Sonstige
While it is important to track trends in the number of road accidents in different countries using national statistics, there is a need for data with more detailed information, so called in-depth accident data. For this reason, several accident data projects emerged worldwide in recent years. However, also different data standards were established and so comparative analysis of international in-depth data has been very hard to conduct, so far. This is why the project iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) was established and created the prerequisites for building up a standardized dataset out of the common denominator of different in-depth accident databases from Europe, USA and Asia. In the first phase, the project received funding from ACEA to compile an initial database. To accomplish this, a suitable data scheme has been defined, a pilot study has been conducted as proof of concept and the recoding of the first common data base has been initiated. Also, to prepare the project for its self-supporting continuation in the next years, a business model has been developed. This paper reports the history and status of the project, the current challenges and the creation of a capable consortium to maintain the data. In mid-2014, the initial database containing 1550 cases from 10 different countries will be completed and a first detailed view on this data will be possible.
The Centre for Automotive Safety Research (formerly the Road Accident Research Unit) at the University of Adelaide in South Australia has a history of in-depth crash investigation going back to the 1970s. In recent years, our focus has been on studying factors that contribute to road crashes, with an emphasis on the role of road infrastructure. Our method involves crash notification by the South Australian Ambulance Service and detailed investigation of the crash scene usually before the crash-involved vehicles have been moved. This at-scene data collection is supplemented with police crash reports, Coroner- reports including autopsy findings for fatal crashes, case notes from hospitals for all injured persons, structured interviews with crash participants and witnesses, and computerised reconstruction of the events of the crash. One of the most notable research findings to emerge from our in-depth work has been the relationship between travelling speed and the risk of crash involvement. By comparing the calculated free speeds of crash-involved vehicles (cases) with the measured speeds of non-crash-involved vehicles travelling on the same roads at the same time of day (controls), we were able to establish that an exponential relationship exists between travelling speed and the likelihood of involvement in a casualty crash. This was the case for both metropolitan and rural areas. This research prompted the reduction of some speed limits in Australia, which has resulted in notable decreases in crash numbers. Another finding of interest in our recent investigation of 298 mostly daytime crashes in metropolitan Adelaide was that medical conditions make a sizeable contribution to the occurrence of road crashes. We found that almost half of the drivers, riders and pedestrians involved in the collisions had at least one pre-existing medical condition, and half of these individuals had two or more such conditions. We found that a medical condition was the direct causal factor in 13% of the casualty crashes investigated and accounted for 23% of all hospital admission or fatal crash outcomes. A follow-up study of all hospital admissions for road crashes in Adelaide is now going ahead to look further at this problem. The paper also describes studies looking specifically at pedestrian crashes. These include studies of the relationship between travelling speed and the risk of a fatal pedestrian crash, and studies utilising real crash data to validate headforms and test dummies used in the assessment of the safety of new vehicles in the event of a collision with a pedestrian.
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences in car occupant injury severity recorded in AIS 2005 compared to AIS 1990 and to outline the likely effects on future data analysis findings. Occupant injury data in the UK Cooperative Crash Injury Study Database (CCIS) were coded for the period February 2006 to November 2007 using both AIS 1990 and AIS 2005. Data for 1,994 occupants with over 6000 coded injuries were reviewed at the AIS and MAIS level of severities and body regions to determine changes between the two coding methodologies. Overall there was an apparent general trend for fewer injuries to be coded at the AIS 4+ severity and more injuries to be coded at the AIS 2 severity. When these injury trends were reviewed in more detail it was found that the body regions which contributed the most to these changes in severity were the head, thorax and extremities. This is one of the first studies to examine the implications for large databases when changing to an updated method for coding injuries.
