The off-set assessment procedure potentially contributes to the FIMCAR objectives to maintain the compartment strength and to assess load spreading in frontal collisions. Furthermore it provides the opportunity to assess the restraint system performance with different pulses if combined with a full-width assessment procedure in the frontal assessment approach. Originally it was expected that the PDB assessment procedure would be selected for the FIMCAR assessment approach. However, it was not possible to deliver a compatibility metric in time so that the current off-set procedure (ODB as used in UNECE R94) with some minor modifications was proposed for the FIMCAR Assessment Approach. Nevertheless the potential to assess load spreading, which appears not to be possible with any other assessed frontal impact assessment procedure was considered to be still high. Therefore the development work for the PDB assessment procedure did not stop with the decision not to select the PDB procedure. As a result of the decisions to use the current ODB and to further develop the PDB procedure, both are covered within this deliverable. The deliverable describes the off-set test procedure that will be recommended by FIMCAR consortium, this corresponds to the ODB test as it is specified in UN-ECE Regulation 94 (R94), i.e. EEVC deformable element with 40% overlap at a test speed of 56 km/h. In addition to the current R94 requirements, FIMCAR will recommend to introduce some structural requirements which will guarantee sufficiently strong occupant compartments by enforcing the stability of the forward occupant cell. With respect to the PDB assessment procedure a new metric, Digital Derivative in Y direction - DDY, was developed, described, analysed, and compared with other metrics. The DDY metric analyses the deformation gradients laterally across the PDB face. The more even the deformation, the lower the DDY values and the better the metric- result. In order analyse the different metrics, analysis of the existing PDB test results and the results of the performed simulation studies was performed. In addition, an assessment of artificial deformation profiles with the metrics took place. This analysis shows that there are still issues with the DDY metric but it appears that it is possible to solve them with future optimisations. For example the current metric assesses only the area within 60% of the half vehicle width. For vehicles that have the longitudinals further outboard, the metric is not effective. In addition to the metric development, practical issues of the PDB tests such as the definition of a scan procedure for the analysis of the deformation pattern including the validation of the scanning procedure by the analysis of 3 different scans at different locations of the same barrier were addressed. Furthermore the repeatability and reproducibility of the PDB was analysed. The barrier deformation readings seem to be sensitive with respect to the impact accuracy. In total, the deliverable is meant to define the FIMCAR off-set assessment procedure and to be a starting point for further development of the PDB assessment procedure.
The objective of this deliverable is to describe the expected influence of the candidate test procedures developed in FIMCAR for frontal impact on other impact types. The other impact types of primary interest are front-to-side impacts, collisions with road restraint systems (e.g. guardrails), and heavy goods vehicle impacts. These collision types were chosen as they involve structures that can be adapted to improve safety. Collisions with vulnerable road users (VRU) were not explicitly investigated in FIMCAR. It is expected that the vehicle structures of interest in FIMCAR can be designed into a VRU friendly shell. Information used for this deliverable comes from simulations and car-to-car crash tests conducted in FIMCAR or review of previous research. Three test configurations (full width, offset, and moving deformable barriers) were the input to the FIMCAR selection process. There are three different types of offset tests and two different full width tests. During the project test procedures could be divided into three groups that provide different influences or outcomes on vehicle designs: 1. The ODB barrier provides a method to assess part of the vehicles energy absorption capabilities and compartment test in one test. 2. The FWRB and FWDB have similar capabilities to control structural alignment, further assess energy absorption capabilities, and promote the improvements in the occupant restraint system for high deceleration impacts. 3. The PDB and MPDB can be used to promote better load spreading in the vehicle structures, in addition to assessing energy absorption and occupant compartment strength in an offset configuration. The consortium selected the ODB and FWDB as the two best candidates for short term application in international rulemaking. The review of how all candidates would affect vehicle performance in other impacts (beside front-to-front vehicle or frontal impacts with fixed obstacles) however is reported in this deliverable to support the benefit analysis reported in FIMCAR. The grouping presented above is used to discuss all five test candidates using similarities between certain tests and thereby simplify the discussion.
