360 Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste; Verbände
Motorradfahrer sind im Straßenverkehr besonders gefährdet, nahezu kein Unfall endet ohne Verletzungen der Motorradaufsassen. Wenn ein Unfall unabwendbar ist (das Unfallgeschehen der Motorräder zeigt seit Jahren stetige Besserungen), verbleibt dem Fahrer als Schutz nur seine eigene Bekleidung. Der im Rahmen diese Projekts angestellte Vergleich verschiedener Feldstudien zeigt, dass hauptsächlich die Extremitäten mit Schwerpunkt bei den Beinen verletzt werden. Ähnlich wie hohe Helmtragequoten zum Rückgang der Kopfverletzungen geführt haben, könnte zweckdienliche Schutzkleidung nahezu vollständig Hautabschürfungen und damit verbunden Wundinfektionen vermeiden. Gleichzeitig werden die Schwellwerte für den Eintritt anderer Verletzungen (zum Beispiel Brüche, Bänderrisse, innere Verletzungen) zu höheren Kollisionsgeschwindigkeiten verschoben. Die im Projektverlauf erarbeiteten Anforderungen an Motorradfahrerschutzkleidung sind so spezifisch und vielfältig, dass sie mit keiner anderen, zum Beispiel berufsspezifischen Kleidung vergleichbar sind. Mit Analysen wurde gezeigt, dass einige Anforderungen nur unter Zielkonflikten mit anderen verwirklichbar sind. Die dadurch nötige Mehrfachfunktion mancher Bauteile führt dazu, dass die Prüfung von Eigenschaften kaum mit den Methoden aus üblichen Normenwerken durchgeführt werden kann. Vor diesem Hintergrund begann die Entwicklung speziell angepasster Versuche. In der Regel bilden sie realistisch die Belastungen bei einem Sturz auf die Fahrbahnoberfläche und in der anschließenden Rutschphase nach. Durch die Verlegung der Versuche in das Labor wird die Reproduzierbarkeit erhöht, die Kosten bleiben vergleichsweise gering. Als wichtigste Prüfkriterien wurden Abriebverhalten, Reibwärmeisolation, Reibbeiwert, Stossdämpfung, Widerstand gegen Stich- und Schnittbeschädigung, Formschluss und Bauteilsteifigkeit erarbeitet. Vorgestellt und bewertet wurden verschiedene bereits existierende Prüfverfahren. Wenn sie ungeeignet schienen oder wenn für ein wichtiges Kriterium kein Verfahren zu finden war, wurden eigene neue Vorschläge gemacht. Unter Abwägung von Prüfaufwand und Aussagekraft der Ergebnisse wurde ein Vorschlag für ein normungsfähiges Prüfverfahren erarbeitet. Im Vorschlag berücksichtigt sind nur bereits existierende oder einfach verwirklichbare Prüfverfahren, die für Motorradfahrerschutzkleidung als geeignet angesehen werden.
