Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2015 (10) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (10) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (7)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (4)
A methodology to derive precision requirements for automatic emergency braking (AEB) test procedures
(2015)
AEB Systems are becoming important to increase traffic safety. Test procedures in testing for consumer information, manufacturer self-certification and technical regulations are used to ensure a certain minimum performance of these systems. Consequently, test robustness, test efficiency and finally test cost become increasingly important. The key driver for testing effort and test costs is the required repeatable accuracy in a test design - the higher the accuracy, the higher effort and test costs. On the other hand, the performance of active safety systems depends on time discretization in the environment perception and other sub-systems: for instance, typical sensors supply information with a cycle time of 50 - 150 ms. Time discretization results in an inherent spread of system performance, even if the test conditions are perfectly equal. The proposed paper shows a methodology to derive requirements for a test setup (e.g. test repeats, use of driving robots, ...) as function of AEB system generation and rating method (e.g. Euro NCAP points awarded, pass/fail, ...). While the methodology itself is applicable to AEB pedestrian and AEB Car-Car scenarios, due to the lack of sufficient test data for AEB Car-Car, the focus of this paper is on AEB pedestrian scenarios. A simulation model for the performance of AEB Pedestrian systems allows for the systematic variation of the discretization time as well as test condition accuracy. This model is calibrated with test results of 4 production vehicles for AEB Pedestrian, all fully tested by BASt according to current Euro NCAP test protocols. Selected parameters to observe the accuracy of the test setup in case of pedestrian AEB is the calculated impact position of pedestrian on the vehicle front (as if no braking would have occurred), and the test vehicle speed accuracy. These variable was shown in real tests to be repeatable in the range of ± 5 cm and ± 0,25 km/h, respectively, with a fully robotized state of the art test setup. The sensitivity of AEB performance (measured in achieved speed reduction as well as overall rating result according to current Euro NCAP rating methods) towards discretization and the sensitivity of performance towards test accuracy then is compared to identify economic yet robust test concepts. These comparisons show that the available repeatability accuracy of current test setups is more than sufficient for today's AEB system capabilities. Time discretization problems dominate the performance spread especially in test scenarios with a limited pedestrian dummy reveal time (e.g. child behind obstruction, running adult scenarios with low car speeds). This would allow to increase test tolerances to decrease test cost. A methodology which allows to derive the required tolerances in active safety tests might be valuable especially for NCAPs of emerging countries that do not have the necessary equipment (e.g. driving robots, positioning units) available for the full-scale and high tolerance EuroNCAP active safety procedures yet still want to rate active safety systems, thus improving the global safety.
Euro NCAP will start to test pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEB) from 2016 on. Test procedures for these tests had been developed by and discussed between the AsPeCSS project and other initiatives (e.g. the AEB group with Thatcham Research from the UK). This paper gives an overview on the development process from the AsPeCSS side, summarizes the current test and assessment procedures as of March 2015 and shows test and assessment results of five cars that had been tested by BASt for AsPeCSS and the respective manufacturer. The test and assessment methodology seems appropriate to rate the performance of different vehicles. The best test result - still one year ahead of the test implementation - is around 80%, while the worst rating result is around 10%. Other vehicles are between these boundaries.
During the past five years, a Euro NCAP technical working group on pedestrian safety has been working on improving test and assessment procedures for enhanced passive pedestrian safety. After harmonizing the tools and procedures as much as possible with legislation, the work was mainly focused on the development of grid procedures for the pedestrian body regions head, upper leg with pelvis and lower leg with knee. Furthermore, the test parameters for the head and the upper leg were revised, a new lower legform impactor was introduced and the injury thresholds were adjusted or, where necessary, the injury criteria were changed. Finally, the assessment limits and colour scheme were refined, widening the range and adding two more colours in order to provide a more detailed description of the pedestrian safety performance. By abstaining from an assessment based on a worst point selection philosophy, the improved test point determination procedures that were introduced during the years 2013 and 2014 give a more homogeneous, high resolution picture of the pedestrian safety performance of the vehicle frontends. By using a uniform grid for each test zone approximately 200 test points, evenly distributed within each area, can now be assessed per vehicle. The introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor in 2014 enables a more realistic injury prediction of the knee and the tibia using a biofidelic test tool. With the new upper legform test that has been launched in 2015 the assessment in that area is now focusing on the injured body region instead of the injury causing vehicle part and thus is aligned with the approach in the remaining body regions head and lower leg. At the same time, a monitoring test with the headform impactor against the bonnet leading edge is closing the possible gap between the test areas to identify injury causing vehicle parts that moved out of focus due to the introduction of the new upper legform test. The paper describes the new test and assessment procedures with their underlying philosophy and gives an outlook in terms of open issues, specifying the needs for further improvement in the future. In parallel to the work of the pedestrian subgroup, a Euro NCAP working group on heavy vehicles introduced a set of protocol changes in 2011 that were related to the assessment of M1 vehicles derived from commercial vehicles, with a gross vehicle weight between 2.5 and 3.5 tons and 8 or 9 seats. The paper also investigates the applicability of the new pedestrian test and assessment procedures to heavy vehicles.
