Sonstige
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- Conference (39)
- Konferenz (39)
- Accident (30)
- Unfall (30)
- Germany (25)
- Deutschland (24)
- Injury (23)
- Verletzung (22)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (18)
- Severity (accid, injury) (16)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (15)
- Statistics (12)
- Statistik (12)
- Analysis (math) (11)
- Cyclist (10)
- Data acquisition (10)
- Datenerfassung (10)
- Radfahrer (10)
- Accident reconstruction (9)
- Datenbank (9)
- Fußgänger (9)
- Pedestrian (9)
- Analyse (math) (8)
- Car (8)
- Cause (8)
- Ursache (8)
- Data bank (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- On the spot accident investigation (7)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (7)
- injury) (7)
- Motorcyclist (6)
- Motorradfahrer (6)
- Reconstruction (accid) (6)
- Severity (accid (6)
- Europa (5)
- Europe (5)
- Fatality (5)
- Interview (5)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (5)
- Tödlicher Unfall (5)
- Verletzung) (5)
- Zusammenstoß (5)
- Accident rate (4)
- Collision (4)
- Geschwindigkeit (4)
- Head (4)
- Human factor (4)
- Menschlicher Faktor (4)
- PKW (4)
- Pkw (4)
- Safety belt (4)
- Schutzhelm (4)
- Sicherheitsgurt (4)
- Simulation (4)
- Speed (4)
- Wirbelsäule (4)
- Accident prevention (3)
- Anfahrversuch (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Biomechanics (3)
- Biomechanik (3)
- Brustkorb (3)
- China (3)
- Crash helmet (3)
- Fracture (bone) (3)
- Impact test (veh) (3)
- Knochenbruch (3)
- Kopf (3)
- Spinal column (3)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (3)
- Unfallverhütung (3)
- Use (3)
- Age (2)
- Alte Leute (2)
- Alter (2)
- Analyse (Math) (2)
- Angle (2)
- Bewertung (2)
- Bicycle (2)
- Blickfeld (2)
- Child (2)
- Digital model (2)
- Error (2)
- Evaluation (assessment) (2)
- Fahranfänger (2)
- Fahrrad (2)
- Fahrzeug (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Field of vision (2)
- Finite element method (2)
- Front (2)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (2)
- Head on collision (2)
- Kind (2)
- Leg (human) (2)
- Numerisches Modell (2)
- Old people (2)
- Overturning (veh) (2)
- Recently qualified driver (2)
- Risiko (2)
- Risk (2)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (2)
- Side impact (2)
- Vehicle (2)
- Vorn (2)
- Winkel (2)
- Überschlagen (2)
- Acceptability (1)
- Aggression (psycho) (1)
- Aggression (psychol) (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Alcohol (1)
- Alkohol (1)
- Anthropometric dummy (1)
- Auffahrunfall (1)
- Australia (1)
- Australien (1)
- Back (human) (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Behinderter (1)
- Bein (1)
- Bein (menschl) (1)
- Bemessung (1)
- Berechnung (1)
- Blutkreislauf (1)
- Breaking (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bruch (mech) (1)
- Calculation (1)
- Cervical vertebrae (1)
- Chest (1)
- Circulation (blood) (1)
- Compression (1)
- Correlation (math, stat) (1)
- Cost (1)
- Crash victim (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Cycling (1)
- Data base (1)
- Database (1)
- Deformation (1)
- Design (overall design) (1)
- Deutschalnd (1)
- Development (1)
- Digital image processing (1)
- Digitale Bildverarbeitung (1)
- Disablement (1)
- Drei (1)
- Droge (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Durchsichtigkeit (1)
- Dynamics (1)
- Dynamik (1)
- Eigenschaft (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic stability program (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Emergency medical aid (1)
- Entwicklung (1)
- Erste Hilfe (1)
- Fahrzeuginnenraum (1)
- Fahrzeugsitz (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Frequenz (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Gesundheit (1)
- Halswirbel (1)
- Health (1)
- Hospitsl (1)
- Human body (1)
- Illness (1)
- Impact (collision) (1)
- Insasse (1)
- Interactive model (1)
- Interaktives Modell (1)
- Interior (veh) (1)
- International (1)
- Japan (1)
- Junction (1)
- Knee (human) (1)
- Knie (menschl) (1)
- Knotenpunkt (1)
- Korrelation (math, stat) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Krankenhaus (1)
- Krankheit (1)
- Körperstellung (1)
- Langfristig (1)
- Length (1)
- Lkw (1)
- Location (1)
- Long term (1)
- Lorry (1)
- Länge (1)
- Lärm (1)
