Sonstige
Tree impacts are still one of the most important focal points of road deaths in Germany. For the year 2008, the latest figures in the national statistics show a share of 28% of road users killed in crashes with trees alongside a road amongst all crashes on rural roads (except the Autobahn). The official German statistics show the attribute "impact on a tree" since 1995. For this first reported year, the share of road users killed in such crashes was 30%. During the last 14 years, fatal accidents with road users killed on rural roads (except the Autobahn) after impacts on a tree declined by 60% from 1,737 (year 1995) to 696 (year 2008). But this is more or less in line with the general evolution of vehicle and traffic safety in Germany. For Germany as a whole the accident statistics do not show a reduction for "treer crashes" which is clearly more than the average for all accidents. But, as shown with the paper, there are different evolutions in the several German States. In public awareness the topic "tree impacts" is mostly associated with the situation in Germany after the reunification. At that time a lot of road users were killed on the avenues in the so called "new countries". The fact that "tree impacts" are still a big share within the figure of killed road users seems to be little-known. Using updated information coming from the official statistics and in-depth-studies, accident researchers can identify a big potential for further improvements of traffic safety on the associated district roads, state roads and federal highways. There is still a need to analyse more details of the accident occurrence with impacts on trees to generate new and updated findings on the current limits and potentials of measures to improve vehicle and traffic safety. To make further efforts in reducing the figures of victims of "tree impacts" the intensification of well-known conventional solutions " for example implementation of guard rails and reduction of speed - is an option. Measures related to vehicle safety technology especially in the field of primary (active) safety will have additional benefit within the physically imposed limits. With this background it can be seen that the subject "tree impacts" should be analysed with a holistic approach taking into account the entire system of driver, vehicle, road, the environment and a social consensus as well.
Small overlap frontal crashes are defined by a damage pattern with most of the vehicle deformation concentrated outboard of the main longitudinal structures. These crashes are prominent among frontal crashes resulting in serious and fatal injuries, even among vehicles that perform well in regulatory and consumer information crash tests. One of the critical aspects of understanding these crashes is knowing the crash speeds that cause the types of damage associated with serious injuries. Laboratory crash tests were conducted using 12 vehicles in three small overlap test conditions: pole, vehicle-to-vehicle collinear, and vehicle-to-vehicle oblique (15-degree striking angle). Field reconstruction techniques were used to estimate the delta V for each vehicle, and these results were compared with actual delta V values based on vehicle accelerometer data. Estimated delta Vs were 50% lower than actual values. Velocity change estimates for small overlap frontal crashes in databases such as NASS-CDS significantly underestimate actual values.
Bone fracture patterns could be crucial in reconstructing the nature of loading, especially in the lower limb and upper limb kinematics in vehicle-pedestrian crashes. In addition, use of FE bone models can be a handy tool to predict vehicle impact velocity and the impact direction. The point of fracture initiation in bone loading has been predicted quite accurately earlier. A methodology that predicts bone crack initiation and its propagation pattern for the six known loading directions using a single material and failure model is presented.
Pedestrian and cyclist are the most vulnerable road users in traffic crashes. One important aspect of this study was the comparable analysis of the exact impact configuration and the resulting injury patterns of pedestrians and cyclists in view of epidemiology. The secondary aim was assessment of head injury risks and kinematics of adult pedestrian and cyclists in primary and secondary impacts and to correlate the injuries related to physical parameters like HIC value, 3ms linear acceleration, and discuss the technical parameter with injuries observed in real-world accidents based documented real accidents of GIDAS and explains the head injuries by simulated load and impact conditions based on PC-Crash and MADYMO. A subsample of n=402 pedestrians and n=940 bicyclists from GIDAS database, Germany was used for preselection, from which 22 pedestrian and 18 cyclist accidents were selected for reconstruction by initially using PC-Crash to calculate impact conditions, such as vehicle impact velocity, vehicle kinematic sequence and throw out distance. The impact conditions then were employed to identify the initial conditions in simulation of MADYMO reconstruction. The results show that cyclists always suffer lower injury outcomes for the same accident severity. Differences in HIC, head relative impact velocity, 3ms linear contiguous acceleration, maximum angular velocity and acceleration, contact force, throwing distance and head contact timing are shown. The differences of landing conditions in secondary impacts of pedestrians and cyclists are also identified. Injury risk curves were generated by logistic regression model for each predicting physical parameters.
