620 Ingenieurwissenschaften und zugeordnete Tätigkeiten
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2015 (95) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
- Buch (Monographie) (52)
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (40)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (2)
- Bericht (1)
Schlagworte
- Germany (75)
- Deutschland (73)
- Research report (46)
- Forschungsbericht (45)
- Conference (26)
- Konferenz (26)
- Test (23)
- Versuch (21)
- Measurement (19)
- Bewertung (17)
Für den Bereich des Straßenbaues steht mit der Radarinterferometrie ein Verfahren zur Verfügung, mit dem Bewegungsmessungen von Straßenbauwerken durchgeführt werden können. Das Ziel des Forschungsprojektes war es, das Potential des satellitengestützten Monitorings für die Erfassung der Bewegungen von Straßenbauwerken zu untersuchen. Hier wurden im ersten Teil der Studie Mindestmessanforderungen an die Aufnahmeparameter des Satelliten und an die Eigenschaften von Straßenbelägen abgeleitet. Eine möglichst hohe räumliche Auflösung der Satellitenbilder sowie möglichst raue Textur der Straßenbeläge erwiesen sich als entscheidende Aspekte für ein erfolgreiches Bewegungs-Monitoring von Straßen. Im zweiten Teil der Studie wurde am Beispiel eines Dammbauwerks auf schlecht tragfähigem Boden ein Satelliten-Monitoring der Konsolidierungssetzungen durchgeführt. Wegen der geringen und inkonsistenten Rückstreuung des Oberflächenmaterials des Dammbauwerks wurden künstliche Radarreflektoren für diesen Zweck konzipiert und aufgestellt. Die Setzungsbewegung des Damms und der Reflektoren wurde zur Kontrolle auch terrestrisch vermessen. Die Reflektoren lieferten ein ausreichend starkes Rückstreusignal. Durch Baustellentätigkeit wurden einige Reflektoren jedoch schief gestellt oder verschüttet. Zudem waren die Konsolidierungssetzungen eines Teils des Damms zuweilen so stark, sodass sie durch das Satelliten-Messverfahren mit TerraSAR-X Daten nicht mehr eindeutig aufgelöst werden konnten. Die satellitengestützte Bewegungsmessung der Pegelreflektoren, die von diesen beiden Fehlerquellen unbeeinflusst blieben, wichen im Mittel um etwa 5 mm von den Nivellementmessungen ab. Das satellitengestützte Monitoring eines Überschüttdamms ist im Vergleich zur herkömmlichen terrestrischen Vermessung relativ kostenintensiv und rechnet sich erst beim Monitoring längerer Abschnitte von etwa 1,8 km, sowie bei einer großen Anzahl von zu erfassenden Messpunkten. Weiter ist das Verfahren nur zur Erfassung der weniger starken Restsetzungen geeignet. Die Satellitenmessung eignet sich besonders fürdas Monitoring von Bodenbewegungen großflächiger Bereiche mit vielen Messpixeln. Sub-ZentimeterGenauigkeiten der Bewegungsmessungen können hierbei erzielt werden.
A methodology to derive precision requirements for automatic emergency braking (AEB) test procedures
(2015)
AEB Systems are becoming important to increase traffic safety. Test procedures in testing for consumer information, manufacturer self-certification and technical regulations are used to ensure a certain minimum performance of these systems. Consequently, test robustness, test efficiency and finally test cost become increasingly important. The key driver for testing effort and test costs is the required repeatable accuracy in a test design - the higher the accuracy, the higher effort and test costs. On the other hand, the performance of active safety systems depends on time discretization in the environment perception and other sub-systems: for instance, typical sensors supply information with a cycle time of 50 - 150 ms. Time discretization results in an inherent spread of system performance, even if the test conditions are perfectly equal. The proposed paper shows a methodology to derive requirements for a test setup (e.g. test repeats, use of driving robots, ...) as function of AEB system generation and rating method (e.g. Euro NCAP points awarded, pass/fail, ...). While the methodology itself is applicable to AEB pedestrian and AEB Car-Car scenarios, due to the lack of sufficient test data for AEB Car-Car, the focus of this paper is on AEB pedestrian scenarios. A simulation model for the performance of AEB Pedestrian systems allows for the systematic variation of the discretization time as well as test condition accuracy. This model is calibrated with test results of 4 production vehicles for AEB Pedestrian, all fully tested by BASt according to current Euro NCAP test protocols. Selected parameters to observe the accuracy of the test setup in case of pedestrian AEB is the calculated impact position of pedestrian on the vehicle front (as if no braking would have occurred), and the test vehicle speed accuracy. These variable was shown in real tests to be repeatable in the range of ± 5 cm and ± 0,25 km/h, respectively, with a fully robotized state of the art test setup. The sensitivity of AEB performance (measured in achieved speed reduction as well as overall rating result according to current Euro NCAP rating methods) towards discretization and the sensitivity of performance towards test accuracy then is compared to identify economic yet robust test concepts. These comparisons show that the available repeatability accuracy of current test setups is more than sufficient for today's AEB system capabilities. Time discretization problems dominate the performance spread especially in test scenarios with a limited pedestrian dummy reveal time (e.g. child behind obstruction, running adult scenarios with low car speeds). This would allow to increase test tolerances to decrease test cost. A methodology which allows to derive the required tolerances in active safety tests might be valuable especially for NCAPs of emerging countries that do not have the necessary equipment (e.g. driving robots, positioning units) available for the full-scale and high tolerance EuroNCAP active safety procedures yet still want to rate active safety systems, thus improving the global safety.
