Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (24)
- Buch (Monographie) (22)
- Bericht (7)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Sicherheit (13)
- Safety (12)
- Injury (9)
- Verletzung (9)
- Bewertung (8)
- Evaluation (assessment) (8)
- Fahrzeug (8)
- Test method (8)
- Fußgänger (7)
- Pedestrian (7)
Institut
Test and assessment procedures for passive pedestrian protection of passenger cars are in place for many years within world-wide regulations as well as consumer test programmes. Nevertheless, recent accident investigations show a stagnation of pedestrian fatality numbers on European roads alongside increasing injury severities for older road users. The EU-funded SENIORS (Safety ENhancing Innovations for Older Road userS) project developed and evaluated a thorax injury prediction tool (TIPT) for later incorporation within test and assessment procedures. Accident data indicates an increasing portion of AIS2 and AIS3+ thoracic injuries of older pedestrians and cyclists which are currently not assessed in any test procedure for vulnerable road users. Therefore, SENIORS focused on the development of a test tool predicting the risk of rib fractures of vulnerable road users (VRU). While injury risk functions were reanalyzed, human body model (HBM) simulations against categorized generic vehicle frontends served as input for the definition of test setups and corresponding impact parameters. TIPT component tests against a generic frontend and an actual vehicle were used for the evaluation of the technical feasibility. The TIPT component tests shows the general feasibility of a test procedure for the assessment of thoracic injuries, with good repeatability and reproducibility of kinematics and results. Impact parameters such as the inclination angles of the thorax, angles of the velocity vector and impact speeds well replicate the parameters gained from the HBM simulations. The proposed markup and assessment scheme offers the possibility of a homogeneous evaluation of the protection potential of vehicle frontends while maintaining justifiable testing efforts. During evaluation testing, the proposed requirements were entirely met. The developed prototype of TIPT and launching system offer impact angles and speeds as suggested by HBM simulations. However, since thorax impacts during pedestrian accidents do not occur perpendicularly to the vehicle surface in most cases, the TIPT built-in linear potentiometers do not acquire the true resultant intrusions on the ribcage and thus, TIPT rib deflections do not reflect the actual human injury risk. However; for the impact forward to the bonnet leading edge, the TIPT seems applicable without further modifications. The test and assessment procedures using the TIPT offer for the first time the possibility of replicating the kinematics of a pedestrian thorax with a component test. The developed assessment scheme gives a first indication on how the risk for thoracic injuries could be implemented within the Euro NCAP Box 3 assessment. Future development of the TIPT may focus on implementing a rib cage that can deflect in all axes in a humanlike way.
Since the beginning of the testing activities related to passive pedestrian safety, the width of the test area being assessed regarding its protection level for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users has been determined by geometrical measurements at the outer contour of the vehicle. During the past years, the trend of a decreased width of the lower extremity test and assessment area realized by special features of the outer vehicle frontend design could be observed. This study discusses different possibilities for counteracting this development and thus finding a robust definition for this area including all structures with high injury risk for the lower extremities of vulnerable road users in the event of a collision with a motor vehicle. While Euro NCAP is addressing the described problem by defining a test area under consideration of the stiff structures underneath the bumper fascia, a detailed study was carried out on behalf of the European Commission, aiming at a robust, worldwide harmonized definition of the bumper test area for legislation, taking into account the specific requirements of different certification procedures of the contracting parties of the UN/ECE agreements from 1958 and 1998. This paper details the work undertaken by BASt, also serving as a contribution to the TF-BTA of the UN/ECE GRSP, towards a harmonized test area in order to better protect the lower extremities of vulnerable road users. The German In-Depth Accident Database GIDAS is studied with respect to the potential benefit of a revised test area. Several practical options are discussed and applied to actual vehicles, investigating the differences and possible effects. Tests are carried out and the results studied in detail. Finally, a proposal for a feasible definition is given and a suggestion is made for solving possible open issues at angled surfaces due to rotation of the impactor. The study shows that, in principle, there is a need for the entire vehicle width being assessed with regard to the protection potential for lower extremities of vulnerable road users. It gives evidence on the necessity for a robust definition of the lower extremity test area including stiff and thus injurious structures at the vehicle frontend, especially underneath the bumper fascia. The legal definition of the lower extremity test area will shortly be almost harmonized with the robust Euro NCAP requirements, as already endorsed by GRSP, taking into account injurious structures and thus contributing to the enhanced protection of vulnerable road users. After finalization of the development of a torso mass for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) it is recommended to consider again the additional benefit of assessing the entire vehicle width.