The accident research of Hanover and (from 1999 on) Dresden registered 736 leg injuries (AIS ≥ 2) from 1983 to March 2007. 174 of these injuries (23.6 %) were fractures or dislocations of foot and ankle. 149 feet of 141 front seat car occupants in 140 cars were affected. Of these 117 were drivers, 24 were front seat passengers. The mean age of occupants was 38.5 -± 16.8 years. Ankle fractures were the most frequent injury (n = 82; 80 malleolar fractures, 2 pilon fractures). 34 fractures and dislocations affected the hindfoot (5 talus and 26 calcaneal fractures, 2 subtalar dislocations and 1 subtotal amputation) , 16 to midfoot (4 navicular fractures, 5 cuboid fractures, 3 fractures of cuneiformia, 2 dislocations of chopart joint, 1 subtotal amputation, and one severe decollement) and 39 the forefoot (metatarsal fractures). Open fractures were seldom seen (2 malleolar fractures, 1 metatarsal fracture). Both feet were injured in 10 cases. 33 occupants (23.4 %) were polytaumatic had a polytrauma, 17 of them died. 81 percent of the occupants were belted. The cars were divided in pre EuroNCAP (year of manufacture 1997 and older) and post EuroNCAP cars (year of manufacture 1998 and newer). Most of the foot injuries were seen in pre EuroNCAP cars. Most of the occupants sat in compact cars (40 drivers and 9 front seat passengers) and large family cars (27 drivers and 7 co-drivers). 49 of 140 accidents occurred on country roads, 26 on main roads and 13 on motorways. The crash direction was mostly frontal. Generally were found no differences of delta v- and EES-level between the injured foot regions, but divided into pre- and post-EuroNCAP cars there was a tendency to higher delta v- and EES-levels in newer cars. The frequency of foot injuries increased linearly with increasing delta v-level; but above delta v-level of 55 km/h the linear increase only was seen in pre-EuroNCAP cars, post-EuroNCAP cars showed no further increase of injuries. The footwell intrusion showed no difference between the injured foot regions but pre-EuroNCAP cars had a tendency to higher footwell intrusion. There were no differences in footwell intrusion between the car types. Only 29 of 174 fractures or dislocations of foot were seen in post-EuroNCAP cars, the predominate number of these injuries (n = 145) were noticed in pre-EuroNCAP cars. A lower probability of long-term impairment was found in post-EuroNCAP cars for equal delta v levels, using the AIS2008 associated Functional Capacity Index (FCI) for the foot region.
Recent findings from real-world accident data have shown that fatality risks for pedestrians are substantially lower than generally reported in the traffic safety literature. One of the keys to this insight has been the large and random sample of car-to-pedestrian crashes available in the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). Another key factor has been the proper use of weight factors in order to adjust for outcome-based sampling bias in the accident data. However, a third factor, a priori of unknown importance, has not yet been properly analysed. This is the influence of errors in impact speed estimation. In this study, we derived a statistical model of the impact speed errors for pedestrian accidents present in the GIDAS database. The error model was then applied to investigate the effect of the estimation error on the pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. To this end, we applied a method known as the SIMulation-EXtrapolation (SIMEX) method. It was found that the risk curve is fairly tolerant to some amount of random measurement error, but that it does become flattened. It is therefore important that the accident investigations and reconstructions are of high quality to assure that systematic errors are minimised and that the random errors are under control.
Among European Countries, Spain first issued a Standard, UNE 135900:2005, further updated in 2008, that deals with homologation and effectiveness evaluation of road restraint systems components designed to reduce harm for bikers impacting on them. An in depth analysis and critical review of this standard is reported in this paper. Beside a close examination of the standard requirements, numerical models of the crash test stated by the standard have been set up and simulated to study the effects of slight speed and approach angle variations on test results, remaining within tolerance gaps allowed by the standard. Model were validated against experimental data. Together with the expected increasing severity of the impact according with speed, a strong influence of approach angle on injury parameters was found. Possible improvements to the norm, in order to make it more robust, are suggested.