The accident research of Hanover and (from 1999 on) Dresden registered 736 leg injuries (AIS ≥ 2) from 1983 to March 2007. 174 of these injuries (23.6 %) were fractures or dislocations of foot and ankle. 149 feet of 141 front seat car occupants in 140 cars were affected. Of these 117 were drivers, 24 were front seat passengers. The mean age of occupants was 38.5 -± 16.8 years. Ankle fractures were the most frequent injury (n = 82; 80 malleolar fractures, 2 pilon fractures). 34 fractures and dislocations affected the hindfoot (5 talus and 26 calcaneal fractures, 2 subtalar dislocations and 1 subtotal amputation) , 16 to midfoot (4 navicular fractures, 5 cuboid fractures, 3 fractures of cuneiformia, 2 dislocations of chopart joint, 1 subtotal amputation, and one severe decollement) and 39 the forefoot (metatarsal fractures). Open fractures were seldom seen (2 malleolar fractures, 1 metatarsal fracture). Both feet were injured in 10 cases. 33 occupants (23.4 %) were polytaumatic had a polytrauma, 17 of them died. 81 percent of the occupants were belted. The cars were divided in pre EuroNCAP (year of manufacture 1997 and older) and post EuroNCAP cars (year of manufacture 1998 and newer). Most of the foot injuries were seen in pre EuroNCAP cars. Most of the occupants sat in compact cars (40 drivers and 9 front seat passengers) and large family cars (27 drivers and 7 co-drivers). 49 of 140 accidents occurred on country roads, 26 on main roads and 13 on motorways. The crash direction was mostly frontal. Generally were found no differences of delta v- and EES-level between the injured foot regions, but divided into pre- and post-EuroNCAP cars there was a tendency to higher delta v- and EES-levels in newer cars. The frequency of foot injuries increased linearly with increasing delta v-level; but above delta v-level of 55 km/h the linear increase only was seen in pre-EuroNCAP cars, post-EuroNCAP cars showed no further increase of injuries. The footwell intrusion showed no difference between the injured foot regions but pre-EuroNCAP cars had a tendency to higher footwell intrusion. There were no differences in footwell intrusion between the car types. Only 29 of 174 fractures or dislocations of foot were seen in post-EuroNCAP cars, the predominate number of these injuries (n = 145) were noticed in pre-EuroNCAP cars. A lower probability of long-term impairment was found in post-EuroNCAP cars for equal delta v levels, using the AIS2008 associated Functional Capacity Index (FCI) for the foot region.
Nowadays airbags are part of the standard equipment in almost all new cars. While airbags are saving an increasing number of people from severe injuries and death in moderate and high speed crashes, they do not completely prevent dashboard injuries. The most common mechanism in dashboard injuries is a posteriorly directed force to the proximal tibia with the knee flexed. This may occur during a motor vehicle frontal impact accident when a knee of the driver or the front-seat passenger strikes the dashboard. The posterior force can be combined with a abducting or rotational force leading to concomitant lateral or posterolateral injury. Car and airbag manufacturers therefore develop special inflatable systems to reduce the impact force in dashboard injuries. Every new inflatable system, however, has to be evaluated in out of position situations in which the system might cause injuries to certain body areas. Therefore, we investigated a new kneebag system in different critical seating positions of post mortem test subjects (PMTS). The tested knee airbag module is a folded airbag (18 litre volume) which is installed below the lower section of the instrument panel of a passenger car. Using four PMTS (2 male, 2 female, age 36"67) the following positions were tested: normal seating position, knee flexed >90 degrees and knee flexed <60 degrees in static deployment tests with direct contact. In addition a dynamic test (48.8kph, AAMA-pulse) was carried out with the PMTS belted in a normal seating position. The inflation phase and the impact of the system on the knee/lower leg were analysed by high speed videos. After the test the lower legs of the PMTS were examined by Xray and autopsy. All soft tissue injuries and bone fractures were recorded. All the tests could be evaluated. Except some superficial skin lesions in the impact area no fracture of the bones around the knee and no knee ligament and tendon injuries were observed. Neither video analysis nor autopsy of the PMTS showed any critical contact injuries caused by the inflation process of the bag. Therefore, it can be concluded that in the tested seating positions which are the most critical for the knee area the knee bag system is safe.
The improvement of passive car security devices led to a reduction of injuries, especially of the head, the neck and the torso mainly due to the airbag function. The passenger's foot and ankle could not profit from this development. Some investigators even reported a progression of leg injuries (1). In this study, we investigated a current collective of patients with foot and ankle fractures or severe soft tissue injuries in relation with defined crash parameters. Special interest was paid to the car's footwell.
The number of injuries sustained by car occupants involving the head, thorax, spine, pelvis and the upper limbs have been reduced significantly during recent years. This is probably due to better safety features in the cars, especially the availability and usage of safety belts, airbags etc. Therefore one can notice clinically a relative increase in survivors of severe frontal crashes, but many of them have injuries to the lower extremities. To verify this, we analyzed the foot and ankle injuries of front seat passengers.