Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2011 (19) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- nein (19) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (9)
- Konferenz (9)
- Deutschland (8)
- Germany (8)
- Measurement (5)
- Messung (5)
- Safety (5)
- Sicherheit (5)
- Anfahrversuch (4)
- Bewertung (4)
Although many German monitoring sites report declines of NOx concentrations, NO2-concentrations actually stagnate or even increase quite often. Various analyses have identified the altered compositions of nitrogen oxides (NO2/NOx-ratio) emitted by motor vehicles (resulting in an increase of primary NO2-emissions) as well as the chemical environmental conditions (mainly ground level ozone) as the main causes. The chemical conversion of NO to NO2 is often parameterized in dispersion calculations of exhaust emissions. A widely applied conversion model is the so-called Romberg approach from 1996. However, the Romberg approach has to be re-evaluated to accommodate the above-mentioned conditions. This article presents an adjustment to the Romberg approach in accordance with the measured data from 2000 to 2006, taking into consideration substantially higher NO2/NOx-ratios especially for higher NOx-concentrations. Model calculations with OSPM (Operational Street Pollution Model) including its internal chemistry module are able to reproduce very well the trends in the measured annual NO2-concentrations over a 10 year period. The relevant parameters for variations between the years are the NOx-emissions, primary NO2-emissions, ozone concentrations, wind conditions, and background concentrations. A simplified chemistry model based on annual mean NOx- and NO2-concentrations, and background ozone concentrations, as well as primary NO2-emissions is presented as a better method than the updated Romberg approach. This model simulates the annual mean NO2-concentrations much more accurately than the conventional and the updated Romberg approaches.
Aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Feinstaub- und NOx-Problematik - Auswirkungen auf die Planungspraxis
(2011)
Durch die Limitierung verschiedener Luftschadstoffe zum Schutz der menschlichen Gesundheit und der Vegetation rückte in den letzten Jahren die Luftqualität an Straßen vielerorts in den Mittelpunkt des öffentlichen Interesses. Da Luftverunreinigungen kein nationales Problem darstellen und nicht an Landesgrenzen halt machen, wurden von der EU Luftqualitätsrichtlinien erlassen. Diese enthalten Grenz- und Zielwerte für verschiedene Luftschadstoffe. Nachdem in den vergangenen Jahren insbesondere die Einhaltung der Grenzwerte für Feinstaubpartikel PM10 Probleme bereitete und als verkehrspolitisch weitreichende Maßnahme Umweltzonen eingeführt wurden, werden zukünftig die Stickoxide in Ballungsräumen und in Straßennähe das größere Problem darstellen. Die Umsetzung der neuen Luftqualitätsrichtlinie 2008/50/EG in nationales Recht erfolgte im Jahr 2010 durch die Einführung der 39. Bundesimmissionsschutzverordnung (BImSchV), die die 22. BImSchV sowie die 33. BImSchV ablöst. Die geltenden Grenz-, Alarm- und Zielwerte, insbesondere PM10-Tages- und NO2-Jahresgrenzwert wurden bei der Überarbeitung bestätigt. Gegenüber den weiteren Regelungen haben sich Neurungen ergeben. Darüber hinaus wurde ebenfalls im Jahr 2010 das neue "Handbuch für Emissionsfaktoren" HBEFa 3.1 veröffentlicht. Dieses dient neben anderen auch dem "Merkblatt über Luftverunreinigungen an Straßen" (MLuS) als Datengrundlage für die Emissionsberechnungen. Eine Überarbeitung des MLuS ist daher notwendig geworden und wird derzeit in einem Projekt der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) durchgeführt. Neben den neuen Emissionsfaktoren werden noch weitere Aktualisierungen vorgenommen.
In einem Forschungsprojekt der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) wurde der Einfluss von arbeits- und tätigkeitsbezogenen Belastungen und Stress auf das Verkehrsverhalten von Lkw-Fahrern im Straßengüterverkehr untersucht. Ausgangspunkt der Überlegungen war das transaktionale Stressmodell, das ein Zusammenwirken von Person und Umwelt im Umgang mit Stress annimmt. Insgesamt wurden 555 Lkw-Fahrer nach ihren Arbeitsbedingungen, den wesentlichen Belastungsfaktoren, ihrem Umgang mit tätigkeitsbezogenem Stress sowie ihrem Fahrverhalten und ihrer Verkehrsauffälligkeit befragt. Aus den Ergebnissen der Untersuchung sowie den Ergebnissen eines abschließenden Experten-Workshops werden Ansatzpunkte für Maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Verkehrssicherheit von Lkw-Fahrern abgeleitet.
