Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (29) (remove)
Document Type
- Book (12)
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Article (5)
- Part of a Book (1)
Keywords
- Safety (29) (remove)
Within the automotive context camera monitor systems (CMS) can be used to present views of the traffic situation behind the vehicle to the driver via a monitor mounted inside the cabin. This offers the opportunity to replace classical outside rearview mirrors and therefore to implement new design concepts, aerodynamically optimized vehicle shapes and to reduce the width of the vehicle. Further, the use of a CMS offers the potential to implement functionalities like warnings or situation-adaptive fields of view that are not feasible with conventional rearview mirrors. Despite these potential advantages, it is important to consider the possible technical constraints of this technology and its effect on driver perception and behavior. On the technical side next to the field of view and die robustness of die system, aspects as its functionality at day and night as well as under varying weather conditions should be object to scientific investigation. Concerning human machine interaction, it has to be considered, that the perception of velocities and distances of approaching vehicles might be different for CMS as compared to conventional rearview mirrors and potential influences of factors as the Position of the displays or drivers' age should be taken into account. In order to shed light on these and further open issues, BASt is currently conducting a study that will cover the use of CMS under controlled conditions as well in real traffic. The first part of the study will focus on passenger cars, while in a second step the empirical investigation will be extended to heavy goods vehicles, where the potentials as well as the limitations of CMS might differ considerably. The presentation will cover the first part, with regard to the experimental design, implementation and initial results if already available.
To determine whether the model "Accompanied driving from age 17" (AD17) contributes to improvement of young drivers' road safety, two large random samples of novice drivers drawn from the Central Register of Driving Licences (ZFER) held at the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) were compared in terms of the rates of accident involvement and traffic offences at the start of their solo driving career. The samples comprised former participants in the AD17 model and novice drivers of the same age who had obtained a driving licence in the conventional manner immediately after their 18th birthday. Both analysis groups were contacted by post and asked to complete an online questionnaire. In response, 19,000 drivers reported on their first year of solo driving and on the occurrence of any accidents or traffic offences during this period. The analyses were repeated with two "silent" analysis groups comprising a total of 75,000 drivers, for whom any records of traffic offences were retrieved from the Central Register of Traffic Offenders (VZR), with a distinction being made between offences in connection with an accident and other offences. The AD17 model was introduced in all 16 German federal states between April 2004 and January 2008. By the end of 2009, almost one million novice drivers had participated in the model, and almost three-quarters of the target group - so-called "early beginners" who wished to commence solo driving immediately after reaching the age of 18 years - opted for the AD17 model. The phase of introduction of the model was associated with a temporary increase of around five per cent in the demand for driving licences from persons under 19 years of age. During the first year of solo driving, the rate of accident involvement for AD17 participants was 19 per cent lower and the rate of traffic offences 18 per cent lower than for drivers of the same age who had obtained their driving licence in the conventional manner. After adjustment for confounds (e.g. gender and vehicle availability), a reduction in accidents by 17 per cent and in traffic offences by 15 per cent remained as an effect attributable to the model. A comparison on the basis of the distances driven indicated 22 per cent fewer accidents and 20 per cent fewer traffic offences. The results are statistically significant and apply to both male and female drivers. The findings were confirmed in the replication study based on VZR data, with one exception: For female AD17 drivers, and here only for VZR-recorded offences excluding accidents, no significant reduction was found. On the other hand, the rate for female drivers is already lower than that of their male counterparts by three-quarters. Approximately 1,700 injury accidents were prevented by implementation of the model in 2009.
Various kinds of demerit point systems have been developed and implemented in European countries, aimed at tackling repeat offences in road transport by acting as a deterrent and providing sanctioning. The impact of a demerit point system on the number of crashes is often reported to be significant, but temporary. The objective of the EU BestPoint project was to establish a set of recommended practices that would result in a more effective and sustainable contribution of demerit point systems to road safety. A high actual chance of losing the licence and a high perceived chance of losing the licence are basic prerequisites for the effective operation of demerit point systems. For measures applied within the context of a demerit point system, a four-step-approach is recommended: warning letter, driver improvement course, licence withdrawal, rehabilitation course. Further recommendations concern issues like points and offences, e.g. which offences should lead to points, target groups, and the administration of demerit point systems. The final result of the EU BestPoint project is a handbook (van Schagen & Machata, 2012) which provides a concise overview of all recommended practices. The presentation/paper outlines how sustainable safety improvements can be achieved if national demerit point systems are implemented and maintained according to the recommended practices. In addition, potential further steps towards an EU-wide demerit point system (cross-border exchange on points and/or offences) are presented.
Die Bewertung von Projekten im Rahmen von Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen erfordert quantitative Input-Informationen zu den Kosten von Verkehrsunfällen. In der deutschen Bewertungspraxis werden bislang ausschließlich die mittel- und unmittelbar anfallenden monetären Folgen von Verkehrsunfällen quantitativ berücksichtigt, während die immateriellen Folgen wie Schmerz, Leid, Verlust an Lebensqualität bzw. die Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung zur Verringerung/Vermeidung dieser Folgen unberücksichtigt bleiben. Die hier vorgelegte Vorstudie fasst den heutigen Stand der Forschung zur Quantifizierung von Zahlungsbereitschaften für die Verkehrssicherheit durch eine umfassende und systematische Übersicht der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zusammen. Die fünf Verfahren hedonische Preisbildung, kontingente Bewertungsmethode, Risiko-Risiko-Analyse, Standardlotteriemethode und Stated-Choice (SC) werden hinsichtlich ihrer theoretischen Fundierung, der verwendeten methodischen Ansätze (Art der Befragung, Modellierung etc.) und den Anwendungserfahrungen untersucht. Unter den verfügbaren Verfahren stellen die SC-Methoden den heutigen State-of-the-Art in der Forschung zur Ermittlung der Zahlungsbereitschaft der Bevölkerung für nicht marktfähige Güter dar. Allerdings liegen die meisten Anwendungserfahrungen mit SC-Ansätzen bislang für die Bewertung der Reisezeit und der Zuverlässigkeit vor. Zusammenfassend ist festzustellen, dass im Laufe der letzten Jahre eine Lücke zwischen dem Stand der Forschung (SC-Methoden) und dem Stand der Praxis (andere Methoden) entstanden ist, die mit Anwendungserfahrungen gefüllt werden sollte. Insbesondere für Deutschland liegt ein wesentlicher Forschungsbedarf vor. Basierend auf diesem Überblick werden daher Vorschläge für die weitere Forschung entwickelt.