TY - CONF A1 - Baier, Andreas A1 - Zimmer, Alf C. T1 - Evaluating human-machine-interfaces for making binary choices: why measuring uncertainty is important and how to do it N2 - Many safety-relevant tasks in control or diagnostics require binary choices such as "conflict versus separation" in air traffic control, "normal versus pathological" when interpreting x-ray pictures, or "permitted versus forbidden" when inspecting airport security scans. Deciders often are uncertain, but nevertheless required to decide between two alternatives, that is, they have not only to decide upon an action, but also about the admissible level of uncertainty. If the accepted level of judgment certainty is not taken into account, the sequence of decisions does not capture the full picture of the underlying decision process. Differences in judgment certainty are relevant, because they reflect not only the adequacy of the human-machine interface that is evaluated, but also the differences in expertise of the decider and the requirements of the actual situation or task. Therefore, capturing both judgment certainty and discrimination performance is essential. A comparison of different human-machine-interfaces (for air traffic control) is used to illustrate a methodological approach, which allows for integrated analyses of decision processes based on receiver-operator-characteristics and practical guidelines for the evaluation of human-machine-interfaces for safety-relevant operation procedures are provided. KW - Bewertung KW - Deutschland KW - Dreidimensional KW - Entscheidungsprozess KW - Ergonomie KW - Flugsicherung KW - Konferenz KW - Sicherheit KW - Visualisierung KW - Zweidimensional KW - Air traffic control KW - Conference KW - Decision process KW - Ergonomics KW - Evaluation (assessment) KW - Germany KW - Safety KW - Three dimensional KW - Two dimensional KW - Visualisation Y1 - 2015 UR - https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1503 UR - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:opus-bast-15033 ER -