Accidents between right turning trucks and straight riding cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity is much higher than in other accidents. The situation is critical especially due to the fact that, in spite of the six mirrors that are mandatory for ensuring a minimum field of sight for the truck drivers, cyclists in some situations cannot be seen or are not seen by the driver. Either the cyclist is overlooked or is in a blind spot area that results from the turning manoeuvre of the truck and its articulation if it is a truck trailer or truck semitrailer combination. At present driver assistance systems are discussed that can support the driver in the turning situation by giving a warning when cyclists are riding parallel to the truck just before or in the turning manoeuvre. Such systems would generally bear a high potential to avoid accidents of right turning trucks and cyclists no matter if they ride on the road or on a parallel bicycle path. However, performance requirements for such turning assist systems or even test procedures do not exist yet. This paper describes the development of a testing method and requirements for turning assist systems for trucks. The starting point of each development of test procedures is an analysis of accident data. A general study of accident figures determines the size of the problem. In-depth accident data is evaluated case by case in order to find out which are representative critical situations. These findings serve to determine characteristic parameters (e.g. boundary conditions, trajectories of truck and cyclist, speeds during the critical situation, impact points). Based on these parameters and technical feasibility by current sensor and actuator technology, representative test scenarios and pass/fail-criteria are defined. The outcome of the study is an overview of the accident situation between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists in Germany as well as a corresponding test procedure for driver assistance systems that at this first stage will be informing or warning the driver. This test procedure is meant to be the basis for an international discussion on introducing turning assist systems in vehicle regulations.
In the paper it is investigated to what extend one can extrapolate the detailed accident database GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study), with survey area Hanover and Dresden region, to accident behavior in other regions and countries within Europe and how such an extrapolation can be implemented and evaluated. Moreover, it is explored what extent of accident data for the target country is necessary for such an extrapolation and what can be done in situations with sparse and low accident information in a target region. It will be shown that a direct transfer of GIDAS injury outcomes to other regions does not lead to satisfactory results. But based on GIDAS and using statistical decision tree methods, an extrapolation methodology will be presented which allows for an adequate prediction of the distribution of injury severity in severe traffic accidents for European countries. The method consists essentially of a separation of accidents into well-described subgroups of accidents within which the accident severity distribution does not vary much over different regions. In contrast the distribution over the various subgroups of accidents typically is rather different between GIDAS and the target. For the separation into the subgroups meaningful accident parameters (like accident type, traffic environment, type of road etc.) have been selected. The developed methodology is applied to GIDAS data for the years 1999-2012 and is evaluated with police accident data for Sweden (2002 to 2012) and the United Kingdom (2004 to 2010). It is obtained that the extrapolation proposal has good to very good predictive power in the category of severe traffic accidents. Moreover, it is shown that iterative proportional fitting enables the developed extrapolation method to lead to a satisfactory extrapolation of accident outcomes even to target regions with sparse accident information. As an important potential application of the developed methodology the a priori extrapolation of effects of (future) safety systems, the operation of which can only be well assessed on the basis of very detailed GIDAS accident data, is presented. Based on the evaluation of the presented extrapolation method it will be shown that GIDAS very well represents severe accidents, i.e. accidents with at least one severely or fatally injured person involved, for other countries in Europe. The developed extrapolation method reaches its limits in cases for which only very little accident information is available for the target region.
Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.
Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrians have been predicted to offer substantial benefit. On this basis, consumer rating programmes, e.g. Euro NCAP, are developing rating schemes to encourage fitment of these systems. One of the questions that needs to be answered to do this fully, is to determine how the assessment of the speed reduction offered by the AEB is integrated with the current assessment of the passive safety for mitigation of pedestrian injury. Ideally, this should be done on a benefit related basis. The objective of this research was to develop a benefit based methodology for assessment of integrated pedestrian protection systems with pre-crash braking and passive safety components. A methodology has been developed which calculates the cost of pedestrian injury expected, assuming all pedestrians in the target population (i.e. pedestrians impacted by the front of a passenger car) are impacted by the car being assessed, taking into account the impact speed reduction offered by the car’s AEB (if fitted) and the passive safety protection offered by the car’s frontal structure. For rating purposes, this cost can be normalised by comparing it to the cost calculated for selected cars. The methodology uses the speed reductions measured in AEB tests to determine the speed at which each casualty in the target population will be impacted. The injury to each casualty is then calculated using the results from standard Euro NCAP pedestrian impactor tests and injury risk curves. This injury is converted into cost using ‘Harm’ type costs for the body regions tested. These costs are weighted and summed. Weighting factors were determined using accident data from Germany and GB and the results of a benefit analysis performed by the EU FP7 AsPeCSS project. This resulted in German and GB versions of the methodology. The methodology was used to assess cars with good, average and poor Euro NCAP pedestrian ratings, with and without a current AEB system fitted. It was found that the decrease in casualty injury cost achieved by fitting an AEB system was approximately equivalent to that achieved by increasing the passive safety rating from poor to average. Also, it was found that the assessment was influenced strongly by the level of head protection offered in the scuttle and windscreen area because this is where head impact occurs for a large proportion of casualties. The major limitation within the methodology is the assumption used implicitly during weighting. This is that the cost of casualty injuries to body areas, such as the thorax, not assessed by the headform and legform impactors, and other casualty injuries such as those caused by ground impact, are related linearly to the cost of casualty injuries assessed by the impactors. A methodology for assessment of integrated pedestrian protection systems was developed. This methodology is of interest to consumer rating programmes which wish to include assessment of these systems. It also raises the interesting issue if the head impact test area should be weighted to reflect better real-world benefit.
