Fahrdynamikregelungen für Zweispurfahrzeuge haben in der letzten Dekade stark dazu beigetragen, die Getötetenzahlen im Straßenverkehr auf einen seit dem zweiten Weltkrieg nicht gekannten Tiefststand zu senken. Die Getötetenzahlen bei Einspurfahrzeugen, speziell Motorrädern, sind im selben Zeitraum bei weitem nicht im selben Maße gesunken. Zwar existieren für Motorräder ABS-Bremssysteme und Antriebsschlupfregelungen, aber darüber hinaus gehende technische Lösungen zur Stabilisierung des Motorrads sind nicht bekannt. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, abzuschätzen, ob Fahrdynamikregelungen für Motorräder einerseits technisch möglich sind und andererseits zur deutlichen Senkung der Unfallzahlen von Motorrädern beitragen können. Aus einer Analyse des Unfallgeschehens wurden für zukünftige Fahrdynamikregelungen ungebremste Kurvenunfälle durch ßberschreiten der maximalen Querbeschleunigung und durch Reibwertsprünge (wie beispielsweise glatte Fahrbahnabschnitte, Sand, ßl, Bitumen und dergleichen) als relevante Unfalltypen identifiziert und als Hauptszenarien für potenzielle Fahrdynamikregelsysteme herangezogen. Ihr Anteil am Unfallgeschehen von Motorrädern wurde mit etwa 4 bis 8 % abgeschätzt. Dazu wurden Motorradexperten nach ihren bisher erlebten Unfällen befragt und die Unfälle einer großen Unfalldatenbank im Detail untersucht. Die beiden Grundszenarien wurden mittels Simulationen und Fahrversuchen hinsichtlich besonderer Erkennungsmerkmale untersucht. Dabei erwies sich die Schwimmwinkelgeschwindigkeit des Fahrzeugs als robustes Kriterium zur Erkennung beginnender ungebremster Kurvenunfälle. ßhnlich große Schwimmwinkelgeschwindigkeiten wurden bei einer Vielzahl von unkritischen Fahrten nicht gefunden. Die Beeinflussbarkeit der untersuchten kritischen Fahrsituationen wurde mit Hilfe eines Modells für die Fahrzeugbewegung während der kritischen Fahrsituationen abgeschätzt. Eine Beeinflussung des Rollmoments zum Aufrichten des Fahrzeugs ist nicht möglich, da weder die Seitenkraft am Reifen in diesen Szenarien, wie es erforderlich wäre, erhöht werden kann, noch realistisch dimensionierte Kreisel diese Stabilisierung erbringen können. Eine Beeinflussung der Schwimmbewegung ist hingegen technisch sinnvoll durch Veränderung der Seitenkräfte über Bremsschlupf an den Rädern darstellbar. Auf diese Weise kann eine Destabilisierung des gleitenden Fahrzeugs beim ßbergang von Niedrig zurück auf Hochreibwert vermieden werden. Damit lässt sich jedoch nur eine kleine Untermenge der genannten Unfallszenarien günstig beeinflussen, sodass als Ergebnis dieser Untersuchung das Potenzial von Fahrdynamikregelungen als recht gering einzuschätzen ist.

It is commonly agreed that active safety will have a significant impact on reducing accident figures for pedestrians and probably also bicyclists. However, chances and limitations for active safety systems have only been derived based on accident data and the current state of the art, based on proprietary simulation models. The objective of this article is to investigate these chances and limitations by developing an open simulation model. This article introduces a simulation model, incorporating accident kinematics, driving dynamics, driver reaction times, pedestrian dynamics, performance parameters of different autonomous emergency braking (AEB) generations, as well as legal and logical limitations. The level of detail for available pedestrian accident data is limited. Relevant variables, especially timing of the pedestrian appearance and the pedestrian's moving speed, are estimated using assumptions. The model in this article uses the fact that a pedestrian and a vehicle in an accident must have been in the same spot at the same time and defines the impact position as a relevant accident parameter, which is usually available from accident data. The calculations done within the model identify the possible timing available for braking by an AEB system as well as the possible speed reduction for different accident scenarios as well as for different system configurations. The simulation model identifies the lateral impact position of the pedestrian as a significant parameter for system performance, and the system layout is designed to brake when the accident becomes unavoidable by the vehicle driver. Scenarios with a pedestrian running from behind an obstruction are the most demanding scenarios and will very likely never be avoidable for all vehicle speeds due to physical limits. Scenarios with an unobstructed person walking will very likely be treatable for a wide speed range for next generation AEB systems.