The 2BeSafe project (2-Wheeler Behaviour and Safety) is a collaborative project (co financed by the European Commission) that aims to study the naturalistic behaviour of Powered-Two-Wheeler (PTW) riders in normal and critical riding situations. That includes the interaction between PTW riders and other road users and possible conflicts between them. One of the predominant causes of accidents involving PTWs is that PTWs are often overlooked by other road users. One task of the project lead by BASt therefore deals with possible improvements in conspicuity and the development of recommendations. Particularly using the findings of the studies on conflict situations, promising lighting arrangements to enhance conspicuity of PTWs during the day and at night are selected. An abstract recognizing pattern for PTWs is defined, enabling other road users (e.g. car drivers) to clearly identify riders. Lamps and outfit like lighting configurations of different colours, different helmet lights, reflect / luminescent clothing parts and retro-reflective markings are designed and manufactured. Then, the different solutions are tested in a laboratory setting using experimental motorcycles together with riders to which the equipment is fitted. As result a proposal for a uniform signal pattern or lamp configuration in the front of all motorcycles and riders will be outlined. The contribution first gives a short overview of the topics of the research project that deal with conflicts and their connection with poor conspicuity and then presents in detail the methods used in the activities concerning solutions for the improvement of conspicuity together with first results.
The ASSESS project is a collaborative project that develops test procedures for pre-crash safety systems like Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB). One key criterion for the effectiveness of e.g. AEB is reduction in collision speed compared to baseline scenarios without AEB. The speed reduction for a given system can only be determined in real world tests that will end with a collision. Soft targets that are crashable up to velocities of 80 km/h are state of the art for these assessments, but ordinary balloon cars are usually stationary targets. The ASSESS project goes one step further and defines scenarios with moving targets. These scenarios define vehicle speeds of up to 100 km/h, different collision scenarios and relative collision speeds of up to 80km/h. This paper describes the development of a propulsion system for a soft target that aims to be used with these demanding scenario specifications. The Federal Highway Research Institute- (BASt-) approach to move the target is a self-driving small cart. The cart is controlled either by a driver (open-loop control via remote-control) or by a computer (closed-loop control). Its weight is limited to achieve a good crashability without damages to the test vehicle. To the extent of our knowledge BASt- approach is unique in this field (other carts cannot move at such high velocities or are not crashable). This paper describes in detail the challenges and solutions that were found both for the mechanical construction and the implementation of the control and safety system. One example for the mechanical challenges is e.g. the position of the vehicle- center of gravity (CG). An optimum compromise had to be found between a low CG oriented to the front of the vehicle (good for driveability) and a high CG oriented to the rear of the vehicle (good for crashability). The soft target itself which is also developed within the ASSESS project will not be covered in detail as this is work of a project partner. Publications on this will follow. The paper also shows first test results, describes current limitations and gives an outlook. It is expected that the presented test tools for AEB and other pre-crash safety systems is introduced in the future into consumer testing (NCAP) as well as regulatory testing.
Die Überarbeitung der RLS-90
(2011)
Die "Richtlinien für den Lärmschutz an Straßen", die RLS-90, sind 20 Jahre alt geworden. Grund genug, an eine Überarbeitung der Richtlinien zu denken. Die der RLS-90 zugrunde liegenden Annahmen der Geräuschemission sind identisch mit denen der RLS-81 und stammen aus den 1970er Jahren. Sie sind also bereits über 30 Jahre alt. Entsprechend hoch sind die Emissionsannahmen der RLS-90 für Lkw insgesamt und für Pkw bei niedrigen Geschwindigkeiten. Nur für Pkw bei hohen Geschwindigkeiten zeigt sich eine höhere Geräuschemission. Neben der Tabelle 4 der RLS-90 wird ein Verweis auf eine Tabelle mit D(Index StrO)-Werten diskutiert, die nach Fahrzeugart und Geschwindigkeitsbereich differenziert aktuelle Korrekturwerte vorhält. Eine wesentliche Voraussetzung hierfür ist, die Überarbeitung des "Verfahrens zur Messung der Geräuschemission von Straßenoberflächen", GEStrO. Die Geräuschemission einer überarbeiteten RLS-90 soll als längenbezogener Schallleistungspegel formuliert und damit kompatibel zu den modernen Richtlinien Schall 03, Ausgabe 2006 und NMPB 2008 sein. Mit einigen kleinen Änderungen im Ausbreitungsteil könnte eine überarbeitete RLS-90 Ende 2011 fertig gestellt sein.