Die wesentlichsten Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: - Bundesweit werden im öffentlichen Rettungsdienst im Zeitraum 2012/13 jährlich rund 12,0 Mio. Einsätze mit insgesamt 14,3 Mio. Einsatzfahrten durchgeführt. Die Einsatzrate beträgt rund 147 Einsätze pro 1.000 Einwohner und Jahr. - 52 % des Einsatzaufkommens werden vom Leitstellenpersonal als Notfall eingestuft, 48 % entfallen auf die Kategorie Krankentransport. - Über zwei Fünftel aller Notfalleinsätze werden unter Hinzunahme eines Notarztes durchgeführt (Notarzteinsatz). Fast ein Drittel der Notfälle zu Verkehrsunfällen (29 %) wird von einem Notarzt bedient. - Rund 3,5 % der Notfalleinsätze gelten einem Verkehrsunfall, was bundesweit rund 208.000 Einsätzen entspricht. Die Verteilung der übrigen Einsatzanlässe bei Notfällen mit und ohne Notarztbeteiligung beträgt: Sonstiger Notfall 51 %, Internistischer Notfall 34 %, Sonstiger Unfall (z.B. Haus-, Schul- und Sportunfall) 11 % und Arbeitsunfall unter 1 %. - Die Verteilung der Rettungsmitteltypen am bundesweiten Einsatzfahrtaufkommen im Zeitraum 2012/13 beträgt: RTW 57 %, KTW 24 %, NEF 18 %, NAW und RTH/ITH unter 1 %. - Beim Einsatzfahrtaufkommen werden rund die Hälfte der Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt durchgeführt. Dies entspricht bundesweit jährlich 8,4 Mio. Einsatzfahrten unter Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt. - Die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 2,5 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte bei der Anfahrt liegt die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit im Mittel bei 14,5 Minuten. - Bei Einsätzen mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt errechnet sich nach dem zuerst eingetroffenen Rettungsmittel am Einsatzort eine mittlere Hilfsfrist von 8,4 Minuten, wobei 95 % der Notfälle innerhalb von 16,9 Minuten mit einem Rettungsmittel bedient werden. - Die Unterscheidung der Einsatzzeit nach Notfällen und Krankentransporten unter zwei Stunden ergibt eine mittlere Einsatzzeit von 52 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten bei der Anfahrt und 56 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt.
Assessment of the effectiveness of Intersection Assistance Systems at urban and rural accident sites
(2015)
An Intersection Collision Avoidance System is a promising safety system for accident avoidance or injury mitigation at junctions. However, there is still a lack of evidence of the effectiveness, due to the missing real accident data concerning Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. The objective of this study is the assessment of the effectiveness of an Intersection Collision Avoidance System based on real accidents. The method used is called virtual pre-crash simulation. Accidents at junctions were reconstructed by using the numerical simulation software PC-Crashâ„¢. This first simulation is called the baseline simulation. In a second step the vehicles of these accidents were equipped with an Intersection Collision Avoidance System and simulated again. The second simulation is called the system simulation. In the system simulation two different sensors and four different intervention strategies were used, based on a time-to-collision approach. The effectiveness of Intersection Collision Avoidance System has been evaluated by using an assessment function. On average 9% of the reviewed junction accidents could have been avoided within the system simulations. The other simulation results clearly showed a change in the principal direction of force, delta-v and reduction of the injury severity.
The main focus of the benefit estimation of advanced safety systems with a warning interface by simulation is on the driver. The driver is the only link between the algorithm of the safety system and the vehicle, which makes the setup of a driver model for such simulations very important. This paper describes an approach for the use of a statistical driver model in simulation. It also gives an outlook on further work on this topic. The build-up process of the model suffices with a distribution of reaction times and a distribution of reaction intensities. Both were combined in different scenarios for every driver. Each scenario has then a specific probability to occur. To use the statistical driver model, every accident scene has to be simulated with each driver scenario (combinations of reaction times and intensities). The results of the simulations are then combined regarding the probabilities to occur, which leads to an overall estimated benefit of the specific system. The model works with one or more equipped participants and delivers a range for the benefit of advanced safety systems with warning interfaces.