- Mathematical model (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Methode der finite Elemente (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Model (not math) (1)
- Modell (1)
- Movement (1)
- Noise (1)
- Norm (tech) (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Overlapping (1)
- Pfosten (1)
- Pole (1)
- Post crash (1)
- Posture (1)
- Properties (1)
- Protective helmet (1)
- Psychological aspects (1)
- Psychologische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Radfahren (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rear end collision (1)
- Rechenmodell (1)
- Reversing (veh) (1)
- Rib (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Risk taking (1)
- Road user (1)
- Rupture (1)
- Rücken (1)
- Rücksichtslosigkeit (1)
- Rückwärtsfahren (1)
- Safety (1)
- Seat (veh) (1)
- Severity (accid, injuy) (1)
- Sicherheit (1)
- Specification (standard) (1)
- Specifications (1)
- Spinal calum (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Thorax (1)
- Three (1)
- Transparent (1)
- USA (1)
- Unfallfolgemaßnahme (1)
- Unfallopfer (1)
- Unfallrate (1)
- Ungeschützter Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Vehicle occupant (1)
- Verformung (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (1)
- Verschiebung (1)
- Versuchspuppe (1)
- Vulnerable road user (1)
- Zusammendrückung (1)
- accident (1)
- Überlappung (1)
Institut
The bicyclist accidents were analyzed to get better understanding of the occurrences and frequency of the accidents, injury distributions, as well as correlation of injury severity/outcomes with engineering and human factors in two different countries of China and Germany. The accident cases that occurred from 2001 to 2006 were collected from IVAC database in Changsha and GIDAS database in Hannover. Based on specified sampling criteria, 1,570 bicyclist cases were selected from IVAC database in Changsha, and 1806 cases were collected from Hannover, documented in GIDAS database. Statistical analyses were carried out by using these selected data. The results from the statistical analysis are presented and discussed in this study.
This study is aimed to investigate the correlations of impact conditions and dynamic responses with the injuries and injury severity of child pedestrians by accident reconstruction. For this purpose, the pedestrian accident cases were selected from Sweden and Germany with detailed information about injuries, accident cars, and accident environment. The selected accident cases were reconstructed using mathematical models of pedestrian and passenger car. The pedestrian models were generated based on the height, weight, and age of the pedestrian involved in accidents. The car models were built up based on the corresponding accident car. The impact speeds in simulations were defined based on the reported data. The calculated physical quantities were analyzed to find the correlation with injury outcomes registered in the accident database. The reconstruction approaches are discussed in terms of data collection, estimating vehicle impact speeds, pedestrian moving speeds and initial posture, secondary ground impact, validity of the mathematical models, as well as impact biomechanics.
This study aimed at prediction of long bone fractures and assessment of lower extremity injury mechanisms in real world passenger car to pedestrian collision. For this purpose, two pedestrian accident cases with detail recorded lower limb injuries were reconstructed via combining MBS (Multi-body system) and FE (Finite element) methods. The code of PC Crash was used to determine the boundary conditions before collision, and then MBS models were used to reproduce the pedestrian kinematics and injuries during crash. Furthermore, a validated lower limb FE model was chosen to conduct reconstruction of injuries and prediction of long bone fracture via physical parameters of von Mises stress and bending moment. The injury outcomes from simulations were compared with hospital recorded injury data and the same long bone fracture patterns and positions can be observed. Moreover, the calculated long bone fracture tolerance corresponded to the outcome from cadaver tests. The result shows that FE model is capable to reproduce the dynamic injury process and is an effective tool to predict the risk of long bone fractures.