The EVERSAFE project addressed many safety issues for electric vehicles including the crash and post-crash safety. The project reviewed the market shares of full electric and hybrid vehicles, latest road traffic accident data involving severely damaged electric vehicles in Europe, and identified critical scenarios that may be particular for electric vehicles. Also, recent results from international research on the safety of electric vehicles were included in this paper such as results from performed experimental abuse cell and vehicle crash tests (incl. non-standardized tests with the Mitsubishi i-MiEV and the BMW i3), from discussions in the UN IG REESS and the GTR EVS as well as guidelines (handling procedures) for fire brigades from Germany, Sweden and the United States of America. Potential hazards that might arise from damaged electric vehicles after severe traffic accidents are an emerging issue for modern vehicles and were summarized from the perspective of different national approaches and discussed from the practical view of fire fighters. Recent rescue guidelines were reviewed and used as the basis for a newly developed rescue procedure. The paper gives recommendations in particular towards fire fighters, but also to vehicle manufacturers and first-aiders.
Since the beginning of the testing activities related to passive pedestrian safety, the width of the test area being assessed regarding its protection level for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users has been determined by geometrical measurements at the outer contour of the vehicle. During the past years, the trend of a decreased width of the lower extremity test and assessment area realized by special features of the outer vehicle frontend design could be observed. This study discusses different possibilities for counteracting this development and thus finding a robust definition for this area including all structures with high injury risk for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle. While Euro NCAP is addressing the described problem by defining a test area under consideration of the stiff structures underneath the bumper fascia, a detailed study was carried out on behalf of the European Commission, aiming at a robust, worldwide harmonized definition of the bumper test area for legislation, taking into account the specific requirements of different certification procedures of the contracting parties of the UN/ECE agreements from 1958 and 1998. This paper details the work undertaken by BASt, also serving as a contribution to the TF-BTA of the UN/ECE GRSP, towards a harmonized test area in order to better protect the lower extremities of vulnerable road users. The German In-Depth Accident Database GIDAS is studied with respect to the potential benefit of a revised test area. Several practical options are discussed and applied to actual vehicles, investigating the differences and possible effects. Tests are carried out and the results studied in detail. Finally, a proposal for a feasible definition is given and a suggestion is made for solving possible open issues at angled surfaces due to rotation of the impactor. The study shows that, in principle, there is a need for the entire vehicle width being assessed with regard to the protection potential for lower extremities of vulnerable road users. It gives evidence on the necessity for a robust definition of the lower extremity test area including stiff and thus injurious structures at the vehicle frontend, especially underneath the bumper fascia. The legal definition of the lower extremity test area will shortly be almost harmonized with the robust Euro NCAP requirements, as already endorsed by GRSP, taking into account injurious structures and thus contributing to the enhanced protection of vulnerable road users. After finalization of the development of a torso mass for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) it is recommended to consider again the additional benefit of assessing the entire vehicle width.
During the past five years, a Euro NCAP technical working group on pedestrian safety has been working on improving test and assessment procedures for enhanced passive pedestrian safety. After harmonizing the tools and procedures as much as possible with legislation, the work was mainly focused on the development of grid procedures for the pedestrian body regions head, upper leg with pelvis and lower leg with knee. Furthermore, the test parameters for the head and the upper leg were revised, a new lower legform impactor was introduced and the injury thresholds were adjusted or, where necessary, the injury criteria were changed. Finally, the assessment limits and colour scheme were refined, widening the range and adding two more colours in order to provide a more detailed description of the pedestrian safety performance. By abstaining from an assessment based on a worst point selection philosophy, the improved test point determination procedures that were introduced during the years 2013 and 2014 give a more homogeneous, high resolution picture of the pedestrian safety performance of the vehicle frontends. By using a uniform grid for each test zone approximately 200 test points, evenly distributed within each area, can now be assessed per vehicle. The introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor in 2014 enables a more realistic injury prediction of the knee and the tibia using a biofidelic test tool. With the new upper legform test that has been launched in 2015 the assessment in that area is now focusing on the injured body region instead of the injury causing vehicle part and thus is aligned with the approach in the remaining body regions head and lower leg. At the same time, a monitoring test with the headform impactor against the bonnet leading edge is closing the possible gap between the test areas to identify injury causing vehicle parts that moved out of focus due to the introduction of the new upper legform test. The paper describes the new test and assessment procedures with their underlying philosophy and gives an outlook in terms of open issues, specifying the needs for further improvement in the future. In parallel to the work of the pedestrian subgroup, a Euro NCAP working group on heavy vehicles introduced a set of protocol changes in 2011 that were related to the assessment of M1 vehicles derived from commercial vehicles, with a gross vehicle weight between 2.5 and 3.5 tons and 8 or 9 seats. The paper also investigates the applicability of the new pedestrian test and assessment procedures to heavy vehicles.