Anhand von zwei verschiedenen Versuchskonfigurationen wurde das Schutzpotential von Kopfschutzsystemen (Fahrradhelm und airbagbasiertes System) untersucht. Hierbei wurden die resultierende Kopfbeschleunigung als Messwert sowie das Kopfverletzungskriterium HIC bei Versuchen ohne und mit Kopfschutzsystem vergleichend gegenübergestellt.
During the past five years, a Euro NCAP technical working group on pedestrian safety has been working on improving test and assessment procedures for enhanced passive pedestrian safety. After harmonizing the tools and procedures as much as possible with legislation, the work was mainly focused on the development of grid procedures for the pedestrian body regions head, upper leg with pelvis and lower leg with knee. Furthermore, the test parameters for the head and the upper leg were revised, a new lower legform impactor was introduced and the injury thresholds were adjusted or, where necessary, the injury criteria were changed. Finally, the assessment limits and colour scheme were refined, widening the range and adding two more colours in order to provide a more detailed description of the pedestrian safety performance. By abstaining from an assessment based on a worst point selection philosophy, the improved test point determination procedures that were introduced during the years 2013 and 2014 give a more homogeneous, high resolution picture of the pedestrian safety performance of the vehicle frontends. By using a uniform grid for each test zone approximately 200 test points, evenly distributed within each area, can now be assessed per vehicle. The introduction of the flexible pedestrian legform impactor in 2014 enables a more realistic injury prediction of the knee and the tibia using a biofidelic test tool. With the new upper legform test that has been launched in 2015 the assessment in that area is now focusing on the injured body region instead of the injury causing vehicle part and thus is aligned with the approach in the remaining body regions head and lower leg. At the same time, a monitoring test with the headform impactor against the bonnet leading edge is closing the possible gap between the test areas to identify injury causing vehicle parts that moved out of focus due to the introduction of the new upper legform test. The paper describes the new test and assessment procedures with their underlying philosophy and gives an outlook in terms of open issues, specifying the needs for further improvement in the future. In parallel to the work of the pedestrian subgroup, a Euro NCAP working group on heavy vehicles introduced a set of protocol changes in 2011 that were related to the assessment of M1 vehicles derived from commercial vehicles, with a gross vehicle weight between 2.5 and 3.5 tons and 8 or 9 seats. The paper also investigates the applicability of the new pedestrian test and assessment procedures to heavy vehicles.
Mit dem Ziel, geeignete Indikatoren und Kriterien für die Bewertung der sicheren Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion für SAE Level 3 Systeme bis 60 km/h im Kontext des automatisierten Fahrens zu identifizieren, wurde dieses Forschungsprojekt mit einem Fokusgruppeninterview begonnen, um relevante Publikationskanäle und eine Liste von Schlüsselwörtern bezüglich Indikatoren für die Bewertung der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion auf SAE Level 3 zu identifizieren. Basierend auf der identifizierten Liste von Schlüsselwörtern wurde eine Literaturrecherche durchgeführt, um relevante Publikationen aus den identifizierten Publikationskanälen zu extrahieren. Anhand der definierten Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien wurden 38 Arbeiten ausgewählt und für eine Meta-Analyse verwendet, um den Einfluss verschiedener Übernahmesituationen auf die Übernahmeleistung zu untersuchen. Die Ergebnisse der Meta-Analyse haben gezeigt, dass die Übernahmeleistungen der Fahrer, gemessen an den Kategorien Übernahmezeit, Übernahmequalität und subjektive Arbeitsbeanspruchung, in statischen und dynamischen Situationen unterschiedlich sind. Anschließend wurden Experteninterviews mit sechs internationalen Experten durchgeführt, um die Ergebnisse der Metaanalyse zu interpretieren und Checklistenelemente zu entwickeln. Am Ende wurden 16 Checklistenpunkte entwickelt, die sechs Kategorien von Systemanforderungen zugeordnet sind und von internationalen Experten zur Bewertung der Sicherheit der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion von SAE Level 3 Systemen bis zu 60 km/h in Serienfahrzeugen verwendet werden können. Diese Checkliste wurde zu einer Online-Anwendung weiterentwickelt, die als einfach zu implementierendes und effizientes Bewertungsverfahren in Bezug auf die verkehrssicherheitsrelevante Interaktionsqualität der Systeme genutzt werden kann.