Im aktuellen Kontext der Verkehrssicherheitsarbeit besteht in Deutschland insbesondere auf Landstraßen der Bedarf an sicherheitsfördernden Konzepten. Als mögliche Maßnahme werden im Ausland bereits vielfach Rüttelstreifen verwendet um die Geschwindigkeit im Annäherungsbereich von Gefahrenstellen zu reduzieren beziehungsweise die Verkehrsteilnehmer zu warnen und somit die Verkehrssicherheit zu erhöhen. Im Rahmen einer Literaturstudie und Befragung von Straßenbauverwaltungen wurde der nationale und internationale Status Quo zum Einsatz von Rüttelstreifen erhoben. Auf Basis dieser Erkenntnisse und theoretischer Grundlagen aus dem Bereich der Akustik, Haptik und Psychologie wurden mögliche Ausführungsvarianten entworfen. Neben psychologischen, physikalischen und verkehrlichen Grundlagen wurden dabei ebenso betriebliche, straßenbautechnische und finanzielle Aspekte berücksichtigt. Die unterschiedlichen Konzepte wurden auf Versuchsfeldern baulich umgesetzt und mit unterschiedlichen messtechnisch ausgerüsteten Fahrzeugen in allen relevanten Geschwindigkeitsbereichen überfahren. Die Messdaten zur Fahrzeuginnenraumakustik und -schwingung wurden im Hinblick auf ihre psychologische Wirkung auf den Fahrer analysiert und so eine optimierte Bauform und ein optimaler Abstand für Rüttelstreifen ermittelt. Zur Untersuchung der verkehrlichen Wirkung wurden vier unfallträchtige Landstraßenabschnitte ausgewählt. Auf diesen wurden die zuvor erarbeiteten Varianten umgesetzt und sowohl Geschwindigkeitsmessungen, als auch Beobachtungen des allgemeinen Fahrerverhaltens durchgeführt. Im Rahmen dieser Untersuchungen konnten keine sicherheitskritischen Fahrmanöver beobachtet werden. Im Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich sank die Geschwindigkeit durch den Einsatz von Rüttelstreifen signifikant um mehrere km/h. Im Rahmen von Befragungen der Fahrer und Anwohner ergab sich eine hohe Akzeptanz hinsichtlich der Maßnahme durch die " meist ortskundigen " Fahrer. Bei den Anwohnern fiel die Akzeptanz insbesondere auf Grund der " teilweise messtechnisch nachweisbaren " erhöhten Lärmemission niedriger aus. Durch die Geschwindigkeitsdämpfung und eine einhergehende Erhöhung der Aufmerksamkeit wird eine Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf den untersuchten Landstraßen erwartet.
Ziel des Projektes war es, den Behörden und Kommunen Hinweise auf die Wirkung von Verkehrsberuhigungen zu geben. Es wurden an der Merseburger Straße in Halle (4-streifige Hauptverkehrsstraße mit cirka 32.000 Kfz/d, Straßenbahn auf eigenem Gleisbett in Mittellage) mit dem mobilen Messfahrzeug SNIFFER im Zeitraum 21.4. bis 10.5.2008 NOx-, PM 2.5- und PM10-Konzentrationen sowie ein Maß für den durch SNIFFER indizierten nicht motorbedingten PM10-Emissionsfaktor räumlich und zeitlich differenziert erfasst. Weiterhin erfolgten an zwei Tagen ebenfalls mittels eines Messfahrzeuges messtechnische Analysen des Verkehrsflusses. Die an der Merseburger Straße durchgeführten verkehrsberuhigenden Maßnahmen (Tempo 30-Signalisierung, an ausgewählten Tagen zusätzlich Displays zur Anzeige der Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeit sowie angekündigte beziehungsweise durchgeführte Radarkontrollen) führten zu nachweisbaren Reduktionen der mittleren Reisegeschwindigkeiten bis 8 km/h. Die größten Reduktionen wurden dabei an den Tagen festgestellt, an denen Radarkontrollen durchgeführt wurden oder der Verkehrsteilnehmer (oder Fahrzeugführer) durch ein Hinweisschild "Geschwindigkeitskontrolle" mit diesen rechnen musste. Allerdings hielten auch da nur cirka 15 % der Fahrzeuge das signalisierte Tempolimit von 30 km/h ein. Cirka 12 % bis 19 % der Fahrzeuge waren trotz Hinweisschilds und