Bei Statistischen Vorbeifahrt-Messungen werden die Geräusche vieler einzelner Fahrzeuge während der Vorbeifahrt gemessen, um die akustische Qualität der Straße zu bestimmen. Dies ist im dichten Verkehr oft nicht mehr möglich, da sich die Geräusche zu stark überlappen. Statt der Verwendung nur eines Mikrofons soll hier der Einsatz von Mikrofonarrays mit 6, 10 und 20 Mikrofonen zur Trennung der Geräusche von verschiedenen Fahrzeugen untersucht werden, um auch im dichten Verkehr messen zu können. Für die Extrahierung der gesuchten Pegel wurde als Referenz ein Verfahren zur Quellentrennung (SIA) eingesetzt. Ein zweites Verfahren (BeamSolve) wurde im Rahmen des Projekts entwickelt. Die Pegel eines einzelnen Fahrzeugs ließen sich auch dann noch vom folgenden Fahrzeug trennen, wenn die Lücke zwischen den Fahrzeugen deutlich unter einer Fahrzeuglänge lag. Abweichungen zur Referenzmessung der einzelnen Fahrzeuge (Pkw und Lkw) ergeben sich systematisch durch die Mittelung des Pegels über mehrere Mikrofonpositionen, was den Maximalpegel um 0,6 Dezibel senkt und als Korrekturfaktor berücksichtigt werden kann. Das SIA-Verfahren liefert im Mittel eine weitere Unterschätzung dieses Pegels um minus 0,2 Dezibel bei einer Streubreite von plus minus 0,2 Dezibel. Das neue BeamSolve-Verfahren liefert im Mittel einen Pegel der 0,8 Dezibel unter dem SIA-Verfahren liegt, also insgesamt 1,6 Dezibel unter den Referenzpegeln mit einem Mikrofon. Die Streuung beträgt dabei plus minus 0,6 Dezibel, wenn 20 Mikrofone verwendet werden. Während das SIA-Verfahren schon mit 6 Mikrofonen stabile Ergebnisse liefert, sind für das BeamSolve 20 Mikrofone vorteilhaft. Damit stehen nun Messverfahren zur Verfügung, mit denen auch im dichten Verkehr die Statistische Vorbeifahrt-Messung angewendet werden kann.
Thoracic injury is one of the predominant types of severe injuries in frontal accidents. The assessment of the injury risk to the thorax in the current frontal impact test procedures is based on the uni-axial chest deflection measured in the dummy Hybrid III. Several studies have shown that criteria based on the linear chest potentiometer are not sensitive enough to distinguish between different restraint systems, and cannot indicate asymmetric chest loading, which has been shown to correlate to increased injury risk. Furthermore, the measurement is sensitive to belt position on the dummy chest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optical multipoint chest deflection measurement system "RibEye" in frontal impact sled tests. Therefore the sensitivity of the RibEyesystem to different restraint system parameters was investigated. Furthermore, the issue of signal drop out at the 6 th rib was investigated in this study.A series of sled tests were conducted with the RibEye system in the Hybrid III 50%. The sled environment consisted of a rigid seat and a standard production three-point seat belt system. Rib deflections were recorded with the RibEye system and additionally with the standard chest potentiometer. The tests were carried out at crash pulses of two different velocities (30 km/h and 64 km/h). The tests were conducted with different belt routing to investigate the sensitivity of chest deflection measurements to belt position on the dummy chest. Furthermore, different restraint system parameters were investigated (force limiter level, with or without pretensioning) to evaluate if the RibEye measurements provide additional information to distinguish between restraint system configurations . The results showed that with the RibEye system it was possible to identify the effect of belt routing in more detail. The chest deflections measured with the standard chest potentiometer as well as the maximum deflection measured by RibEye allowed the distinction to be made between different force limiter levels. The RibEye system was also able to clearly show the asymmetric deflection of the rib cage due to belt loading. In some configurations, differences of more than 15 mm were observed between the left and side areas of the chest. Furthermore, the abdomen insert was identified as source of the problem of signal drop out at the 6th rib. Possible solutions are discussed. In conclusion, the RibEye system provided valuable additional information regarding the assessment of restraint systems. It has the potential to enable the evaluation of thoracic injury risk due to asymmetric loading. Further investigations with the RibEye should be extended to tests in a vehicle environment, which include a vehicle seat and other restraint system components such as an airbag.