Upcoming test procedures and regulations consider the use of Q-dummies. Especially Q6 and Q10 will be introduced to assess the safety of child occupants in vehicle rear seats. Therefore detailed knowledge of these dummies is important to improve safety. As recent studies have shown, chest deflection measurements of both dummies are influenced by parameters like belt geometry. This could lead to a non optimized design of child restraint systems (CRS) and belt systems. The objective of this study is to obtain a more detailed understanding of the sensitivity of chest measurements to restraint parameters and to investigate the possibilities of chest acceleration as an alternative for the assessment of chest injury risks. A study of frontal impact sled tests was performed with Q6 and Q10 in a generic rear seat environment on a bench. Belt parameters like modified belt attachment locations were varied. For the Q6 dummy, different positioning settings of the CRS (booster with backrest) and of the dummy itself were investigated. The Q10 dummy was seated on a booster cushion. Here the position of the upper belt anchorage point was varied. To simulate the influence of vehicle rotation in the ODB crash configuration, the bench was pre-rotated on the sled in additional tests with the Q10. This configuration was tested with and without pretensioner and load limiter. Chest deflection in Q6 showed a high sensitivity to changes in positioning of the CRS and the dummy itself. A more slouched position of the CRS or dummy resulted in a reduction of measured chest deflection, whereas chest acceleration increased for a more slouched position of the CRS. Chest deflection in Q10 is sensitive to belt geometry as already shown in other studies. In a more outboard position of the shoulder belt anchorage the measured chest deflection is higher. Chest acceleration shows the opposite tendency, which is highest for the rearmost location of the upper belt anchorage. On a pre-rotated bench the highest chest deflection within this test series was observed without load limiter/pretensioner and an outboard belt position. By optimizing the belt location and the use of pretensioner/load limier the chest deflection was significantly reduced. For the Q6 a criterion based on chest acceleration as well as deflection measured at two locations might be the most reliable approach, which requires further research with an additional upper deflection sensor. In the Q10 the measured chest deflection does not always correctly reflect the severity of chest loading. The deflection is depending on initial belt position and restraint parameters as well as test conditions, which result in different directions of belt migration. A3ms chest acceleration might be a better indicator for severity of chest loading independent of different conditions like belt geometries. However, in some cases the benefit of an optimized restraint system could only be shown by deflection. These findings suggest that further research is needed to identify a chest injury assessment method, which could be based on deflection as well as acceleration or other parameters related to belt to occupant interaction.
Frontal impact is still the most relevant impact direction in terms of injury causation amongst car occupants. Especially for car-to-car frontal impacts the mass ratio between the involved vehicles has a significant impact on the injury risk (the heavier the opponent car the higher the injury risk). In order to address this issue frontal Mobile Deformable Barrier test procedures have been developed world-wide (for example the MPDB procedure that was fully described during the FIMCAR Project). The objective of this study was to investigate how vehicles of different weight classes perform in a mobile barrier test procedure compared to a fixed barrier test procedure (the full width rigid and offset deformable barrier test). Beyond that, the influence of vehicle mass and vehicle deformation on injuries was evaluated based on real world accident data. Five vehicle types were selected and tested in a fixed offset test procedure (ODB), a full width rigid barrier test procedure (FWRB) and a mobile offset test procedure (MPDB). For the accident analyses data from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) was evaluated with a focus on MAIS 2+ injured belted front row car (UN-R 94 compliant cars) occupants in frontal impact accidents. Test data indicates higher dummy loadings, in particular for the head acceleration and chest acceleration, in the MPDB test for the vehicles with a mass lighter than the trolley (1,500 kg) compared to the FWRB test. The trend of increased vehicle stiffness (especially illustrated by tests with the MPDB and small cars) shows the need of a further improvement of passive restraint systems to reduce the occupant loading and with it the injury risk. The analyzed GIDAS data confirm the higher injury risk for occupants in cars with an accident weight of less than 1,500 kg compared to those with a crash weight above 1,500 kg in car-to-car and car-to-object or car-to-HGV, respectively. Furthermore the injury risk increases with decreasing mass ratio (i.e., the opponent car is heavier) in car-to-car accidents. Independent from the higher injury risk, the risk for passenger compartment intrusion in frontal impact appears not to be independent on the crash weight of the car.
This paper deals with the determination of test criteria for the durability assessment of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based geosynthetic barriers (GBR-P) products in tunnel sealing systems. In the project different products for road tunnel application are investigated by systematic long time storage in hot water using a new test procedure based on SIA V 280 standard (test no. 13) and EN 14415. The objective of this research project is to derive suitable exposure conditions and criteria for a practical testing procedure with regard to service lifetimes of up to 100 years. For that test temperature and time as well as the best suitable test medium have been investigated in a structured way. To verify the results of the new test procedure the material properties of GBR-P samples removed from older road tunnels are investigated. Based on the presented results of the still on-going research program some preliminary conclusions regarding the updating of the German regulations for road tunnel sealing systems (ZTV-ING part 5 section 5 and TL/TP KDB) are given.
