Refine
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Article (1)
- Book (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Keywords
- Fahrzeug (7) (remove)
Institute
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (7)
- Sonstige (1)
Die amtliche Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik kann nur in begrenztem Umfang Informationen zu Unfallentstehung, Unfallablauf sowie zu den zugrunde liegenden Verletzungsmechanismen bereitstellen. Verbleibende Informationslücken lassen sich durch spezielle Erhebungsteams schließen, die Verkehrsunfälle nach wissenschaftlichen Aspekten dokumentieren. Hierzu unterhalten das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen seit 30 Jahren ein Forschungsprojekt zur Unfalldatenerhebung an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover. Seit 1999 erfolgt eine Kooperation mit der Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik (FAT), die ein weiteres Erhebungsteam an der Technischen Universität Dresden unterhält. Die Unfalldaten gehen in die gemeinsame GIDAS-Datenbank ein, aus der sich umfassende Informationen zu den breit gefächerten Forschungsfeldern "Passive und aktive Fahrzeugsicherheit", "Verkehrs- und Rettungsmedizin" und "Straßenbezogene Sicherheitsfragen" gewinnen lassen. In der Zukunft werden Unfallvermeidungsstrategien und Unfallursachenprophylaxe im Vordergrund einer prospektiven Unfallforschung stehen. Die Daten werden auch in Zukunft für die weitere Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit einen bedeutenden Beitrag leisten.
Die Klasse der Leichtkraftfahrzeuge (LKfz) unterliegt in Deutschland bislang keiner Zulassungspflicht und damit auch keiner regelmäßigen technischen Überwachung. Es handelt sich hierbei um Fahrzeuge mit einer Leermasse unter 350 kg und einer zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 45 km/h. Das äußere Erscheinungsbild der LKfz ähnelt dem eines normalen Kleinwagens. Die Fahrzeuge erhalten ein Versicherungskennzeichen, als Fahrerlaubnis wird ein Führerschein der Klasse B benötigt. Im Rahmen dieser Forschungsarbeit wurde untersucht, ob von der Einführung einer obligatorischen technischen Überwachung für LKfz ein Beitrag zur Verkehrssicherheit zu erwarten ist und wie eine solche Überprüfung aussehen sollte. Hierzu wurden stichprobenhaft drei gebrauchte LKfz unterschiedlicher Hersteller, ein neues LKfz sowie ein vergleichbarer kompakter Pkw beschafft. Die Untersuchung erfolgte in drei Schritten: - Die LKfz wurden zunächst einer Hauptuntersuchung nach Paragraf 29 Straßenverkehrszulassungsordnung (StVZO) zugeführt und anschließend einer darüber hinausgehenden Prüfung unterzogen. Dabei zeigten sich teilweise erhebliche, sicherheitsrelevante Mängel, die ohne eine Überprüfung unerkannt geblieben wären. - Um Aussagen über die aktive Sicherheit der LKfz zu erhalten, wurden Versuche zur Fahrdynamik durchgeführt. Prinzipiell zeigten sich im Vergleich untereinander sowie mit dem normalen Kleinwagen keine wesentlichen Unterschiede in den fahrdynamischen Eigenschaften im Geschwindigkeitsbereich bis 45 km/h; es kam zu keinen kritischen Fahrsituationen. Allerdings wurden erst durch die Fahrversuche Defekte an der Bremse und der Lenkung bei je einem der LKfz entdeckt. - Zur Beurteilung der passiven Sicherheit wurden die LKfz, ausgerüstet mit einem Dummy, mit einer Geschwindigkeit von 35 km/h gegen einen starren Block gefahren. Auswirkungen auf die passive Sicherheit der LKfz aufgrund einer fehlenden technischen Überwachung konnten hierbei nicht nachgewiesen werden. Grundsätzlich zeigte sich jedoch, dass bei der passiven Sicherheit der LKfz ein erhebliches Verbesserungspotenzial besteht. Resultierend aus den Ergebnissen dieser Untersuchungen ergibt sich folgende Forderung: Zur Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit sollte eine regelmäßige technische Überwachung der LKfz eingeführt werden. Die Überprüfung sollte in Anlehnung an die Hauptuntersuchung von Pkw erfolgen, im Prüfumfang jedoch speziell auf die LKfz abgestimmt werden. Hierzu gehört insbesondere eine kurze Probefahrt, um Mängel an der Bremsanlage beziehungsweise Lenkanlage oder Manipulationen an der Drosselung der Geschwindigkeit feststellen zu können.
