TY  - CONF
A1  - Takubo, N.
A1  - Oga, R.
A1  - Kato, K.
A1  - Hagita, K.
A1  - Hiromitsu, T.
A1  - Ishikawa, H.
A1  - Kihira, M.
T1  - Evaluation of event data recorder based on crash tests
N2  - Event Data Recorder (EDR) is an additional function installed in airbag control module (ACM) to record vehicle and occupant information for a brief period of time before, during, and after a crash event. EDRs are now being installed in ACMs by several automakers in the USA and in Japan. The aim of this study is to understand the performance of EDRs for the improvement of accident reconstruction with more reliable information. In the first report of the study, data obtained from EDRs of seven vehicle types were evaluated using 2006-2007 J-NCAP (Japanese new car assessment program) full-lap frontal barrier crash tests and offset frontal deformable barrier crash tests data. For more practical standpoint, we conducted thirteen crash tests reconstructing typical real-world accidents such as single vehicle accidents with barriers or poles, car to car accidents and multi rear-end collisions focusing on Japanese typical accident types. Data obtained from EDRs are compared with data obtained from optical speed sensor, instrumented accelerometers and high speed video cameras. The velocities determined from pre-crash data of EDRs and the maximum change in velocity, delta-V, and delta-V time history data obtained from post-crash data of EDRs are analyzed. The results are as follows: - Pre-crash velocities of EDRs were very accurate and reliable. An average difference between the EDR recording values and reference speeds was 4.2% and a root mean square of the differences was 9.2%. Only two cases resulted large differences for the pre-crash velocity. Both of them were cases with braking prior to the collision. However, another test with braking resulted less difference. The braking condition may influence accuracy of pre-crash velocities. - Maximum delta-Vs obtained from the EDRs showed uncertainty of measurement in several cases in comparisons with the reliable delta-V data. The differences in maximum delta-V were more than 10% in five of twenty-five events data and more than 20% in two of twenty-five events data. An average of the all differences was about 4% and root mean square of the differences was about 11%. Especially large deformation at narrow area may influence accuracy of post-crash delta-V. - Multiple rear-end crash tests were reconstructed using EDRs data as case studies. Some EDRs recorded two events and a time gap between two events, so that these reconstruction case studies were very accurate and reliable. - If though only one of three vehicles in multiple rear end crash was equipped EDR, overview and velocities of all cars may be reconstructed using these limited EDR data. In this case study, leading car- EDR data and middle car- EDR data were valuable. However if only following car was equipped EDR, the reconstruction was not accurate
KW  - Anfahrversuch
KW  - Auffahrunfall
KW  - Bewertung
KW  - Fahrdatenschreiber
KW  - Genauigkeit
KW  - Leistungsfähigkeit (allg)
KW  - Unfallrekonstruktion
KW  - Accuracy
KW  - Efficiency
KW  - Evaluation (assessment)
KW  - Event data recorder (road vehicle)
KW  - Impact test (veh)
KW  - Rear end collision
KW  - Reconstruction (accid)
Y1  - 2010
UR  - https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/555
UR  - https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:opus-bast-5554
ER  -