Tunnel in Spritzbetonbauweise werden in der Regel mit einem Abdichtungssystem aus Kunststoffdichtungsbahnen (KDB) gegen das anstehende Bergwasser abgedichtet. Die Tunnelabdichtungen aus KDB müssen dabei über die gesamte Nutzungsdauer des Bauwerks von in der Regel 130 Jahren zuverlässig ihre Funktion erfüllen. Ein einfacher Austausch der KDB oder der Einbau einer gleichwertigen Alternative ist in der Regel nicht, oder nur mit erheblichem Aufwand möglich. Bislang existieren national und international keine abgesicherten Prüfkriterien, die eine Bestimmung der Langzeitbeständigkeit von KDB über die geforderte Nutzungsdauer von mindestens 100 Jahren ermöglichen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Untersuchungsergebnisse eines BASt Forschungsprojektes präsentiert, in dem Prüfkriterien für die Abschätzung der Langzeitbeständigkeit von KDB aus PVC-P hergeleitet werden. In diesem Projekt werden verschiedene marktübliche KDB für die Tunnelabdichtung mit einem beschleunigten Prüfverfahren "Lagerung in heißem Wasser" systematisch auf ihr Alterungsverhalten hin untersucht. Das hierfür verwendete Immersionsprüfverfahren wurde neu entwickelt und basiert auf der SIA V 280 (Prüfung Nr. 13) und DIN EN 14415. Ziel der Untersuchungen ist es, die erforderlichen Prüfkriterien zu definieren, die für eine praxisgerechte Abschätzung der Nutzungsdauer von mindestens 100 Jahren erforderlich sind. Hierfür werden beispielsweise die Einlagerungsdauer, die Einlagerungstemperatur und das Prüfmedium strukturiert untersucht. Zum Vergleich der Prüfergebnisse aus dem Immersionsprüfverfahren werden Untersuchungen an ausgebauten KDB Proben aus 2 älteren Straßentunneln herangezogen. Die Ergebnisse des Forschungsvorhabens sollen in die Fortschreibung des nationalen Regelwerks für den Straßentunnelbau (TL/TP KDB) einfließen.
Mit Fokus auf Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) wird das urbane NO2-Problem umrissen. Um die Jahresgrenzwerte einzuhalten, sind beispielsweise in allen Straßenschluchten in NRW Reduktionen nötig. Die Europäische Kommission hat gegen mehrere Mitgliedsstaaten, darunter Deutschland, Vertragsverletzungsverfahren wegen der Überschreitung von NO2-Grenzwerten eröffnet. Dargestellt werden die Langzeittrends bezüglich der gemessenen Abnahme bei der Stickoxidbelastung. Potenzielle Maßnahmen können hinsichtlich ihrer möglichen Wirkungen durch den Einsatz von Modellen abgeschätzt werden, zum Beispiel Umweltzonen, Fahrverbote, Elektrofahrzeuge. Die Ergebnisse der Messungen und Modellrechnungen werden dargestellt und kritisch beleuchtet. Als Fazit ergibt sich, dass das urbane NO2-Problem nicht einfach zu lösen ist, Minderungen der NOx-Emissionen spiegeln sich nicht in der gleichen Größenordnung in der Abnahme der NO2-Belastung wieder. Bei zusätzlich wirksamen Maßnahmen wie beispielsweise einem höheren Anteil von Elektrofahrzeugen fehlt die (schnelle) praktische Umsetzbarkeit. Eine Kombination aus lokalen, regionalen und europaweiten Maßnahmen ist nötig, um das Problem zu lösen.
Ausgehend von den rechtlichen Grundlagen für die Luftreinhaltung sowie den Grenzwertfestlegungen für Feinstaub (PM10) sowie Stickoxide (NO2) wird auf die heutige Luftqualität in Städten mit Schwerpunkt Stuttgart eingegangen. Dargelegt werden die festgestellten Überschreitungen bei den Grenzwerten für PM10 und NO2. Eingegangen wird auf die Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Luftbelastung in Stuttgart und die Wirkungen in Bezug auf die Senkung der Grenzwert-Übersschreitungen beziehungsweise Jahresmittelwerte von PM10 und NO2 an den Hotspot-Stationen "Am Neckartor" und "Hohenheimer Straße". Abschließend wird ein perspektivischer Ausblick gegeben: obwohl die Luftsituation in den Städten kontinuierlich besser geworden ist, gibt es an stark befahrenen städtischen Straßen weiterhin Grenzwertüberschreitungen. Die EU-Vertragsverletzungsverfahren machen weitere Maßnahmen notwendig. Die Städte brauchen praxiserprobte Maßnahmen und keine langfristigen, kostspieligen Pilotversuche mit unsicherem Ausgang.
