these cases did not attempt any avoidance maneuver, second, they were largely of ages under 25, and finally, the majority of the crashes were in an intersection scenario. In addition, the two major scenarios unveiled were the car attempting a left turn from the opposite direction and the car attempting a left turn from the right. The paper mentions several solutions to enhance the motorcycle- conspicuity and to allow the car drivers to better anticipate its behavior, which seem to be key factors in the intersection-related crashes (and more generally in the passenger vehicle(s) versus motorcycle(s) crashes).
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.
Die Verkehrssicherheit in Deutschland konnte in den letzten Jahrzehnten durch zahlreiche Verbesserungen sowohl im Bereich der Fahrzeugtechnik, der Fahrausbildung als auch der Straßeninfrastruktur deutlich verbessert werden. Wurden im Jahr 1970 noch über 21.000 Menschen im Straßenverkehr getötet, so waren es im Jahr 2008 weniger als 4.500, und dies, obwohl in diesem Zeitraum eine Verdreifachung der Verkehrsleistung festzustellen ist. Um diese positive Entwicklung auch zukünftig durch Straßeninfrastrukturmaßnahmen zu unterstützen, wurden und werden Verfahren zur Berücksichtigung von Aspekten der Verkehrssicherheit im Zuge der Planung, des Entwurfs und des Betriebs von Straßen entwickelt bzw. weiterentwickelt. Zu nennen ist hier z.B. die Fortschreibung des Verfahrens zur Wirtschaftlichkeitsbewertung, die Einführung des Sicherheitsaudits, die Erarbeitung des Merkblatts für die Durchführung von Verkehrsschauen sowie die Erarbeitung des Handbuches für die Bewertung der Verkehrssicherheit. Analysen des Unfallgeschehens unter Berücksichtigung von Straßeninfrastrukturmerkmalen haben auch wichtige Grundlagen für die im Entwurf vorliegende Richtlinie für die Anlage von Landstraßen beigesteuert. Dass hier Verbesserungen besonders dringlich sind, wird anhand einer Analyse des Unfallgeschehens differenziert nach der Ortslage deutlich. Seit eineinhalb Jahrzehnten liegt der Anteil der auf Landstraßen im Straßenverkehr Getöteten bei mehr als 60%. Dabei sind Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung von Fahrunfällen, wie z.B. die Einhaltung der Radienrelation und eine ausreichende Querneigung, von besonderer Bedeutung, da dieser Unfalltyp einen Anteil von fast 40% am gesamten Unfallgeschehen auf Landstraßen ausmacht. Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung von Unfällen im Längsverkehr, wie z.B. die Wahl von Querschnitten mit verkehrstechnisch gesicherten Überholmöglichkeiten, sind ebenfalls bedeutend, da dieser Unfalltyp einen Anteil von knapp 25% ausmacht. Von Bedeutung für die Verkehrssicherheit auf Landstraßen sind zudem die Gestaltung und die Verkehrsregelung im Bereich von Kreuzungen und Einmündungen. Dort ereignen sich gut ein Viertel aller Unfälle auf Landstraßen. Die Gestaltung von Seitenräumen ist für die Verkehrssicherheit auf Landstraßen ebenfalls von erheblicher Bedeutung. Allein der Anteil der bei Baumunfällen auf Landstraßen Getöteten beträgt fast 30%. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird die Bedeutung von Schutzeinrichtungen dort, wo feste Hindernisse unvermeidbar sind, deutlich. Gerade im Kontext mit Schutzeinrichtungen ist die Verkehrssicherheit für Motorradfahrer relevant. Im Merkblatt für die Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf Motorradstrecken sind diesbezüglich bewährte Infrastrukturmaßnahmen angeführt.