The ASSESS project is a collaborative project that develops test procedures for pre-crash safety systems like Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). One key criterion for the effectiveness of e.g. AEB is reduction in collision speed compared to baseline scenarios without AEB. The speed reduction for a given system can only be determined in real world tests that will end with a collision. Soft targets that are crashable up to velocities of 80 km/h are state of the art for these assessments, but ordinary balloon cars are usually stationary targets. The ASSESS project goes one step further and defines scenarios with moving targets. These scenarios define vehicle speeds of up to 100 km/h, different collision scenarios and relative collision speeds of up to 80km/h. This paper describes the development of a propulsion system for a soft target that aims to be used with these demanding scenario specifications. The Federal Highway Research Institute- (BASt-) approach to move the target is a self-driving small cart. The cart is controlled either by a driver (open-loop control via remote-control) or by a computer (closed-loop control). Its weight is limited to achieve a good crashability without damages to the test vehicle. To the extent of our knowledge BASt- approach is unique in this field (other carts cannot move at such high velocities or are not crashable). This paper describes in detail the challenges and solutions that were found both for the mechanical construction and the implementation of the control and safety system. One example for the mechanical challenges is e.g. the position of the vehicle- center of gravity (CG). An optimum compromise had to be found between a low CG oriented to the front of the vehicle (good for driveability) and a high CG oriented to the rear of the vehicle (good for crashability). The soft target itself which is also developed within the ASSESS project will not be covered in detail as this is work of a project partner. Publications on this will follow. The paper also shows first test results, describes current limitations and gives an outlook. It is expected that the presented test tools for AEB and other pre-crash safety systems is introduced in the future into consumer testing (NCAP) as well as regulatory testing.

Within this paper different European accident data sources were used to investigate the causations and backgrounds of road traffic accidents with pedestrians. Analyses of high level national data and in-depth accident data from Germany and Great Britain was used to confirm and refine preliminary accident scenarios identified from other sources using a literature review. General observations made included that a high proportion of killed or seriously injured pedestrian casualties impacted by cars were in "dark" light conditions. Seven accident scenarios were identified (each divided into "daylight" and "dark" light conditions) which included the majority of the car front-to-pedestrian crash configurations. Test scenarios were developed using the identified accident scenarios and relevant parameters. Hypothetical parameters were derived to describe the performance of pedestrian pre-crash systems based on the assumption that these systems are designed to avoid false positives as a very high priority, i.e. at virtually all costs. As result, three "Base Test Scenarios" were selected to be developed in detail in the AsPeCSS project. However, further Enhanced Test Scenarios may be needed to address environmental factors such as darkness if it is determined that system performance is sensitive to these factors. Finally, weighting factors for the accident scenarios for Europe (EU-27) were developed by averaging and extrapolation of the available data. This paper represents interim results of Work Package 1 within the AsPeCSS project.

Accidents between right turning trucks and straight driving cyclists often show massive consequences. Accident severity in terms of seriously or fatally injured cyclists that are involved is much higher than in accidents of other traffic participants in other situations. It seems clear that adding additional mirrors will very likely not improve the situation. At ESV 2015, a methodology to derive test procedures and first test cases as well as requirements for a driver assist system to address blind spot accidents has been presented. However, it was unclear if and how testing of these cases is feasible, to what extent characteristics of different truck concepts (e.g. articulated vehicles, rigid vehicles) influence the test conduction and outcome, and what tolerances should be selected for the different variables. This work is important for the acceptance of a draft regulation in the UN working group on general safety. In the meantime, three test series using a single tractor vehicle, a tractor-semitrailer combination and a rigid vehicle have been conducted. The test tools (e.g. surrogate devices) have been refined. A fully crashable, commercially available bicycle dummy has been tested. If used correct, this dummy does follow a straight line quite precisely and it does not cause any damage to the truck under test in case of accidental impact. The dummy specifications are freely available. During testing, the different vehicle categories resulted in different trajectories being driven. Articulated vehicle combinations did first execute a turn into the opposite direction, and on the other hand, single tractor vehicles did behave comparable to passenger cars. A possible solution to take these behaviors into account is to require the vehicles to drive through a corridor that is narrow for a precise straight-driving phase and extends during the turn. Other investigated parameters are the dummy and vehicle speed tolerances. The results from this research make it possible to draft a regulation for a driver assistance system that helps to avoid blind spot accidents: test cases have been refined, their feasibility has been checked, and corridors for the vehicles and for important parameters (e.g. test speeds) have been set. The test procedure is applicable to all types of heavy goods vehicles. In combination with the accidentology (ESV 2015 paper), the work provides the basis for a regulation for such an assistance system.