New vehicle types are extensively tested to check almost all factors that influence ride and handling. With reference to the Association of German Car Tuners" (VDAT e.V.) valuations, approximately 10% of all cars in Germany are being modified by their owners. 28 % of those modifications" sales are divergent wheel-tire combinations, 13 % are tuning measures on the chassis suspension or wheel spacers. In almost all cases the singular modifications present a general permission for specific vehicles they have been tested in. Combined tuning measures, however, are often checked by just one inspector, following a procedure of mostly subjective assessment criteria. Today, critical attributes are only being observed, in case a vehicle is involved in an accident and the modifications are identified as crash causal factors or as a cofactor on the development of a crash. For the first time, a field study allows a survey of safety affecting chassis modifications. The test layout has to comply with some basic conditions. Different vehicle concepts with a wide margin of modifications are required to get a high transferability of the results. A total amount of more than 150 tested vehicles serves the same purpose. The tests are limited concerning the installation time of measurement techniques and the requirement that no damage, defilement or immoderate wear of the vehicles are accepted by their owners. Due to such factors as well as the driver Ìs acceptance, the vehicles are controlled by its owners instead of robots or test drivers. For keeping down the driver- influence, the lane has narrow boundaries and the driver has to drive in strictly adherence to the given instructions. After gathering all modifications, as well as static and kinematic parameters like the toe and camber angle, dynamic testing of predominantly lateral dynamics is conducted. Besides standardized tests like the ISO 3888-2 (Obstacle Avoidance) or the ISO 14512 (Braking on Surfaces with Split Coefficient of Friction), to test the influence of modified kingpin offsets caused by wheel spacers, some deviant tests are conducted. Those are required due to the demand of objective test results for road tests with vertical induced stimulation of the chassis suspension. Hence, new tests on corner braking with and without vertical stimulation have been developed. The interpretation of data includes thresholds, e.g. the maximum entrance velocity without hitting cones, on the one hand, and the analysis of characteristics of data concerning time and frequency range, "1-second values" and peak response times on the other hand. Besides the thresholds as indicators for the achievable velocities, which are mainly affected by friction coefficients, the vehicle reaction in the course of time characterizes the vehicle reaction in the threshold range and consequently the operational demands on the driver. The field study has started and promises the first long-range analysis of chassis modifications. The results offer a basis for hypothesis and resultant further test layouts for oncoming studies of the identified critical tuning measures.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions, the crash compatibility between the colliding vehicles is crucial. Compatibility compromises both the self protection and the partner protection properties of vehicles. For the accident data analysis, the CCIS (GB) and GIDAS (DE) in-depth data bases were used. Selection criteria were frontal car accidents with car in compliance with ECE R94. For this study belted adult occupants in the front seats sustaining MAIS 2+ injuries were studied. Following this analysis FIMCAR concluded that the following compatibility issues are relevant: - Poor structural interaction (especially low overlap and over/underriding) - Compartment strength - Frontal force mismatch with lower priority than poor structural interaction In addition injuries arising from the acceleration loading of the occupant are present in a significant portion of frontal crashes. Based on the findings of the accident analysis the aims that shall be addressed by the proposed assessment approach were defined and priorities were allocated to them. The aims and priorities shall help to decide on suitable test procedures and appropriate metrics. In general it is anticipated that a full overlap and off-set test procedure is the most appropriate set of tests to assess a vehicle- frontal impact self and partner protection.