An die Lichtsignalsteuerung richten sich hohe Qualitätsanforderungen, da ihr für einen sicheren und flüssigen Verkehrsablauf im Straßennetz eine wichtige Rolle zukommt. Um eine hohe Qualität der Lichtsignalsteuerung auch im wachsenden Altbestand von Anlagen zu gewährleisten, liegt es nahe, eine regelmäßige, systematische Überprüfung vorzunehmen, um Mängel frühzeitig erkennen und beheben zu können. Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens war es, eine aufwandsoptimierte Verfahrensweise und die notwendigen Hilfsmittel für ein systematisches Qualitätsmanagement für Lichtsignalanlagen (LSA) zu entwickeln. Hierzu wurde zunächst die Lichtsignalsteuerung als Gegenstand des Qualitätsmanagements eingehend erörtert. Auf dieser Grundlage wurden Verfahrensweisen und EDV-gestützte Hilfsmittel entwickelt, mit denen die Güte des Verkehrsablaufs und die Verkehrssicherheit im Straßennetz und an einzelnen Knotenpunkten mit geringem Aufwand überprüft werden kann. Zur Qualitätsbewertung werden Unfalldaten, Prozessdaten und Betriebsdaten analysiert sowie der Verkehrsablauf vor Ort beobachtet. Der Aufbau einer Wissensbasis diente dazu, den Kenntnisstand zu Möglichkeiten der Qualitätsverbesserung an Lichtsignalanlagen für die Anwendung verfügbar zu machen. Hierin sind typische Qualitätsmaengel an Lichtsignalanlagen mit Möglichkeiten der Abhilfe verknüpft. Ferner sind Prüfbedingungen der Eignung und Umsetzbarkeit der Maßnahmen hinterlegt. Mit Hilfe dieses Expertensystems können Maßnahmen identifiziert und bewertet werden. Die Anwendung des Verfahrens an verschiedenen Knotenpunkten zeigt, dass der systematische und modulare Aufbau gut geeignet ist, aussagekräftige Informationen zur Qualität der Lichtsignalsteuerung zu erlangen und geeignete Maßnahmen zur Qualitätsverbesserung zu identifizieren. Das Verfahren kann mit geringem Aufwand durchgeführt werden und kann daher einen Beitrag für die verbreitete Anwendung des Qualitätsmanagements für Lichtsignalanlagen leisten.
Each year the traffic accident research teams in Dresden and Hanover provide an in-depth investigation of approximately two thousand accidents, aggregated in the GIDAS database. To accomplish a comprehensive review of each traffic accident recorded, a sensible and thorough encoding of suffered injuries is indispensable. The Abbreviated Injury Scale by AAAM offers a valuable and handy solution to achieve this goal. However, there were a few difficulties in the use of the AIS that came up in the past, which let to necessary improvements for the utilization of the AIS 2005 for GIDAS.
Den bisherigen Richtlinien zu Verkehrserhebungen ist gemeinsam, dass sie - wenn überhaupt - nur sehr wenige Aussagen zur erreichbaren Datenqualität enthalten. Normative Vorgaben und konkrete Handlungsanweisungen, die zu einer Verbesserung der Datenqualität von Erhebungen führen, fehlen in der Regel für die meisten Erhebungsverfahren. Abgesehen von Einzelaspekten wie beispielsweise den Kernelementen für Haushaltsbefragungen zum Verkehrsverhalten gibt es keine Qualitätsstandards für die Konzipierung, Durchführung und Auswertung einer Verkehrserhebung. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, mit Blick auf verschiedene Datennutzer und Arten der Datenverwendung wissenschaftlich abgesicherte Qualitätsstandards für Verkehrserhebungen zu erarbeiten. Im Kern sollten Hinweise gegeben werden, durch welche konkreten methodischen Ansätze und praktische Maßnahmen man für die unterschiedlichen Erhebungsverfahren im Verkehrswesen (Zählungen, Messungen, Verhaltensbeobachtungen und Befragungen) die jeweils bestmögliche Datenqualität erreichen kann. Die Ergebnisse dieses Projektes sollen darüber hinaus auch als eine Grundlage für die Fortschreibung der neuen "Empfehlungen für Verkehrserhebungen (EVE)" dienen. Im Kapitel 2 wird zur Schaffung eines geeigneten theoretischen Rahmens nach einer allgemeinen, an den Ansätzen des Qualitätsmanagements orientierten Definition von Datenqualität zunächst ein umfassendes Datenqualitätskonzept dargestellt, welches im Bereich der amtlichen Statistik auf europäischer Ebene entwickelt worden ist. Kapitel 3 stellt wichtige verkehrswissenschaftliche Grundlagen der vorliegenden Untersuchung zusammen. Ausgangspunkt ist eine allgemeine Charakterisierung von Verkehrserhebungen. In Kapitel 4 wird der konzeptuelle Rahmen für die Ermittlung von Standards der Datenqualität dargestellt. Hierzu werden allgemeine Indikatoren der Datenqualität auf Verkehrserhebungen übertragen. Anschließend werden die verschiedenen Anspruchsgruppen und deren Anforderungen an die Datenqualität betrachtet und darauf aufbauend die Elemente einer Qualitätsstrategie für Verkehrserhebungen entwickelt. Wie eine angemessene Datenqualität bei den verschiedenen Arten von Verkehrserhebungen erreicht werden kann, wird in den Kapiteln 5 bis 8 dargestellt. Hier werden Hinweise und Empfehlungen zum Stichprobenverfahren gegeben und es wird aufgezeigt, wie systematische Fehler (Nichterfassung von Stichprobeneinheiten, Fehler bei der Erfassung von Merkmalen, bei der Datenaufbereitung und -auswertung sowie der Darstellung von Ergebnissen) vermieden oder zumindest reduziert werden können. Abschließend werden in Kapitel 9 die wesentlichen Erkenntnisse zusammengefasst und ein Dokumentationsschema vorgestellt, welches einen Orientierungsrahmen für die Durchführung von Verkehrserhebungen liefert.