High demands on exhaust emissions of passenger cars and light commercial vehicles require complex technologies. The three-way catalytic converter is an essential part of state of the art emission control systems. If a catalytic converter is damaged or its effectiveness deteriorates, it can be replaced by a replacement converter. Replacement catalytic converters from the aftermarket are approved on the basis of Regulation No 103 of the UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. According to this regulation the replacement catalytic converter shall be designed, constructed and capable of being mounted so as to enable the vehicle to comply with the provisions taken as a basis for its type approval. Furthermore the pollution emissions must be effectively limited throughout the entire normal service life of the vehicle under normal operating conditions. In the context of the research project, the durability of replacement catalytic converters was examined. A VW Golf with emission standard Euro 4, 1.4 l petrol engine (55 kW) was selected as a test vehicle. At the start of the examinations, the vehicle showed a mileage of 75,000 km. The selected vehicle was regularly serviced in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. No emission-relevant faults were recorded by the OBD system. The initial control measurement of the vehicle in as-delivered condition with the originally installed catalytic converter showed that the corresponding emissions of the regulated pollutants were considerably below the Euro 4 emission limits to be applied. Subsequently, an original replacement catalytic converter, which was purchased from an authorised dealer, and 4 catalytic converters purchased in the independent aftermarket, were examined. The replacement catalytic converters were conditioned according to the specifications of ECE Regulation No 103 and then measured in new condition. The catalytic converters were then aged on a burner test rig. Here a total mileage of 80,000 km was simulated. After 10,000 km and 40,000 km, the ageing was interrupted and the exhaust gas emissions of the test vehicle with the aged catalytic converters were measured. The examination was ended as soon as a limit value had been exceeded. The results of the project indicate that with the replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases available in the independent aftermarket, considerable quality differences can occur. At the end of the ageing over a distance of 80,000 km only the original replacement catalytic converter and one replacement catalytic converter from the independent aftermarket complied with the Euro 4 emission limits. With one replacement catalytic converter, the Euro 4 emission limits were already exceeded in new condition. With another replacement catalytic converter, the examination was aborted after 10,000 km ageing and with a further catalytic converter after 40,000 km ageing due to the Euro 4 emission limits being exceeded. The ECE Regulation No 103 provides for a test of durability of such systems over 80,000 km, but also alternatively enables the use of fixed deterioration factors. In practice, the durability of the replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases is guaranteed by their manufacturers. However, replacement catalytic converters are rarely inspected as part of the approval. In-use compliance provisions for replacement systems for the after-treatment of exhaust gases are not mentioned in the corresponding specifications. The results of this study indicate that the requirements in the ECE Regulation No 103 are not adequate to ensure the durability of replacement catalytic converters.
Die verschärften Anforderungen an das Emissionsverhalten von Pkw und leichten Nutzfahrzeugen haben aufwändige Technologien erforderlich gemacht. Ein wesentlicher Bestandteil aktueller Abgasnachbehandlungssysteme ist der Katalysator. Wenn ein Katalysator beschädigt wird oder seine Wirksamkeit nachlässt, kann er durch einen Austauschkatalysator ersetzt werden. Austauschkatalysatoren, die im Zubehörmarkt angeboten werden, werden auf Basis der Regelung Nr. 103 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE - United Nations Economic Commission for Europe) genehmigt. Entsprechend dieser Regelung muss der Austauschkatalysator so beschaffen sein und so eingebaut werden können, dass das Fahrzeug den Vorschriften der Regelungen entspricht, die bei seiner Typprüfung zu Grunde gelegt worden sind. Außerdem müssen die Schadstoffemissionen während der gesamten normalen Lebensdauer des Fahrzeuges unter normalen Betriebsbedingungen wirksam begrenzt werden. Im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens wurde die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren untersucht. Als Testfahrzeug wurde ein VW Golf der Abgasstufe Euro 4 mit einem 1.4-l-Benzinmotor (55 kW) ausgewaehlt. Bei Beginn der Untersuchungen wies das Fahrzeug eine Laufleistung von 75.500 km auf. Das ausgewählte Fahrzeug war regelmäßig entsprechend den Herstellervorgaben gewartet worden. Im OBD-System waren keine abgasrelevanten Fehler abgelegt. Bei der Eingangsmessung des Fahrzeuges im Anlieferungszustand mit dem ursprünglich verbauten Katalysator wurden die anzuwendenden Euro 4-Grenzwerte deutlich unterschritten. Anschließend wurden ein Original-Austauschkatalysator, der in einer markengebundenen Fachwerkstatt, und 4 Katalysatoren, die verdeckt im freien Teilemarkt beschafft worden waren, untersucht. Die Austauschkatalysatoren wurden entsprechend den Vorgaben der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 konditioniert und dann im Neuzustand vermessen. Anschließend wurden die Katalysatoren auf einem Brennerprüfstand gealtert. Dabei wurde eine Laufleistung von insgesamt 80.000 km simuliert. Nach 10.000 km und 40.000 km wurde die Alterung unterbrochen und die Abgasemissionen des Testfahrzeugs wurden mit den gealterten Katalysatoren gemessen. Sobald bei einem Katalysator eine Grenzwertüberschreitung festgestellt wurde, wurde die Untersuchung beendet. Die Ergebnisse der Untersuchung zeigen, dass bei im freien Teilemarkt erhältlichen Austauschsystemen zur Abgasnachbehandlung erhebliche Qualitätsunterschiede auftreten können. Nur mit dem Original-Austauschkatalysator und mit einem Austauschkatalysator, der im freien Markt beschafft worden war, konnten auch nach einer Alterung über 80.000 km die Euro 4 Grenzwerte eingehalten werden. Bei einem Austauschkatalysator wurden bereits im Neuzustand die Euro 4 Grenzwerte überschritten. Bei einem anderen Austauschkatalysator wurde die Untersuchung nach 10.000 km Alterung und bei einem weiteren Katalysator nach 40.000 km Alterung aufgrund einer Überschreitung der Euro 4 Grenzwerte abgebrochen. Die ECE Regelung Nr. 103 sieht eine Prüfung der Dauerhaltbarkeit derartiger Systeme über 80.000 km vor, ermöglicht jedoch alternativ die Verwendung von festen Verschlechterungsfaktoren. In der Praxis wird die Dauerhaltbarkeit der Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung von ihren Herstellern garantiert, eine Überprüfung findet im Rahmen der Genehmigung jedoch in den seltensten Fällen statt. Eine Feldüberwachung für Austauschsysteme zur Abgasnachbehandlung ist in den entsprechenden Vorschriften nicht vorgesehen. Die Ergebnisse dieser Untersuchung weisen darauf hin, dass die Anforderungen in der ECE Regelung Nr. 103 nicht ausreichen, um die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Austauschkatalysatoren sicherzustellen.