The EVERSAFE project addressed many safety issues for electric vehicles including the crash and post-crash safety. The project reviewed the market shares of full electric and hybrid vehicles, latest road traffic accident data involving severely damaged electric vehicles in Europe, and identified critical scenarios that may be particular for electric vehicles. Also, recent results from international research on the safety of electric vehicles were included in this paper such as results from performed experimental abuse cell and vehicle crash tests (incl. non-standardized tests with the Mitsubishi i-MiEV and the BMW i3), from discussions in the UN IG REESS and the GTR EVS as well as guidelines (handling procedures) for fire brigades from Germany, Sweden and the United States of America. Potential hazards that might arise from damaged electric vehicles after severe traffic accidents are an emerging issue for modern vehicles and were summarized from the perspective of different national approaches and discussed from the practical view of fire fighters. Recent rescue guidelines were reviewed and used as the basis for a newly developed rescue procedure. The paper gives recommendations in particular towards fire fighters, but also to vehicle manufacturers and first-aiders.
The Intersection 2020 project was initiated to develop a test procedure for Automatic Emergency Braking systems in intersection car-to-car scenarios to be transferred to Euro NCAP. The project aims to address current road traffic accidents on European roads and therefore sets a priority of the identification of the most important car-to-car accidents and Use Cases. Taking into account technological and practical limitations, Test Scenarios are derived from the Use Cases in a later stage of the project. This paper presents parts of a larger study and provides an overview of common car-to-vehicle(at least four wheels) collision types at junctions in Europe and specifies seven Accident Scenarios from which the three scenarios “Straight Crossing Paths (SCP)”, “Left Turn Across Path – Opposite Direction Conflict (LTAP/OD)” and “Left Turn Across Path – Lateral Direction (LTAP/LD)” are most important due to their high relevance regarding severe car-to-car accidents. Technical details about crash parameters such as collision and initial speeds are delivered. The analysis work performed is input for the definition and selection of the Use Cases as well as for the project’s benefit estimation. The numbers of accidents and fatalities in accidents at intersections involving a passenger car were shown per intersection type. In both statistics, it was found that accidents at crossroads and T- or staggered junctions are of highest relevance, followed by roundabouts. Focusing on accidents at intersections between one passenger car and another road user shows that around one-third of all accidents and related fatalities could have been assigned to car-to-PTW accidents and one-fifth of all accidents and fatalities to car-to-car accidents. Regarding car-to-car accidents with at least serious injury outcome 38% out of 34,489 car-to-car accidents happened at intersections. These figures correspond to 18% of the fatalities (4,236 fatalities in total). Considering all intersection types, around half of all related accidents happened in urban environments whereas this number decreased to one-third of all fatalities. Further, the proportion of road fatalities per country occurring at intersections varies widely across the EU. Also, there are proportionately more fatalities in daylight or twilight conditions at junctions. Use Cases are supposed to be derived from Accident Scenarios and by adding detailed information for example about the road layout, right-of-way and the vehicle trajectories prior to the collision. Instead of applying cluster algorithms to the accident data, a pragmatic approach was finally preferred to create them. Note: Use Cases serve as an intermediate step between the Accident Scenarios and the Test Scenarios which describe the actual testing conditions. Finally, 74 Use Cases were identified. This large number indicates the complexity of intersection crashes due to the combination of several parameters.
Per definition, SAE Level 2 (L2) Systems perform both the lateral and longitudinal vehicle motion control with the expectation that the driver completes the Object and Event Detection and Response (OEDR). Since every system performs also parts of the OEDR itself and this amount of OEDR also varies between different L2 systems depending on the intended system design, it cannot be taken for granted that drivers automatically understand their roles and responsibilities in interaction with the system. Especially highly reliable L2 systems performing a greater amount of OEDR while at the same time requiring only little driver input over time can make it difficult for drivers to correctly identify their role and responsibility. Until now, neither application-oriented assessment methods nor design guidelines for OEDR related system design features taking safety of human-machine-interaction into account are available. The objective is therefore to deliver a standardized tool for the assessment of human-machine-interaction-related safety of vehicles with L2 systems currently available on the market. To evaluate the impact of different system design aspects on safety of human-machine-interaction and also to be able to differentiate between system designs, a holistic, standardized and application-oriented assessment procedure is proposed. The novel tablet-based assessment tool focuses not only on available standards and guidelines but measures also concrete user behaviour and user understanding in interaction with the L2 systems. The aim is to gain further insights which cannot be measured directly by simple checklist instruments. For preparation, based on international standards, literature reviews and expert consultations, a first checklistbased expert-evaluation for currently available vehicles with L2 systems was developed. These assessments are focusing on different sources of user information (e.g. user manual), human-machine-interface design as well as the prevention of unintended use by different driver monitoring techniques. The checklist-tool was developed in cooperation with experts of different EuroNCAP test laboratories and validated in a common expert workshop to gain high level of standardization and agreement. However, to assess safety of human-machine-interaction holistically beyond these rather explicit forms of information design criteria, also implicit forms of drivervehicle-communication via vehicle dynamics, functional behavior or reliability play an important role and should be taken into account. Therefore, the main and novel methodological aim is to consider also interaction related processes regarding user´s understanding of roles and responsibilities when applying automated driving functions as well as user´s awareness of automation modes or traffic situations in the modular tablet-based assessment tool.