The objectives of the FIMCAR (Frontal Impact and Compatibility Assessment Research) project are to answer the remaining open questions identified in earlier projects (such as understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of force based metrics and barrier deformation based metrics, confirmation of specific compatibility issues such as structural interaction, investigation of force matching) and to finalise the frontal impact test procedures required to assess compatibility. Research strategies and priorities were based on earlier research programs and the FIMCAR accident data analysis. The identified real world safety issues were used to develop a list of compatibility characteristics which were then prioritised within the consortium. This list was the basis for evaluating the different test candidates. This analysis resulted in the combination of the Full Width Deformable Barrier test (FWDB) with compatibility metrics and the existing Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) as described in UN-ECE Regulation 94 with additional cabin integrity requirement as being proposed as the FIMCAR assessment approach. The proposed frontal impact assessment approach addresses many of the issues identified by the FIMCAR consortium but not all frontal impact and compatibility issues could be addressed.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were to review existing full-width test procedures and their discussed compatibility metrics, to report recent activities and findings with respect to full-width assessment procedures and to assess test procedures and metrics. Starting with a review of previous work, candidate metrics and associated performance limits to assess a vehicle- structural interaction potential, in particular its structural alignment, have been developed for both the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB) and Full Width Rigid Barrier (FWRB) tests. Initial work was performed to develop a concept to assess a vehicle- frontal force matching. However, based on the accident analyses performed within FIMCAR frontal force matching was not evaluated as a first priority and thus in line with FIMCAR strategy the focus was put on the development of metrics for the assessment of structural interaction which was evaluated as a first priority.
Accident analysis
(2014)
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and frontal impact working group (WG15) and the EC funded FP5 VC-COMPAT project activities, two test approaches have been identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in today- research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis should be performed. The specific objectives of the work reported in this deliverable were: - Determine if previously identified compatibility issues are still relevant in current vehicle fleet: Structural interaction, Frontal force matching, Compartment strength in particular for light cars. - Determine nature of injuries and injury mechanisms: Body regions injured o Injury mechanism: Contact with intrusion, Contact, Deceleration / restraint induced. The main data sources for this report were the CCIS and Stats 19 databases from Great Britain and the GIDAS database from Germany. The different sampling and reporting schemes for the detailed databases (CCIS & GIDAS) sometimes do not allow for direct comparisons of the results. However the databases are complementary " CCIS captures more severe collisions highlighting structure and injury issues while GIDAS provides detailed data for a broader range of crash severities. The following results represent the critical points for further development of test procedures in FIMCAR.
Cost benefit analysis
(2014)
Although the number of road accident casualties in Europe is falling the problem still remains substantial. In 2011 there were still over 30,000 road accident fatalities [EC 2012]. Approximately half of these were car occupants and about 60 percent of these occurred in frontal impacts. The next stage to improve a car- safety performance in frontal impacts is to improve its compatibility for car-to-car impacts and for collisions against objects and HGVs. Compatibility consists of improving both a car- self and partner protection in a manner such that there is good interaction with the collision partner and the impact energy is absorbed in the car- frontal structures in a controlled way which results in a reduction of injuries. Over the last ten years much research has been performed which has found that there are four main factors related to a car- compatibility [Edwards 2003, Edwards 2007]. These are structural interaction potential, frontal force matching, compartment strength and the compartment deceleration pulse and related restraint system performance. The objective of the FIMCAR FP7 EC-project was to develop an assessment approach suitable for regulatory application to control a car- frontal impact and compatibility crash performance and perform an associated cost benefit analysis for its implementation.