Mobility plays an important role in the Federal Republic of Germany. Motorised private transport and, consequently, passenger vehicles are the crucial factor. Vehicles should be environmentally and socially compatible yet also economically efficient at the same time. The crucial factor for pollution of the environment from road traffic is the exhaust emissions of the vehicles on the road. This is why, with the Directive 98/69/EC and the related introduction of exhaust emission standard Euro 3, the testing of the conformity of passenger and light commercial vehicles (in-service conformity check) was introduced. Vehicles already on the roads are to be examined again under type examination conditions (Type I Test) after a statistical selection process. In this way it is to be ensured that the systems and components relevant for the exhaust emissions of a vehicle will also function after several thousand kilometres. This is why the vehicles are checked again during in-service conformity check with respect to their limited pollution components. Due to the ever greater significance of CO2 emissions, both the CO2 emissions and the fuel consumption were included in this research project. For the success of such a project the choice of vehicle is of critical importance. Since this is the only way it is possible to also obtain a representative result. Therefore, in addition to the selection criteria required by law, statistical and technical criteria are also considered. The vehicle owners were selected on a random basis. All test vehicles were checked with respect to their pollutant components in the emissions laboratory in accordance with their standard. By law the same testing conditions apply in an in-service conformity check as in the relevant type approval. In this research project a total of 17 vehicle types were examined. Six types were equipped with positive-ignition engines and 11 types with compression ignition engines. Both groups were to each include vehicles of the limits Euro 4 and Euro 5. For vehicle types with positive-ignition engines, there was one type with the exhaust emission standard Euro 5. All others satisfied the exhaust emission standard Euro 4. For the vehicle types with compression ignition engines, 4 types satisfied exhaust emission standard Euro 5 and 7 types fulfilled exhaust emission standard Euro 4. Among the vehicle types with compression ignition and exhaust emission standard Euro4, there were 4 types of category M1 and 3 types of category N1 of class III. The aim of the research project is to examine the exhaust emissions in-service conformity of passenger and light commercial vehicles in operation to draw conclusions concerning the durability of engine components and systems for exhaust emission treatment. Overall in this in-service conformity testing programme, we were able, in accordance with the statistical procedure, to assess all 17 of the vehicle types tested as "positive". With the exception of one vehicle type, it was possible to conclude the random test for all vehicle types tested with the minimum random sample. This means that all 3 vehicles of one type in as-delivered condition complied with or fell below the respective limits for pollutant emissions according to the criteria of the statistical procedure. In the case of one vehicle type, where the random sample had to be enlarged, it was necessary to examine a total of 8 vehicles. Furthermore, with all vehicle types the CO2-emissions and fuel consumption (Type I Test) were determined to subsequently compare the measured CO2 emissions with those of the manufacturers. Of the 17 vehicle types examined, eleven vehicle types complied with the relevant manufacturers" values or fell below them. With six vehicle types, the CO2 emissions were more than the permissible 4% above the manufacturer- value during the Type I Test.
Mobilität spielt in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland eine wichtige Rolle. Dabei ist der motorisierte Individualverkehr und somit der Pkw-Verkehr die entscheidende Größe. Der Verkehr soll umweltgerecht, sozialverträglich aber auch gleichzeitig wirtschaftlich effizient sein. Entscheidend für die Schadstoffbelastung der Umwelt durch den Straßenverkehr sind die Abgasemissionen der im Verkehr befindlichen Fahrzeuge. Daher wurde mit der Richtlinie 98/69/EG und der damit verbundenen Einführung der Abgasstufe Euro 3 erstmalig die Prüfung der Konformität von in Betrieb befindlichen Personenkraftwagen und leichten Nutzfahrzeugen (Feldüberwachung) eingeführt. Dabei sollen bereits im Verkehr befindliche Fahrzeuge nach einer statistischen Auswahl unter Typprüfbedingungen (Typ I Test) erneut untersucht werden. So soll gewährleistet werden, dass die abgasrelevanten Systeme und Bauteile eines Fahrzeuges auch noch