Impact severity is a fundamental measure for all in-depth crash investigation projects. One methodology used in the UK is based on the US Calspan software package CRASH3. The UK- in-depth crash investigation studies routinely use AiDamage3 a software package which is based on an updated version of the original CRASH3 algorithm, including enhancements to the vehicle stiffness coefficients. Real world accident-damaged vehicles are measured and their crush is correlated with a library of stiffness coefficients. These measurements are then used, along with other parameters, to calculate the crash energy and equivalent changes of velocity of the vehicles (delta-v), which is a measure of the impact severity. UK in-depth accident studies routinely validate the crash severity methodologies applied as the vehicle fleet changes. This is achieved by analysing crash test data and using the appropriate residual crush damage and other inputs to AiDamage3 and checking the program- outputs with the known crash severity parameters. This procedure checks, at least in part, the default stiffness values in the data libraries and the reconstruction methods used.
Internationally, the need is expressed for harmonized traffic accident data collection (PSN, PENDANT, etc.). Together with this effort of harmonization, traffic accident investigation moves more and more in the direction of accident causation. As current methods only partly address these needs, a new method was set up. The main characteristics of this method are: • Accident/injury causation (associated) factors can objectively be identified and quantified, by comparison with exposure information from a normal population. • All relevant accident and exposure data can be included: human-, vehicle-, and environmental related data for the pre-crash, crash and postcrash situation (the so-called Haddon matrix). The level of detail can be chosen depending on interest and/or budget, which makes the method very flexible. In this paper the accident collection and control group method are presented, including some of the achieved results from a pilot study on 30 truck accidents and 30 control locations. The data were analyzed by using cross-tabulations and classification-tree analysis. The method proved useful for the identification of statistically significant causational aspects.
The role of a national motor vehicle crash causation study-style data set in rollover data analysis
(2010)
On 1 January 2005, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, an agency of the United States Department of Transportation, implemented a new data collection strategy designed to assess crash avoidance technologies and report associated behavioral inputs and outcomes. The original goal was a six-year program, however, during the shortened data collection period; it proved a valuable resource for understanding a precrash environment previously obscured by forensic case investigation. Another unintended consequence was an overlap with infrastructure, roadway geometry, and design with the occupant and vehicle outcomes, by virtue of well-defined attributes. External to the collected data, supplementary information was extrapolated, by using manuals published in the United States, by the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials and selected State Departments of Transportation, in conjunction with the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Study (NMVCCS). This provided a backdrop to the infrastructure framework of the rollover problem within which the occupant and vehicle outcomes were studied. If a NMVCCS-style data collection were to be implemented elsewhere, then complementary manuals produced by federal transportation officials might be consulted producing similar relationships. The current study uses NMVCCS data to describe vehicles travelling through diverse design geometries and the outcome for occupants involved in crashes within that system. Codified and extrapolated data form the basis for assessing NMVCCS and its value to the transportation safety community, as the protocols are applicable universally. The benefit in continuing a NMVCCS-style study is noted, as the interaction of roadway infrastructure and occupant protection agencies might find paths to better work together in solving the complex rollover problem using a common data-driven approach.
The SafetyNet project was formulated in part to address the need for safety oriented European road accident data. One of the main tasks included within the project was the development of a methodology for better understanding of accident causation together with the development of an associated database involving data obtained from on-scene or "nearly onscene" accident investigations. Information from these investigations was complemented by data from follow-up interviews with crash participants to determine critical events and contributory factors to the accident occurrence. A method for classification of accident contributing factors, known as DREAM 3.0, was developed and tested in conjunction with the SafetyNet activities. Collection of data and case analysis for some 1 000 individual crashes have recently been completed and inserted into the database and therefore aggregation analyses of the data are now being undertaken. This paper describes the methodology development, an overview of the database and the initial aggregation analyses.