Since its beginning in 1999, the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) evolved into the presumably leading representative road traffic accident investigation in Europe, based on the work started in Hanover in 1973. The detailed and comprehensive description of traffic accidents forms an essential basis for vehicle safety research. Due to the ongoing extension of demands of researchers, there is a continuous progress in the techniques and systematic of accident investigation within GIDAS. This paper presents some of the most important developments over the last years. Primary vehicle safety systems are expected to have a significant and increasing influence on reducing accidents. GIDAS therefore began to include and collect active safety parameters as new variables from the year 2005 onwards. This will facilitate to assess the impact of present and future active safety measures. A new system to analyse causation factors of traffic accidents, called ACASS, was implemented in GIDAS in the year 2008. The whole process of data handling was optimised. Since 2005 the on-scene data acquisition is completely conducted with mobile tablet PCs. Comprehensive plausibility checks assure a high data quality. Multi-language codebooks are automatically generated from the database structure itself and interfaces ensure the connection to various database management systems. Members of the consortium can download database and codebook, and synchronize half a terabyte of photographic documentation through a secured online access. With the introduction of the AIS 2005 in the year 2006, some medical categorizations have been revised. To ensure the correct assignment of AIS codes to specific injuries an application based on a diagnostic dictionary was developed. Furthermore a coding tool for the AO classification was introduced. All these enhancements enable GIDAS to be up to date for future research questions.
An approach to the standardization of accident and injury registration systems (STAIRS) in Europe
(1998)
STAIRS is a European Commission funded study whose aim is to produce a set of guidelines for a harmonised, crash injury database. The need to evaluate the effectiveness of the forthcoming European Union front and side impact directives has emphasised the need for real world crash injury data-sets that can be representative of the crash population throughout Europe. STAIRS will provide a methodology to achieve this. The ultimate aim of STAIRS is to produce a set of data collection tools which will aid decision making on vehicle crashworthiness as well as providing a means to evaluate the effectiveness of safety regulations. This paper will disseminate the up-to-date findings of the group as they try to harmonise their methods. The stage has been reached where studies into the diverse methods of the UK, French and German systems of crash injury investigation have been undertaken. An assessment has already been made of the relationships between the three current systems in order to define the areas of agreement and divergence. The conclusions reached stated that there were many areas that are already closely related and that the differences were only at the detailed level. With the emphasis on secondary safety and injury causation, core data sets were decided upon, taking into account: vehicle description, collision configuration, structural response of vehicles, restraint and airbag performance, child restraint performance, Euro NCAP, pedestrian and vehicle occupant kinematics, injury description and causation. Each variable was studied objectively, the important elements isolated and developed into a form that all partners were agreeable on. A glossary of terms is being developed as the project progresses which includes ISO standards and other definitions from the associated CAREPLUS project, which addresses the comparability of national data sets. A major consideration of the group was the data collection method to be employed. The strengths and weaknesses of each study were investigated to obtain a clear idea of which aspects offered the best way forward. The quality of this information and transference into a common format, as well as the necessary error checking systems to be employed have just been completed and are described. In tandem with this area of study the problem of the statistical relationship of each sample to the national population is also being investigated. The study proposes a mechanism to use a sample of crash injury data to represent the national and international crash injury problem
Bicyclists are minimally or unprotected road users. Their vulnerability results in a high injury risk despite their relatively low own speed. However, the actual injury situation of bicyclists has not been investigated very well so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual injury situation of bicyclists in Germany to create a basis for effective preventive measures. Technical and medical data were prospectively collected shortly after the accident at the accident scenes and medical institutions providing care for the injured. Data of injured bicyclists from 1985 to 2003 were analyzed for the following parameters: collision opponent, collision type, collision speed (km/h), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Maximum AIS (MAIS), incidence of polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >16), incidence of death (death before end of first hospital stay). 