Ziel des Forschungsvorhabens ist die Erstellung eines Szenarienkonzepts zur möglichst vollständigen Beschreibung der Fahraufgabe auf der Bundesautobahn. Unter Berücksichtigung existierender Ansätze wird eine auf drei Säulen basierende Struktur von Szenarien erarbeitet. Stationäre Fahrzustände bilden die erste Säule, Transitionen für zeitlich ausgedehnte Übergange zwischen diesen Zuständen bilden die zweite und überlagerte Interaktionen als dritte Säule dienen zur weiteren Erhöhung der Beschreibungsfähigkeit. Aus diesen granularen Grundbausteinen können komplexere Verkehrsszenarien als Kompositionen zusammengesetzt werden. Weiterhin werden sicherheitsrelevante Szenarien definiert, die ebenfalls aus den Grundbausteinen erstellbare Szenarien sind, aber durch ihre besonders hohe Relevanz und die Möglichkeit zur detaillierten Betrachtung ebenfalls als Grundszenarien herangezogen werden. Anforderungsverstärkende Faktoren schließlich ergänzen die Szenarienbeschreibung um besondere Umstände, etwa durch andere Verkehrsteilnehmer, die Straßenführung oder durch Umgebungsbedingungen.
Das Gesamtkonzept wurde im Rahmen des Projekts in einem internationalen Expertenworkshop vorgestellt und erörtert. Im Zuge dessen wurden zur Begegnung offener Punkte weitere Szenarien und anforderungsverstärkende Faktoren hinzugefügt.
Die grundsätzliche Validität des Konzepts und insbesondere die Realisierbarkeit in der Praxis wird durch die Umsetzung einer automatischen Erkennung dieser Szenarien aus dem Verkehrsdatensatz „highD“ gezeigt. Die dabei gewonnenen Erkenntnisse spiegeln sich ebenfalls im Szenarienkonzept wider.
Das Gesamtergebnis wird festgehalten in einem Codebook, welches eine Beschreibung aller Szenarien inklusive der für sie relevanten Messgrößen definiert.
Seit vielen Jahren wird unter dem Begriff der Fahrerablenkung (driver distraction) diskutiert, welche Einschränkungen und Probleme durch die Bearbeitung zusätzlicher fahrfremder Tätigkeiten während des Fahrens in der Leistungsfähigkeit von Fahrern entstehen. Parallel zu dieser Debatte erwuchs in den vergangenen Jahren allerdings auch das Wissen, dass Fahrer trotz oftmals hoher Mehrfachbelastungen beim Fahren in der Lage sind, Unfälle zu vermeiden. Arbeiten im nicht-automatisierten Fahren zeigten, dass Fahrer bestimmte Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen, die es ihnen erlauben, die hohen Belastungen der Fahraufgabe und zusätzlicher fahrfremder Tätigkeiten zu regulieren und somit eine sichere Fahrleistung zu garantieren. Aufbauend hierauf konnte das abgeschlossene Projekt FE 82.0614/2014 zeigen, dass Fahrer vergleichbare Strategien zur Ressourcenregulierung in Übernahmesituationen des automatisierten Fahrens besitzen sowie dass sich Trajektorienbereiche auf der Straße definieren lassen, die Fahrer subjektiv als angemessen bewerten. Das aktuelle Projekt ist bestrebt, diese zwei Forschungsstränge zu kombinieren. Es wurde im automatisierten Fahren die Handlungsrelevanz der subjektiven Fahrleistungsschwellen im Sinne der Aktivierung von Fahrerstrategien untersucht. Dazu wurden die bereits bekannten Schwellenwerte im Rahmen einer Online-Studie um zusätzliche Situationsfaktoren erweitert und anschließend im Fahrsimulator überprüft. Des Weiteren wurde die Handlungsrelevanz dieser Schwellen sowohl im Fahrsimulator als auch im Realversuch untersucht. Ausgehend von den Ergebnissen wurden Empfehlungen für automatisierte Fahrfunktionen im Sinne adaptiver Mechanismen in der Trajektorienplanung abgeleitet