For the assessment of vehicle safety in frontal collisions compatibility (which consists of self and partner protection) between opponents is crucial. Although compatibility has been analysed worldwide for over 10 years, no final assessment approach has been defined to date. Taking into account the European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) compatibility and the final report to the steering committee on frontal impact [Faerber 2007] and the FP5 VC-COMPAT[Edwards 2007] project activities, two test approaches were identified as the most promising candidates for the assessment of compatibility. Both are composed of an off-set and a full overlap test procedure. In addition another procedure (a test with a moving deformable barrier) is getting more attention in current research programmes. The overall objective of the FIMCAR project is to complete the development of the candidate test procedures and propose a set of test procedures suitable for regulatory application to assess and control a vehicle- frontal impact and compatibility crash safety. In addition an associated cost benefit analysis will be performed. In the FIMCAR Deliverable D 3.1 [Adolph 2013] the development and assessment of criteria and associated performance limits for the full width test procedure were reported. In this Deliverable D3.2 analyses of the test data (full width tests, car-to-car tests and component tests), further development and validation of the full width assessment protocol and development of the load cell and load cell wall specification are reported. The FIMCAR full-width assessment procedure consists of a 50 km/h test against the Full Width Deformable Barrier (FWDB). The Load Cell Wall behind the deformable element assesses whether or not important Energy Absorbing Structures are within the Common Interaction Zone as defined based on the US part 581 zone. The metric evaluates the row forces and requires that the forces directly above and below the centre line of the Common Interaction Zone exceed a minimum threshold. Analysis of the load spreading showed that metrics that rely on sum forces of rows and columns are within acceptable tolerances. Furthermore it was concluded that the Repeatability and Reproducibility of the FWDB test is acceptable. The FWDB test was shown to be capable to detect lower load paths that are beneficial in car-to-car impacts.
Diese Forschungsarbeit beschäftigt sich mit der Ergänzung des Hinweispapiers "Hinweise zur Wirksamkeitsschätzung und Wirksamkeitsberechnung von Verkehrsbeeinflussungsanlagen" und der Untersuchung der bestehenden Verfahren zur Wirksamkeitsschätzung. Das Ziel dieser Forschungsarbeit ist es für die noch fehlenden Verkehrsbeeinflussungstypen ex-ante Wirksamkeitsschätzungen zu erarbeiten. Die Verfahren sollen primär einfach in ihrer Handhabung sein und im Detaillierungsgrad bezüglich der Datengrundlage variieren können. Ein weiteres Ziel war es die im Hinweispapier beschriebenen Verfahren auf ihre Anwendbarkeit hin zu überprüfen. Um die unterschiedlichen Wirkungen bezüglich Verkehrsfluss und Verkehrssicherheit von Verkehrsbeeinflussungsanlagen (VBA) zu ergründen wurde eine internationale Literaturrecherche durchgeführt. Zudem wurde nach bereits bestehenden Verfahren in anderen Ländern zur ex-ante Wirksamkeitsschätzung recherchiert. Es wurde festgestellt, dass es international kaum Verfahren und Untersuchungen zur Vorabschätzung der Wirkung von Verkehrsbeeinflussungsanlagen gibt. Als Primärindikator für die Bewertung der Wirksamkeit von Verkehrsbeeinflussungsmaßnahmen hinsichtlich der Verkehrssicherheit gilt deren Einfluss auf Unfallzahlen, d. h. auf die Unfallhäufigkeit bezogen auf die "Exposition" (bei VBA ist dies im Wesentlichen die Verkehrsmenge). Zur Schätzung der Wirksamkeit von VBA auf die Verkehrssicherheit bedarf es Verfahren, die die voraussichtliche Veränderung der Unfallhäufigkeit infolge einer VBA-Maßnahme ermitteln. Indikatoren zur Bewertung der Wirksamkeit bezüglich Verkehrsfluss sind hauptsächlich Reisezeitersparnisse durch Reduzierung der Anzahl von Situationen mit Verkehrszusammenbrüchen. Die Wirksamkeitsschätzung im Vorfeld geht von Annahmen aus, die das Potential bezüglich der Zeitkostenersparnis bewerten. So wurde im Rahmen des Projektes