In Germany the number of casualties in passenger car to pedestrian crashes has been reduced by a considerable amount of 40% as regards fatalities and 25% with regard to seriously injured pedestrians since the year 2001. Similar trends can be seen in other European countries. The reasons for that positive development are still under investigation. As infrastructural or behavioral changes do in general take a longer time to be effective in real world, explanations related to improved active and passive safety of passenger vehicles can be more relevant in providing answers for this trend. The effect of passive pedestrian protection " specified by the Euro NCAP pedestrian test result " is of particular interest and has already been analyzed by several authors. However, the number of vehicles with some valid Euro NCAP pedestrian score (post 2002 rating) was quite limited in most of those studies. To overcome this problem of small datasets German National Accident Records have been taken to investigate a similar objective but now based on a much bigger dataset. The paper uses German National Accident Records from the years 2009 to 2011. In total 65.140 records of pedestrian to passenger car crashes have been available. Considering crash parameters like accident location (rural / urban areas) etc., 27.143 of those crashes have been classified to be relevant for the analysis of passive pedestrian safety. In those 27.143 records 7.576 Euro NCAP rated vehicles (post 2002 rating) have been identified. In addition it was possible to identify vehicles which comply with pedestrian protection legislation (2003/102/EG) where phase 1 came into force in October 2005. A significant correlation between Euro NCAP pedestrian score and injury outcome in real-life car to pedestrian crashes was found. Comparing a vehicle scoring 5 points and a vehicle scoring 22 points, pedestrians" conditional probability of getting fatally injured is reduced by 35% (from 0.58% to 0.37%) for the later one. At the same time the probability of serious injuries can be reduced by 16% (from 27.4% to 22.9%). No significant injury reducing effect, associated with the introduction of pedestrian protection legislation (phase 1) was detected. Considerable effects have also been identified comparing diesel and gasoline cars. Higher engine displacements are associated with a lower injury risk for pedestrians. The most relevant parameter has been "time of accident", whereas pedestrians face a more than 2 times higher probability to be fatally injured during night and darkness as compared to daytime conditions.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe (EU27) is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car's safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EU-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car's frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation. This paper reports the cost benefit analyses performed to estimate the effect of the following potential changes to the frontal impact regulation: • Option 1 " No change and allow current measures to propagate throughout the vehicle fleet. • Option 2 " Add a full width test to the current offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) test. • Option 3 " Add a full width test and replace the current ODB test with a Progressive Deformable Barrier (PDB) test. For the analyses national data were used from Great Britain (STATS 19) and from Germany (German Federal Statistical Office). In addition in-depth real word crash data were used from CCIS (Great Britain) and GIDAS (Germany). To estimate the benefit a generalised linear model, an injury reduction model and a matched pairs modelling approach were applied. The benefits were estimated to be: for Option 1 "No change" about 2.0%; for Option 2 "FW test" ranging from 5 to 12% and for Option 3 "FW and PDB tests" 9 to 14% of car occupant killed and seriously injured casualties.
Today, Euro NCAP is a well established rating system for passive car safety. The significance of the ratings must however be evaluated by comparison with national accident data. For this purpose accidents with involvement of two passenger cars have been taken from the German National Road Accident Register (record years 1998 to 2004) to evaluate the results of the NCAP frontal impact test configuration. Injury data from both drivers involved in frontal car to car collisions have been sampled and have been compared, using a "Bradley Terry Model" which is well established in the area of paired comparisons. Confounders " like mass ratio of the cars involved, gender of the driver, etc. " have been accounted for in the statistical model. Applying the Bradley Terry Model to the national accident data the safety ranking from Euro NCAP has been validated (safety level: 1star <2 star <3 star <4 star). Significant safety differences are found between cars of the 1 and 2 star category as compared to cars of the 3 and 4 star category. The impact of the mass ratio was highly significant and most influential. Changing the mass ratio by an amount of 10% will raise the chance for the driver of the heavier car to get better off by about 18%. The impact of driver gender was again highly significant, showing a nearly 2 times lower injury risk for male drivers. With regard to the NCAP rating drivers of a high rated car are more than 2 times more probable (70% chance) to get off less injured in a frontal collision as compared to the driver of a low rated car.
In spite of today's highly sophisticated crash test procedures like the different NCAP programs running world-wide, bad real world crash performance of cars is still an issue. There are crash situations which are not sufficiently represented by actual test configurations. This is especially true for car to car, as well as for car to object impacts. The paper describes reasons for this bad performance. The reasons are in principal bad structural interaction between the car and its impact partners (geometric incompatibility), unadjusted front end stiffness (stiffness incompatibility) and collapse of passenger compartments. To show the efficiency of improving cars' structural behaviour in accidents with different impact partners an accident data analysis has been taken out by members of European Project VC-COMPAT. Accident data analysis has shown that in Germany between 15,000 and 20,000 of the now severely injured car occupants might get less injured and between 600 and 900 car occupant fatalities might be saved. Similar results arise for the UK.