nach mehreren tausend Kilometern funktionieren. Deshalb werden die Fahrzeuge bei der Feldüberwachung auf ihre limitierten Schadstoffkomponenten ein weiteres Mal überprüft. Aufgrund der immer größeren Bedeutung der CO2-Emissionen wurden in diesem Forschungsvorhaben sowohl die CO2-Emissionen als auch der Kraftstoffverbrauch mit erfasst. Für den Erfolg eines solchen Projektes ist die Fahrzeugauswahl von entscheidender Bedeutung. Denn nur so ist es möglich auch ein repräsentatives Ergebnis zu erhalten. Deshalb wurden neben den gesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Auswahlkriterien auch statistische und technische Kriterien berücksichtigt. Dabei erfolgte die Auswahl der Fahrzeughalter nach dem Zufallsprinzip. Alle Prüffahrzeuge wurden im Abgaslabor, entsprechend ihrer Abgasnorm, auf ihre Schadstoffkomponenten überprüft. Gemäß der Gesetzgebung gelten bei einer Feldüberwachung die gleichen Prüfbedingungen wie bei der jeweiligen Typgenehmigung. In diesem Forschungsvorhaben wurden insgesamt 17 Fahrzeugtypen untersucht. Wobei 6 Typen mit Fremdzündungsmotor und 11 Typen mit Selbstzündungsmotor ausgestattet waren. Beide Gruppen sollten jeweils Fahrzeuge der Grenzwertstufen Euro 4 und Euro 5 beinhalten. Bei den Fahrzeugtypen mit Fremdzündungsmotor war ein Typ mit der Abgasnorm Euro 5, alle anderen erfüllten die Abgasnorm Euro 4. Bei den Fahrzeugtypen mit Selbstzündungsmotor erfüllten 4 Typen die Abgasstufe Euro 5 und 7 Typen entsprachen der Abgasstufe Euro 4. Unter den Fahrzeugtypen mit Kompressionszündung und der Abgasnorm Euro 4 befanden sich 4 Typen der Klasse M1 und 3 Typen der Klasse N1 der Gruppe III. Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens ist es, die Abgasemissionen von in Betrieb befindlichen Pkw und leichten Nutzfahrzeugen zu untersuchen, um so Rückschlüsse auf die Dauerhaltbarkeit von Motorkomponenten und Systemen zur Abgasnachbehandlung ziehen zu können. Insgesamt konnten bei dieser Feldüberwachung, gemäß dem statistischen Verfahren, alle 17 geprüften Fahrzeugtypen mit "positiv" bewertet werden. Mit Ausnahme eines Fahrzeugtyps, wurde bei allen untersuchten Fahrzeugtypen, die Stichprobe mit der Mindeststichprobengröße abgeschlossen. Das bedeutet, dass alle 3 Fahrzeuge eines Typs im Anlieferungszustand die jeweiligen Grenzwerte für Schadstoffemissionen gemäß den Kriterien des statistischen Verfahrens einhielten bzw. unterschritten. Nur bei einem Fahrzeugtyp war die Erhöhung der Stichprobe auf 8 Fahrzeuge erforderlich. Weiterhin wurden bei allen Fahrzeugtypen die CO2-Emissionen und der Kraftstoffverbrauch (Typ I Test) bestimmt, um anschließend die gemessenen CO2-Emissionen mit denen der Hersteller vergleichen zu können. Von den 17 untersuchten Fahrzeugtypen hielten elf Fahrzeugtypen die jeweiligen Herstellerangaben ein oder unterschritten diese. Bei sechs Fahrzeugtypen lagen die CO2-Emissionen um mehr als die bei der Typprüfung zulässigen 4% über der Herstellerangabe.
Für dieses Forschungsvorhaben wurden ca. 2.000 im Verkehr zugelassene Fahrzeuge der Fahrzeugklassen M1/N1, die mit dem OBD-System ausgerüstet sind und ab 01.01.2006 erstmals zum Verkehr zugelassen wurden, im Rahmen der regelmäßigen technischen Überwachung (-§ 29 StVZO) bezüglich der Ergebnisse der OBD-Prüfung und der Endrohrmessung untersucht. Die Untersuchungen wurden dabei von nationalen Überwachungsinstitutionen ausgeführt. Die Prüfungen erfolgten exakt nach den Vorgaben, die in der AU-Richtlinie vom 07.05.2012 (Verkehrsblatt 2012, S. 330) festgelegt sind. Auch wenn gemäß der AU-Richtlinie nach Abfrage des OBD-Systems auf eine anschließende Endrohrmessung verzichtet werden konnte, wurde diese im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens zusätzlich durchgeführt. Die Untersuchungen wurden als zufällige Auswahl (tageweise Vollerhebung) und prinzipiell zu gleichen Teilen für Fahrzeuge mit Otto- und Dieselmotoren durchgeführt. Die Untersuchungen fanden im Zeitraum zwischen September 2012 und März 2014 statt. Es wurden die Ergebnisse von 975 Untersuchungen an Fahrzeugen mit Ottomotor sowie 921 Untersuchungen an Fahrzeugen mit Dieselmotor von FSD untersucht und ausgewertet. Untersuchungen mit unvollständigen Daten, nicht plausibler Dokumentationen, nichtbestandener Sichtprüfung, nicht herstellbarer Kommunikation zwischen dem AU-Gerät und dem Fahrzeug oder nicht vollständiger Prüfbereitschaftstests wurden für die weitere Auswertung, d. h. für den Vergleich der Ergebnisse der OBD-Abfrage und der Endrohrmessung verworfen. Die Auswertung erfolgte getrennt nach Diesel- und Ottomotor sowie Euro-Stufen. Damit wurde eine belastbare Datenbasis erarbeitet, die den Umfang von Abweichungen (in Bezug auf "bestanden" / "nicht bestanden") zwischen dem Ergebnis der Messung am Auspuff und der Abfrage des On-Board-Diagnosesystems aufzeigt.