ein neues Verfahren zur Vorabschätzung von Netzbeeinflussungsanlagen bezüglich Verkehrssicherheit entwickelt. Zudem wurden neue Verfahren für Knotenbeeinflussungsanlagen zur ex-ante Wirksamkeitsschätzung von Verkehrsfluss und Verkehrssicherheit konzipiert. Die neu entwickelten, sowie die bereits bestehenden Verfahren, wurden in Excel-Dateien anwenderfreundlich umgesetzt. Eine einfache und komfortable Nutzung der Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Wirksamkeit aller VBA-Typen hinsichtlich Verkehrsfluss und Verkehrssicherheit ist dadurch möglich. Alle ex-ante Verfahren wurden an Hand von realen Daten aus geeigneten Testfeldern auf ihre Anwendbarkeit hin überprüft. Zur Kontrolle der Sensitivität unterschiedlicher Datenquellen für die Verfahren wurden alle Eingangsgrößen mittels einer Fehlermöglichkeits- und Einflussanalyse, kurz FMEA, geprüft. Abschließend wurden Ergänzungsvorschläge zum bereits bestehenden Hinweispapier "Hinweise zur Wirksamkeitsschätzung und Wirksamkeitsberechnung von Verkehrsbeeinflussungsanlagen" erarbeitet, sowie weiterer Forschungsbedarf zur Verbesserung und Erweiterung der neuen sowie der bestehenden Verfahren angemerkt. Die Verfahren zur Wirksamkeitsschätzung wurden in Excel-Dateien umgesetzt und können u.a. unter der Email-Adresse wirksamkeit-vba@vt.bv.tum.de angefordert werden.
The present report is a compilation of the evaluation results obtained by the end of 2009 in respect of the experimental novice driver training models "Voluntary further training seminars for novice drivers" (here: "VFT" model"). The models were initially introduced by the legislator on a trial basis in 2003 and 2005 respectively, and were to be evaluated and tested with regard to their road safety effectiveness prior to making a decision on the permanent integration into the driver licensing system. Alongside the question of road safety effectiveness (summative evaluation), the evaluation studies also analysed the experience gained from practical implementation of the individual concepts (process/formative evaluation). Whereas the safety impact is of direct significance for the decision on permanent adoption of the models, the results of the process evaluation are important independently of this decision for considerations of the possibilities for concept optimisation. The evaluation studies conducted by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) were spread over a total of six sub-projects; complete and conclusive results are available for five of these sub-projects. The evaluation of the VFT model was unable to confirm the road safety effectiveness of this approach. It is especially disturbing to learn that participants in the VFT model display a significantly greater risk of accident involvement and traffic offences compared to novice drivers of the same age and with similar driving experience who have not attended a VFT seminar. Possible causes, insofar as a directly causal effect of the VFT participation is excluded, can most reasonably be assumed to lie in the curtailed effectiveness of the probationary licence rules in the case of VFT participants (participation is honoured with a shortening of the probationary period by up to one year) and self-selection effects in conjunction with VFT participation (model may attract above all those novice drivers with a tendency to conspicuous driving behaviour, as a means to achieve a shortening of the probationary period). In view of the significantly poorer driving behaviour of the VFT participants, and against the background of the aforementioned plausibility considerations regarding the underlying causes, however, it seems expedient to already now remove the incentive of a shorter probationary period in case of VFT participation. The evaluation of practical implementation of the VFT model revealed the need for further development of several points. This refers to the quality of the active, attitude-building training forms to be applied by the seminar leaders and moderators, as well as questions concerning optimised seminar organisation in the interest of training quality. It is here recommended that the seminar concept be subjected to a thorough review, and that the conditions for concept-adequate implementation be improved.