The Traffic Accident Research Institute at University of Technology Dresden investigates about 1,000 accidents annually in the area around and in Dresden. These datasets have been summarized and evaluated in the GIDAS (German Accident In-Depth Study) project for 13 years. During the project it became apparent that the specific traffic situation of a covert exit of a passenger car and an intersecting two-wheeler involves a high risk potential. This critical situation develops in a large part due to the lack of visibility between the driver and the intersecting bike. In this paper the accident avoidance potential of front camera systems with lateral field of view, which allows the driver to have an indirect sight into the crossing street area will be presented.
The project UR:BAN "Cognitive assistance (KA)" aims at developing future assistance systems providing improved performance in complex city traffic. New state-of-the-art panoramic sensor technologies now allow comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of the vehicle environment. In order to improve protection of vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, a particular objective of UR:BAN is the evaluation and prediction of their behaviour and actions. The objective of subproject "WER" is development support by providing quantitative estimates of traffic collisions at the very start and predict potential in terms of optimized accident avoidance and reduction of injury severity. For this purpose an integrated computer simulation toolkit is being devised based on real world accidents (GIDAS as well as video documented accidents), allowing the prediction of potential effectiveness and future benefit of assistance systems in this accident scenario. Subsequently, this toolkit may be used for optimizing the design of implemented assistance systems for improved effectiveness.
The evaluation of the expected benefit of active safety systems or even ideas of future systems is challenging because this has to be done prospectively. Beside acceptance, the predicted real-world benefit of active safety systems is one of the most important and interesting measures. Therefore, appropriate methods should be used that meet the requirements concerning representativeness, robustness and accuracy. The paper presents the development of a methodology for the assessment of current and future vehicle safety systems. The variety of systems requires several tools and methods and thus, a common tool box was created. This toolbox consists of different levels, regarding different aspects like data sources, scenarios, representativeness, measures like pre-crash-simulations, automated crash computation, single-case-analyses or driving simulator studies. Finally, the benefit of the system(s) is calculated, e.g. by using injury risk functions; giving the number of avoided/mitigated accidents, the reduction of injured or killed persons or the decrease of economic costs.
Standortkataster für Lärmschutzanlagen mit Ertragsprognose für potenzielle Photovoltaik-Anwendungen
(2015)
Lärmschutzwände an bundesdeutschen Fernverkehrsstraßen bieten ein beachtliches Energiepotenzial. In welchem Umfang war bisher nicht ausreichend untersucht. Es fehlen bisher jedoch Untersuchungen darüber, welcher Anteil dieser Anlagen für eine Photovoltaik-Nutzung geeignet ist. Auch fehlen die geeigneten Werkzeuge und Datengrundlagen, um die Eignung im Einzelfall und in der statistischen Übersicht zu analysieren und zu bewerten. Die Ergebnisse dieses Forschungsvorhabens liefern einen Beitrag, diese Lücken zu schließen. Mit diesem Forschungsvorhaben wurde zum ersten Mal ein für die BRD flächendeckendes Kataster der Lärmschutzeinrichtungen erstellt. Auf Grundlage des zu erstellenden Katasters von Lärmschutzeinrichtungen und sonstigen Barrieren an Straßen (Seiten- und Mittelbarrieren) wurden zudem Verfahren entwickelt, die die Standorteignung von Lärmschutzanlagen für Photovoltaikanlagen ermittelt. Die erfassten Informationen wurden in einem "Geografischen Informationssystem" (GIS) zusammengeführt, das nun der Fachabteilung als Arbeitsgrundlage dienen kann. Das entwickelte geografische Informationssystem beinhaltet Berechnungswerkzeuge, die es erlauben, Potenzialanalysen des Photovoltaikertrags an jedem Punkt des Straßenraums für Bundesfernstraßen durchzuführen. Dabei ist es möglich, Ertragsberechnungen sowohl für bestehende Lärmschutzeinrichtungen als auch für neue Standorte für die Zwecke der Ausbauplanung durchzuführen. Damit wird die Grundlage geschaffen, die private Investorenbeteiligung zu forcieren. Die Ergebnisse wurden so aufbereitet und zur Verfügung gestellt, dass ein Import der Ergebnisse in das "Bundesinformationssystem Straße" (BISStra) problemlos möglich ist. Die Ergebnisse des Forschungsvorhabens liefern entscheidende Grundlagen zur Beurteilung der multifunktionalen Nutzung von Lärmschutzanlagen und Barrieren im Straßennebenraum. Damit wird die Grundlage für weitere Planungen geschaffen. Bei Neuanlagen kann bereits in der Planungsphase die Photovoltaik-Eignung bewertet werden. Mit den erfassten Wildbarrieren besteht nun eine Datengrundlage, die es nachfolgenden Arbeiten erlaubt, den Bedarf für besondere Schutzmaßnahmen zur Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit und auch zum Schutz gefährdeter Arten oder Populationen abzuleiten.