TY - CONF A1 - Niewöhner, Walter A1 - Roth, Franz A1 - Gwehenberger, Johann A1 - Gruber, Christian A1 - Kühn, Matthias A1 - Sferco, Raimondo A1 - Pastor, Claus-Henry A1 - Nagel, Uwe A1 - Stanzel, Michael T1 - Proposal for a test procedure of assistance systems regarding preventive pedestrian protection N2 - This paper is showing a proposal for a test procedure regarding preventive pedestrian protection based on accident analysis. Over the past years pedestrian protection has become an increasing importance also during the development phase of new vehicles. After a phase of focusing on secondary safety, there are current activities to detect a possible collision by assistance systems. Such systems have the task to inform the driver and/or automatically activate the brakes. How practical is such a system? In which kind of traffic situations will it work? How is it possible to check the effectiveness of such a system? To test the effectiveness, currently there are no generally approved identifiable procedures. It is reasonable that such a test should be based on real accidents. The test procedure should be designed to test all systems, independent of the system- working principle. The vFSS group (advanced Forward-looking Safety Systems) was founded to develop a proposal for a technology independent test procedure, which reflects the real accident situation. This contribution is showing the results of vFSS. The developed test procedure focuses on accidents between passenger cars and pedestrians. The results are based on analysis results of in-depth databases of GIDAS, German insurers and DEKRA and added by analysis of national and international statistics. The in-depth analysis includes many pre-crash situations with several influencing factors. The factors are e. g. speed of the car, speed of the pedestrian, moving direction and a possible obscuration of the pedestrian by an object. The results comprise also the different situations of adults and children. Furthermore, they include details regarding influence of the lighting conditions (daylight or night) especially with respect to the accident consequences. In fact, more accidents happen at daylight, but fatal accidents are more often at night. A clustering of parameter combinations was found which represents typical accident scenarios. There are six typical accident scenarios which were merged in four test scenarios. The test scenarios are varying the starting position of the pedestrian, the pedestrian size (adult or child) and the speed of the pedestrian, whereas the speed of the car will not be varied. To ensure the independency from used sensing technologies it is necessary to use a suitable dummy. For example, if sensors are based on infrared, the dummy should emit the temperature of a human being. The test procedure will identify the collision speed as the key parameter for assessing the effectiveness of the tested system. The collision speed is defined as the reduction between initial test speed of the car and impact speed. The assessment of the speed reduction value regarding the safety benefit, however, will be part of a separate procedure. KW - Analyse (math) KW - Erwachsener KW - Fahrerassistenzsystem KW - Fußgänger KW - Kind KW - Konferenz KW - Prüfverfahren KW - Unfall KW - Unfallverhütung KW - Accident KW - Accident prevention KW - Adult KW - Analysis (math) KW - Child KW - Conference KW - Driver assistance system KW - Pedestrian KW - Test method Y1 - 2011 UR - https://bast.opus.hbz-nrw.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/715 N1 - Weiterhin beteiligt: Audi AG; Allianz-Zentrum für Technik; Bayerische Motorenwerke; Unfallforschung der Versicherer; Ford Deutschland; Daimler AG; Volkswagen AG. Volltext: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv22/22ESV-000393.pdf ER -