4,264 injured bicyclists were included. 55% were male and 45% female. The age was grouped to preschool age in 0.9%, 6 to 12 years in 10.8%, 13 to 17 years in 10.4%, 18 to 64 years in 64.7%, and over 64 years in 13.2%. The MAIS was 1 in 78.8%, 2 in 17.0%, 3 in 3.0%, 4 in 0.6%, 5 in 0.4%, and 6 in 0.2%. The incidence of polytrauma was 0.9%, and the incidence of death was 0.5%. The incidence of injuries to different body regions was as follows: head, 47.8%; neck, 5.2%, thorax, 21%; upper extremities, 46.3%; abdomen, 5.8%; pelvis, 11.5%, lower extremities, 62.1%. The accident location was urban in 95.2%, and rural in 4.8%. The accidents happened during daylight in 82.4%, during night in 12.2%, and during dawn/dusk in 5.3%. The road situation was as follows: straight, 27.3%; bend, 3.0%; junction, 32.0%; crossing, 26.4%; gate, 5.9%; others, 5.4%. The collision opponents were cars in 65.8%, trucks in 7.2%, bicycles in 7.4%, standing objects in 8.8%, multiple objects in 4.3%, and others in 6.5%. The collision speed was grouped <31 in 77.9%, 31-50 in 4.9%, 51-70 in 3.7%, and >70 in 1.5%. The helmet use rate was 1.5%. 68% of the registered head injuries were located in the effective helmet protection area. In bicyclists, head and extremities are at high risk for injuries. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. Remarkably, two thirds of the head injuries could have been prevented by helmets. Accidents are concentrated to crossings, junctions and gates. A significant lower mean injury severity was observed in victims using separate bicycle lanes. These results do strongly support the extension or addition of bicycle lanes and their consequent use. However, the lanes are frequently interrupted at crossings and junctions. This emphasizes also the important endangering of bicyclists coming from crossings, junctions and gates, i.e. all situations in which contact of bicyclists to motorized vehicles is possible. Redesigning junctions and bicycle traffic lanes to minimize the possibility of this dangerous contact would be preventive measures. A more consequent helmet use and use and an extension of bicycle paths for a better separation of bicyclists and motorized vehicle would be simple but very effective preventive measures.
This contribution introduces a number of psychological methods of analysis that are based on the practice-oriented collection of information directly at the site of an accident and that allow for an analysis and coding of the accident causes. Investigation examples and examples of the data combinations with basic medical and technical data are outlined. Objective of the collection is the inter-disciplinary investigation of human factors in the causes of accidents ("human-factor-analysis"). The psychological data are incorporated according to an integrative model for accident causes based on empiric algorithms in the data base of the accident research, where the clustered evaluation potential of comprehensive factors of the accident development can be illustrated. The central theoretical concept for the basic model of the progress of the accident from a psychological point of view comprises psychological indicators for the evaluation of the site of the accident for the analysis of the perception conditions as well as a classification of the gleaned data into the accident progress model according to chronological and local criteria. Perception conditions, action intentions and executions as well as conditions limiting perception and actions are acquired, using a questionnaire for persons involved in an accident, and are also integrated into the data structure concerning weighted feature characteristics as well as combined with other relevant features. Suitable systematization tools for the collection and coding of psychological accident development parameters have to be provided, which require primarily a model image of the corresponding processes from the persons involved in the accident (perceptions, expectations, decisions, actions). The interactive accident model contains components of the models by KÜTING 1990, MC DONALD 1972, SURREY 1969 and RASMUSSEN 1980. Based on the inter-action of the three partial systems "person", "vehicle" and "environment", the first step is the assessment of the situation by the persons involved in the accident. This is dependent on the personal attitudes and motives, on experiences and expectations concerning the progress of the situation. Subsequently, data concerning the manner of the coping with the ambiguous state as well as with the instable state (emergency reaction immediately before the accident occurs) are collected. The factors relating to the persons involved in the accident are gathered on several levels using corresponding questionnaires. The coding of the found and collected characteristics is conducted in a multidimensional evaluation relating to the technical results of the accident reconstruction and of the psychological classification, which are subsequently integrated in coded form into the data base of the accident research. The result of this analysis is a description of the development of the accident depicted on a chronological vector from a perception and decision theoretical perspective. This is explained in detail using exemplary cases.