Geschwindigkeitsdisplays während der Radarkontrollen schneller als 41 km/h. Relevante Veränderungen des Verkehrsflusses (Stand-, Konstantfahrt- und Beschleunigungsanteile) waren durch die Maßnahmen nicht zu verzeichnen. Auf den Straßenabschnitten der Merseburger Straße, auf denen der Verkehrsfluss gleichmäßig war, konnte eine signifikante positive Korrelation zwischen dem Maß für die nicht motorbedingten SNIFFER-PM10-Emissionsfaktoren und der Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeit festgestellt werden. Daraus lässt sich eine Minderung von 20 % für die Werktage mit wirksamen verkehrsberuhigenden Maßnahmen ableiten. Falls es gelingen würde, dass alle Fahrzeuge das Tempolimit von 30 km/h bei gleichem Verkehrsfluss einhalten würden, dann ergäbe sich aus den abgeleiteten Korrelationsfunktionen ein maximales Minderungspotenzial von 40 % bis 50 %. An Straßenabschnitten, an denen der Verkehrsfluss ungleichförmiger war, konnte keine solche Korrelation gefunden werden. Hier spielen wahrscheinlich andere Einflüsse (zum Beispiel das Beschleunigungsverhalten der Fahrzeuge) eine stärkere Rolle. Die untersuchten Maßnahmen an der Merseburger Straße in Halle hatten somit einen, wenn auch geringen, positiven Effekt auf die PM10-Belastung an der Messstelle HEVC. Die nach HBEFa klassifizierte Verkehrssituation hatte im Messzeitraum keinen signifikanten Einfluss auf die SNIFFER-PM10-Emissionsfaktoren. Der im derzeitigen PM10-Emissionsmodell angesetzte starke Anstieg der nicht motorbedingten PM10-Emissionsfaktoren für Straßen mit schlechtem Verkehrsfluss, welcher sich aus einer Vielzahl von ausgewerteten Immissionsmessungen ableitete, spiegelte sich nicht wider. Signifikant niedrigere Werte des mit SNIFFER ermittelten Maßes für die nicht motorbedingten PM10-Emissionsfaktoren wurden trotz des dort vorliegenden schlechten Fahrbahnzustandes nur in der Turmstraße festgestellt. Optisch wesentlichster Unterschied zu den anderen Straßenabschnitten war dort neben dem sehr schlechten Straßenzustand eine sehr glatte Oberfläche der großen Asphaltflickstellen relativ zu den anderen Straßenoberflächen und die nur einseitig dichte Straßenrandbebauung in Nord-Süd-Ausrichtung. Die anderen Straßenabschnitte sind entweder beidseitig bebaut oder ost-west orientiert. Im Messzeitraum führten die gepflasterten Fahrbahnoberflächen nicht zu einem deutlich höheren SNIFFER-PM10-Emissionsfaktor. Allerdings musste SNIFFER auf diesen auch deutlich langsamer als auf den anderen Straßenabschnitten fahren.
Accident data shows that the vast majority of pedestrian accidents involve a passenger car. A refined method for estimating the potential effectiveness of a technology designed to support the car driver in mitigating or avoiding pedestrian accidents is presented. The basis of the benefit prediction method consists of accident scenario information for pedestrian-passenger car accidents from GIDAS, including vehicle and pedestrian velocities. These real world pedestrian accidents were first reconstructed and the system effectiveness was determined by comparing injury outcome with and without the functionality enabled for each accident. The predictions from Volvo Cars" general Benefit Estimation Model are refined by including the actual system algorithm and sensing models for a relevant car in the simulation environment. The feasibility of the method is proven by a case study on a authentic technology; the Auto Brake functionality in Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection (CWAB-PD). Assuming the system is adopted by all vehicles, the Case Study indicates a 24% reduction in pedestrian fatalities for crashes where the pedestrians were struck by the front of a passenger car.