Verkehrsunfälle auf Außerortsstraßen sind im Gegensatz zu Unfällen auf Innerortsstraßen durch eine besonders hohe Unfallschwere gekennzeichnet. Daraus ergibt sich die Notwendigkeit, Ansätze für die Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf Außerortsstraßen durch bauliche oder nicht bauliche Umsetzungen zu finden, von denen es in Deutschland eine Reihe gibt. Einer dieser Ansatzpunkte ist die Durchsetzung der zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit. Insbesondere bei einbahnig zweistreifigen Außerortsstraßen besitzt die Geschwindigkeit einen großen Einfluss auf die Verkehrssicherheit, da mit steigender Geschwindigkeit nicht nur die Unfallanzahl, sondern besonders die Unfallschwere steigt. Um auf das besorgniserregende Unfallgeschehen auf den Außerortsstraßen mit praktikablen Maßnahmen zu reagieren, hat die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) 1996 in Abstimmung mit dem Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (BMVBS) die Projektgruppe "Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit auf einbahnig zweistreifigen Außerortsstraßen" (Außerortsstraßensicherheit - AOSI) eingerichtet. Sie soll detaillierte Vorschläge zur kurz- und mittelfristigen Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit unterbreiten und deren Wirksamkeit in einem Großversuch (Vorher-Nachher-Untersuchung) auf ausgewählten Strecken überprüfen. Im Jahr 2004 wurde die TU Dresden im Rahmen der dritten Projektphase mit der Untersuchung der Auswirkungen von linienhaft angeordneten ortsfesten Geschwindigkeitsüberwachungsanlagen (AOSI - Teil 3) beauftragt. Es umfasste die vollständige Durchführung und Auswertung der Wirksamkeit dieses Maßnahmenpaketes der linienhaft angeordneten Überwachungsanlagen (OGÜ-Anlagen) und die Formulierung von Empfehlungen für den künftigen Einsatz. Inhalt der Studie waren eine Analyse des Geschwindigkeitsniveaus sowie Untersuchungen zum Unfallgeschehen auf den auf den AOSI-Streckenabschnitten im Vorher-Nachher-Vergleich sowie Akzeptanzuntersuchungen. Der Bericht fasst die Methodik aus diesem Projekt sowie aus den Untersuchungen zu den Strecken mit Überholfahrstreifen (UEFS) kurz zusammen. Die Ergebnisdarstellung beschränkt sich jedoch ausschließlich auf das Maßnahmenpaket der linienhaft, ortsfesten Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung, da die Untersuchungen zu den ÜFS-Strecken noch nicht abgeschlossen sind. Die Studie ergab, dass das Geschwindigkeitsniveau auf den untersuchten Abschnitten vor Inbetriebnahme der OGÜ-Anlagen mit teilweise bis zu 20 km/h erheblich über der zulässigen Geschwindigkeit lag. Durch die Inbetriebnahme verringerte sich das Geschwindigkeitsniveau auf allen Strecken in Richtung des zulässigen Niveaus. Querschnitte, bei denen vorher sehr hohe Überschreitungen gemessen wurden, hatten die größten Geschwindigkeitsrückgänge. Nach einiger Zeit der Gewöhnung (circa 2 Jahre) fand eine Harmonisierung der Geschwindigkeiten statt, sodass die Geschwindigkeitsdifferenzen vor und nach den OGÜ-Anlagen geringer wurden. Die Akzeptanzuntersuchungen zeigten, dass die Mehrheit der Befragten mit einem Einsatz solcher Anlagen zur Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit einverstanden ist. Einfluss auf die Akzeptanz haben die Streckengeometrie und die beschilderte zulässige Höchstgeschwindigkeit. Ohne Einfluss waren die Vorankündigung durch Hinweisschilder, das Alter und das Geschlecht der Kraftfahrer sowie die Häufigkeit der Streckennutzung. Bei der Unfalluntersuchung ergab sich, dass sowohl die Schwere als auch die Gesamtzahl der Unfälle durch die Durchsetzung der zulässigen Höchstgeschwindigkeit erheblich vermindert werden konnte. Die linienhafte Geschwindigkeitsüberwachung hat damit das Unfallrisiko auf solchen Abschnitten, die vorher durch ein besonders hohes Unfallgeschehen aufgefallen waren, zum Teil erheblich gesenkt. Weiterhin wurde das Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnis der OGÜ-Anlagen auf den jeweiligen Strecken analysiert. Der Einsatz von OGÜ-Anlagen kann besonders auf Bestandsstrecken mit einem überhöhten Geschwindigkeitsniveau und einem linienhaft auffälligen Unfallgeschehen (besonders Fahrunfälle mit schweren Personenschäden) empfohlen werden. Ausprägungen der Streckencharakteristik, die auf einen Einsatz hindeuten, werden genannt und es werden Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung der Maßnahme gegeben.