For the avoidance of traffic accidents by means of advanced driver assistance systems the knowledge of failures and deficiencies a few seconds before the crash is of increasing importance. This information e.g. is collected in the German accident survey GIDAS by an interview derived from the ACAS methodology. However to display the whole range of accident causation factors additional information is needed on enduring factors of the system components "human", "infrastructure" and "machine". On the strategic level these accident moderating factors include long term influences such as medical preconditions or a general higher risk taking behavior as well as influences on the immediate conflict level such as an aggressive response to a perceived previous traffic conflict. This study was conducted to examine the feasibility of collecting such causation information in the scope of an in-depth accident investigation like GIDAS. Due to the comprehensive amount of information necessary to estimate the moderating factors the collection of the information is distributed to different methods. 5 cases of real world crashes have been investigated where information was collected on-scene and retrospective by interviews. The identified moderating factors of the accidents and the method for collecting the information are displayed.
Introduction: The method of causation analysis applied under the German accident survey GIDAS, which is based on Accident Causation Analysis System (ACAS) focuses on an on-scene data collection of predominantly directly event-related causation factors which were crucial in the accident emergence as situational resulting events and influences. The paradigm underlying this method refers to the findings of the psychological traffic accident research that most causally relevant features of the system components human, infrastructure and vehicle technology are found directly in the situation shortly before the accident. This justifies the survey method which is conducted directly at the accident (on-scene), shortly after the accident occurrence (in-time) with the detection of human-related causes (in-depth). Human aspects of the situation analysis that interact and influence the risk situations shortly before the collision are reported as errors, lapses, mistakes and failures in ACAS in specific categories and subcategories. Thus methodically ACAS is designed primarily for the collection of accident features on the level of operational action, which certainly leads to valid findings and behavioral causes of accidents. The enhancement by means of Moderating Conditions concerns the pre-crash phase in different levels: strategical, tactical and operational.
From literature well-known analyzes on risks, hazards and causes of accidents of older drivers are amended by the present study in which a comparison of the specific features of accident causes of older car drivers (older than 60 years) and of younger car drivers (under 25 years) is conducted. Mainly the question is pursued if specific errors, mistakes and lapses are predominant in the two different age groups. The analysis system ACAS (Accident Causation Analysis System) used hereby consists of a sequential system of accident causation factors from the human, the technical and the infrastructural field, whereupon for this study the influence of the human features on the accident development in two different age groups is of interest. ACAS is both an accident model and an analysis and classification system, which describes the human participation factors of an accident and their causes in the temporal sequence (from the perceptibility to concrete action errors) taking into consideration the logical sequence of individual basic functions. In five steps (categories) of a logical and temporal sequence the hierarchical system makes human functions and processes as determinants of accident causes identifiable. The methodology specifically focuses on the use in so-called "In-Depth" and "On-Scene" investigation studies. With the help of the system for each accident participant one or more of five hypotheses of human cause factors are formed and then specified by appropriate verification criteria. These hypotheses in turn are further specified by indicators in such manner that the coding of the causation factors by a code system meets the needs of database processing and are accessible to a quantitative data analysis. The first results of the descriptive comparison of the two age groups concern mainly differences in the functional levels "information admission/perception" (where the elderly drivers have more difficulties than the young ones) and "information processing/evaluation" (where the younger drivers show more problems). Concerning the cognitive function of "planning" the group of younger drivers seems to be more often involved in an accident because of excessive speed.