Refine
Document Type
- Article (4) (remove)
Keywords
- Driving aptitude (2)
- Fahrtauglichkeit (2)
- Fahrzeugführung (2)
- Safety (2)
- Sicherheit (2)
- Ablenkung (1)
- Alte Leute (1)
- Arzneimittel (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Bewertung (1)
Institute
As bearing capacity measurements become more and more important, the necessity of assuring quality by establishing a QA system becomes more relevant. Within this context, the FGSV recommends the introduction of comparative measurements. Since 2015, two pilot events took place, with the main aim of introducing repetitive comparative measurements, in which all FWD operators shall participate. The results of the comparative measurements show that the basic principles behind comparative measurements (of the FWD), elaborated as a Europe-wide consensus and put into practice in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, are valid, but still there is a variety of questions to be answered concerning certain details of the measuring system itself, e. g. measurement of the temperatures (air, pavement) and the impact of load introduction. All in all, the two pilot events in 2015 and 2016 proved that the comparability of the different FWD measuring devices is satisfactory.
Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a major health problem. Patients are increasingly treated with chronic opioid therapy (COT). Several laboratory studies have demonstrated that long-term use of opioids does not generally impair driving related skills. But there is still a lack of studies investigating on-the-road driving performance in actual traffic. The present study assessed the impact of COT on road-tracking and car-following performance in CNCP patients. Twenty CNCP patients, long-term treated with stable doses of opioid analgesics, and 19 healthy controls conducted standardized on-the-road driving tests in normal traffic. Performance of controls with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.5 g/L was used as a reference to define clinically relevant changes in driving performance. Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP), a measure of road-tracking control, was 2.57 cm greater in CNCP patients than in sober controls. This difference failed to reach statistical significance in a superiority test. Equivalence testing indicated that the 95% CI around the mean SDLP change was equivalent to the SDLP change seen in controls with a BAC of 0.5 g/L and did not include zero. When corrected for age differences between groups the 95% CI widened to include both the alcohol reference criterion and zero. No difference was found in car-following performance. Driving performance of CNCP patients did not significantly differ from that of controls due to large inter-individual variations. Hence in clinical practice determination of fitness to drive of CNCP patients who receive opioid treatments should be based on an individual assessment.
Als Alternative zu psychometrischen Test sind realitätsnahe Untersuchungen im Fahrsimulator denkbar, die standardisiert ohne Gefährdung erfolgen. Ziel des beschriebenen Projekts war die Entwicklung und Validierung einer Methodik für die Simulation (Streckenauswahl, Bewertungskriterien, Simulator-Konfiguration), anhand derer die Fahrkompetenz älterer Autofahrer im Fahrsimulator vergleichbar gut gemessen werden kann wie im Realverkehr. Neben Fahraufgaben mittlerer Schwierigkeit waren im Fahrparcours auch Szenarien enthalten, die besonders für ältere Autofahrer schwierig sind. Die Bewertung der Fahrkompetenz wurde auf der Basis registrierter und klassifizierter Fahrfehler vorgenommen. Realisiert wurde ein 2x3-Versuchsplan mit dem dreistufigen abhängigen Faktor "Methode" (Realverkehr versus High-Fidelity-Simulator versus Kompaktsimulator) und dem zweistufigen Gruppenfaktor "Alter" (25-50 Jahre versus älter als 70 Jahre). Im Ergebnis schneiden die älteren Fahrer in verschiedenen Fahrverhaltensparametern in den Fahrverhaltensbeobachtungen sowohl im Simulator als auch im Realverkehr, bei hoher interindividueller Varianz, im Mittel schlechter ab als die Vergleichsgruppe. Die Befunde der beiden Simulatoren korrelieren sehr hoch miteinander. Zu folgern sei, dass bei entsprechend gestalteter Fahrverhaltensbeobachtung sich die Befunde zur Fahrkompetenz von Senioren aus dem Simulator auf den realen Straßenverkehr übertragen lassen. In Bezug auf seine Vorhersagekraft der Fahrkompetenz bei einer Fahrverhaltensbeobachtung hat sich das Verfahren gegenüber herkömmlichen psychometrischen Tests als überlegen erwiesen.
There is considerable evidence for the negative effects of driver distraction on road safety. In many experimental studies, drivers have been primarily viewed as passive receivers of distraction. Thus, there is a lack of research on the mediating role of their self-regulatory behavior. The aim of the current study was to compare drivers' performance when engaged in a system-paced secondary task with a self-paced version of this task and how both differed from baseline driving performance without distraction. Thirty-nine participants drove in a simulator while performing a secondary visual"manual task. One group of drivers had to work on this task in predefined situations under time pressure, whereas the other group was free to decide when to work on the secondary task (self-regulation group). Drivers' performance (e.g., lateral and longitudinal control, brake reaction times) was also compared with a baseline condition without any secondary task. For the system-paced secondary task, distraction was associated with high decrements in driving performance (especially in keeping the lateral position). No effects were found for the number of collisions, probably because of the lower driving speeds while distracted (compensatory behavior). For the self-regulation group, only small impairments in driving performance were found. Drivers engaged less in the secondary task during foreseeable demanding or critical driving situations. Overall, drivers in the self-regulation group were able to anticipate the demands of different traffic situations and to adapt their engagement in the secondary task, so that only small impairments in driving performance occurred. Because in real traffic drivers are mostly free to decide when to engage in secondary tasks, it can be concluded that self-regulation should be considered in driver distraction research to ensure ecological validity.