TY  - CONF
A1  - Eggers, Andre
A1  - Schwedhelm, Holger
A1  - Zander, Oliver
A1  - Cordero Izquierdo, Roberto
A1  - Garcia Polanco, Jesus Angel
A1  - Paralikas, John
A1  - Georgoulias, Konstantinos
A1  - Chryssolouris, George
A1  - Seibert, Dominic
A1  - Jacob, Christophe
T1  - Virtual testing based type approval procedures for the assessment of pedestrian protection developed within the EU-project IMVITER
N2  - For a number of EU regulatory acts Virtual Testing (VT) is already allowed for type approval (see Commission Regulation No. 371/2010 of 16 April 2010 amending the Framework Directive 2007/46/EC). However, only a very general procedure on how to apply VT for type approval is provided. Technical details for specific regulatory acts are not given yet. The main objective of the European project IMVITER (IMplementation of VIrtual TEsting in Safety Regulations) was to promote the implementation of VT in safety regulations. When proposing VT procedures the new regulation was taken into account, in particular, addressing open issues. Special attention was paid to pedestrian protection as pilot cases. A key aspect for VT implementation is to demonstrate that the employed simulation models are reliable. This paper describes how the Verification and Validation (V&V) method defined by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers was adapted for pedestrian protection VT based assessment. or the certification of headform impactors an extensive study was performed at two laboratories to assess the variability in calibration tests and equivalent results from a set of simulation models. Based on these results a methodology is defined for certification of headform impactor simulation models. A similar study was also performed with one vehicle in the type approval test setup. Its bonnet was highly instrumented and subjected to 45 impacts in five different positions at two laboratories in order to obtain an estimation of the variability in the physical tests. An equivalent study was performed using stochastic simulation with a metamodel fed with observed variability in impact conditions of physical headforms. An estimation of the test method uncertainty was obtained and used in the definition of a validation corridor for simulation models. Validation metric and criteria were defined in cooperation with the ISO TC22 SC10 and SC12 WG4 "Virtual Testing". A complete validation procedure including different test setups, physical magnitudes and evaluation criteria is provided. A detailed procedural flowchart is developed for VT implementation in EC Regulation No 78/2009 based on a so called "Hybrid VT" approach, which combines real hardware based head impact tests and simulations. This detailed flowchart is shown and explained within this paper. Another important point within the virtual testing based procedures is the documentation of relevant information resulting from the verification and validation process of the numerical models used. For this purpose report templates were developed within the project. The proposed procedure fixes minimum V&V requirements for numerical models to be confidently used within the type-approval process. It is not intended to be a thorough guide on how to build such reliable models. Different modeling methodologies are therefore possible, according to particular OEM know-how. These requirements respond to a balance amongst the type-approval stakeholders interests. A cost-benefit analysis, which was also performed within the IMVITER project, supports this approach, showing the conditions in which VT implementation is beneficial. Based on the experience gained in the project and the background of the experts involved an outlook is given as a roadmap of VT implementation, identifying the most important milestones to be reached along the way to a future vehicle type approval procedure supported by VT. The results presented in this paper show an important step addressing open questions and fostering the future acceptance of virtual testing in pedestrian protection type approval procedures.
KW  - Bewertung
KW  - Fahrzeug
KW  - Fehler
KW  - Fußgänger
KW  - Kopf
KW  - Numerisches Modell
KW  - Schutz
KW  - Simulation
KW  - Typenzulassung
KW  - Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung
KW  - Zusammenstoß
KW  - Collision
KW  - Cost benefit analysis
KW  - Digital model
KW  - Error
KW  - Evaluation (assessment)
KW  - Head
KW  - Official approval
KW  - Pedestrian
KW  - Prevention
KW  - Simulation
KW  - Vehicle
Y1  - 2013
UR  - https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/705
N1  - Weiterhin beteiligt: Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and Automation, University of Patras; Audi AG; ESI Group.
Volltext: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv23/23ESV-000344.pdf
ER  -